As we watch the
continuous power struggle in Washington D.C. (one that admittedly leaves us
conservatives banging our head against a wall) you have to wonder if what we
are witnessing is even real. Surely most
“constitutional conservatives” find themselves enraged at the traitorous
actions on constant display by those in whom we have put our faith. These
supposed conservatives are more than willing to compromise on all the ideals
that we put them in office to stand for. What’s more frustrating is the ease in
which this theatrical drama of Republicans vs. Democrats has divided Americans
among deeply ideological lines. While watching from the sidelines it would
appear that liberals and conservatives in D.C. are diabolically opposed to each
other’s ideals, exact opposites of one another ready to battle it out in the
halls of Congress for the soul of the country. The sad reality is that at the
end of the day they all go out and have a beer and laugh with each other as
they recall the day’s charades. They are
working side by side with one another, purposely taking this side or that with
any given issue in an effort to set the tone for what they would like us to
think. This is called the Hegelian Dialectic.
What is the Hegelian
Dialectic?
A method of
guiding the thoughts of others to a predetermined conclusion, the Hegelian
Dialectic was adopted by Karl Marx and Frederic Engels as a means of guiding
people into accepting their theory of economic communism. http://www.fhu.com/hegelian.html
The founder of this “dialectic” process, George Hegel was heavily influenced by
Darwin’s theory of evolution and believed that philosophical conflict would
lead to the evolution of mankind. This is similar to materialism which claimed
the same thing but in a way that concerned matter and not necessarily people. Hegel
believed that through conflict mankind can be brought to state of perfection.
The formula for this conflict was thesis-antithesis-synthesis. Another way of
saying this is two opposing sides agreeing to settle their differences by
coming to a conclusion that met somewhere in the middle. The truth is however
that this conclusion is predetermined and the strategy itself is designed to
get society to agree to it. The conclusion itself is nothing short of getting
people to surrender their rights and liberties to the all powerful state, which
of course, were the Goal of Marx and Engels.
It could also be
argued that capitalism and communism are systems devise to achieve the same
goal. Two ideologically opposed groups engaged in a constant struggle while inadvertently
benefiting someone in the shadows. http://www.texemarrs.com/022010/rothschilds_plan.htm Both world wars were products of the
Rothschilds and were orchestrated to give the appearance of nations pushing a “Marxist
Agenda” vs nations practicing Capitalism, the proletariat vs. the bourgeoisie,
if you will. While many of us have been
led to believe the U.S. and western powers were the victors in these wars, we
must ask ourselves if we really were. Looking at the events of the day it seems
that the desired outcome of pitting two ideologies against one another, a move
towards global dictatorship, has been accomplished. Through these was we have
seen the rise of The League of Nations, predecessor to the U.N., the formation
of the European Union where Europe’s national identity and sovereignty has all
but been destroyed and a massive move to recondition the hearts and minds of
America while inundating us with multiculturalism and moral relativism.
Given the fact that our politicians are
constantly fighting, and we have the republicans constantly selling us out
under the false guise of “compromise” I would argue they are applying this
theory and working hand in hand in doing so. There is one problem however; the
idea of societies evolving to perfection through conflict has never been proven,
nor has Darwin’s theory of evolution for that matter. In fact, I think you can
argue exactly the opposite, that conflicting ideologies do not lead to the
perfection of man when they are manipulated against one another. They only lead
to dead people, millions of dead people as this dialectical process of applying
Marxism throughout the twentieth century has proven. World War I and WWII,
Vietnam, Cambodia, the Korean War, are all examples of this dialectic at work.
It did not work out so well in any of these instances did it?
Perhaps this gives
us a little understanding, some insight into why things in this country are so
screwed up. Our political hacks that call themselves the elite are really
proving how stupid they really are as they try to apply the same old strategy
while expecting a different result. I guess there is one question that remains.
Are they really expecting anything different or do they know exactly what they
are doing?
No comments:
Post a Comment