The
terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 brought The United States into a
permanent state of war. President Trump and President Obama both promised to
end the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq and bring our troops home. Regrettably,
both presidents not only failed to do so, they increased America’s war
footing in the middle east through endless bombing campaigns in Syria, Libya, Yemen, Somalia and Pakistan.
These operations took place under the administrations of Presidents Bush, Obama
and Trump. We are once again facing the prospect of another unnecessary war,
this time with Iran.
The
endless war on terror is apparently a policy initiative that Democrats and Republicans
will stop fighting each other for and show unilateral support.
The
argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies...
is a foolish idea. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that
the American people can throw the rascals out at any election without leading
to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. Then it should be possible to
replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party which will be
none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the
same basic policies (Carol
Quigley, The Tragedy of Hope 1966).
War
with Iran has been planned for decades, as have all the others we have recently
engaged in. In 1997, a strategic blueprint for projecting American power and
removing perceived threats to said power was established. This was called the Project
New American Century. This plan called for the United States to
be able to accomplish four essential missions at one time ̶ defend the American
homeland, fight and win simultaneous major wars, shape the security environment
in critical regions, and transform the military to exploit the revolution in
military affairs. We have been fighting simultaneous wars
to be sure, but we are not winning them.
The
report identified the Middle East as being critical for American interests.
This is of course, because of the vast oil reserves. The power of the U.S.
dollar rests on the fact that it is the world’s reserve currency when it comes
to purchasing oil. In other words, oil is traded only in U.S. dollars. This
resulted from a secret deal that was made with Saudi Arabia during the Nixon
administration. Oil prices were surging, and the U.S. economy was essentially
in free fall. Richard
Nixon ended the convertibility of the U.S. dollar to gold,
rendering it virtually worthless. The deal made with Saudi Arabi ensured a
strong U.S. dollar as Saudi Arabia guaranteed it would enforce sales of its oil
in dollars only, in exchange for United States military muscle.
The basic framework was strikingly simple. The
U.S. would buy oil from Saudi Arabia and provide the kingdom military aid and
equipment. In return, the Saudis would plow billions of their petrodollar
revenue back into Treasuries and finance America’s spending (Wong, 2016).
According to the above quote, the U.S. economy
has been propped up because of this deal with Saudi Arabia. Having nothing else
to give it value, the dollar would collapse if it lost its status as the worlds
reserve currency. That is exactly what has been happening. Maintaining the
dollar as the primary oil trading currency could be called a critical interest
in critical regions. Iraq, Syria, and Libya have all stopped selling oil for dollars. Which was the primary reason
for our military involvement.
When the Project New American Century speaks of
projecting U.S. power, it means maintaining its status as the worlds reserve
currency in order to protect our economy. The U.S. Government believed it could
initiate regime change in middle eastern countries that threatened the hegemony
of the U.S. dollar. In some cases, our country recruited and trained foreign
militants to do the fighting. All they really accomplished was the promise of
endless war and the need to maintain a constant presence in the region. Iran is
the last of seven countries that have been identified as targets of PNAC
objectives. They dropped the dollar as its reserve currency in 2018.
Many conservatives are beating the war drums and
supporting President Trump’s posturing against Iran. They are forgetting one
thing. We have been at war since 2001 and are getting nowhere in terms of
declaring victory either in Afghanistan or Iraq. The entire premise of the Iraq
war was a lie as it is with Iran. For eighteen years our government lied to us about the
progress being made in Afghanistan. This includes the duration of the Trump presidency.
The Lessons Learned
interviews contradict years of public statements by presidents, generals and
diplomats. The interviews make clear that officials issued rosy pronouncements
they knew to be false and hid unmistakable evidence the war had become
unwinnable. Several of those interviewed described explicit efforts by the U.S.
government to deliberately mislead the public and a culture of willful
ignorance, where bad news and critiques were unwelcome (Whitlock, Shapiro & Emamdjomech, The Washington Post).
Despite all this, the
American public is once again, through constant propaganda and chest pounding
rhetoric, being lulled into supporting another unwinnable war. This could very
well turn into an international crisis. Along with the developing situation in
Virginia concerning gun confiscation, it looks like Trump is right about one thing.
The year 2020 is going to bring big things for America.
Dude, seriously. Are you ex-military? If so, i don't understand you questioning this strategic strike, it was surgical. This person should have been eliminated years ago, but now he carried out something and had more planned for our Embassy's across the Middle east. Then you want to talk about the Virginia situation at the same time, and President Trump somehow involved in the Virginia thing? It wasn't posturing, our Embassy in Iraq was attacked, and an American killed, and was planned by this thug that should have been dispatched years ago. It was an operation that needed to be done. I am trying to comprehend how you think this action is consistent with the US actions of other Admins. Their indecisiveness previously is what made this necessary. Also, you should put your name with your article, own your s**t.
ReplyDeleteJim, do you have reading comprehension or just eat all the propaganda up that the mainstream media and politicians pour in your dog bowl? Seriously, man, David is one of the very few writers who actually understands the playbook and quite often calls it far in advance of what anyone else does. You'd be wise to shut your pie hole about things you know nothing about, including the Constitution, which by the way, where does it authorize such a surgical strike without a declaration of war? Article, Section and clause please. If you don't provide that, then you are just as anti-Constitutional as those you claim to oppose.
Deletewoo hoo!
DeleteThat's brilliant! How am I hiding it? I posted it under my name. Reading your reply makes me think you have a serious reading comprehension problem. The post was primarily about the history of all three administration collaborating on the war on terror and the fact that they have been chomping at the bit to get Iran for years. Hence the quote from Quigley. The end line is referencing Trumps comment about big things coming to America in 2020. Its called creative writing.
ReplyDelete