Earlier this week at the University of Boston, Robin DiAngelo, a professor with the University of Washington, gave a presentation in which she blamed white people
for being “dangerous” if they fail to see people for their skin color. She
claims that white people who deny the “reality of being black” while claiming
to believe all men are equal are exhibiting white supremacism. What is the
reality of black people that she is speaking of? Is she suggesting that they
are incapable of achieving anything on their own, without the help of the white
liberal welfare state? Is she suggesting they simply accept their place in
society as an oppressed underclass and not even try? That is what is implied.
Wouldn’t DiAngelo be the white supremacist for thinking this way?
The University of Washington recently made headlines when it
was revealed their writing program is teaching students that the English
language is racist. They claim there is no conclusive standard for the English
language; therefore, holding people to any standard would be unfair because not
everyone can be expected to keep up with its constant changes. The following is
the full description of the University of Washington’s writing program.
The writing center works from several important
beliefs that are crucial to helping writers write and succeed in a
racist society. The racist conditions of our society are not simply a matter of
bias or prejudice that some people hold. In fact, most racism, for instance, is
not accomplished through intent. Racism is the normal condition of things.
Racism is pervasive. It is in the systems, structures, rules, languages,
expectations, and guidelines that make up our classes, school, and society. For
example, linguistic and writing research has shown clearly for many decades
that there is no inherent “standard” of English. Language is constantly
changing. These two facts make it very difficult to justify placing people in
hierarchies or restricting opportunities and privileges because of the way
people communicate in particular versions of English.
Because we all live, work, learn, and communicate within
such racist systems, the consultants in the writing center assume that a big
part of our job is to help students become more critical of these unjust
language structures as they affect students’ writing and the judgment of that
writing. In particular, being aware of racism as structural offers students the
best chances to develop as writers and succeed on their own terms in an
inherently racist society.
Furthermore, by acknowledging and critiquing the systemic
racism that forms parts of UWT and the languages and literacies expected in it,
students and writing center consultants can cultivate a more socially just
future for everyone. Just avoiding racism is not enough because it means we are
doing nothing to stop racism at large, and it amounts to allowing racism to
continue.
Is it any wonder our society is
falling apart? Our universities are teaching that everything about our society,
including the language we speak, is racist. The message of white privilege has
become so perverted and twisted that Martin Luther King Jr.’s vision of a
color-blind society, where people were judged by the content of their
character, has been turned upside down. The word racism now implies believing
that black people are equal with whites.
In a journal article entitled The English Only Movement in the U.S. and the World in
the Twenty First Century it is argued by University of Arizona
professor Teresa Pac that the English language has historically been used to
oppress minorities and prevent them from gaining access to American culture.
She also argues that white elitists enforced English as a national language
because they feared minority languages would become dominant. This is a
ridiculous assertion as English has never been the national language and the
United States opens her doors to more immigrants from the third world than any
other nation. This is an academic journal your children are reading in college.
The roots of racism can be traced back to the fields of
psychology and psychiatry. These fields are heavily influenced by
Darwinian/atheistic thinking, meaning that the study of human behavior is
generally conducted from a scientific as opposed to a spiritual or religious
perspective. Evolutionary theory then, is being applied to the development of
mankind. Francis Galton, according to the Citizens
Commission on Human Rights, was an English psychologist who was
related to Charles Darwin and shared many of his views concerning his theory of
evolution. Galton, because he believed in evolutionary science, was convinced
that Africans were inferior. Stating in his book “Tropical South Africa”
that they had no independent will of their own, Galton believed that Africans
needed leadership and preferred a life of servitude. This belief is what was
later used to justify slavery. In fact, Africans who resisted slavery were
considered mentally ill, as it was generally believed that blacks were
incapable of self-care and freedom. This disease was referred to as
Drapetomania and it is the root belief in what is driving the discussion of
racism today. The left’s fundamental argument, as expressed by Professor
DiAngelo, is that white people who view blacks as equal, and deny their
“reality” as oppressed victims are racists. They are essentially arguing that
black people are not as good as white people and need the government to make
sure they have an equal chance at success. Isn’t that the very nature of white
supremacism? Suggesting that whites are superior and are the only ones capable
of helping blacks overcome oppression?
No comments:
Post a Comment