As
the situation in Virginia continues to escalate the possibility that they are
deliberately trying to lure patriots into committing acts of violence must be
considered. It is the Hegelian dialectic
at play ̶ create the problem by criminalizing legal gun owners, provoke the
reaction and offer the solution. The final solution that is, the merging of the
United States into a one world order headed by the United Nations. As crazy as
that sounds the groundwork for such a merger is well established as the United
States committed itself to United Nation objectives with the signing of the United
Nations Participation Act in 1945.
This law committed the
United States to full participation in the U.N. while authorizing the president
to appoint representatives and commit the United States military to conflicts
based on U.N. objectives. To be more specific, congress would retain the power
to determine the size and terms of military deployments but the power to determine what would constitute the type of crisis warranting
their use would be solely up to the United Nations Security Council. That is a
huge loss of American sovereignty in and of itself because the power to wage
war, according to the U.S. Constitution, rests with the United States Congress
alone. It was because of the provisions of this law that President Truman was
able to commit troops to the Korean War without the consent of congress and instead,
the vote of the U.N. Security Council on the pretext of an international
emergency. The same could be said for many of the wars and police
actions that would soon follow.
Dave Hodges, of the Common
Sense Show, and Mike Adams of NewsTarget.com
are claiming that they have uncovered evidence of a conspiracy to deploy U.N.
troops in Virginia to confiscate firearms which democrats intent to outlaw. No
solid evidence was provided by either Hodges or Adams. Hodges in fact, is
infamous for publishing alarming articles claiming his information came from “his
inside sources.” The idea that the U.N. would be used against Americans in gun
confiscation is not new and is something that in the past, was likely to have
one labeled as a conspiracy theorist. Sadly, all the pieces are in place for
such an event to occur and because most gun owners in America have discredited the
idea as a grand conspiracy, we will be caught playing catch up.
Many laws and policy
objectives have been put in place that have led us to where we are now. Despite
opposition from the public, the gun control agenda is gaining steam and more and
more states are introducing legislation to outlaw semi-automatic firearms. In
1961 the U.S. government passed public law 87-297, the Arms
Control and Disarmament Act. This is interesting because the law
specifically states that there shall be no laws authorizing the reduction of
our armed forces or the prohibiting of the civilian ownership of arms unless
pursuant to the treaty making powers of the President. The House, after staging
the fake impeachment spectacle, approved the finalization of the new trade deal
with Mexico and Canada, the USMCA. This trade agreement further surrenders our sovereignty to the U.N. despite it being hailed as
one of the great things Trump has done for the country. If this new treaty does
create a so called North American Union under the control of the United Nations,
then the situation in Virginia could easily be declared an “international
emergency” giving them the sole authority to deploy peace keeping troops. As
conspiratorial as it may sound this is laid out in law. There was also the U.N.
Arms treaty. President Trump was hailed as being pro-gun when he withdrew
from the treaty, which John Kerry signed as Secretary of State. In truth,
it doesn’t matter if Trump withdrew from it if the USMCA becomes the law of the
land.
The Arms treaty has several provisions which
allow for nations who have signed on to appeal to the United Nations for help
in disarmament affairs with nations that haven’t.
In
implementing this Treaty, each State Party may seek assistance including legal
or legislative assistance, institutional capacity-building, and technical,
material or financial assistance. Such assistance may include stockpile management, disarmament,
demobilization and reintegration programs, model legislation, and effective
practices for implementation. Each State Party in a position to do so shall
provide such assistance, upon request. Each State Party may request, offer or
receive assistance through, inter alia, the United Nations, international,
regional, sub regional or national organizations, non-governmental
organizations, or on a bilateral basis. A voluntary trust fund shall be
established by States Parties to assist requesting States Parties requiring
international assistance to implement this Treaty. Each State Party is
encouraged to contribute resources to the fund.
The treaty also states that the ownership
of firearms by civilians would be respected based on a nation’s laws. This is a
provision that led many people to the false belief that it would have no effect
upon U.S. citizens. As noted earlier, if the USMCA becomes the law of the land
and the U.S., Canada and Mexico are merged into one entity, our constitution
and bill of rights would be rendered virtually meaningless. Many states are now
in the process of outlawing firearms, as noted earlier. Furthermore, the text
in article 16 of the Arms Treaty could enable Mexico and Canada, who both have
signed the treaty, to appeal to the U.N. for help in forcing the disarming of
American citizens. American gun owners are being portrayed as radical
extremists and our guns, as the cause of Mexico’s violence. Also, consider that
every state with high rates of gun violence and strict gun laws, blames the
neighboring states that do not. This is all deliberate propaganda to create the
justification for U.N. involvement. Don’t forget that the Obama Administration signed
many localities on to the U.N. Strong
Cities Network, which puts international organizations in control of local
law enforcement agencies. Is there a connection between this and what is
happening in Virginia? That is unclear. Virginia has no cities listed as being members.
New York, Georgia, Tennessee, Pennsylvania and Colorado however, are listed as
being members in the Strong Cities Network.
While Hodges and Adams may not provide
the direct quotes or sources of their claims, the stage is indeed being set for
possible use of U.N. troops on our soil. This writer is making no claim that he
knows of any plans, he is only providing the documented evidence which suggests
the possibility. This is evidence that has been ignored for far too long on the
grounds that it is nothing more than a whacked-out conspiracy theory. Too many
people have lived under the misguided notion that it could never happen here.
Something is happening and the situation is going to escalate, and it could very
well be deemed an international emergency by the U.N., enabling them to deploy
their peace keeping troops.
So-called "peace keeping force." This is an attack on the very foundation of our Nation.
ReplyDeleteYup
DeleteUnder a biblical government of, by, and for God established upon His moral law, the US would not be in the UN and the UN would not be in the US. In fact, neither would exist.
ReplyDeleteThe United States involvement in the United Nations is but one of hundreds of thousands of consequences of the whirlwind today's America is reaping thanks to the wind sown by the constitutional framers when they replaced the Bible's unchanging moral law with their own man-made Enlightenment and Masonic traditions:
"[B]ecause they have ... trespassed against my law ... they have sown the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind...." (Hosea 8:1, 7)
Today's America is reaping the inevitable ever-intensifying whirlwind (including the UN and firearm restrictions) resulting from the wind sown by the constitutional framers and fanned by today's hoodwinked Christians and patriots who have been bamboozled into believing today's whirlwind can be dissipated by appealing to the wind responsible for spawning the whirlwind.
For more, see online Chapter 3 "The Preamble: We the People vs. Yahweh" of "Bible Law vs, the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/biblelaw-constitutionalism-pt3.html
Then, find out how much you really know about the Constitution as compared to the Bible. Take our 10-question Constitution Survey at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/ConstitutionSurvey.html and receive a complimentary copy of a book that examines the Constitution by the Bible.