Forward: The information used in this article comes
from a position paper I wrote in response to an essay called“White Male, White Privilege.”
The essay is available for review at The Radical Conservative. The position I
took concerning racism and social justice prompted my professors to claim I wasn’t
fit for the field of social work because the whole educational curriculum revolved
around the idea of White America oppressing blacks and other minorities, which
you know is something I write about quite often. We simply must be ready at a moment’s
notice to rebut these claims of racism with facts, and we mustn’t be afraid to
educate others about them as well. Its overwhelmingly obvious that the agenda
is to cause racial strife while claiming that blacks and other minorities are
systematically oppressed. We all know this isn’t true.
Earlier this week, Attorney General Eric Holder once again claimed that the United States of America is a nation of cowards when it comes to the issue of race.http://dailycaller.com/2014/01/24/eric-holder-us-still-a-nation-of-cowards-on-race/ Holder originally made this comment in 2009, and in a recent interview, after being asked if he would take it back, refused to do so. He continues to maintain the position that minorities are oppressed by the white male, and Americas society and cultural norms have nothing but negative impacts on minorities and women. This is just another lame example of how the left projects their failures onto the rest of us and uses race as an excuse for everything. This week we also heard the president accuse America as a whole for not liking him because he is black. This was based on his rapidly diminishing popularity; we also heard him blame Rush Limbaugh for people not liking him. As if we are all like little democratic voters, running around looking for someone to tell us what to think. President Obama and Eric Holder would have you believe that capitalism and our constitution are why we have a divided society when in truth; it is their racial identity politics that leaves this nation more polarized than it has been in decades.
This writer has
often tried to turn this argument against the left by trying to show the true
racist nature of their policies. We live in a day where believing black people
are equal with whites is the new racism. Equality today means equal results
instead of equal opportunity, and it can be safely argued that this policy of
“socially engineering” equality has been destructive on the very people it was
supposed to be helping. A recent example is Eric Holder coming down on public
schools if he feels there is racial disparity in how children are punished. He believes that school systems are punishing
black children disproportionately and this should be alleviated. The truth is;
failure to hold children accountable for their actions only produces
irresponsible adults. Affirmative Action
is another example, while there may have been a time when the democrats Jim
Crow laws demanded that action such as this be taken; we are well beyond that
now as most white people view blacks as being equal. Most people except for
guilt ridden liberal democrats anyway. Their belief that black people need
affirmative action has created an entitlement mentality where there is no need
for people benefitting from it to live to their fullest potential. It is the
victimization and entitlement mentality that leaves generations of blacks
trapped in so called “generational poverty.” It is the reinforced belief of
being owed, propagated by the likes of Obama, Holder and other liberals that
leaves blacks “disproportionately” impoverished.
America is not a
racist nation. Most people look back at our history and are appalled at the fact
that there was slavery in a nation founded on freedom. This collective guilt
was used very effectively by those pushing racial identity politics. In fact,
programs like affirmative action are viewed by several black people as being in
need of change and no longer needed in a world that has moved past the issue of
skin color. In an article published by American Scholar, Ralph Eubanks writes
about his grandson being admitted into college because of affirmative action
laws. His grandson readily admitted that he did not experience any situation
which made him feel as if he needed to depend upon such laws for admission. He
didn’t feel as if being “black” was a disadvantage. Perhaps he would be better off staying out of
college, because in today’s world of Critical Race Theory, he would be taught
otherwise.
Another example of
affirmative action in the academic environment is The University of Michigan’s
policy of enrolling a “critical mass” of unrepresented minorities. Minorities are admitted into academic programs
not based on merit but based on a quota system.
How is this fair? Certainly, this policy would leave a person of color
who has worked hard to accomplish something in the cold as the quota system
would prevent them from even reviewing their records. This policy also dictates that minorities
receive twenty extra bonus points. Again, how does this encourage minority
students to pursue academic excellence? It reinforces the mentality that they
are owed and leaves those that can excel out in the cold. As far as white
privilege goes, because of affirmative action a woman named Barbara Gruter was
denied admission to the UofM law school even though she had a GPA of 3.8 and
scored a 161 on the Law School admissions teat. With facts like these it is
hard to say that whites are oppressing minorities. (Wen, 2002) While a Supreme
Court decision forced this school to change their policy based on the above
incident, many schools across the nation still use a quota based system.
Eric Holder and
Barrack Obama, along with the rest of the racial grievance industry would be
better off if they would acknowledge the support that white America has showed
for such programs. Through the 1970’s
and the 1980’s white America has overwhelmingly supported programs that helped
people who were historically discriminated against, to the tune of 65%. Ironically,
throughout the same period, roughly half of the black population opposed
programs that automatically granted them privilege over white Americans. This
shows that blacks wanted equality of opportunity as opposed to outcome. (Lynch,
Fredrick R, William R & Beer, 1990) It should also be noted that racism
played a huge role in the election of first black president, and not in the way
you may think. Barrack Obama received a huge amount of support from white
America. No doubt this reflected a foolish belief that simply voting for a
black man would prove they weren’t racist. Cameron Duodo writes in the New
African that there were many blacks who were opposed to Obama because he was
half white. In fact he references a black priest who condemned Obama because his
mother was Caucasian.
Perhaps Eric
Holder and Barrack Obama would do themselves well by realizing we are not
programmable automatons as they seem to believe. We are capable of making our
own decisions based on our own research. Just because there is a small portion
of the population who can readily be relied upon to fall in line with these
racial identity politics, doesn’t mean the rest of us are just going to sit
here and take it. Mr. Obama, Mr. Holder, we the people of the United States are
sick and tired of being called racist, when it is overwhelmingly obvious you
use the word as a vehicle to transform the nation.
Lee, Wen H. (2002) General
Statistics Reverse Discrimination.
Lynch, F & Beer, W. (1990)
“You Aint The Right Color Pal” Policy
Review, (51), 64
Eubanks, W. (2009) Affirmative
Action and After: Now is the Time To Consider Policy That Must Change, But
Simply Replacing Race With Class Is Not The Soluition. American Scholar, 78(1), 41-48
Duodo, C. (2008) Do Some Blacks
Have A Problem With Obama? New African,
46-47.
While your argument is generously annotated, you will not win the argument. You see, you are arguing facts against emotion. I have always maintained that the "liberal / conservative" dichotomy occurs not only in political goals but also in the view of reality (read Thomas Sowell's "A Conflict of Visions"). This differing set of "filters" makes it impossible for conservatives to bring the other side into agreement with the facts. They simply don't see the world the way we do and never will. Not to be defeatist, but given demographics, it may not be possible to save the entire country; only a part of it.
ReplyDelete