Sunday, November 10, 2019

Political Theater: Trump vs. The Left and the unnoticed approach of the police state


Joseph Goebbels once said that a lie repeated often enough would be accepted as truth. Perhaps then, if the truth is continuously repeated, it too will be accepted for what it is. Sometimes, the truth does not sit well in the minds of men. It forces us to face discomfort and accept realities that we otherwise might ignore to satisfy our own sense of reality. Living the lie allows us to disregard our personal responsibilities to the world around us while providing us with a false sense of security that tends to diminish when faced with the realization that we have been deceived. Nothing could demonstrate this idea better than the political circus that is our government.

Since the election of Donald Trump America has been treated to a non-stop, relentless propaganda campaign designed to discredit and unseat the man as a duly elected president. Many of his diehard supporters have come to believe that he is singlehandedly waging a battle for freedom against an entrenched “deep state.” The more the left rallies against him the more his supporters love him. In fact, sixty-two percent of his voters have said that it wouldn’t matter what he did, they would still support him. This is disturbing as it shows an unwillingness to face the truth.

While the attention of the country has been focused on the impeachment drama, a Trump vs. the Democrats soap opera, the nation is in fact, taking a draconian turn to the left and no one notices. It isn’t that they don’t notice ̶ rather, it is a refusal to come to grips with the idea that things may not be what they seem. While one side portrays the president as someone who absolutely must be removed from office because he colluded with the Russians, or engaged in “quid pro quo” with Ukraine, the other side shows him as a man who can do no wrong. A brilliant tactician who is engaging in a game of four-dimensional chess who at any moment will take down the deep state and restore America to greatness. Sometimes, when things seem too good to be true, they are.

Carrol Quigley, a former professor from Georgetown University and author of the book “Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in our Time” is quoted as saying the American political system should give the impression that there are two parties working against one another when in truth, they are pursuing the exact same policies. It should also be noted that Quigley was one of Bill Clinton’s professors.

The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies... is a foolish idea. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can throw the rascals out at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies. (Quigley, 1966)

Attorney General Barr recently released a memorandum, to little fanfare no less, to U.S. attorneys across the country detailing his plan to create a pre-crime detection system in the Justice Department. According to Joe Wolverton II of The New American Magazine, this system will enable social media companies to share their collected data on individuals who are displaying a potential for violence with federal agencies in an effort to stop mass shootings before they occur. The key words being used here are “disrupt those who are mobilizing for violence.” In other words, Facebook, Google, Twitter and other social media platforms will be sending what you say to the federal government if they think you are acting in a threatening way. This is kind of like passing a national red-flag law without having to pass it. Donald Trump can safely back away from his support for red-flag laws and still get what he wants as a matter of policy.  The fact that this initiative wasn’t publicly announced should show American’s that the impeachment sideshow is just that, a distraction from the fact that two political parties are working together to suppress our liberties and subvert the constitution.

This slow and steady advancement of the police state is a perfect example illustrating Quigley’s quote. First, it was the Patriot Act under Bush. We had to surrender some of our liberties to keep us safe in the wake of the September 11 terror attacks. Then, under Obama, it was the National Defense Authorization Act of 2011, where the war on terror was gradually being moved to the American home front. Slowly and ever so incrementally, the image of Islamic terrorism is being replaced, and everyday patriotic Americans are being viewed as potential threats.

The theatrical production being presented to America is vote Trump or get socialism. The truth is that we are going to end up with the same no matter which way we vote. The trick is getting us to accept it. People will argue that Trump has done so many wonderful things and the economy is booming ̶ but the truth is that the government doesn’t control the economy, the federal reserve does. The economy is something that can be manipulated to go one way or the other, it has no consequential effects in the long game of transforming America. The Left and the Right can continue to have false debates on non-essential issues, keeping the American people trapped in their ideological boxes while steadily advancing an agenda most of us aren’t paying attention to. The only way we could possibly reverse course is to come to grips with the idea that things may not be what they seem and stop declaring that we would vote for a president no matter what he does. 


6 comments:

  1. More people should educate themselves to whom Quigley is. Thank you for posting this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Truth be told, we are way past the point of socialism, and have been for quite some time. The US is an odd hybrid of Fascism (or Corporatism as Mussolini accurately described it, and he would know) and Communism (Central Banking system is quite the literal definition of it). And if one reads the 45 Goals of Communism, most of those goals have long been achieved. All that's really left is mass confiscation of firearms (red flag laws appear to be a beta-test on a small scale to determine the public reaction), then the Purge will begin.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow! this is Amazing! Do you know your hidden name meaning ? Click here to find your hidden name meaning

    ReplyDelete
  4. Quigley's personal opinion and his personal support for the conspiracy formed by secret societies isn't the focus of his books. Quigley had unprecedented access to their internal records for two years. Quigley was a whistleblower who exposed the plans of the 'movers and shakers' of the world, among them Cecil Rhodes and Leo Amery Lord Milner, signer of the Balfour Declaration and their plan to conquer the world's government. This is of critical importance today in light of the following statement made at the 1992 UNCED meeting, and at this link:
    https://abeldanger.blogspot.com/2010/05/british-imperium-racism-exhale-co2-is.html

    "Excerpts from a document of the Secretariat for World Order which was distributed at the Des Moines UNCED [United Nations Conference on Environment and Development] meeting (1991):

    We are the living sponsors of the great Cecil Rhodes will of 1877, in which Rhodes devoted his fortune to "The extension of British rule throughout the world... the colonization by British subjects of the entire Continent of Africa, the Holy Land, the Valley of the Euphrates, the islands of Cyprus and Candia [Crete], the whole of South America, the islands of the Pacific not heretofore possessed by Great Britain, the whole of the Malay Archipelago, the seaboard of China and Japan, the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire....

    We stand with Lord Milner's credo. We too, are "British Race Patriots" and our patriotism is "the speech, the tradition, the principles, the aspirations of the British Race." Do you fear to take this stand, at the very last moment when this purpose can be realized? Do you not see that failure now, is to be pulled down by the billions of Lilliputians of lesser race who care little or nothing for the Anglo-Saxon system?"
    https://abeldanger.blogspot.com/2010/05/british-imperium-racism-exhale-co2-is.html
    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2007/11/charles-burris/the-legacy-of-carroll-quigley/

    Quigley wasn't a player; he was an observer. His book was published after Bill Clinton, a Skull and Bones and Committee of 300 player, was his student.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Usury is the cancer of the world, which only the surgeon’s knife of Fascism can cut out of the life of the nations." - Ezra Pound, "What is Money For?"

    During World War II, the great American ex-pat poet and "traitor," Ezra Pound, then based in Italy, issued a warning the British:

    “Your enemy is not Germany, your enemy is money on loan. Your infamy is bound up with Judaea. You can not touch a sore or a shame in your empire but you find a Mond, a Sassoon, or a Goldsmid. No Sassoon is an Englishman, racially. No Rothschild is English, no Strakosch is English, no Roosevelt is English, no Morgenthau, Cohen, Lehman, Warburg, Kuhn, Khan, Baruch, Schiff, Sieff or Solomon was ever yet born Anglo-Saxon. And it is for this filth that you fight. It is for this filth that you have murdered your empire."

    After the war, the American government kept Pound in a mental institution for 12 years.

    Poor Unjolly Old England. It wasn't all that long ago that this island seat of a vast global empire -- upon which "the sun never set" -- for all its heavy handedness and exploitation -- brought stability, civilization and progress to much of the Turd World. But today, the conquerer is now the conquered -- a pathetic captive province of the communistic European Union (3 & 1/2 bloody long years since the "Brexit" vote and still no escape!) mired in moral degeneracy, weighed down with crushing levels of debt; taxation and regulation: and, as a result, plagued with deepening poverty rates for many of its Aryan natives.

    Of course, the article describes the deepening despair of the featured English townspeople as the result of "austerity" budget cuts put in place by England's "Conservative" Party. But a close reading between the lines of this sad story about the sad lives of the mostly older rural residents of the northwest county of Cumbria offers us a hint of the related true "root causes" ™ of the decline of Cumbria and greater England as a whole, namely, an aging population (due to decades of low birth rates) and no jobs -- the standard rotten social and economic fruits of Marxism / libtardism.

    More and more, modern England, much like the rest of the dying West, is beginning to resemble the England of George Orwell's "Oceania" from his classic 1949 novel titled, "1984." Orwell's nightmarish vision of the future depicts a sick society in which the ruling elites acclimate the impoverished masses ("proles") to their wretched state by the deliberate promotion of immorality, alcoholism and unremitting propaganda. Orwell's spooky foresight was either one of great intuition -- or, perhaps, he knew the playbook in advance? At a time when the English were still famed for being "prim and proper" -- Orwell, in Part 1, Chapter 7, prophesied the following for how the "proles" of "Oceania" would be dumbed-down, demoralized and controlled.

    "Left to themselves, like cattle turned loose upon the plains of Argentina, they (the proles) had reverted to a style of life that appeared to be natural to them, a sort of ancestral pattern... They were born, they grew up in the gutters... petty quarrels with neighbours, films, football, beer, and above all, gambling, filled up the horizon of their minds.

    To keep them in control was not difficult. A few agents of the Thought Police moved always among them, ... marking down and eliminating the few individuals who were judged capable of becoming dangerous; but no attempt was made to indoctrinate them with the ideology of the Party. It was not desirable that the proles should have strong political feelings. All that was required of them was a primitive patriotism which could be appealed to whenever it was necessary.

    ReplyDelete
  6. And even when they became discontented, as they sometimes did, their discontent led nowhere, because being without general ideas, they could only focus it on petty specific grievances. The larger evils invariably escaped their notice. .... Even the civil police interfered with them very little. There was a vast amount of criminality in London, a whole world-within-a-world of thieves, bandits, prostitutes, drug-peddlers, and racketeers of every description; but since it all happened among the proles themselves, it was of no importance. In all questions of morals they were allowed to follow their ancestral code."

    Mr. Orwell nailed it, didn't he?

    No analysis of the sorry state of Not-So-Great Britain is complete without again revisiting one of the main historical themes of TomatoBubble.com -- World War II, aka "The Bad War." You see, by being on the "winning" side of an expensive and bloody conflict imposed upon innocent Germany by the Jewish bankers and their worldwide henchmen (Churchill being foremost among them) -- Britain, by design, soon found itself broke and internationalized under the oppressive leftist yoke of a regionalized tyranny which later became the European Union.

    Ironically, it was The Great One (that's Hitler for all you newbies & normies https://nationalvanguard.org/2019/05/sweden-local-activists-celebrate-adolf-hitlers-birth/#comment-27216 ) who stood firmly in opposition to this Globalist scheme. And that is why, in spite of his repeated and sincere offers of peace, friendship and even a protective alliance with the UK, the traitors of Britain -- that drunken, closet homo-pedo-sexual swine Churchill first and foremost among them -- in service to the true masters (cough cough), drove the British Empire into war, bankruptcy, dissolution and slavery.

    Let's allow the great protagonists, The Great One and The British Mad Dog, to confirm this historical reality in their own respective words:


    The Great One (1940):

    "Yes, the German people used to live in a democracy, and had been plundered and squeezed dry. No, what does democracy or authoritarian state mean for these international hyenas? They’re not interested in either! They are interested in only one thing: Is anyone willing to let themselves be plundered, yes or no? Is anyone stupid enough to keep quiet in the process, yes or no? And when a democracy is stupid enough to keep quiet, then it is good! And when an authoritarian government declares: “You do not plunder our people any longer, neither from the inside or outside!” then that is bad."

    The British Mad Dog (1949, same year as Orwell's book):

    "We must recreate the European family in a regional structure called it may be the United States of Europe. ... If at first, all the states of Europe are not willing or able to join the union, we must nevertheless proceed assemble and combine those who will and those who can. .... "This indispensable structure of regional groupings is coming into being. ... In this way alone, can the skeletal structure of world government be clothed with the flesh and blood of a living organism and the acts of state be confirmed by the passionate heartbeats of millions of men."


    Unfortunately, the "international hyenas," which The Great One warned about and fought against, ultimately prevailed in that horrible war -- and that, dear reader, is why the people of Cumbria County, England are suffering today. And it is also why "The Bad War" (by yours truly) and The British Mad Dog (also by yours truly) were both banned by Amazon after several years of strong sales.

    Source http://www.tomatobubble.com/who_murdered_england.html

    ReplyDelete