A Social Injustice Indeed....A Grave Social Injustice

Colin Kaepernick's refusal to stand for the National Anthem has kick started a string of similar incidents across the country. Not only are other professional athletes joining Kaepernick's ridiculous protest, but high school teams are now refusing to show respect to the Star Spangled Banner as well. It has gotten so far out of hand that even a state senator from the state of Missouri is standing in solidarity with this so called protest against social injustice. The only problem is that the real social injustices aren't even being addressed. These people are exercising a constitutionally protected right by taking  a stand against the very constitution that protects it. That, in the words of Michael Savage, proves that liberalsim is a mental disorder. Unfortunately, the idea that the United States is an oppressive, unfair nation has gained some major ground under the tenure of the community organizer in chief. After nearly a decade of contious lies designed to discredit the culture of liberty, and portray America as a racist, xenophobic nation; a weary beaten down population has no idea how to defend the truth. That is, in and of itself, a social injustice of epic proportions.

The real injustice lies in the fact that the United States has become an oppressive nation. We are now a country where our very government, in cahoots with the mainstream media, deliberately misleads us in a misinformation campaign designed to keep us distracted from the fact that we have been completely sold out. We have been divided on every social level while the media works feversihly to incite racial and class warfare. Our schools are complicit in this as they have completely rewritten the truth about about our history in order to support the narrative that America systematically discriminates against minorities. Our teachers are even so dumbed down that they have no idea that they are teaching lies. Our kids are being taught that being white is inherently evil and that they are privileged recipients of a system that automatically favors them and punishes others based on skin color alone.

The real injustice lies in the fact that we have a government facilitating the systematic overthrow of this nation by allowing a radical leftist to get away with everything he wishes to "fundamentally transform." The Republican Party has rendered themselves absolutely useless as they have, for all practical purposes, stepped aside and made it perfectly clear they would not oppose Obama.

The real injustice lies in the fact that we have thousands of troops returning home from wars that both the Democrats and Republicans voted for, only to be spit upon by the likes of idiots that have no understanding of the definiton of liberty, nor any respect for people who sacrafice for their freedom to speak as they choose. Troops returning home with PTSD, lost limbs and broken families; only to be cast aside for immigrants who care nothing about this country except for what they can get from it. We were told we had to go fight them over there so they wouldn't come over here, and now, our government is voluntarily bringing in the same people we were sent to fight. People who come here with the intent to murder. This is not only a grave social injustice, it is treason of the highest order.

Yes, there is indeed a social injustice occurring in this country and it isn't due to racism or discrimination. It isn't sexism, homophobia or even wealth inequality. It is because a group of elitists, in an effort to wrestle away our liberties have systematically lied about our nation and left those behind that have done so much for us. They sent our fathers our brothers, mothers and sisters off to foreign lands to fight wars in the name of freedom and when they came back they were demonized, called extrremists and left to die on V.A. waiting lists while their commander in chief sends billions to our enemies. A nation that forgets its defenders is a nation that will be forgotten.

The Depths of Ideolgical Subversion: Communism and Islam

To this day many people are convinced that the September 11^th attack of 2001 was a conspiracy orchestrated by our own government to usher in the New World Order. This type of attack is known as a “false flag” and the United States is no stranger to their use. Pearl Harbor and The Gulf of Tonkin were both said to be false flag attacks used to get the American people to accept war. Operation Northwoods was another false attack planned by the Joint Chiefs of Staff to get the American people to accept an invasion of Cuba. These plans called for attacks against American citizens, and then blaming it on the Island nation. Luckily this plan never came to fruition.  After September 11 The United States government immediately launched a campaign in the Middle East that began with Afghanistan and then included Iraq and now Libya and Syria. This plan was referred to as the Project New American Century and ultimately, it also included plans to attack Iran. Liberals were sure that Barack Obama was going to end the wars in the Middle East and bring a new era of peace; however, his wars in Libya and Syria are merely extensions of the Project New American Century which seeks to expand American military dominance around the globe. This means that Obama is carrying out the same war plans started by Bush.  Actually, the Project New American Century was written well before the attacks of September 11, and one of the planners allegedly admitted a new Pearl Harbor event would likely be necessary to get the American people to accept an invasion of not only Afghanistan, but Iraq as well.

Fifteen years later the debate still rages as to whether September 11 was an actual attack launched by radical Islamists in the name of Jihad, or an attack launched against our freedoms by our own government. The evidence is becoming increasingly clear, according to an article published by Europhysics Magazine, that the twin towers were not brought down by excessive heat from burning jet fuel, but by controlled demolition. As if we need a panel of experts to bring us to this conclusion. According to the article, the Twin towers, along with building 7, would have been the first known case of total collapse due to excessive heat and fire melting steel frames.

“Indeed, neither before nor since 9/11 have fires caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise—nor has any other natural event, with the exception of the 1985 Mexico City earthquake, which toppled a 21-story office building. Otherwise, the only phenomenon capable of collapsing such buildings completely has been by way of a procedure known as controlled demolition, whereby explosives or other devices are used to bring down a structure intentionally. Although NIST finally concluded after several years of investigation that all three collapses on 9/11 were due primarily to fires, fifteen years after the event a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists are unconvinced by that explanation.”

How would the American people react if they were to find out this was a conspiracy orchestrated by their own government? What if the conspiracy was planned to not only do away with the freedoms we have enjoyed and taken for granted, but to completely destroy the morale of the American people, while simultaneously discrediting the American government on the world stage in order to offer a different form of government as a solution? Is it possible that the release of this article is a prelude to a revelation that the U.S. government intentionally staged the September 11 attacks in order to launch wars of aggression? Granted, this is all merely speculation conjured up by an author who is fascinated by the techniques of psychological warfare; however, there are little bits of evidence that suggest this is a strong possibility.

First of all, look at the inroads Islam has made in American society since the 9/11 attacks. The attacks themselves have been turned into the means in which Muslims have become oppressed victims in America. Stereotyping a Muslim as a terrorist is the new Jim Crow and they have made tremendous progress using this as a civil rights tactic. Could you imagine how empowered the Muslims would be if it were revealed that the U.S. government deliberately staged the 9/11 attacks in order to prop up Islam as the enemy? Revelation of this kind would likely put America in its place while shaming the vast majority of us into silence.  Secondly, the global elite have been trying to destroy conservatism and the patriot movement for a long time. If it was determined that the government of George Bush and the Neocons deliberately staged this event it would be the ultimate end of the Republican Party. It would also destroy the morale of the Republican rank and file as well. They would have absolutely no idea how to deal with this kind of information and they wouldn’t know which leg to stand on.  This would force them into compliance with whatever solution would be offered, which of course would be along the lines of a global type government.

Is it possible that this attack was not launched by radical jihadists but by Communists within our own government using Islam as a force for revolution? Is it possible that the 9/11 conspiracy theory is a deliberate misinformation campaign designed to keep us from seeing the real objective, which would be  the complete discrediting of our form of government all together in order to offer communism as a solution? This is exactly what would happen if it were revealed to the world that the U.S. deliberately staged the 9/11 attacks in order to launch wars of aggression in the Middle East.  It is also a strategy that would fall right in line with the Communist concept of Ideological Subversion.

Former KGB agent Yuri Bezmenov describes Ideolgical Subversion as a process that seeks to demoralize an entire nation to the point that despite the abundance of information available to the public, they have absolutely no way of discerning what is real. It is certainly safe to say that we are at that point in the United States. Never before in the history of man has so much information been right at our finger tips yet, somehow we have never been more misinformed.  He also describes it as a process of educating the population into the culture of the enemy, more and more we are seeing Islam becoming the protected culture in America while at the same time, acceptance of the loss of American Sovereignty is gaining tremendous ground.  Discovering that our own government was responsible for the 9/11 attacks, as stated earlier, would empower the Muslim world and destroy any remaining faith the American masses had in their system of government. This alone would accomplish the Communist goal of discrediting the America Constitution. The following is from the book The Naked Communist.

Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

In 1951, State Department advisor John Dulles gave a testimony before the U.S. Congress describing a plan he referred to as the Communist Peace Offensive. He offered his opinion that the Soviet Union was involved in all out propaganda campaign designed to give the world the impression that the United States was the country that stood for wars of conquest and that Communism was the solution to worlds problems and stood for peace.  Looking at the mentality of many people in our younger generations you would have to argue, despite the fact that much of this material refers to events prior to WWII, that there is something of this affect happening in our country. Young college students, as well as activist groups, are literally begging for enslavement that masquerades as freedom. If an organization such as the U.N., for example, were to reveal to the world that the U.S was responsible for 9/11 then this Communist plan to portray the American government as Imperialistic warmongers would have been successful beyond their wildest dreams.

Many people may be wondering why we are discussing Communism and not Islam; after all, it was radical Islamists who allegedly attacked us on September 11, 2001, not Communist revolutionaries. Despite the fact that Russia currently acts as an adversary to radical Islam, the truth is quite different. According to Cliff Kincaid in his book “The Sword of Revolution And The Communist Apocalypse” Russia has a long history of support for Islam because Muslims were one of the peoples considered to be oppressed by the bourgeoisie. This makes Muslims perfect candidates for acting as the useful idiots of Communist revolutionaries who seek to do nothing but create chaos in order to offer communism as a solution. Kincaid cites an excerpt from a report written by a former KGB agent for America’s Survival Inc. where he describes the history of Russian support for Islamic terrorism.

The communists have considered Islam their ally from the very beginning, because in the early twentieth century, Islam was the religion of the oppressed people. Support of Islam was considered a part of the Russian based anti-colonialism. It is very significant that Vladimir Lenin in December 1917 addressed his second message, delivered just after coming to power, to the “Toiling Muslims of Russia and East.” So they considered Muslims a reservoir of people for the world communist revolution.

This makes a lot of sense if you stop and think about it. Sharia Law has little to do with the actual religion of Islam and more to do with a radical political ideology. It is virtually an Islamic version of communism if you want to be more specific. Looking at where America is today, 15 years after the September 11 attacks, it is safe to say that America is forever changed and will likely never be the same. People are begging for communism and restrictions on our freedoms, Islam is becoming more of an accepted culture than Christianity and the idea of American Sovereignty in the minds of millions is a laughable concept. The idea of a free and prosperous America has been destroyed and if it were revealed that the U.S. was in fact responsible for 9/11, then the country would be completely discredited on the world stage and ripe for a complete ideological takeover, which is in fact one of the goals of the communists. Are the communists using Islam as a force for world revolution? Was it communism behind the September 11 attacks? We will likely never for sure; however, if they soon come out with proof that it was the U.S. we may have a better understanding.

The Psychopolitics of Global Warming and Population Control

Despite the fact that man-made climate change continue to be proven false, the left drives on with its fear driven insistence that human beings must dramatically change their behavior in order to save the planet. Everything revolves around the idea that mans consumption of natural resources is creating an unsustainable environment, and if we don’t somehow curb our use of fossil fuels we will destroy mother Earth and humanity itself. The left would have you believe that the only way to save our world is to give up your sovereignty and let a cabal of global elitists tell you how to live. In fact, James Traub, writing for Foreign Policy magazine claims that it is time to force people to accept a reality they may not want to accept. He says that the masses are deluded and it is the job of the global elite to set them straight. This is because across the world people are rejecting globalism and embracing freedom. As far as climate change goes, it is obviously an agenda that revolves around completely controlling man kind’s activities, including the rate at which we reproduce.

According to Travis Rieder, professor at the John Hopkins University in Baltimore, dangerous climate change will be taking place by the year 2036 and this is ample reason to stop having children.  He is attempting to scare people into believing that the world is too much of a horrible place to raise kids and it would be more compassionate, given the threats we face, to not have children at all. Truthfully, this is all part of the U.N. agenda on sustainable development and population control. The left wants you to believe that having children poses a greater risk to the environment as they will grow up being consumers in rich, capitalist countries. This consumption of course contributes to the use of over strained natural resources and leaves an excessive carbon footprint which in turn, contributes to catastrophic climate change. The website populationmatters.org discusses the importance of choosing to have a small family as well by citing some of the same issues concerning the environment and child bearing.

“Many people today seek to live in a more sustainable and environmentally friendly manner. They travel less, or in ways that cause lower emissions. They use energy efficient methods to heat and power their homes. They recycle what they can and seek to minimize their food miles and food waste. These are all to be welcomed, but they only reduce a person’s impact to a limited extent and only for their lifetime.

Your choice about how many children you have is much more important. Each additional child will have more impact on the environment and consume more resources. And the impact will continue for that child’s life and the lives of all of his or her descendants.”

The issue of bringing children into the world is discussed here as if it is a harmful event that contributes to the destruction of humanity. They speak of having a child in the same terms of choosing how to heat or cool your home in the interest of saving energy; this is because they want you to believe that bringing children into the world places a greater burden on limited natural resources. To understand this further, consider the following from a document called From Consumer Kids to Sustainable Childhood.

“Mainstreaming sustainability education is essential to creating the awareness and inherent understanding among all children of the bounded reality of a closed system such as Earth’s where infinite growth based on natural resources is an oxymoron. Understanding the links between a consumer lifestyle and environmental degradation is paramount to children’s ability to think critically and take action towards more sustainable lifestyles for themselves and their current and future communities.”

The underlined portion sums it quite nicely; they believe that there are simply too many people on Earth and that there are not enough resources to go around. Truthfully this has nothing to do with global warming as much as it has to do with the elite wanting complete control of the resources in question. Global warming and the issue of sustainability is the means in which they convince the people to accept their agenda out of fear, and their agenda is simply reducing the size of the world’s population. Consider, for example, the words of the U.N. climate chief Christina Figueres. She says that the world should make every effort to reduce the world’s population to protect the environment and fight global warming. She also stated that the expected increase in population levels to nine billion people by 2050 would be an enormous strain on the Earth’s natural resources. Suggesting that people should not have children appears to be one of the chosen methods to convince people that reducing the population is a necessity.

How do you convince humanity that putting the brakes on their own procreation is a good idea? You use the education system to teach them that their lifestyles are unsustainable and their traditional goals of wealth creation and home ownership are selfish and greedy.  You teach them that their everyday activities are contributing to the destruction of the environment and if they don’t drastically change their behavior humanity will face unparalleled destruction.

 Internationally, the United Nations has spearheaded efforts to upgrade sustainability teaching via the Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005-2014). One major output of these efforts is a multimedia teacher education program on ‘Teaching and Learning for a Sustainable Future’ complete with learning modules and child focused learning activities. Overall, the objective is to advise national governments to implement sustainability in all formal education.  (http://www.worldwatch-europe.org/sites/default/files/WIE_REPORT_2_CONTENT_FINAL_LQ.pdf)

The underlined portion highlights the United Nations intentions to implement sustainability education worldwide in all formal education settings, including the United States.  In many universities as well as high schools across the country kids are being taught that capitalism is unsustainable and greedy, and that the consumer driven society in which we live is responsible for the depletion of valuable natural resources. The overall intent is to convince humanity that they are living lives that are destroying their environment and the only way to stop this from happening is to surrender to the dictates of a global oligarchy. In other words, they want you to fear the lies and turn to their solutions. On that note it is appropriate that we re-examine the words of Laventri Beria from Brain Washing- A Synthesis on the Russian Art of Psychopolitics-

By psychopolitics our chief goals are effectively carried forward. To produce a maximum of chaos in the culture of the enemy is our first most important step. Our fruits are grown in chaos, distrust, economic depression and scientific turmoil. At last a weary populace can seek peace only in our offered Communist State, at last only Communism can resolve the problems of the masses.

Global warming is one of the biggest hoaxes ever devised by the evil minds of men. The intent is to scare the masses into accepting an agenda that will completely dominate all aspects of their lives. The idea that carbon dioxide, a gas that is absorbed by plants to produce oxygen is destroying the planet is the very definition of scientific turmoil. They want you to see the reasonableness in surrendering your freedom in order to save the planet, and if you are unwilling to do so you will then become part of the problem.  We know what happens to people that dictatorial regimes consider being a part of the problem. They are already attempting to criminalize speech that goes against the global warming narrative. How far will this go? How far will the elite go to accomplish their goals of depopulation? Will they soon begin rounding up global warming dissenters? If enough of the mindless sheeple can be convinced that the deniers are making their life more difficult the answer to that question could very well be yes.

The Acceptance of a Corrupted Morality is the Real Problem We Face

America has reached a place of complete desperation where the hopes of the future have been placed in the aspirations of two people-Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. The wife of Monica Lewinski’s ex-boyfriend is by far one of the most corrupted and vile individuals ever to seek high office and Donald Trump; well Trump is a real estate billionaire and reality T.V. star who started the race claiming to be an outsider-but ultimately ended up showing his support for the corrupt Republican establishment with his endorsements of Paul Ryan, Kelly Ayotte and John McCain. These are career politicians by the way, that support gun control.

Too many Americans feel that their minimal participation in the political process is all that is required and that voting in the right candidate is all that is needed to set the country on the right course. This is a process that repeats over and over again; one political party holds the reigns for four to eight years and then the other party promises to fix all of the problems created during that period. The people, for the most part, tend to just follow along, not really taking any active part in the process until just months before the election.  Of course, this is something that the political elite anticipate and capitalize on, an ignorant, uninformed population.

“Just because you don’t take an interest in politics doesn’t mean politics won’t take an interest in you.” (Perciles)

It is the personal belief of this author that there is a deliberate creation of hopelessness amongst the population in order to sway opinions and attitudes in the favor of the elite. People are either paying no attention at all, blissful of the potential danger their apathy creates, or their minds are preoccupied with problems that others tell them they should be concerned about.  Others are aware that the system is a complete sham and that we are being manipulated to the ends of a power hungry oligarchy that seeks to completely dominate all aspects of human being.  We are the conspiracy theorists and our opinions are usually completely disregarded.

Whatever the case may be one thing holds true; most Americans, because we are so busy with our day to day lives trying to survive, have completely forgot that the government of the United States belongs to and answers to us. We have forgotten that the maintenance of liberty requires personal responsibility and that holding political representatives accountable is our duty, and if we wish to pass onto our children a better, more secure nation, we must guard liberty with a jealous fervor.

Any athlete or fighter knows that an opponent’s biggest strength can often be exploited as their biggest weakness. Our liberty has been turned against us in that manner because the definition of liberty itself has been twisted into something that was never intended.  America was founded on the idea that individualism is superior to collectivism in the sense that an individual working to advance his own interests will inadvertently advance the interests and well being of the nation. This, for the most part has held true. Collectivized nations, where individuals are forced to work for the state, have always failed because an individual will not be motivated to work hard when the majority of what he works for is dispersed to others who have done nothing to earn it. Liberty is based on the idea that man, when left to his own devises, will act in a responsible manner while pursuing his own interests. Because the vast majority of Americans have adhered to living according to Christian principles for most of our history these concepts have created the greatest and most prosperous nation the world has known.

Liberty itself has been turned into a weapon.  It was once understood that living in a free society meant living responsibly. We have always had the freedom to do whatever we wished, but because we were based on a Christian morality we knew the difference between right and wrong. In order to gain power the political elite corrupted the idea of what is considered moral to the point that no one even knows anymore what is right. For instance, in a book called the Happiness Hypothesis, (which was something this author had to read in college,) Jonathon Haidt argues that concepts of right and wrong are not universal but rather social constructs that we invent  to justify our feelings of what we think should be right or wrong. He actually uses incest as an example by arguing that there is no universal truth which suggests that incest is wrong, we only think it should be wrong. This is moral relativism and it has replaced our traditional Christian based morality.

The fact that our nation’s morality has been corrupted isn’t really the problem. It is only corrupted because the majority of America has not paid enough attention, or didn’t stand against the corruption. All too often environmental manipulation techniques, the division of classes, the labeling of different social groups- calling people racist because they have the audacity to oppose the absurd, for example, has created a nation that is afraid to speak out. A fear of losing the lives we have built for ourselves dictates what we say and who we associate with. If we are working in a job that pays our bills we are not likely to stand against any corruption that may be taking place if there is fear of reprisal or social isolation. Can you imagine the power we would have if we put the principles we say we believe in ahead of our fears to speak out for them? Therein lies the point; our biggest strength has been turned against us. Individualism has been turned into a weapon and has been used to isolate every one of us into social classes that all have differing ideas of what freedom means to them. Look at the left for example; they know what they are doing when it comes to unifying people behind a goal; the only problem is they are willing to lie, cheat and absolutely corrupt themselves in order to achieve a society based on ideas that have already proven to be disastrous. What are people who say they love America and the principles she was founded on willing to do in order to change course? The first thing we have to do is realize that each and every one of us can do more than what we are doing now. People, our children are facing an America with no future and we continue to chug along with daily life believing that our vote will fix it.

Cast aside this political madness and become the change you want to see

For most Americans the choice for the 2016 presidential election is becoming crystal clear. We either vote for Donald Trump or allow a woman who is perhaps the most corrupt and wicked individual to ever run for office become the next president.  The recent email leaks have painted an increasingly dark picture of the Democrat Party as the facts that they mock their minority voters and deliberately pay actors to play roles in their schemes have been exposed. It has also been revealed that the Clinton campaign colluded with Democrat National Committee and the media in an effort to sabotage Bernie Sanders’ efforts to become the nominee. Bernie Sanders voters have been blocked from entering the convention and Sanders signs have been confiscated.  In essence, the Democrat Party has been exposed for being the corrupt, authoritarian machine that it is. Even the main stream media can no longer hide that, so it seems.

This leaves us with Donald Trump, the man who said the Constitution isn’t always relevant. He also happened to donate more money to the Clinton foundation than he has to veterans, which sadly to say, donating to veterans is something he often brags about.  This author has ventured out in the far reaches of conspiracy theory and argued that Donald Trump is a shill who was deliberately selected by the Washington establishment to be a distraction, at the very least, while attempting to destroy conservatism.  This is exactly what has happened; the Republican Party is divided like never before with people claiming that a refusal to vote for Trump is a vote for Hillary. This may be true to some degree; in fact, it would be just as true if the situation was reversed. Democrats who refuse to vote for Clinton would inadvertently be voting Trump, wouldn’t they? Either way, what difference does it make? Donald trump isn’t any different than Hillary Clinton as far as major policy issues are concerned, especially when it comes to foreign policy and the war against Isis. For example; The National Review ran an article citing Trump’s 60 Minutes interview concerning his plans to fight Isis and it turns out his plan is Identical to Clinton’s and Obama’s. Sadly, Donald trump sounds like a bumbling idiot when describing his plan, which again, is no different than what Obama is doing now. The following is Trump’s 60 Minutes interview.

Donald Trump: I am going to have very few troops on the ground. We’re going to have unbelievable intelligence, which we need; which, right now, we don’t have. We don’t have the people over there. We are going to use–

Lesley Stahl: You want to send Americans–

Donald Trump: Excuse me– and we’re going to have surrounding states and, very importantly, get NATO involved because we support NATO far more than we should, frankly, because you have a lot of countries that aren’t doing what they’re supposed to be doing. And we have to wipe out ISIS. And speaking of Turkey, Turkey is an ally. Turkey can do it by themselves. But they have to be incentivized. For whatever reason, they’re not. So we have no choice.

Lesley Stahl: But I still don’t know if you’re going to send troops over–

Donald Trump: Very little. I’m gonna–

Lesley Stahl: But declare war–

Donald Trump: –get neighboring states and I’m going to get– we are going to get NATO; we’re going to wipe ‘em out. We’re gonna...

The point of this article isn’t to compare Trump and Clinton, they are virtually the same. The methods in which the main stream media manipulate you to believe what you are seeing is the real point. Do you really think that the masters behind the Democrat Party are so stupid as to let such damaging information make front page news when they control all of the media? If the Democrat Party and the main stream media are so tight and working in conjunction with one another then why was all of this information  thrust into public view? It is all part of the Communist takeover of America, or better put, the creation of the one world government.

This exposure of corruption brings shame to the American political system and forces Americans to re-think their system of government, it makes them demand change. This is the goal- discredit the culture; discredit America to the point that the average American no longer believes in the system.  The following is from the 45 Goals of the Communist takeover of America, which were entered into the congressional record in 1963.

Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms." –

Our political system may not be a form of artistic expression but it certainly is the means in which we express our First Amendment. The criminality exposed in the political system suggests that people are not capable of living in a free society without being corrupted. This could be taken a step further by examining some of the programming seen on television. Everything is about violence and sex; everything we view on the media either revolves around a shameful political system which divides the people, sex and violence, and it is all done with the explicit intent of making freedom look damaging. It is being done to discredit our culture by deliberately corrupting our psyche.  In fact, as this author has suggested in previous articles, which can be viewed here and here, the television itself was created for this very purpose.

The overall goal of the entire system at this point, is to create so much chaos, and to corrupt the idea of truth to the point that the average American has no idea which leg to stand on when it comes to defending their values, families and nation. The manipulators behind the scenes, despite what they are showing you in the media, are in complete control as they guide your thoughts and actions to their own end. The majority of Trump supporters, no matter what evidence is presented to them, will refuse to believe it because they have been brought to a point of complete desperation where they believe he is the only one that can save the country. This too was done on purpose in order to force you to continue playing their game. This is the continuing cycle that repeats itself every four to eight years and things never get better, they only get worse. One of these times you would think a national savior would actually fix the country. As of right now, both the Republican and Democrat Parties are a source of pure and complete disdain among the American people and sadly, the morale of Americans has been decimated to the point where all they can do is rally around the next so called leader who promises the type of change they want to see. What they should really be doing is looking in the mirror and asking themselves why they allow this to continue. Voting for one man who has political aspirations will not fix this; only throwing aside a corrupted system and becoming the change you want to see will.

Source: http://www.nationalreview.com

Communists Seek to Discredit America Through Lies and Chaos

Our country is in real trouble. We are being governed by a deceptive body of global government oligarchs who wish to impose their will upon the American people by breaking down our morality and presenting our way of life as the sole cause of problems in the world. Ever since President Obama was inaugurated we have been subject to one attempt after another to a campaign designed explicitly to make us believe we are a racist, selfish nation and that freedom and capitalism are responsible for poverty, inequality and the oppression of minorities. The United States is also presented as a greedy, war mongering nation whose exploitation of third world resources is responsible for global warming. In essence, those pushing for global government are using the age old technique of the Hegelian Dialectic to present capitalism as evil and communism as the world’s savior.  This plan is known as The Communist Peace Offensive and was presented to the U.S. congress by John Dulles, Republican advisor to the State Department in 1950. This was at the height of the global nuclear threat where much of this plan was then used in order to get the U.S. to surrender its nuclear arms. In other words, it was thought that the U.S. could be conned into believing that disarming herself would be a sign of moral strength. Everything that the global government advocates push is a deception of one form or another and their attempts to present our nation as the “problem” must be resisted at all levels because once the morale of the American people has been completely crushed, a total communist takeover becomes inevitable.

In the book “Toward Soviet America,” the case is made against capitalism by suggesting that mass starvation and the exploitation of the masses exists in all capitalist countries and that the United States had deliberately lied about the social progress made after Russia’s communist revolution. The communists wanted the world to believe that the Soviet Union was a workers’ paradise and that there was flourishing economic growth. The truth however, was the exact opposite. Millions died as the result of Vladimir Lenin’s efforts to collectivize the nation’s agriculture and his ruthless execution of political enemies. (Cawthorne, N. Tyrants: History’s 100 Most Evil Despots and Dictators. Metro Books, New York.) Communists believe that men must be controlled and that all human activity must exist purely for the benefit of the state. It was believed that collectivization would bring the efforts of the masses together for the greater good of Russia. Farms were seized and placed under state control, unrealistic quotas were demanded from the peasants, and those that resisted were executed.  This has been the repeating theme of communism throughout the twentieth century.  Nearly one hundred million people have been murdered in opposition to the idea that their labors should benefit the state and not themselves.

Many people in America have fallen for the lie that capitalism is an oppressive system. It’s astonishing really; everything they benefit from in this society derives from the concepts of the private ownership of property and industry. The negative attitudes towards capitalism and the emerging acceptance of socialism/communism is the result of a psychological warfare campaign designed to explicitly discredit the United States.  In the report The Communist Peace Offensive, John Dulles addresses the threat of psychological warfare and the inability of the American people to understand its effectiveness. The following is from this report.

Just as France developed illusions about the impregnability of the

Maginot line prior to World War II, only to succumb later to Hitler's

iron legions, so some Americans conceive of our security as based only

upon a spectacular weapon like the atom bomb or the H-bomb. They

fail to realize the destructive and disintegrating effects of psychological

warfare, which may be less spectacular but equally effective.

The Communist leaders are fully aware that propagandists, within

or without the United States, have easy access to the American public.

There is one radio for every two persons in the United States, and the

United States maintains radio freedom both as to broadcasting and

the listener's choice of program. The American press is also free.

Thus, an American may read or listen to whatever he pleases.

This paragraph speaks directly to the efforts made to use every available means to target the minds of the American people and wage a campaign designed to influence their beliefs about themselves and their country. Today, the mainstream media is nothing more than a constant stream of propaganda which spins every terrible tragedy in a way which suggests our culture needs to change and that our way of life is responsible for the carnage presented to us on a daily basis. The hope is that we willingly surrender our liberty and see their offered state of communism as the solution.

Many people view the talk of communist infiltration as mere conspiracy, which speaks to the effectiveness of psychological manipulation. People tend to believe what they are continually told, and lies that are told often enough are eventually accepted as truth.  Not only is our national media aiding in these efforts, the education system is as well. Over the past few years lessons on institutional racism and “white privilege” have infected the minds of American college students to the point we have a new wave of race riots erupting across the country in an effort to deliberately create chaos. We have a generation of people willing to surrender their liberties for security because they have been made to believe there is a constant threat to their safety, and most unbelievable is the fact that millions of people accept the premise that we are contributing to the destruction of the planet because we exhale carbon dioxide. This is all the result of ideological subversion within our own education system.

The communists know through their experiments in Pavlovian conditioning that most people, once brought up in a certain ideology, cannot be broken from it. We all have those experiences where we present cold hard factual data to someone and because they are ideologically set on their belief system they will choose to ignore these facts and continue their lives in ignorance. Most of what is presented concerning a communist attempt to undermine America can be taken from their own words. For instance, Joseph Stalin said that the best way to destroy America is to undermine her spirituality, morality and patriotism. Well, this has been the overall theme of this article; this is exactly what is taking place in America. America is being presented as a racist, warmongering, imperial, oppressive power in order to appeal to the senses of the masses and make them beg for another system of government. While the communists claim that capitalism is a system that seeks control and exploits the poor, the truth is really quite evident when you examine the words of Laventry Beria in “Brainwashing: A Synthesis of the Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics.”

In chapter one, simply entitled An Address by Beria, Laventry lays the groundwork for how to brainwash the American people into accepting communism. He explicitly states that capitalists seek control and then explains how to subvert our culture through the use of psychological warfare. For instance, in the following passage he explicitly mentions the use of drugs in an attempt to create a state of insanity in the nation.

Psychopolitics is a solemn charge. With it you can erase our enemies as insects. You can cripple the efficiency of leaders by striking insanity into their families through the use of drugs. You can wipe them away with testimony as to their insanity. By our technologies you can even bring about insanity itself when they seem too resistive.

He then goes onto say that you can change the loyalties of those that oppose you through brainwashing or “destroy their minds.”

You can change their loyalties by Psychopolitics. Given a short time with a Psychopolitician you can alter forever the loyalty of a soldier in our hands or a statesman or a leader in his own country, or you can destroy his mind.

Finally, he goes on to describe how our own system of governance can be used against us through the constant campaign of terror in society.

Use the courts, use the judges, use the Constitution of the country, use its medical societies and its laws to further our ends. Do not stint in your labor in this direction. And when you have succeeded you will discover that you can now effect your own legislation at will and you can, by careful organization of healing societies, by constant campaign about the terrors of society, by pretense as to your effectiveness make your Capitalist himself, by his own appropriations, finance a large portion of the quiet Communist conquest of the nation.

In essence the communists seek to convince you that your country is one founded on the precepts of conquest and exploitation by lying and creating chaos, and then they claim that this will bring peace.  Of course, the definition of peace according to a communist is the absence of opposition to socialism. I think it’s time to ask who it is that’s really seeking control.

United Nations Participation and the Loss of American Sovereignty

There have been rumors going around concerning the arrival of U.N. troops at U.S. military bases.  Conspiracy theories abound which suggests peacekeeping troops will be used to confiscate weapons from American citizens in the final stage to merge the U.S. into a globalist world order headed by the United Nations. People who espouse these views are immediately discredited as “tinfoil hat” wearers and conspiracy kooks by people that believe something like that could never happen here. The evidence however is overwhelming when considering how deeply entangled the U.S. has become in United Nations affairs. For instance, Loretta Lynch and Barack Obama have initiated a program called the Strong Cities Network, which is the product of a U.N. think tank called the Institute for Strategic Dialogue. The purpose of the Strong Cities Network is to combat home grown extremism while giving the U.N. law enforcement capabilities over our cities. While many would think this makes sense in the age of terror, this author has described many times who this administration, and the U.N. indecently, considers being the extremists.  Another example is the numerous treaties proposed by the U.N. which would surrender U.S. sovereignty to a world governing body; an example is the Arms Trade Treaty.

Is the United States losing its sovereignty to a world governing body? Sadly, the answer to that question is yes and it is a process that started many years ago with something called The United Nations Participation Act which was signed into law on December 20, 1945.

This law committed the United States to full participation in the U.N. while authorizing the president to appoint representatives and commit the United States military to conflicts based on U.N. objectives. To be more specific, congress would retain the power to determine the size and terms of military deployments but the power to determine what would constitute the type of crisis warranting their use would be solely up to the United Nations Security Council. That is a huge loss of American sovereignty in and of itself because the power to wage war, according to the U.S. Constitution, rests with the United States Congress alone. It was because of the provisions of this law that President Truman was able to commit troops to the Korean War without the consent of congress and instead, the vote of the U.N. Security Council on the pretext of an international emergency.  The same could be said for many of the wars and police actions that would soon follow.

Another area of concern is the United Nations insistence that the United States fully comply with what has become known as Agenda 21, or the sustainable development agenda.  This is the agenda based on the idea that United States, and capitalism in general, is responsible for global warming and in order to save the planet our sovereignty must be surrendered and our wealth redistributed to third world countries. According to climate justice activists the United States owes the world a climate debt because of our excessive use of fossil fuels. The U.S. commitment to the so called “climate change” problem is the result of another law passed by congress committing us to United Nations objectives. This law was called the United Nations Environmental Program Participation Act of 1973. This act, Public Law 93-188 made it U.S. policy to contribute funds to the United Nations in a “coordinated international” effort to protect and improve the environment.  The Obama administration is working feverishly to implement the climate change agenda by reducing our reliance on fossil fuels on the pretense that they are destroying the environment. The U.N. climate chief, Christine Figueres, has publicly stated that all efforts should be made to reduce the human population in order to save the planet from climate change and that a global communist regime would be the best form of government to do so.  According to Public Law 93-188, our government is providing the funds necessary to this effort.

Finally, an act passed by our congress concerning the United Nations that should have all Americans concerned because it deals with the very heart of the liberties we hold dear is the Arms Control and Disarmament Act of 1961, or Public Law 87-297.  This law calls for the complete disarming of the U.S. military as a sovereign force and the merging of our troops into a global, U.N. peacekeeping force.  The basic premise of this law is to give all policing and military powers to an international force governed by the United Nations.

The over-all goal of the United States is a free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world which has achieved general and complete disarmament under effective international control; and a world in which adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.

In order to make possible the achievement of that goal, the program sets forth the following specific objectives toward which nations should direct their efforts:

The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force;

The elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining internal order;

The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United Nations;

The establishment and effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization within the framework of the United Nations to insure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations.

Our armed forces have been reduced considerably over the past several decades and under President Obama, this process has accelerated. The U.N. Arms Trade Treaty seeks to strengthen this law by giving the U.N. jurisdiction over all arms, including those in the hands of U.S. civilians. Many believe that this treaty wouldn’t affect the rights of U.S. gun owners; however, with a U.S. military diminished in size and scope and an international army being funded by our own government through established law, not to mention the haphazard manner in which our lawmakers ignore our constitution, there is little to prevent the disarming of U.S. citizens at the hands of the United Nations. There are provisions of the Arms Trade Treaty that suggest lawful legitimate use of firearms would be protected; however, self defense and the right to over throw tyrannical governments are not considered human rights by U.N. bureaucrats.

In 2015 Congressman Mike Rogers introduced legislation to get the U.S. out of the United Nations. The bill, titled the American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2015 has once again been introduced to congress after the recent Brexit vote. The question of whether or not a move like this is even possible, considering the laws that have been passed committing us to U.N. objectives is indeed a tough one to answer. Our congress is currently made of people sold out to global government issues and they have recently demonstrated a willingness to surrender the liberties of their constituents by allowing votes on gun control and staging a sit-in demanding security in exchange for liberty.  Are they just playing a role to further the goals set by U.N. bureaucrats and global government advocates decades ago? The answer to that question is probably yes. If the U.S. is to retain its sovereignty it is imperative that we exit the U.N. and repeal all laws that give them any power over U.S. law immediately.  Or else we may just find U.N. troops policing our streets one day.