As the debate over manmade global
warming rages on it is becoming clear that there is one aspect of the
controversy that is definitely heating up, and that is the debate itself.
Increasingly, we are seeing reports that rebut all of the claims being made by
global warming alarmists, mainly in the fact that there has been no warming in
seventeen years. The more these reports surface, the harder these people push
to have their anti capitalist, anti freedom agenda implemented. They have
attempted to convince the masses that the only way to prevent a climate
catastrophe would be to implement Chinese style communism and population
control on the planet. http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/17650-climate-alarmists-push-chinese-communism-population-control
They have resorted to comparing those who
have denied global warming to people who claim the holocaust didn’t happen as a
way to discredit them as crazy conspiracy theorists, and finally, in a supposed
effort to preserve the environment they have actually called for “reduction” in
the world’s population as they fear world population levels will be between 8
and 11 billion by 2050. http://www.thenewamerican.com/rio-20/item/11724-science-group-un-rio%2020-summit-must-reduce-global-population Just how do they plan on doing this?
Great efforts are being made by the
global warming alarmists, mainly global government advocates like the Obama administration
and the entire United Nations, to discredit those denying their science. They
are labeling dissenters as conspiracy theorists and blaming them for standing
in the way of their attempts to “save humanity” from itself. Using the same propaganda type rhetoric as in
other communist initiatives, global warming deniers are accused of not caring
about the poor, the children, the future and stand accused of preventing “climate
justice,” whatever that is. In other words they are claiming that a failure to
act will lead to certain doom and the climate deniers would be the ones
responsible. Therefore, they are evil fascists and for all practical purposes,
it is safe to say they are attempting to “dehumanize” any who would disagree.
Perhaps the deniers are the first among the populations they intend to “reduce”
for our own good.
Finally, someone has claimed to
have had enough and is fighting back in a big way. It isn’t just some
insignificant person whose opinion doesn’t matter; he is one of the world’s top
climate scientists who served as senior scientist for climate studies at NASA.
His name is Dr. Roy Spencer and he doesn’t take to well to being called a
fascist when in fact it is the policies sought after by the alarmist that
resemble fascism more than anything. Dr. Spencer is intent on pointing out this
out to the world. http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/17685-climate-scientist-global-warming-nazis-threaten-humanity
Speaking truthfully, it’s hard to
understand how anyone could buy into the type of propaganda being fed by the
global warming communists. It’s beyond obvious to anyone who knows anything
that a reduction in the worlds CO2 levels would be more harmful to the planet
than beneficial. After all, we are a carbon based life form are we not? Do the
trees still not require the carbon dioxide exhaled by breathing beings in order
to produce oxygen for us to inhale? If someone would stop and think about this
a moment they would then realize that these claims of global warming due to
carbon dioxide emissions are an attack against humanity itself because we emit carbon
dioxide as living breathing things. Therein lies the problem, it seems that
kids in school are spending more time watching An Inconvenient Truth and The
Story of Stuff than learning about real science. The only inconvenient truth
for Al Gore would be when the whole world realizes how much money he made by
lying to you about “carbon foot prints.”
The fact of the matter is that
those advocating restrictions on freedom to supposedly save the planet, are
calling for the destruction of the very system that produces the wealth that
feeds the world. Capitalism has done more to raise people out of poverty than
any other economic system. Destroying a free market system where people are
free to pursue the means to produce their own sustenance and grow their own
wealth will not lead to a system in which poverty is reduced, but one where
there is less wealth and material goods available to benefit the poor. It doesn’t
take a rocket scientist to see this, just a thoughtful analysis. Alarmists
resort to calling deniers extremists and fascists, yet we call for policies
that allow for the expansion of free market principles in order to allow others
to lift themselves out of poverty. On the other hand, the alarmists are calling
for reductions in population levels
and strict controls on human behavior in order to push an agenda based
on a science that at best, still remains very controversial but for all
practical purposes has been refuted. Who are the real fascists? Who are the
real extremists here? That’s up for you to decide.
No comments:
Post a Comment