Monday, January 31, 2022

Exploring the Concepts and Realities of Ideological Subversion




I was in my local grocery store the other day. It was earlier in the morning than when I usually go. I have been at home all week recovering from carpal tunnel surgery and this was the first time I had been out since. Even though the site has long become a familiar one, we have been dealing with the issue of Covid for over two years now, seeing most shoppers wearing facemasks left me feeling, shall we say, disheartened and deeply concerned about the state of our nation. The store was relatively packed, and I was, maybe, one of three or four shoppers not wearing a face covering. What left me feeling so disillusioned was the behavior of some of the people. For instance, one man saw me standing in an aisle all alone. He was at least twenty years older than me, putting him at around seventy or so. He was scared to death to walk down the aisle I was in and deliberately avoided doing so, despite the open space and me being the only one in the lane. Another individual, when I reached down to grab a package of shredded cheese, jumped back as if I had just threatened her with a gun. I was already at least three feet away from her when I grabbed my item, but she felt the need to put on this little show. I have reached the point, a long time ago mind you, where I can no longer take any of this seriously, and I begin to wonder if people have any interest in defending what little freedom of thought remains in our country. I told the woman I was not contagious and just a few years ago it was common knowledge that people would get sick from the flu every year. Influenza, after all, is a coronavirus as is the common cold. Her reply was at once, both hilarious and disturbing. She said she has Covid. If that’s the case, what is she doing in the grocery store? She didn’t appear sick. Her voice wasn’t coarse and despite being a bit misguided and frightened, appeared to be relatively healthy. Who knows, maybe she is recovering? I realized at this point, and I have known this from the beginning of all this nonsense, that there is no going back to normal. The issue of Covid-19, its variants, the vaccine, and all the other information pertaining to the so-called pandemic, has captivated, or captured, the hearts and minds of most Americans to the point where their perceptions of reality are so deeply altered, they will never let go. In the check-out lane, the cashier greeted me with the usual attempt to get rid of all their plastic bags as if I am someone who simply responds to the power of suggestion. “Plastic bags for you today sir?” He says with a smile. “No, thank you,” I replied. Driven by an urge to snap people out of this trance-like state they are in, I asked him if he had ever heard of Ivan Pavlov. He replied by asking, “The dog guy?” “Yes, the dog guy,” I said. “Did you know that Joseph Stalin employed him to apply his conditioning techniques to people in communist Russia?”

America’s perception of what is or what isn’t considered normal is deeply rooted in our subconscious. We all get up every day and live our lives within the confines of what has largely appeared to be a world that makes sense. We go to work, pay our bills, and keep ourselves informed by watching the daily news. We have our beliefs, our opinions, and our attitudes towards major social issues which affect all of us. Democrats believe that America is a racist nation in need of a complete make-over. Republicans believe that Donald Trump was America’s savior after eight years of Obama, without even considering his long friendship with the Clinton’s, and the fact that Billie boy encouraged him to run in 2015. Covid-19 has dominated our thoughts and beliefs for more than two years. No matter what side of the aisle you are on you cannot escape it. It has become the reality whether you believe it or not.

These issues are at the forefront of American consciousness because they are constantly pushed through the avenues where most Americans receive information, media and education. On one side of the aisle there is Fox News, which presents itself as the conservative outlet, and on the other, CNN. America’s educational institutions have become little more than pushers of liberal indoctrination and thought reform. While most conservatives would agree that education has taken a very socialistic turn, working to melt the minds of our younger generation, would they consider the possibility that Fox News exists to shape, define, and guide conservative thought? Probably not, if they pride themselves on staying informed. According to the book Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, highly educated people consider the news, whichever flavor pleases their senses, to be credible, and are likely to go along with whatever their favorite outlet is reporting. This is useful information if the purpose of the media is to shape and guide public opinion.

While the nation appears to be brainwashed by the illusion that masks and vaccines will save them, without asking the obvious question of why they haven’t already, there is good news. Millions around the world are awakening to a new reality. They are beginning to wonder if there might be something to the whacked-out, tinfoil hat, one-world government conspiracy “theory.” The bigger problem is that the powers that be successfully discredit and demonize any movement that works to expose this truth. In the 1950s, Joseph McCarthy worked to expose communist infiltration in our government, and the methods of subversion they employed. The term McCarthyism was attached to anyone who bought into his ideas. Today, anyone who opposes the leftist agenda is discredited through elaborately staged illusions meant to give the impression they were something that they weren’t. The best example of this is from a biography of Saul Alinsky from Stanford Horwitt. Many people are likely to know this, but it is a good reminder of what we are dealing with. Alinsky was asked by a group of college students what the best way to protest a George Bush rally would be. This is when he was a U.N. Representative. Alinsky told them to show up to the rally dressed like the KKK, and cheer whenever he said something they were against. Mainly pertaining to the Vietnam war. This, of course, created the illusion that the KKK supported Bush and that Bush was for the KKK.

There is an idea that I have come across in a couple of different books. In The Naked Communist, for example, Cleon Skousen says that if we study the problem of communism, we may be able to preserve freedom for all mankind. Unfortunately, he said this back in 1958. In another book, The Rape of the Mind, Joost Meerloo states “If we are to survive as free men, we must face up to the problem of politically inspired mental coercion, with all its ramifications.” What does this mean? It means we must accept that the world isn’t as it seems. Conservatives must accept that it isn’t just Democrats trying to transform our world. They must accept that when six corporations control all the media, and the owners of Fox News contributed more to Hillary Clinton while pushing stories promoting Trump, something is fishy. They must accept that perhaps Q is little more than a psychological warfare operation, controlling the thoughts of Trump supporters. The Soviets, after all, were experts in the use of controlled opposition to transform independent nations into communists states. Above all, it means that we must accept that everything we have ever believed about our thoughts and attitudes could be little more than deliberately created perceptions meant to keep us trapped in a thinking pattern that distracts us from the true reality. The reality of what Soviet defector Yuri Bezmenov refers to as, Ideological Subversion.

Ideological Subversion: To change the perception of reality to such an extent that despite the abundance of information, no one can come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their communities, and their country. (Yuri Bezmenov)

According to Bezmenov, Ideological Subversion is such a long process that the average person doesn’t realize that any change is taking place. This is like the concept of Fabian Socialism, small incremental changes over long periods of time. The frog in boiling water, so to say. Most Americans alive today, for example, were born after the invention of the television. The idea that we receive the information that guides our decisions and daily activities through our T.V. sets has been so normalized, for so long, that no one blinks an eye at it. Most Americans are also unaware of the fact that the Soviets had plans to use our free press against us before the television was even invented. In a report entitled The Communist Peace Offensive, it is highlighted that communist propagandists were keenly aware of how to use America’s free press to push their aims. This was at a time when America received all its information through radio. They were exploiting our freedoms, and our susceptibility to the belief we were exercising freedom of choice by choosing what we wanted to listen to. Bezmenov states that one of the key principles of subversion is turning a stronger force against itself. This is a concept echoed in Saul Alinsky’s Rule for Radicals, where on page 128 he says to “Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this because they can no longer live up to their own rules than the Christian Church can live up to Christianity.” This is an example of political coercion we must face up to. Our cherished freedom of speech is being used as a weapon against us in the mass media. Even if we are aware of communist propaganda, we can’t argue against it because of the First Amendment. So, we believe.

Media, according to Bezmenov, is one of the main avenues of subversion because it has a direct impact on public opinion and attitude. This isn’t a crazy conspiracy theory. Countless hours of research have gone into media-related studies going all the way back to The War of the Worlds radio broadcast. The book, Invasion from Mars: A Study of the Psychology of Panic highlights the fact that researchers found people’s trust in media figures had a major impact on their belief that what they were listening to was a real-world event, not a play. The book, Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research discusses the role of media from being simply a conveyor of information to a tool of persuasion. For years there was little in the way of solid evidence suggesting that media can change people’s beliefs or opinions because it was doing little more than telling people the facts. It was in the 1960s that researchers found that opinions and attitudes were largely shaped not by the story itself, but how the story was framed for the audience. How did the media present the story? The news media started assuming the role of defining what issues American’s would think about, not necessarily how they thought about the issues. This, according to the authors of Chapter One of Media Effects, is referred to as the agenda-setting role of mass media. Defining what it is Americans consider to be the most pressing and salient issues of the day.

Again, this is an example of the problem of communism we must study. Media Effects: Advances in Theory Research isn’t a conspiracy book. It is a detailed account of the numerous studies that have occurred to figure out how to use media to persuade, not inform, written by the researchers. If we decide to keep ourselves trapped in a line of thinking that was deliberately designed by these people to guide our opinions, and define for us what we should consider important, we will not get out of this. Another book to look at is Manufactured Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media by Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky. Chomsky is admittedly, a known leftist, however, his insight rings true. Discussing something called the Propaganda Model, he describes a news media where a certain amount of dissension is allowed to counter the mainstream narrative. This is done to give the illusion of a free press as the alternative information is kept within acceptable bounds and margins. In other words, whether you are listening to news that pushes or questions the Covid-19 narrative, your mind is still on Covid-19. Right where the commies want it to be.

This is the reality we are living in. Our thoughts, beliefs, attitudes, and opinions have been subverted through the infiltration of media. A massive amount of research has been conducted concerning how we respond to media messages, how they affect our opinions and dominate our thinking. The mass media sets the agenda for what we are to consider “the most important and salient issues of the day.” As noted earlier, researchers also know that highly educated people pride themselves on staying informed and up to date on the latest information, and view media sources as legitimate. This is the reality of Ideological Subversion. It isn’t a crazy whacked-out conspiracy theory, but a frightening truth that can be verified if people could learn what to research. The media narrative over Covid-19 has been so successful, for example, that people continue to rush out to testing sites and accept a positive test result, despite the fact that the World Health Organization itself has admitted the PCR tests are producing high rates of false positives.

A good article is supposed to describe the problem and offer viable solutions. Presenting workable ways to solve the problem of brainwashing is difficult because you must first, convince people they have been brainwashed. Solving this problem and returning America to a state of uninfringed liberty means accepting that we have all been affected by this. We cannot go on thinking that Fox News is giving us the conservative viewpoint, for example. We must move on realizing, based on the evidence presented, that they could be defining what it is conservatives should be thinking about.  It is the same for all media. The false left/right paradigm exists to create conflict and push us towards socialism. The bottom line is this. We must shut off the news and start researching for ourselves. It has all been written down, the work has already been done. We just need to read and accept that it may be the reality we are dealing with.

 

 

Sunday, January 2, 2022

 To whomever, it may concern,

For months now I have been working to draw attention to deliberate lies and inconsistencies pertaining to the Coronavirus narrative. I suppose I had some hope that there were people willing to do what our forefathers did and put their necks on the line in defense of liberty. I suppose I was wrong. In this letter, I will provide the links to the information which shows there is no need for mandated vaccines, and frankly, information that should have stopped this dead in its tracks long ago.

First and foremost, I need to remind you that Dr. Fauci has been exposed as a liar. He has been exposed for funding GAIN OF FUNCTION RESEARCH. Are you suggesting that I should be forced to take a vaccine that was just proven to be manipulated to be more dangerous? How can you justify this when there is other information which discredits the entire narrative? Furthermore, the director of the National Institute of Health has just resigned due to this revelation. Francis Collins, NIH Director, Resigns After Gain-of-Function Falsehood Exposed (breitbart.com) The Deputy Director of NIH recently admitted that Gain of Function Research was conducted with SARS COV-2. Vaccines cannot be undone. By mandating me to take this vaccine you are requiring I be injected with a substance invented to fight a disease that was manufactured through gain of function research, to be more virulent, in a laboratory.  NIH admits US-funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan (nypost.com)

The following is from the CDC’s own document entitled-CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel. On page 40 they admit there was no isolated sample of covid 19 when they developed the PCR testing procedures. The following is from that document-

Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full-length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen. Samples were extracted using the QIAGEN EZ1 Advanced XL instrument and EZ1 DSP Virus Kit (Cat# 62724) and manually with the QIAGEN DSP Viral RNA Mini Kit (Cat# 61904). Real-Time RT-PCR assays were performed using the Thermo Fisher Scientific TaqPath™ 1-Step RT-qPCR Master Mix, CG (Cat# A15299) on the Applied Biosystems™ 7500 Fast Dx RealTime PCR Instrument according to the CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel instructions for use.

CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel - Instructions for Use (fda.gov)

If there was no isolated sample of the virus from which they developed the PCR test, what did they use to develop the vaccine? Can you tell me what they mean when they say, “viral transport medium to mimic the clinical specimen?” If you can’t explain that do you not have a moral imperative to find out what that means? Does this not violate laws concerning informed consent such as 38 U.S. Code 7331?

Are you aware of the legal and scientific processes which are required in the documenting of new viruses? If not, here is some information on that for you to read. WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF THE 'NOVEL CORONAVIRUS', 'SARS-CoV-2'? - Dr. Kevin P. Corbett - Evidence Not Fear

This is important because the W.H.O. acknowledged that the PCR tests were producing high rates of false tests. In June 2021 the CDC announced they were halting the use of the PCR tests by December 2021. In their own words, they are calling for something that can differentiate between the flu and Covid-19. Can you explain why? Can you explain what testing procedures they are using now and how they are ensuring they are not producing false positives? If you cannot, do you not have the moral imperative to find out for the sake of your employees? Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing

Last summer Dr. Birx admitted that they were labeling all deaths as covid-19 deaths. The number of those allegedly killed by Covid was revised several times over to reflect the number of those who may have died from other health complications. The CDC, this past June, released the following report ̶ Underlying Medical Conditions and Severe Illness Among 540,677 Adults Hospitalized With COVID-19, March 2020-March 2021. In their own words, the death of 94.9% of the 540, 677 people hospitalized due to COVID-19 can be attributed to comorbidities such as heart disease, diabetes, hypertension and even high rates of anxiety. This means, and we have known this all along, that only a small percentage of the population are affected by Covid-19 in a life-threatening way. Furthermore, in this report the CDC states that only people at risk from these other underlying ailments should be targeted for vaccination. The following quote is from that report-

The highest risk of severe COVID-19 illness was associated with obesity, anxiety and fear-related disorders, diabetes with complication, CKD, and neurocognitive disorders. Among patients younger than 40, essential hypertension was also a risk factor for death. The total number of underlying medical conditions was a strong risk factor of severe COVID-19 illness. Preventing COVID-19 in populations with these conditions and multiple conditions should remain a public health priority, along with targeted mitigation efforts and ensuring high uptake of vaccine, when available, in these people and their close contacts.

In October 2020, The New England Journal of Medicine released their article entitled Ensuring Uptake of Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 where they essentially recommend employers be tasked with mandating the vaccine because it would avoid the “constitutional due-process issues” of government mandating it. They also state that the vaccine should only be mandated by employers if there is a system of accountability in place. Are you going to take responsibility for adverse reactions? If not, you have a moral imperative to protect your employees from possible harm. The following is a quote from that article-

Ensuring Uptake of Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 (nejm.org)

“Neither fines nor criminal penalties should be used, however; fines disadvantage the poor, and criminal penalties invite legal challenges on procedural due-process grounds. Both are bad public health policy for a Covid-19 vaccine because they may stoke distrust without improving uptake.”

I would urge you to read it. To avoid these issues, they are putting the burden on you, and it has been planned that way.

The FDA press release letter clearly states there is an increased risk for Myocarditis and, that the long-term effects of the vaccine are not yet known.

“Additionally, the FDA conducted a rigorous evaluation of the post-authorization safety surveillance data pertaining to myocarditis and pericarditis following administration of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and has determined that the data demonstrate increased risks, particularly within the seven days following the second dose. The observed risk is higher among males under 40 years of age compared to females and older males. The observed risk is highest in males 12 through 17 years of age. Available data from short-term follow-up suggest that most individuals have had resolution of symptoms. However, some individuals required intensive care support. Information is not yet available about potential long-term health outcomes. The Comirnaty Prescribing Information includes a warning about these risks.” FDA Approves First COVID-19 Vaccine | FDA

Are you prepared to inform me and other employees about the possibility of these risks and the unknown long-term effects based on our own individual health histories? If not, how can you rightfully and morally mandate a vaccine simply because you are being told to? The government may offer some protection against liability but in the long run, adverse reactions will be the responsibility of those forcing the vaccine on their employees under duress of losing their jobs. That is a false choice that employees cannot be held responsible for when they are being forced.

I would urge you to read the vaccine approval letters from the FDA to Pfizer. They clearly state that what was approved was a vaccine called COMIRNATY, which they claim is the same ingredients of the Pfizer Bio-n-Tech vaccine. However, the Pfizer vaccine was only reauthorized under the emergency use authorization. Can you assure me that the shot you will be requiring me to take is the Comirnaty vaccine and not the Pfizer Bio-N-Tech? If not, you are forcing me to take a shot that is still under the EUA. If you cannot make sense of this information, then do you not have the moral imperative to find out exactly what is going on if you are going to force your employees to be vaccinated? Senator Ron Johnson has sent two letters to the FDA demanding clarification on this issue to which he has received no response. Under federal law, it is illegal to require a vaccine which is still under emergency use authorization, or if there are other effective means available to treat the disease.

“On August 23, 2021, FDA approved the biologics license application (BLA) submitted by BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH for COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) for active immunization to prevent COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 in individuals 16 years of age and older. On August 23, 2021, having concluded that revising this EUA is appropriate to protect the public health or safety under section 564(g)(2) of the Act, FDA is reissuing the August 12, 2021 letter of authorization in its entirety with revisions incorporated to clarify that the EUA will remain in place for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for the previously-authorized indication and uses, and to authorize use of COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) under this EUA for certain uses that are not included in the approved BLA.” Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine EUA LOA reissued October 20 2021 (fda.gov)

Have you heard the term ANTIBODY DEPENDENT ENHANCEMENT commonly associated with the mRNA vaccines? It is a process which allegedly inserts the spike protein of the synthetic virus, (because remember, the CDC admits they never isolated a virus) into your DNA which in turn, when later exposed to a similar virus or the so-called virus itself, you become sicker because your body replicates it. Here is some information on that as well.

“Antibody-based drugs and vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are being expedited through preclinical and clinical development. Data from the study of SARS-CoV and other respiratory viruses suggest that anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies could exacerbate COVID-19 through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). Previous respiratory syncytial virus and dengue virus vaccine studies revealed human clinical safety risks related to ADE, resulting in failed vaccine trials. Here, we describe key ADE mechanisms and discuss mitigation strategies for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and therapies in development. We also outline recently published data to evaluate the risks and opportunities for antibody-based protection against SARS-CoV-2.”

Can you provide me with information that guarantees I will not experience this? If you cannot, do you not have the moral imperative to learn more about it? According to a recent study, the majority of Covid hospitalizations are occurring because of anti-body dependent enhancement in fully vaccinated individuals. AI-Powered DoD Data Analysis Program Named “Project Salus” SHATTERS Official Vaccine Narrative | SOTN: Alternative News, Analysis & Commentary (stateofthenation.co)

The Covid-19 pandemic has been filled with misinformation and deliberate lies meant to scare an unsuspecting public into compliance with this vaccine effort. The information has been provided which paints a clear picture at the very least, that forced vaccinations would be unethical simply because the information is inconsistent. As it stands right now, there is no recourse for individuals to take as the pharmaceutical companies and government are immune for prosecution in the event of adverse reactions. Currently, according to the CDC’s own Vaccine Adverse Reaction Reporting System, there have been thousands of reports since this vaccine was introduced. There is also a federal lawsuit alleging that 45,000 people have died of this vaccine. With all due respect to you and your organization, unless you can guarantee my safety and follow the laws of informed consent, which I am pretty sure I have demonstrated you cannot, you have no legal or moral authority to force this vaccine on me and it would be, no matter what the president says, against the law to fire me or anyone else given the circumstances. I would urge you to jump on board the lawsuit that is being filed by not only the State of Oklahoma, but twenty other states as well before making any decisions we all will regret.

Furthermore, it has been recently discovered that the vaccine is only good for six months before it starts losing its efficacy. Are you prepared to force your employees to get booster shots every six months to a year?  Effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine up to 6 months in a large integrated health system in the USA: a retrospective cohort study (thelancet.com)

I would also like to highlight my religious objections to this vaccine as well as all others. Revelations 13:17 clearly states that a mark will come and if men refuse to take it, they will not be able to buy or sell. Clearly, with the idea of vaccine passports and some businesses refusing services, and even some hospitals refusing organ transplants if patients do not have this vaccine, we are on this path. It is my sincere religious belief, based on the words in Revelations and my personal relationship with Christ, that this vaccine represents such a mark. For the record, I have not taken any vaccines since being released from active duty over 15 years ago, with the exception of the swine flu. I only took this one because my wife had my small children injected with it. If they were gong to suffer any adverse effects, I was going to suffer them also. My children are now grown, and my wife stands with me in my refusal to take this vaccine. It is also well known that the use of aborted fetal tissue was used in the development and testing processes of this vaccine. I stand 100 percent against all abortions and feel there is no legal, moral of ethical grounds in which a vaccine that used aborted fetal tissue can be forced on me or anyone else. COVID-19_Vaccine_Fetal_Cell_Handout.pdf Some will argue the lives potentially saved would rule out ethical concerns however, it is clear that this vaccine is not preventing people from contracting Covid-19. Title VII of the Civil Rights act states that religious discrimination in the workplace is illegal. It is also illegal to segregate people based on their religious beliefs or, to harass people based on their religious beliefs. Making people justify their religious beliefs in response to a mandated vaccine which is still authorized under emergency use could constitute harassment and segregation. Drawing any attention towards those people who have chosen to not get vaccinated because of religious reasons certainly would be considered harassment and making them follow any different procedures because of their unvaccinated status would be singling them out, thus, constituting segregation.

There is one final point I would like to make. Congress, the people we elect, are exempt from this mandate. This means they are sitting back letting you, the civilian business owner, assume all the risks in doing so. Is that right? Shouldn’t the people we elect to represent us be subject to the same laws, or at the very least, be working to protect your interests? After all, they are not the ones with money invested in employee training and other business details associated with retaining good, dependable help. It is becoming abundantly clear that millions across the country are refusing this vaccine and many employers, consequently, are suffering a lack of staff. Do you think this is the right way to go? Is it right that this burden was placed on you because the government knew they didn’t have the lawful authority to do it?

Thank you

David Risselada

 

 

 

 

Analyzing the Attempts to Normalize Pedophilia.

  December 18, 2023   by  David Risselada Sometimes I find myself at a loss. The past few years have been quite an experience for me as I ha...