Friday, March 23, 2018

The Next Generation of Tyrants

On Saturday March 24th, students across America will once again be taking to the streets to demand law makers pass stricter gun laws. Poor, brainwashed kids don't even realize there are already thousands of gun laws on the books. None of which by the way stopped either the Parkland shooter or the most recent attempt at mass murder in Maryland. The latter showed quite clearly that the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. In this writers humble opinion, any school shooting that happens after the nation witnessed this truth will be squarely on the shoulders of the school district who failed to provide adequate armed security at their school. This doesn't mean providing your students with a bucket of rocks as Pennsylvania school superintendent Dr. David Helsel believes.

While the media and their government cohorts attempt to portray this movement as grassroots in nature, led by students demonstrating great leadership, the truth is vastly different. Powerful leftwing groups such as Planned Parenthood, Every Town for Gun Safety and the Woman's March are behind the funding. Public schools, using taxpayer dollars are also encouraging kids as young as kindergarten age to participate. In one instance a student was suspended from school for refusing to join in the protests as he was a second amendment supporter.

When schools force students to participate in political activities they are essentially causing, whether intentionally or not, conflict and confusion in school students because the values the school system intends to push may contradict the values the student is learning at home. This is unacceptable. Also, if a student chooses to express himself in a different manner or express values that are not in line with the masses, the student could become isolated or even targeted for retaliation. 

The sad reality of all of this is that our students are being denied the truth of history. All through the twentieth century mass movements against what was considered to be the normal culture always ended in mass violence and bloodshed. Tyrannical dictators like Hitler, Pol Pot and Mao Tse Tung worked incessantly on the children of the nation, turning them into agents of the state while programming them with the idea that the culture they grew up in was somehow backwards while teaching them they had the power to fix it all. The result was mass slaughter and the destruction of nations. Some may consider this to be an inappropriate analogy however, this writer disagrees. Last week during the school walk out against gun violence we witnessed student mobs engaging in behavior like ripping down an American flag, storming and trashing a Wal-Mart and attacking police. Our students are turning into out of control mobs with the help of the public school system.

Another example of this out of control behavior occurred near this writers hometown of Tulsa Oklahoma. A young student of Glenpool High School was viciously beaten to the point where surgery was necessary simply for expressing opinions that went against the tide. In a post on social media this student made a comment referring to the protests by saying he would catch all the clowns heading to the sports arena for the circus. He claims he was referring to the students participating in the walk out simply to get out of class. In other words, he was beat for not participating in the anti-gun walk out because he had given the impression that the clowns he referred to were the protestors themselves. Did he really deserve this? Is this the new reality we live in now? Where expressing different opinions can get us beat down? 

The left likes to refer to those of us who support the constitution and the bill of rights as Nazi's and bigots. The truth is that the school system and other leftist controlled organizations are creating the next generation of  tyrants. They have taught our kids nothing of truth, but instead filled their heads with lies about being oppressed victims. They have taught our kids that they live in a nation of white supremacy and that we are all racist unless we abandon our values and march in lockstep with leftism. They have taught them that the state is their controller and master and conditioned them to live in fear always looking to government for answers. This is not likely to end well. In conclusion I would like to leave you with one of my favorite quotes.


Here is a link to the go fund me page for the student in Glenpool.


at No comments:

Wednesday, March 7, 2018

A Growing Hatred In America


In America, the higher education system continues to push an anti-American, racist agenda against white people. The narrative that whites are privileged and unconsciously racist has led to a growing resentment of mainly, the white male. According to the white privilege narrative American institutions are perpetuating systemic racism which prevents minorities from getting a fair shot in society. Any hatred expressed against the white man is not considered racism as minorities in America have been taught they are oppressed victims and lack the institutional power to discriminate against whites. This is creating a very unstable and divided country with the potential to spin rapidly out of control as the hatred towards white people and their alleged privilege continues to grow.

It isn’t difficult to see where this is leading. The dehumanization of the white male is following the same systematic process that led to diabolical regimes committing genocide across the globe. It works the same every time, blame a certain demographic for societies problems and teach the rest of the population that they are victims of that demographics privileges and abuses. This method of dividing society came through the realizations that Marx’s ideas of class war had not come to fruition. Antonio Gramsci, in an effort to create a new Marxism based on culture as opposed to class coined the term Counter Hegemony as a way of turning society against the dominant culture. The term Hegemony refers to the cultural influence of the dominant social group. In other words, whites make up the dominant social class in America, therefore they are the oppressors. Gramsci believed that the ruling class through culture and civil society exerted dominance and that other social groups in society lacked any significant organization or leadership. In his Essay Gramsci and the Theory of Hegemony Thomas Bates cites a paragraph from the work The Risorgimento: A Multinational Movement that describes the concept of counter hegemony.

An independent class of intellectuals does not exist, but rather every social group has its own intellectuals. However, the intellectuals of the historically progressive class ... exercise such a power of attraction that they end ... by subordinating the intellectuals of other social groups and thus create a system of solidarity among all intellectuals, with links of a psychological (vanity) or caste nature. This fact is realized spontaneously in historical periods in which the given social group is truly progressive. (https://ondercetin.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/bates-1975.pdf)

In other words, American society has been broken down into different groups with their own value systems and beliefs that are counter-intuitive to the dominant culture. Feminists, homosexuals, Muslims, Hispanics, African-Americans, and even transgendered people are all bound together by the common thread of being victims of white privilege.  In Gramsci’s view these groups didn’t even realize they were oppressed because they have created a values system that justified their repression. He believed he could change society by encouraging these different groups to go against the dominant culture. This has been an extremely successful undertaking as most of American society now identifies as being a victim of white privilege.

The anger against the white man is not limited to just America. Across the globe the third world has been systematically taught that the white Europeans were Imperialist men of conquest and that they have unjustifiably stolen the resources of the nations they conquered. The white man stands accused of alone, being responsible for the atrocities committed in the Atlantic slave trade even though Africans themselves participated by selling and enslaving their own people. Arabs have also been involved in trading African slaves as early as the year 900 A.D.

“Africans were not strangers to the slave trade, or to the keeping of slaves. There had been considerable trading of Africans as slaves by Islamic Arab merchants in North Africa since the year 900. When Leo Africanus travelled to West Africa in the 1500s, he recorded in his The Description of Africa and of the Notable Things Therein Contained that, "slaves are the next highest commodity in the marketplace. There is a place where they sell countless slaves on market days." Criminals and prisoners of war, as well as political prisoners were often sold in the marketplaces in Gao, Jenne and Timbuktu.” (South African History Online, 2011)

In South Africa this hatred is quickly coming to fruition as the African National Congress has voted to strip the white farmers, whom have been in South Africa since the 1600’s, of their farms without just compensation. Julius Malema is the leader of South Africa’s Marxist party and believes that the whites stole their land and have been unjustly occupying it for centuries.

“The time for reconciliation is over. Now is the time for justice,” Malema told the parliament. “We must ensure that we restore the dignity of our people without compensating the criminals who stole our land.” (RT, 2018)

This is similar rhetoric we hear from some black groups in America demanding that white people pay reparations for the exploitation of black labor during slavery and the alleged injustices that whites continue to perpetrate against blacks today.  These include the accusations that blacks are denied equal access to education and afforded equal employment opportunities.

Where is this hatred going to lead us? The rhetoric in South Africa against white farmers and the confiscation of their land is only a small part of the whole story. Since the Marxists have taken over, more than 70,000 white people in South Africa have been brutally murdered. The Marxist ideology is based purely on resentment and hatred towards those who have been portrayed as oppressors and always leads to mass killings of entire populations of people.

In America, the white privilege narrative, as stated earlier, has led to a growing hatred of white people and radical groups sharing in the Marxist mindset have been calling for action. Groups like Black Lives Matter, in response to the Michael Brown shooting, began calling for the death of police officers and white people in America. They have been fallaciously taught that white police officers are deliberately hunting them down and executing them in cold blood. They have been taught for decades that they are victims of a racist America that deliberately keeps them poor. Unfortunately, this is true. Democratic politicians preside over the nation’s poorest cities, while continually advocating for policies that create more government dependence in minority neighborhoods. The impoverished conditions are blamed on white Republicans to keep blacks voting for democrats. The welfare state continues to expand, which does more to stifle opportunity as more money is syphoned from the private sector only to be wasted in an endless bureaucratic nightmare. Since the war on poverty began over twenty two trillion dollars has been wasted on programs allegedly designed to alleviate poverty and nothing has changed. Democrats are keeping them down, so they can be used as the next revolutionary army.

If something doesn’t change soon, and conservatives don’t gat a hold of our educational institutions, the situation in America could potentially go the way of South Africa and other third world countries. We are reaching a point where nearly all conservative based groups are being associated with a white supremacist attitude. White Supremacy is being named the biggest national security threat in the nation by the FBI while the whites in South Africa are being targeted for genocide. This is despite the fact that 93% of black murder victims are murdered by other black people. Labeling all whites as white supremacists is sure to keep the fear-based anger alive and well.

We must keep a close eye on what develops in South Africa. Surely, whatever occurs there is sure to inspire Marxist groups in America, who already have been indoctrinated into the politics of hatred and envy, to radicalize and recruit new members into their organizations. While many people will argue that this will never happen here because we have a participatory Democracy, or a Democratic Republic, it is important to remember that South Africa once had something similar. They lost their country to political correctness, skillful propaganda, and pressure from outside groups. America is being overrun with third world immigrants who do not share our values and our opposition is being classified as racism and white supremacism.

"White South Africans, you should remember, have been in that part of Africa for the same amount of time whites have inhabited North America; yet ultimately South Africans voted for their own suicide. We are not so very different from you.

We lost our country through skillful propaganda, pressure from abroad (not least from the U.S.A.), unrelenting charges of "oppression" and "racism," and the shrewd assessment by African tyrants that the white man has many Achilles' heels, the most significant of which are his compassion, his belief in the "equality of man," and his "love your neighbor" philosophy -- none of which are part of the Third World's history.

The mainline churches played a big role in the demise of Western influence throughout Africa, too; especially in South Africa. Today's tyrants were yesterday's mission-school protÈgÈs. Many dictators in Africa were men of the cloth. They knew their clerical collars would deflect criticism and obfuscate their real aims, which had nothing whatever to do with the brotherhood of man." (Rense.com)


at 1 comment:

Tuesday, March 6, 2018

Education and Stimulus Response Mechanisms


The following is a chapter from the new book I have been working on. Let me know what you think please.

As briefly mentioned in the last chapter, B.F. Skinner wrote on the post-scientific view of man that if the environment could be changed human behavior would change with it. This came to be known as operant conditioning. This was based on Ivan Pavlov’s discovery on learning which was classical conditioning. This is the idea that behavior could be trained through stimulus response mechanisms. What Pavlov discovered was that a dog would begin to associate food with the sound of the bell and repeat the same behavior when simply presented with the sound of the bell.  Unfortunately, it has been discovered, that if thoroughly broken-down, man responds to stimulus response mechanisms in much the same way. Much of our education system has been based on techniques of negative and positive reinforcement.


In her book “The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America” Charlotte Iserbyt explains that our education system, in the 1960’s, began the work of modifying the behavior of our children as opposed to educating them[1]. The purpose was to create compliant citizens that generally agreed with government policy and global governance. Competition of free thought and ideas, and the expression of freewill were not on the agenda. Instead, the standardization of human behavior and the elimination of belief systems which opposed government goals were. With classical conditioning techniques, or stimulus response mechanisms, social science and educators alike saw the potential for developing the type of human they saw useful as opposed to free thinkers schooled in the ways of rugged individualism. Professor John Goodlad, author of the book “The Public Purpose of Education and Schooling,” is quoted in Iserbyt’s book as saying the following.


“The most controversial issues of the twenty-first century will pertain to the ends and means of modifying human behavior and who shall determine them. The first educational question will not be what knowledge is of the most worth? but what kinds of human beings do we wish to produce? The possibilities virtually defy our imagination.”


Clearly there has been enormous success in accomplishing this agenda. The American male has been virtually wiped out and replaced with the hipster generation. Kids in public school are graduating believing that there are more than two genders. In fact, seventy-seven percent of Democrats with a higher education degree believe that gender is not determined at birth.[2] Furthermore, forty-four percent of America’s largest generation, the millennials, claim that they would prefer socialism over capitalism.[3] Imagine that, just what the social engineers had hoped for!


This transformation of public education began in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. John Dewey[4], known today as the father of modern education, was one of the most influential figures in transforming America’s education system. Dewey was a Fabian Socialist [5]who believed there was a need to move away from a traditional education where reading, arithmetic and writing were the focus[6] as society progressed into the industrial age. He saw the old systems and institutions that revolved around the family and the church as crumbling and outdated, not able to fulfill the needs of the new developing society. Science, the arts, and nature learning would take precedence. Education should focus on socializing the student as opposed to educating them to be free thinkers. Dewey foresaw that a public education system, where education was free, and children were guided by trained teachers, had the potential to create a system where the children themselves would be aiding in the creation of an equalitarian society.


Again, here we are in the early twenty first century and American students from elementary education in free public schools to top tier universities are advocating for socialism. They are being educated to believe it is their job to create a world based on the principles of equality, not liberty. Professor Goodlad’s question of what kind of student should be produced is being answered. They are creating a generation of social activists ready to take to the streets to make the final push towards a collective society.  Referring back to the list of forty-five communist goals it is readily apparent that using our children and the school systems to push their agenda has been the plan.


17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack[7].
In 1932, William Foster, national chairman of the Communist Party of the United States wrote the book “Toward Soviet America”[8], where he described his vision of American education, which is frightening as it is apparent that eliminating all forms of American patriotism is on the agenda.


            "A U.S. Department of Education; implementation of a scientific materialist philosophy; studies revolutionized, being cleansed of religious, patriotic and other features of the bourgeois ideology; students taught on the basis of Marxian dialectical materialism, internationalism and general ethics of a new socialist society; present obsolete methods of teaching will be superseded by a scientific pedagogy. The whole basis and organization of capitalist science will be revolutionized. Science will become materialistic, hence truly scientific. God will be banished from the laboratories as well as from the schools[9]."


We have seen this come to fruition on many levels as students have been professionally organized across the country to protest what they perceive as inequality when it comes to the issue of race, gender, and wealth. Protest movements such as Occupy Wall Street and Black Lives Matter are made up primarily of college aged leftists who have had a constant barrage of Marxist propaganda pumped into their soft heads since first entering the public education system. At the time of this writing, February 2018, high school students were being organized to protest for gun control in much the same way.


This is the result of stimulus response, or operant conditioning. The education system has been transformed into one where compliance with social norms has been rewarded with positive reinforcement and undesirable traits have been rooted out. Positive reinforcement simply means rewarding desirable behavior immediately after the behavior is performed. This can be done socially with verbal praise or with candy and stickers for elementary school children. In 1969 the U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare released a booklet entitled Reducing Behavior Problems: An Operant Conditioning Guide for Children[10] where operant conditioning is defined as the following-


“In its simplest form, operant conditioning involves the systematic use of consequences to strengthen and weaken behaviors under specified stimulus conditions. Operant behavior is strengthened by some consequences called reinforcers and weakened by other consequences called punishers. Withdrawal of reinforcing consequences will also weaken behavior. This procedure is called extinction[11].”

Going along with Dewey’s vision, children in America are being trained, not educated, to be good, obedient socialists. The effectiveness of this type of behavior modification, if started at an early age, can be very effective as demonstrated by the mindset and lack of any patriotism in college students today. The same report cited above also stated that the most effective stimulus is the social praising of students for exhibiting appropriate behavior. Imagine students being socially praised for demonstrating attitudes that favor the socialist controlled education systems teachings. That is exactly what has occurred. In fact, a student’s attitudes can be just as easily changed through negative reinforcers as they can through positive reinforcers.

Looking again to B.F Skinner’s Beyond Freedom and Dignity[12] we can see that people can be easily controlled through stimulus response mechanisms. In other words, people’s attitudes can be changed and brought into alignment with the collective using ridicule, peer pressure and the demonization of their belief systems.


“People who get along together well under the mild contingencies of approval and disapproval are controlled as effectively as (and in many ways more effectively than) the citizens of a police state. Orthodoxy controls through the establishment of rules, but the mystic is no freer because the contingencies which have shaped his behavior are more personal or idiosyncratic. Those who work productively because of the reinforcing value of what they produce are under the sensitive and powerful control of the products. Those who learn in the natural environment are under a form of control as powerful as any control exerted by a teacher[13].


What Skinner is saying here is that there is a social desire to fit in with peers and a fear of not being able to is a great motivator for behavioral change. Our public schools have become bastions for anti-American attitudes and in many cases pro-American attitudes are viciously frowned upon and attacked as America is often presented as a selfish, white supremacist nation. Students from patriotic families may feel forced to keep their opinions quiet as they are sure to be ridiculed and put on the spot by students who are rewarded for expressing socialistic views.


The Manual on Psychopolitics addresses this issue by describing how ridicule and pressure can change a person’s loyalties to that of his enemy.


“The changing of loyalties consists, in its primary step, with the eradication of existing loyalties. This can be done in one of two ways. First, by demonstrating that previously existing loyalties have brought perilous physical circumstances such as imprisonment, lack of recognition, duress, privation and secondly, by eradicating the personality itself. The first is accomplished by a steady and continuous indoctrination of the individual that his previous loyalties have been granted to an unworthy source[14].”


As part of this there is the creation of a state of mind in the individual, by actually placing him under duress, and then furbishing him with false evidence to demonstrate that the target of his previous loyalties is itself, the source of the duress[15].


What Beria is saying is that demonization and public shaming of a person’s beliefs is a powerful tool of behavioral change. Constant exposure to this type of negative reinforcer, especially at a young age can have lasting effects on the psyche of an individual. This conclusion, given the state of American youth today, must be taken seriously as this type of behavioral modification is still occurring in our public schools.




at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Analyzing the Attempts to Normalize Pedophilia.

  December 18, 2023   by  David Risselada Sometimes I find myself at a loss. The past few years have been quite an experience for me as I ha...