The
Coronavirus has shaken American life to its core. Not only has this alleged
pandemic wrecked a booming economy, putting millions on unemployment and
forcing businesses to close; it has left countless millions living a life of
perpetual fear. Across the country, an untold number of Americans are fooling
themselves into believing that wearing a mask will save them from a pandemic
that has proven to be nothing short of an over hyped attempt to gain coercive
control of our lives. Despite the over abundance of emerging information proving,
for example, that the death
numbers were over exaggerated, and hospitals are not
as overwhelmed as the media portrayed, the official narrative presenting
the Coronavirus as the doomsday threat of our lifetime persists. The
consequence is a population with a diminished ability to reason for themselves,
not knowing how to discern reality from fantasy while just going along to get
along.
To
date there has been no official study that has sought the effectiveness of wearing
clothe masks, or N-95 respirators as protection from the Coronavirus. This
is according Dr. Blaylock M.D. He states that because there have been no
conclusive studies, the only comparable illness to compare to Covid-19 is the
flu. There is no existing research which indicates that a healthy person
wearing a mask is protected from any illness associated with influenza. There
is substantial evidence however, according to Blaylock, that wearing a mask can
cause serious problems due to low oxygen levels in the blood. This is referred to as Hypoxia and affects our
ability to fight off infections like the flu, or other diseases. Furthermore,
there is evidence suggesting that a person who is infected with a respiratory
virus could cause further harm to themselves as particles of the virus will get
caught in the mask as they exhale, causing them to be re-inhaled. This leads to
a build up of the virus in their system, potentially making them seriously ill.
Despite
the availability of this information and other studies like the one released by
The World Health Organization
suggesting that healthy people don’t need to wear a mask, people across the
country are masking up as if their lives depend on it. In 2014 the National
Institute of Health published a report from the Singapore Journal of Health entitled
“The Use of
Facemasks to Prevent Respiratory Infection: A Literature Review in the Context
of the Health Belief Model.” This study revolved around people’s
motivations for wearing face masks. It found the following-
We found that individuals are more likely to wear
facemasks due to the perceived susceptibility and perceived severity
of being afflicted with life-threatening diseases. Although perceived
susceptibility appeared to be the most significant factor determining
compliance, perceived benefits of mask-wearing was found to have significant
effects on mask-wearing compliance as well. Perceived barriers include
experience or perception of personal discomfort and sense of embarrassment. Media
blitz and public health promotion activities supported by government agencies
provide cues to increase the public’s usage of facemasks.
This
study suggests they knew what our reaction to Covid-19 would be and, that they knew
how easily we could be convinced to follow along. This is the application of
social science at its finest. They have been studying human behavior for
decades and know exactly how to manipulate us to their ends. B.F. Skinner wrote
in his book “Science
and Human Behavior” that man’s behavior can largely be determined by the
specific conditions to which he is exposed. In other words, he believed that
the environment largely predicted the way men would behave.
If we are to use the
methods of science in the field of human affairs, we must assume that behavior
is lawful and determined. We must expect to discover that what a man does is
the result of specifiable conditions and that once these conditions have been
discovered, we can anticipate and to some extent determine his actions (Skinner, Science
and Human Behavior).
This substantiates the
results of the NIH article. That study was conducted to determine what motivates
people to wear face masks. The manipulation of the environment and pushing the
story of a deadly pandemic was the stimulus, and people falling into compliance
was the expected response. This was determined in 2014.
What Skinner is
essentially saying is that people are programmable, and our behavior is not the
result of our own will, or chosen course of action, but a result of
environmental circumstances.
Prevailing
philosophies of human nature recognize an internal "will" which has
the power of interfering with causal relationships and which makes the
prediction and control of behavior impossible. To suggest that we abandon this
view is to threaten many cherished beliefs—to undermine what appears to be a stimulating and
productive conception of human nature (Skinner, Science
and Human Behavior).
In
an article entitled “The
Psychological Manipulation of Universal Masking,” published by Health
Freedom Ohio, the author points out the long used tactic of discrediting people
who do not go along with social norms. People who refuse to wear masks are
uncaring, selfish and pose a danger to everyone else. No doubt this is social
conditioning for the acceptance of mandatory vaccinations. Those wearing masks
have been fooled into believing that they are morally superior and that their
actions show that they have some deep concern for the safety of us all, despite
the evidence proving otherwise. B.F. Skinner had something to say about this as
well. In “Beyond
Freedom Dignity,” Skinner says that people can be persuaded into behaving
in certain ways out of a fear of being rejected. “People who get along
together well under the mild contingencies of approval and disapproval are
controlled as effectively as (and in many ways more effectively than) the
citizens of a police state” (Skinner,
Beyond Freedom Dignity.) In other words, those wearing masks are doing so
out of a deep-rooted fear that they will be perceived as contributing to the
problem, or not caring about humanity. They will then viciously defend their
actions because they have been led to believe that their compliance represents
a moral superiority.
Those who work productively because of the reinforcing
value of what they produce are under the sensitive and powerful control of the
products. Those who learn in the natural environment are under a form of
control as powerful as any control exerted by a teacher. (Skinner,
Beyond Freedom Dignity.)
The social sciences have made great progress in
understanding and manipulating human behavior. People can indeed be conditioned
to behave in predictable ways, making it easier for those seeking to exert their
control over society. Skinner’s theories on operant conditioning have attempted
to prove that people’s behavior is largely determined by the environment around
them, which often can force people to act in ways to save their lives. He put
forth a thesis which suggests we have no control of our behavior at all, and that
certain factors like the fear of rejection, or appearing to have a morally
superior position can reinforce behavior patterns no matter what the truth is. Can
those wearing a mask be brought to see that it is making no difference at all? Or,
will they continue to do so until they are told they are safe? The one thing
that proves Skinner’s theories to be incorrect is the self-evident truth that
people have a choice. Just as there are millions wearing masks, there are
millions who know the truth and will refuse to do so. If Skinner’s theory were completely
accurate, those refusing to wear masks could be pushed into doing so by
portraying them as uncompassionate or uncaring. What is the difference?
People are more easily manipulated when the foundations of
truth have been ripped out from under them. In America, the concept of absolute
truth has been replaced with moral relativism while the very character of our national
morality has been under a vicious assault. Americans are turning
to atheism at an alarming rate, making them more susceptible to the type of
behavioral manipulation described by Skinner. For a person grounded in truth
and following God’s word knows they can choose their behavior and not be led by
fear. The very foundations of this country are based on the premise that
religious and moral men can be free because they can control their behavior. B.F.
Skinners theory represents a system which denies God’s truth and leans on men’s
own understanding. Which is something the Bible clearly warns us against. A
society living in perpetual fear of an over-hyped flu virus is the consequence
of developing systems antithetical to God’s and looking to science instead of
God.
Proverbs 3:5 Trust in the Lord with all your heart and lean
not, on your own understanding.
Great essay! This is powerful wisdom. Human beings are far too susceptible to conditioning. The education system in America is the spearhead for, "the concept of absolute truth has been replaced with moral relativism". This is equivalent to a lobotomy when people assume this point of view. When everything is relatively equal then our opinion is as good as any other opinion and there is no more truth. Libertarian self interest & greed becomes the best goal in life. Part of what's lost in this lobotomy is the ability to deeply reason (theorize) about what is truth. We are conditioned (brainwashed) to believe that all conspiracy theory is crazy thinking so to be sane we must never theorize about conspiracies going on right under our nose. Education has to be restored to combating conditioning & seeking wisdom & Truth.
ReplyDelete