DACA, H.R. 4760 and the Hegelian Dialectic

Watching the current events play out in Washington D.C. is like watching a circus on steroids. The false left/right paradigm in politics has both sides saturated with misinformation, accusations of corruption, anger and confusion. New revelations of deep state criminality are being released to the public at such a rapid pace it is impossible to keep up. The so called FISA memo promises to reveal malfeasance at the highest levels of government which would shock Americans to their very core, changing the way they view their nation.

Could this be the ultimate goal of the elite? Destroy America's faith in her system of government in order to pave the way for something new, something we may not fully understand? The evidence of this is overwhelming if you understand the Hegelian Dialectic.

The Hegelian Dialectic is a way of controlling and guiding our thoughts and actions into already existing, predetermined solutions. Another way of describing this would be to say that the extremes of both sides, the left and the right for example, are presented as conflict while the actual goal of the elite is presented as the compromise. The best, most recent example is the DACA debate. 

DACA itself is an unconstitutional executive order signed by former President Barack Obama. It gave temporary legal status to children of illegal immigrants who by no fault of their own, were brought across the border. The current battle between the left and right is just a circus sideshow designed to condition the public to accept the inevitable outcome. That outcome is the eventual legalization of the DACA people. In fact, President Donald Trump has stated that he is for giving them eventual legal status. 

This is how the Hegelian Dialectic works, while the corporate media and their government sidekicks portray the issue as a conflict with the President standing firm and the Democrats caving, a bill to give these people permanent legal citizenship is being advanced in congress. H.R. 4760, Securing America's Future Act of 2018 will give legal status to some one million or so immigrants while also enabling them to bring some family members across the border. According to supporters of the bill, legal status would be granted to the so called DACA recipients over a 10-12 year period, however this is roughly the time it takes to become a citizen already.

Proof of the effectiveness of the dialectical process is seen by observing the Trump supporters defend his complete reversal on the issue. 

By presenting the extremes of both sides, full and complete amnesty on the left and deportation on the right, the public is likely to be subdued into accepting H.R. 4760 as an acceptable solution to a problem that shouldn't exist in the first place. 

According to Chuck Baldwin, this bill will require all Americans to possess a national I.D. card. Without it, Americans would not be able to travel, open a bank account or even get a job. A national I.D. which possesses the biometric information of the individual has been a long term goal of the both the left and right for years. In a post on Facebook, Baldwin cites the concerns of Dr. Ron Paul about the bill.

"For years now, statists in BOTH parties have been fighting to RAM their radical National ID-database scheme into law.

"In fact, this scheme was a key portion of the infamous failed “Comprehensive Immigration Reform” bills BOTH parties tried to ram through during the Obama administration.

"Now, using the momentum behind Trump’s tough talk on immigration and border security, I’m afraid the statists believe the best way to finally enact their National ID scheme is by promoting their bill on Capitol Hill as a “DACA fix” while they sell it to the GOP base as a border “security” measure.

"Of course, that’s nothing more than a buzzword meant to trick Americans from all over the country into thinking that Congress is going to seal our southern border.

"But in reality, it means something far different.

"The “security” members of BOTH parties in the U.S. House want doesn’t target any U.S. border. Instead, it’s meant to create an all-out police state within them."

In typical fashion, the left and right are working together under the guise of a crisis in order to pass legislation that would otherwise be unacceptable to the American people. It wouldn't be the first time an Orwellian bill was passed under the guise of preserving American ideals while using an American sounding name. The Patriot Act, for example, was rammed through after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack under the false notions that it would secure our freedoms when in fact, it set the stage for much of the surveillance state that is in existence today.  

American's want to believe that they elected a President who is standing for their values and willing to take it to the left in big ways. The truth is that Trump has always been a Democrat and has always supported amnesty. In fact, he donated most of his political money to Democrats during the election which put Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi in power. This enabled the passage of Obamacare. For those that think that Trump may have changed his position consider the fact that even after 2010 he continued to donate heavily to democrats, even after the passage of Obamacare. Need I remind you that the repeal of Obamacare, a major campaign promise, has not yet occurred?  Also, consider that in his own book Trump stated the following concerning single payer health care.

"We must have universal healthcare. I'm a conservative on most issues but a liberal on this one. We should not hear so many stories of families ruined by healthcare expenses." (Donald Trump, The America We Deserve)

Could this be the real reason that Obamacare has not been repealed as promised?

While Trump, in the opinions of his biggest supporters, has accomplished many big things the truth is that when it comes to major policy initiatives of the big statists nothing is changing. The Hegelian Dialectic is being used to present Americans with contrived conflicts in order to guide our thoughts and actions into pre-determined solutions that in the long run, further the objectives of big government. Many will scoff at this however, the fact remains that Obamacare has not been repealed, there is no wall, there will be no wall and for all practical purposes, the media side show concerning the government shutdown seems to be a show as the president now supports a pathway to citizenship. Is that what you voted for?

The media will continue to be used as a means to keep Americans arguing over the issues they want you to argue about while legislators work together contriving bills that serve their interests, not yours. 

"There's another reason for working inside the system. Dostoevski said that taking a new step is what people fear most. Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and chance the future. This acceptance is the reformation essential to any revolution." (Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals)

Oh No! Not Another Government Shutdown

So here we are again, on the precipice of the ever feared "government shutdown" that happens whenever something unpopular among the American people needs government funding and they are about to go broke because they can't manage our money. In typical fashion, the Democrats are blaming the Republicans by claiming they don't care about seniors, disabled people and the poor because they are willing to let the government shutdown to prevent the so called DACA deal from becoming a reality. In the eyes of the American people, it is a refreshing change of events to watch a Republican administration actually stand up to the Democrats. We can only hope it is real and not some circus sideshow. This particular writer has a hard time believing anything that goes on in Washington D.C.

The Democrats, in their attempt to blame Republicans, need to take a step back and think this through a little harder. They do not understand that illegal immigration is a losing issue for them. They are driving on with the mistaken belief that after a whole year of pursuing an investigation against a duly elected president based on lies and the constant attempts to portray him as mentally unstable, bigoted and now, obese of all things, that they are going to win the house back in the midterm elections. Talk about being mentally unstable. If the Democrats should happen to win the house then Americans will deserve whatever damage they wreak upon us.

It is past due time that Americans turn the little games the Democrats play against them in the same way they use our values against us. They have been able to get away with labeling us as bigots and racists when it comes to illegal immigration by claiming we are not living up to the nations ideals of equality and liberty for all people. This is an Alinsky tactic and it has worked for them marvelously because the policy makers and politicians are deathly afraid of being portrayed as uncompassionate.

This tactic is right out of the book "Rules For Radicals" on page 128. "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules. You can kill the with this, for they can no longer obey their own rules than the Christian Church can live up to Christianity." By employing this tactic they are able to portray anyone not in favor of DACA as being against freedom and opportunity for all people. Never mind the fact that millions legal immigrants who came here the right way, work hard and respect our culture are also angered by the prospect of illegal immigrants receiving amnesty.

Amnesty in and of itself would not be such a bad prospect is there was a certain amount of assimilation required and they were self sustaining people expected to provide for their own. We all know this isn't the case. Our children are paying tens of thousands of dollars for college degrees in which many times, they are unable to find gainful employment suitable to pay it back and the Democrats, want to give illegals free college. The Democrats, against all logic and common sense, are ignoring the fact that Donald Trump won the election on the promise of reeling in illegal immigration and putting American's first by proudly proclaiming they are willing to shutdown the government and deny their own constituents the benefits they paid into with their tax dollars. The Democrats are proudly proclaiming that they are more interested in the rights of illegal immigrants who don't respect our culture than they are of those people who blindly put them in office every election cycle.

That's the point, isn't it? As Rush Limbaugh points out on many occasions the Democrat voting base is shrinking, particularly among their most counted on voters. Support for Donald Trump is up among black Americans. If the Democrats can't pander to them for votes then they need a new permanent underclass that will be dependent upon government welfare for decades to come.  In other words, all Democrats care about is winning elections and pushing their socialist agenda. They don't care where the votes come from and they despise you for opposing socialism, if they have to fight to make America a white minority country in order to accomplish this goal that is what they will do.

The truth of the whole matter is that Americans don't care about majorities and minorities. It shouldn't matter if we are a white majority nation or a black majority nation. What American's care about is our culture and way of life being preserved. Lets face it, no where in this country do you see people risking life and limb to escape so they can go to the third world for a better life. On the contrary, people from around the world do what ever they can to escape hell hole nations such as Cuba, Syria, Somalia and others where the dignity of the individual is not recognized and free will is suppressed. If these countries and their respective cultures are superior to our own or at least relative in a sense then why else do we need to have them come here. If America is such a racist, intolerant nation then what is it about our culture that gives these people an opportunity for a better life? The Democrats can't have it both ways. They can not continue to label us racist and then demand people be allowed to immigrate here freely for better opportunity while at the same time displaying fake moral outrage over words like sh*thole countries. It doesn't make any sense and it shows their true intentions.

Perhaps Democrats wouldn't have to worry about losing an electorate if they truly cared about American ideals and the culture of individual liberty. If DACA is passed into law we need to do whatever we can to expose these people to our beliefs, bring them into our culture and teach them how they are nothing but votes for people who will later sell them out for a voter from somewhere else.

Star Wars Episode 8 and Cultural Change Through Hollywood

Here we are at the end of 2017. A year better forgotten than remembered with the horrible mass shootings, destructive hurricanes, NFL activism and a fake witch hunt against a duly elected president who for all intents and purposes, seems to be doing what is in the nation's best interest.

The fight for social change raged on as feminists and race baiters continued to insist they live in a system of oppression, dominated by a white male patriarchy who benefits from unearned privileges in a society plagued by inequality. To them, America represents an old, antiquated system designed to benefit only the rich while keeping minorities down.

There is a hardly a refuge where this divisive message of social justice can be avoided as nearly every aspect of our culture has been infiltrated by the so called Social Justice Warrior, AKA, communist dingaling. Indoctrinated snowflakes seeking ways to influence the gullible into viewing Communism in a favorable light, who believe America must be rebuilt in a socialist image to ensure fairness and total equality.

While many people typically seek out entertainment as a means of escaping the real world, it is now nearly impossible to go the movies, for example, without having this same message shoved in our face. Unfortunately, the much anticipated Star Wars Episode 8 represents the latest example. Since the release of The Force Awakens in 2015, which had subtle hints of a politically correct agenda but still a fun movie to watch, Star Wars fans, hardcore and casual alike, have been sitting on the edge of their seats awaiting the next chapter in this beloved saga. There was expectations that Rey had powerful parents, Snoke would have a backstory that tied in the other trilogies and that Luke would kick some serious dark side butt. Instead, we got a Rey that came from nowhere and a Luke Skywalker who was defeated, ashamed and useless to the story.

One of the over all message of the film, concerning the character Rey, was that families didn't matter and that anyone, no matter where they are from can turn out to be somebody special. This is a message that American's do not need forced upon them, we already know this. By the very virtue of living in America everyone here is blessed with the possibility of opportunity that many in the world will never know. Yet, the leftist attitude towards America is that we are an unfair nation that offers opportunity to white males only, while insisting that everyone from the across the globe be allowed free access for a chance at a better life. Could it be any more contradictory?

It was almost as if Rian Johnson, liberal ding dong extraordinaire, was deliberately flipping Star Wars fans the bird as he knew we had high expectations for Rey's lineage. It was as if he believed that Star Wars itself, a story about the Skywalker family, represented the patriarchy where only the male Skywalker's held any special significance. This is of course a ridiculous assertion as powerful force users existed before the Skywalker's, some of which were female by the way. Rey, who many are referring to as a Mary Sue was able to do everything effortlessly with no training whatsoever and she made Luke Skywalker look foolish and cowardly.

If Rey's lineage represents the idea that families aren't important what message are they sending about Luke and his attitude towards the failed Jedi Order?

In the film Luke goes on a rant about the failure of the old Jedi Order and how the Jedi need to die in order to set things right. The old Jedi Order represents everything the liberals believe to be wrong with America. This idea is reinforced with Kylo Ren's line "Let the past die, kill it if you have to." The overall message of the film is that it is time to let the old antiquated America die and rebuild it in a collective/socialist fashion. Again, this is reinforced by Kylo Ren commenting on how he intends to burn it all down.

Furthermore, the feminization of Luke Skywalker represents the death of the ever so feared "TOXIC MASCULINTY" that the liberals are now pushing on every male living in the United States. The fact that Finn, a prominent African American character in The Force Awakens was reduced to a blithering idiot in this film shows that no male is safe from this full frontal assault against testosterone. Being black alone is no longer a redeemable quality to the social justice snowflakes. You must now be willing to submit yourself to the feminist mantra of ridding yourself of all that is masculine.

Poe Dameron is another example. In The Force Awakens there was potential to build him into a cool character that people may have been interested in. Instead, a feminist woman with purple hair, who proved to play no significant role whatsoever, except for the fact that she, instead of a male, sacrificed herself to save the resistance, belittled him with an overbearing hateful attitude towards men that was way too obvious. As if Princess Leia, in the original trilogy, was reduced to nothing and constantly humiliated by the men in the movies. On the contrary, she was portrayed as a strong, independent woman. Therein lies the real problem. Feminism doesn't really portray a movement for equality, it represents a movement to destroy manhood altogether and seat feminist woman in her duly deserved seat of power.

There are many other aspects of this movie such as hints towards animal rights activism and the evil rich oppressing the poor and down trodden that have turned it into nothing but leftist garbage.
Needless to say, the eighth installment of what is arguably the most popular space saga ever has left many die hard fans upset to the point that there is little anticipation towards the release of  Episode 9. It was almost as if the movie was deliberately made to cause the type of controversy and divide that it has in order to discredit the fans that love the saga. After all, the original trilogy, according to Brian D. Buckley, is altogether sexist. So this trilogy is political revenge and social justice of the highest order. An opportunity for the left to take our male privilege and toxic masculinity and shove it down our throats with girl power.

Furthermore, any opposition to the film on the pretense that it destroyed Luke Skywalker as a character, and the fact that it portrays all men as idiots will be shouted down by the left as also being anti-woman and misogynist.

So Hollywood has once again been used as a means for pushing cultural change and political agendas instead of realizing their rightful place as entertainers and nothing more. If they keep it up they may find themselves with empty theater seats just as the NFL has empty stadium seats.

Don't Celebrate H.R. 38 Just Yet

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017, The U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 38, The National Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act. This is considered a huge win for gun owners as state conceal carry permits will be legally recognized and honored in all fifty states. As it stands now there are several states that do not observe other conceal carry permits which makes traveling risky if one doesn't know the laws. There would certainly be advantages of having a national concealed carry law; however, there may be disadvantages as well. For instance, the government may have just opened the door to putting themselves in charge of issuing concealed carry permits. Which would entail more licensing fees and unneeded bureaucratic processes. After all, the people celebrating the passing of this law often cite the Second Amendment as the only gun law needed. Putting conceal carry at the national level is a far cry from the much demanded Constitutional Carry which would be  more in line with the Constitution itself.

Celebrating the passage of H.R. 38 may be short lived. Congressman Thomas Massie (R) Kentucky has posted several warnings about the intents of Congress to deceive you. Massie warned that H.R. 38 would be coupled, in the house, with H.R. 4477, which if passed into law, would empower the federal bureaucracies to add more names to NICS background check system based on the criteria found in U.S. Code Title 18, section 922. Massie warns that H.R. 38 would likely be stripped in the senate and that H.R. 4477 would be all we are left with. This is absent any amendments that may make their way into the Feinstein/Schumer sponsored bill.

After reviewing this bill, this author found that there is no contradictions with existing federal law. In other words, this bill does not create a new list of new prohibited persons, rather it forces these agencies to comply with existing law. This is still a problem. According to federal law, Title 18, section 922, a person who has been adjudicated mentally defective, or incompetent is considered a prohibited person. The key word being adjudicated. Federal bureaucracies such as the Veterans Administration and the Social Security Administration have taken it upon themselves to label people incompetent without their constitutionally protected right of due process. In other words, if you have had a beneficiary assigned to handle your finances because of a little stress or other issue, you are labeled incompetent, and an unelected bureaucrat now has the power to adjudicate your rights away. This is not due process. As a result of these bogus practices thousands of veterans who have served their country honorably have been stripped of their gun rights by the same people who voted to send them to war. The whole nation should be outraged by this. Prohibiting people who need a little help getting their affairs in order does not and will not prevent people intent on committing murder from doing so.

Interestingly enough, the text of H.R. 4477 cites it's constitutional authority as being Article 1, Section 8 clauses four and eighteen.

Clause four has to do with naturalization and bankruptcies. What does that have to do with restricting gun rights? Nothing. The following is the text of Article 1, section 8, clause four.

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

Article 1, section 8, clause eighteen is as follows-

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

Passing laws, or empowering bureaucracies to strip the rights of law abiding citizens is hardly necessary or pursuant to the powers vested to the government in our constitution. Article 6, clause two of the constitution, known as the supremacy clause, specifically states that the Constitution and the laws made in its pursuance, are the supreme laws of the land. To cite this clause as constitutional authority to restrict someone's rights without due process is the epitome of unconstitutional.

Article 6, clause two-

This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

To be in compliance with Article 1, section 8 then would mean stripping all laws that restrict anyone's rights without due process, period. Our congressman and women, many of whom voted to send our troops to war, should be fighting to ensure their rights are restored, not restricted based on nonsensical criteria put out by biased agency directors. They should be fighting to enforce laws that limit the criminals ability to harm law-abiding citizens. Instead, their feel good solutions empower those with no intention to follow the law and only disarm those inclined to follow it. Taking guns away from good men who admit to needing a little help will not stop anyone from obtaining a gun illegally and using it to commit murder. On the contrary, it may prevent people in need of help from seeking it due to a  fear of losing their rights.

Psychopolitical Dupes: A Congress Compromised and The Real Russian Collusion

According to recent reports, Special Counsel Robert Mueller has brought charges against former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn for allegedly lying to the FBI concerning Russian meddling into the 2016 presidential election. It is also expected that Flynn will testify against President Trump, claiming that he was given specific orders to contact the Russians during the campaign. Contacting the Russians during a campaign is hardly an illegal activity. It has already been proven that Hillary Clinton had paid an oppositional research firm to produce the fake "dossier" that most of this bogus investigation is predicated upon. Despite this, the left is intent on burying Trump one way or the other and any information they can come up with to feed their rabid dogs is fair game.

Over the past few months some startling revelations have been made concerning just how corrupt Washington D.C. is. Hillary Clinton not only funded the fake dossier, she was directly involved in selling U.S. uranium reserves to the Russians, while Mueller was head of the FBI no less. Yet, our noble government continues to allow this sham against a duly elected president to continue unabated. The reason is becoming increasingly clear as news of sex scandals erupt in the halls of congress, our government has been compromised. Within the past couple of weeks several congressman and one senator, both Democrat and Republican have been exposed for sexual harassment and using tax payer money to silence their victims. Given the fact that Representative John Conyers' lawyer is threatening to expose more elected officials for the same lewd behavior, there is a high likelihood that the governments silence against the Clinton/Mueller corruption is due to blackmail. Has our congress become nothing more than a body of psychopolitical dupes who are being controlled through the use of sex?

The amount of promiscuity which can be induced in mental patients can work definitely to the advantage of the pyschopolitical recruiting agent. The Dupe can thus be induced into many lurid sexual contacts, and these, properly witnessed, can thereafter be used as blackmail material to assist any failure of pain drug hypnosis in causing him to execute orders. Laventri Beria- Textbook of Psychopolitics

The communists were famous for creating controlled opposition groups. Is it so hard to believe that people could be paid to be provocative in order to draw unwanted sexual advances which would later be used to blackmail someone?

The idea that Donald Trump colluded with the Russians is laughable, at best. The Russian influence in our country is certainly real; however the Russians would be more interested in seeing a far left party come to power as left wing ideology is more in line with communist objectives. Many people believe that Russia is no longer a communist nation and that they have abandoned their old totalitarian ways with the collapse of the Soviet Union and the fall of the Berlin wall. This is indicative of the great success of their long term strategy of deception aimed at disarming the west and putting a more friendly face on communism. Through misinformation and outright lies, Russian agents deceived the world into believing that communism was dead and no longer a threat in order to ease fears in the west of any communist conspiracy.

Former KGB agent Anatoly Golitsyn wrote in his book New Lies For Old that communists, in an effort to achieve global communism, were willing to use any deceptive means necessary, even creating the illusion that communism itself was dead. This was called the "Weakness and Evolution Pattern" and it was employed with the intent of understating communist strength and intent.

"The pattern of disinformation used during the implementation of a
long-range policy may be called the "weakness and evolution" pattern,
or the pattern of "calculated ideological moderation." Its aim is to
calm the fears of the adversaries of international communism by
understating real communist strength and to confound the policies of
those adversaries by masking the realities of communist policy.

When following this pattern, therefore, disinformation reflects real
or imaginary weaknesses, splits, and crises in the communist world
and projects an image of evolution away from an ideological toward a
conventional, national system. The intention is that the nations of the
noncommunist world, accepting the alleged disunity and evolution of
the communist world as genuine, will fail to respond effectively to
communist offensive strategy and, in their confusion, will be induced
to make practical miscalculations and mistakes in their dealings with
the communist world. The major role of disinformation in the
weakness and evolution pattern is to conceal and misrepresent

the real nature, objectives, tactics, and techniques of communist policy."  (Golitsyn, New Lies For Old)

Further more, in Golitsyn's book, The Perestroika Deception, it is clear that any meddling in the United States political process was designed to weaken the influence of the political right and ensure that radical left wing candidates won elections. Particularly, one presidential election in 1992.

"To neutralise the influence of the anti-Communist political right in the
American political parties and to create favourable conditions for a victory of the rad-
ical left in the 1992 US presidential elections." Anotoly Golitsyn-The Perestroika Deception

Wouldn't this mean that the Clintons, whom have already been shown to be corrupt and working with the Russians, were the ones who colluded with them in a presidential campaign?

According to Golitsyn, who was a former KGB agent, the entire objective of the Soviets long term strategy, known as Perestroika, or restructuring, was weakening the United States militarily and politically while eliminating any anti-communist opposition from the conservative right. Anyone warning of a communist threat was thoroughly ridiculed and discredited as someone standing as an obstacle to world peace. The United States is presented as a war mongering, imperialistic power whose nations founding was based on racism while the communists, in an effort to hide their past, presented their ideology as one of concern for humanity, fairness and total equality. This made it nearly impossible for American's to confidently identify the threat without fear of humiliation.

The paramount global objective of the strategy of 'perestroika' is to weaken and
neutralize anti-Communist ideology and the influence of anti-Communists in political
life in the United States, Western Europe and elsewhere - presenting them as
anachronistic survivors of the Cold War, reactionaries and obstacles to 'restructuring'
and peace. Anyone who warns about Moscow's true objectives is automatically
branded a 'Cold Warrior', even by people who have doubts about Moscow's motives. Anotoly Golitsyn-The Perestroika Deception

This deceptive strategy goes a long way in describing what has happened in our country. It is a strategy in full employ as anyone opposing the liberal, Democrat agenda is destroyed, or perhaps lured into unethical behavior in an effort to silence them or get them to go along with their objectives. Our elected officials sit in silence as a dog and pony show aimed at ousting a legitimately elected president continues and the best anyone can tell, based on recent developments, is that they are afraid their own demons and corruption will be revealed.

The Right to Life and the Second Amendment

The left is circling the wagons again on gun control. It is only a matter of time before they have the support needed to ram through their agenda, which would only leave good people defenseless against those with no inclination to follow the law. This has been a slow, incremental process aimed at changing the culture and psyche of the American population. Fear, propaganda and lies have been shoved down our throats along with an educational agenda designed to change the way the younger generations view their nation. Consider this for a moment, seventy seven percent of Democrats with a higher education degree believe that gender is not determined at birth. This was accomplished through constant indoctrination into leftist ideology in our taxpayer funded institutions. If we as a nation fail to realize they are working incessantly to influence people's opinions on the second amendment, we will eventually lose it.

For years the public education system, through common core,  has been re-writing the text of the second amendment to give students the impression that government should decide who is or isn't able to own firearms. Furthermore, the re-written text falsely claims that firearms are to be registered with the government. The actual text of the second amendment is very clear, the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. This warped view of the second amendment is being pushed while at the same time, very little is being taught about the Constitution and the principles of liberty; other than the lie that it was written to protect the interests of rich, racist white men.

The public school system has been instrumental in developing a fear of firearms through intruder on campus or active shooter drills while at the same time suspending anyone from school for simply playing with anything that resembles a gun. 

It will not be long before the constant pressure brought upon pro-gun legislators will take it's toll. Senator Chris Murphy has indicated that many republicans are ready to cave on gun legislation. Unlike the left, the pro-gun right lacks the ability to bring about this kind of pressure with the right kind of arguments that would sway anyone's opinions. While there are nearly one hundred million gun owners, if not more; the fact is that not all of these people share the same ideals and understanding of what the second amendment is all about. To many, it is simply about hunting, not protecting life and liberty. They have fallen for the lie that the military and police are responsible for that.

In America, the right to life and liberty is a principle enshrined in our founding documents. Unfortunately, the right to life has been wickedly undermined as killing unborn children has been propelled to the status of a fundamental human right. If the left will argue for the right to murder innocent life, they certainly do not care about your ability to defend your own. If living the life you were given by your creator is not fundamentally protected, then defending it with a semi-automatic weapon certainly will not be.

We are in a battle of worldviews, unfortunately there are too many people on the right that do not understand the worldview of the left, let alone the principles of liberty and individualism they claim to espouse. The left believes in social science and the study of human behavior. To them, the individual is devoid of a freewill and is driven instead, by animalistic instincts. Looking at things from this point of view means that any individual with a firearm can be "triggered" into committing mass murder. This explains why after every mass shooting we are inundated with stories of the good neighbor whom nobody suspected was capable of hurting a fly suddenly snapped. They want you to see human behavior from the Darwinist/Marxist point of view. Consider the following explanation from B.F. Skinner's Beyond Freedom and Dignity.

In what we may call the pre-scientific view (and the word is not necessarily pejorative) a person's behavior is at least to some extent his own achievement. He is free to deliberate, decide, and act, possibly in original ways, and he is to be given credit for his successes and blamed for his failures. In the scientific view (and the word is not necessarily honorific) a person’s behavior is determined by a genetic endowment traceable to the evolutionary history of the species and by the environmental circumstances to which as an individual he has been exposed. Neither view can be proved, but it is in the nature of scientific inquiry that the evidence should shift in favor of the second. As we learn more about the effects of the environment, we have less reason to attribute any part of human behavior to an autonomous controlling agent. And the second view shows a marked advantage when we begin to do something about behavior. Autonomous man is not easily changed: in fact, to the extent that he is autonomous, he is by definition not changeable at all. But the environment can be changed, and we are learning how to change it. The measures we use are those of physical and biological technology, but we use them in special ways to affect behavior. 

What this refers to is a method of changing human behavior. Two worldviews concerning how humans behave are laid out. One, referred to as the pre-scientific, explains man as a being able to freely choose his path and control his behavior. The other, known as post-scientific, describes man as an animal whose behavior is traced back to our evolutionary roots and environmental circumstances, which we have no control over. For scientific purposes, writes Skinner, it is best that man is viewed from the post-scientific mind set because it provides the best advantage to do something about behavior through environmental manipulation. In other words, the media and our education system are working hand in hand to keep people living in fear in order to change people's perceptions about guns and the necessity of the second amendment. While many people understand this, the technique is based on the science of human behavior. Mans actions can be changed through the manipulation of the environment in which they live.

The Marxist mindset is devoid of spirituality and individualism. To them, there is no God; therefore, we are not special in any sense. It doesn't matter if we as individuals exist or not. All that matters to the Marxist is the collective, colonized mind. There is no universal truth. They teach a doctrine of moral relativism, meaning that all things are the same and there is no superior morality.

A nation cannot exist in a state of liberty without truth, without a universal morality.  Living in freedom in fact, means living in and understanding that there is universal truth. The universal, self evident truths our nation is based on is that we all, no matter if we are on the left or right, are endowed by our creator with natural, inalienable rights. Each individual human being, being guaranteed the right to life has dignity and a will of their own that no other has a right to take from them. To argue in favor of the second amendment is to argue in favor of the dignity and sanctity of the individual human being. Their life is worth defending against those who place no value in any life except their own. To pass laws which disarm the law-abiding gun owner is to say that the individual who lives a decent life and contributes to society has no value compared to those whom law makers know, will break the law and murder with impunity, whether it be with a gun, a knife or a hammer. Life means nothing to these people and they don't care what laws are passed. Politicians pushing for gun control are telling the American people that our lives matter little and that we must wait for other people with a gun to show up and save our lives if we are in danger. All to often, when police arrive all they can do is draw a chalk outline.

Having the right to life inherently means having the responsibility to protect it. If that responsibility lies with the government then we do not have the right to life at all. The government then becomes the decider of our fate, the choosers of whether we live or die. Unfortunately, the soul of America has been corrupted and too many people have no idea what personal responsibility is. So many young people view this nation as being flawed and are ready to accept communism as an alternative governing system, even though they would be intellectually incapable of explaining what it really is.

It is up to us America to turn this around. We have to stop sitting in silence while the left mobilizes. We have to speak up when the education system teaches our children lies. We have to live up to the values we claim to espouse to and most of all, we have to articulate our beliefs in an effort to change opinions. How can we expect change if we don't change the way we approach this? The left has demonstrated over and over that they are willing to commit acts of mob violence to destroy a country they hate. What can we do to save a country we love?

It appears I have been wrong about President Trump. If this is what he really believes then I will support him in 2020.