In 2009 Eric Holder went on record and testified
before a Senate judiciary Committee. The testimony was shocking to say the
least and could have very well changed the way that laws are enforced in our
country. Eric Holder, on that 25th of June proclaimed that the new
hate crime legislation would not protect “white people” or “Christian
ministers.” Generally speaking a hate
crime is defined as a targeted attack against an individual or groups based on
characteristics such as race, religion, ethnicity and now even sexual
orientation. Eric Holder, while being grilled by the committee maintained his
position by stating that the new legislation was written to protect those that
have historically been oppressed and targeted because of skin color or
religious affiliation, giving African Americans and Jews as examples. When
asked some simple question pertaining to how the laws would be enforced Mr.
Holder stumbled over himself a bit as he struggled to justify his reasoning.
One question posed to him involved a preacher being violently attacked by a
homosexual militant because of the preacher’s sermon on homosexuality. While a
crime such as this would certainly be motivated by hatred and focuses on
religious beliefs as a motive, Holder refused to call that a “hate crime.” The
reason for that is simple if you understand “white privilege” and “social
justice” education. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOABBn5Tnm0
Just as a reminder, “white privilege” education
means your children are currently or will be taught that white men are the
beneficiaries of a system that is biased towards and only benefits them. As a
result, white men, knowingly or not, are automatically contributing to the
oppression of the minorities in the United States. This mentality is also the
premise of multiculturalism. Social justice is just another nice sounding term
that essentially means taking from those that earned and giving to those who
haven’t. When you look at the heart of what this doctrine is actually saying is
that only white people can be racist because we have the power of the
institutions behind us to reinforce our discriminatory behavior, while
minorities do not. Therefore minorities cannot be racist; they can not commit
crimes based on racism. Wouldn't protecting minorities with hate crime
legislation that doesn't apply to whites be an example of having an
“institutional power” behind you?
Throughout the course of the past couple years we
have been witness to a shocking rise in racial violence. Through flash mob‘s or
the so called knockout game, blacks have been systematically targeting helpless
white victims. Through “white privilege education” and “critical race theory”
the left would have you believe that these incidents result from years of systematic,
institutional oppression in which the victims can no longer control themselves.
They would argue that the violent actions of a few teenagers towards a helpless
old man are justified due to the “historical oppression” their people have had
to face. This is a premise of critical race theory. This is why these people
are not prosecuted under hate crimes legislation even though the first white man
recently busted playing the knock out game will be. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/dec/26/federal-authorities-charge-white-knockout-suspect-/
You have to wonder if this theory does more to
de-humanize the black population than it does offer an excuse for their
behavior. The theory itself definitely excuses the behavior but at what cost?
By justifying these crimes based on a dead history that we as Americans have
done everything we can to rectify,(affirmative action, welfare programs, hate
crime legislation) is the left actually telling society that blacks are less
than human who are unable to live up to the consequences of their actions, or
deal with their anger in a different way? Being human means learning from our
mistakes and dealing with our emotional issues; and by doing so we can expect
to grow and become stronger people. Are the proponents of white privilege and
critical race theory denying this opportunity to black Americans by making them
believe they are still being victimized? You only have to look at the disastrous
results of other left wing equality programs like affirmative action or the
Great Society welfare programs to see what happens when liberals interfere.
Today the vast majority of black families are fatherless and impoverished as a
result of failed liberal promises. In an attempt to hide this failure the left
ridicules all successful black Americans as being Uncle Tom’s or sellouts,
while continuing to discredit white America for having a society based on institutional
racism.
Let me demonstrate this using another example. The
left initially claimed that the Benghazi attacks of Sept. 11 2012 were the
result of an offensive video and because the video was offensive to the Muslim
culture we were supposed to accept their response to it. Really, what the left wants
us to accept is that the Muslim culture is so immature and so sensitive that
the only way they can respond to something offensive is through senseless
violence? We are supposed to view them with compassion and understanding while
the left justifies their actions because they were offended? Again, this
attempt at reverse psychology, in my opinion, does more to harm the Muslim
population by excusing their murderous attitudes than it does to make us feel
sorry for them. This is the backwards world of liberalism we live in today.
The institutional racism that is built in our
society is the responsibility of the left. Throughout history it has been the
democrats who have supported segregation and slavery while continuously voting
against civil rights legislation. Today, they attempt to hide their history
through racial identity politics, and the creation of a system where inequality
is the new equality. By creating laws based on racial preferences the left is
telling minorities that they believe they are not as capable as white men and
therefore need their programs in order to stand a chance in the racist United
States of America. This does little but reinforce hatred while attempting to justify
black on white violence. This also solidifies an existing entitlement mentality
where there is no need to work as everything will be provided by the
government. This backwards thinking is destroying generations of families and
the left calls it compassion. It is also setting a dangerous precedent where the definition of racism is radically changed. Through the lens of liberalism racism now means believing that blacks in America can achieve something without their help. The insistence that black American's need these programs is evidence enough of the racist attitudes of the left, only by believing that blacks are not equal would they have the audacity to create such a system of racial preferences.
No comments:
Post a Comment