In
an article entitled Virtue
and Guns published by Psychology Today, the author argues that the current
gun culture in America is detrimental to development of good moral character.
He cites the differences of the gun culture of fifty years ago, which he claims
focused mainly around hunting and target practice to one that almost
exclusively revolves around training for self-defense and conceal carry tactics.
The author claims that people engaged in gun training today are doing so for the
exclusive purpose of learning how to kill. A thoughtful, albeit not completely
correct response was written where David
Yamane claims, and rightfully so, that some acts of violence are indeed virtuous
and necessary in a violent world. He cites a recent shooting where an unarmed,
would-be victim tackled an active shooter and asked why the act would be any less
virtuous had the man been able to stop the shooter dead in his tracks with a
gun. Certainly, less people would have been killed. There is a stark contrast between
the way the left and right view such scenarios. This stark contrast indeed
rests in the way they each value human life.
I
have been in martial arts for twenty-five years. I have also trained firearms
on a regular basis and work to bring the two together for the purpose of
understanding the realities of gun use in a self-defense situation. One of the
concepts that was taught to me was the development of killer instinct. Before
you misconstrue what I am trying to say, let me explain. The development of
killer instinct can be described as the cultivation of our inner rage for the
purpose of learning self-control. As most people know, the focus in any martial
art is developing the ability to control one’s emotions. By cultivating the
inner rage that resides in all of us we learn to recognize when it comes. Training
in martial arts and adding a philosophical element to the use of violence makes
us question whether its use is even necessary, or in some cases, makes us avoid
it all together. In other words, it is because the martial artist possesses
extraordinary skill he is, in the name of humanity, able to possess the
necessary self-control it takes to either avoid violence or make the calculated
decision to act.
The
same is true with gun training. Shooting, after all, can be considered a
martial art. Most people that are seriously engaged in the gun culture agree
that training is necessary and wish more people would take it upon themselves
to do so. Not everyone does; however, this does not make them, or the fact that
they are carrying a gun for self-defense necessarily dangerous, or immoral. In
fact, there is an inherent responsibility implied on men to protect their
families, and in a world where violent criminals have an unfettered access to
guns of all kinds it would be immoral to not take such a precaution. It could also be argued that expecting someone else to put their life on the line for you is also immoral. Self protection is an individual responsibility; and the Supreme court has ruled that the police have no moral obligation to put their lives in harms way for your protection. Those that
do take it upon themselves to train take it with the utmost seriousness and
understanding that any mistake on their part could cost the lives of innocent
people. In fact, it has been duly noted that armed citizens that make training
a part of their daily lifestyle are
far less responsible for the death of innocent bystanders than police are.
People
who take the training seriously are also far more aware of their surroundings
as well as the power they possess to take life. Most people that carry,
including myself, also carry with them an individual medical kit and would likely
work to save the life of anyone they may have had to engage in a defensive
shooting. We are not training to take a life but to stop a threat.
By
developing our killer instinct, we are putting to rest the insecurities in ourselves
that tend towards the escalation of violence. A person who has adequately
developed their skills as a fighter is more likely to look at walking away from
a fight as the correct response. A person carrying a firearm who has been well
trained is keenly aware of developing situation around him and understands that
their first responsibility at the sign of trouble may be to call or assist
police in responding to situations. We do not all think we are “Rambo.”
Finally,
there is a stark difference in the way the anti-gun left, and the right see
human life. This is self-evident by their infatuation with abortion. The left tends
to promote the victim culture because they do not believe average people are
capable of anything. An armed society scares them because they are afraid of
themselves and their inability to control the anger they walk around with every
day. They are ok with people being slaughtered until police arrive because deep
down, they believe not in self-government and individualism, but that as a
society we need to be controlled. The very idea of freedom itself scares them
as evident by the way they are always trying to limit it.
Gun ownership and self-preservation are unalienable
rights. Taking the responsibility to protect those we love, and being prepared to act in defense of others can be viewed as the highest form of morality. As John Adams said,
our constitution is made only for a moral people, freedom can not exist without a population rooted in absolute morality. Nowhere on earth is there so
many people carrying guns in public with
such a low incidence of gun violence, comparatively speaking. Afterall, those
legally carrying guns are among the most law-abiding people in the country.
Your Affiliate Money Making Machine is waiting -
ReplyDeleteAnd making money online using it is as simple as 1---2---3!
Here's how it works...
STEP 1. Tell the system what affiliate products you want to push
STEP 2. Add some PUSH BUTTON TRAFFIC (it LITERALLY takes JUST 2 minutes)
STEP 3. See how the system grow your list and sell your affiliate products all for you!
So, do you want to start making money???
Click here to make money with the system