Tuesday, April 25, 2017

The Artificial Womb and the Devaluation of Man

What are we supposed to make of  the world in which we currently live? It's as if the very nature of what it means to be human is being changed right before our very eyes. Karl Marx, in his book The Communist Manifesto, wrote that one of his objectives was to dethrone God in the minds of men. Communism, besides being a failed economic system, was actually designed to attack the freewill of man while breaking his connection to the divine. Establishing the state as the one and only god was his ultimate aim. Looking at the world today it is hard to argue that we are not close to realizing his goal. The normalization of transgenderism and homosexuality along with the constant attack against the nuclear family serves to redefine what we understand to be a civilized society. The feminist movement has contributed greatly to this end as it was deliberately created by a communist propagandist, Betty Friedan, in order to discredit the role of a mother in American culture. Sadly, we have reached a point in our society where the right to kill an unwanted baby is more valued by some than the miracle that being able to give birth represents. As we continue to chug along in this backwards world we move closer and closer to the day where human life will in a sense, become obsolete and retain no value.

While we were being taught that it is acceptable in civilized society to murder unborn children, science has been hard at work learning how to create life in a laboratory. The science journal "Nature Communications," recently published its findings on the ability to grow a baby lamb in an artificial womb. At the rate technology is currently advancing it is only a matter of time before they can do this with humans as well. Scientists claim however, that the artificial womb would only serve to complete the development of premature embryos and that getting through the early stages of development would still require a human mother; for now anyway. It is important to note that one of the benefits of this technology would be eliminating "some of the health risks of pregnancy." This is important in understanding the connection to Marxist philosophy because a book written in 1930 entitled "The World in 2030 A.D." by Fredrick Edwin Smith makes the assertion that growing babies in a laboratory would eliminate the health risks of pregnancy while also furthering gender equality, which is in and of itself, a Marxist concept.

In 2030, the prospect of woman’s liberation from the dangers of childbirth will almost certainly become a matter of general realization. This evolution, the most serious biological departure since the natural separation of living organisms into two sexes, will vitally transform the whole status of women in society. Unless their present importance and limitations be clearly apprehended, their future development cannot be apprehended. (The World In 2030 A.D. Birkenhead, Fredrick Edwin Smith. 1930)

The early 1900's is remembered as a time when communism/progressivism was taking hold in American politics. It isn't hard to imagine these concepts existing at this time as this was also the time eugenics and the idea of eliminating the unfit was coming into being.

If this technology continues to advance and we reach a point where human beings can be grown in a laboratory, Marx may indeed see his dream of destroying God in the minds of men become a reality. There will no longer be a need for God as these new humans would surely be taught by their  masters that government is all they need. If that sounds too far fetched ask your self why they are pushing concepts like transgenderism. They are working to change what it means to be human, to change God's creation into their own.

To complicate the problem further consider the fact that Artificial Intelligence is set to explode onto the scene and displace nearly sixty percent of the current workforce. Imagine a world where robots do all the work and government decides how many living humans they need to support the automated workforce.

Sadly, with the way that humans are being "dehumanized" and blamed for fictitious problems like global warming, it is easy to see that this is the direction we are headed. Perhaps this is part of the elite's depopulation agenda. Teach the masses to abort their own off spring and in the meantime take control of the very method in which life is created. Before you know it, the state has become the one and only God where humans are harvested in labs purely to serve the objectives of the state.

Monday, April 24, 2017

Bill Nye Contributes to Transgender Insanity

We are all familiar with Bill Nye the so called Science guy. His overtly political stance on what he calls science is often shared in middle and high school classes across the country. He has taken hard left positions on the topic of global warming and now seems to be embracing the transgender movement as well. The left is trying to solidify in the minds of young people that transgenderism is hard, proven science. In reality it is a mental disorder whose biggest proponents are severely suffering. This video which aired on the "Bill Nye Saves the World" show is a perfect example.


Friday, April 21, 2017

Living Up To Our Own Book Of Rules

The left has one goal and that is to completely destroy and discredit the conservative movement. They have been working effortlessly, through the universities and other institutions, to create the impression that their morals and values are mainstream. People on the right, espousing conservative viewpoints, are to be ridiculed and cast aside as extremist,  hateful bigots who marginalize minorities and women. In too many instances unfortunately, the so called right falls for the trap and literally manufactures the rope from which they will later hang. There is no better example of this than the recent Bill O'Reilly situation where it was revealed he paid out millions to settle with those who were accusing him of sexual harassment. Some people would argue against the notion that O'Reilly was in fact a conservative, however; in the minds of millions he was the voice of the conservative movement who as of now, has been successfully silenced by the left. After years of dominating the news with his so called "no spin" approach, O'Reilly has accomplished little more for conservatives than feeding the left wing narrative that conservatives are sexist, chauvinist pigs.

If the right truly wants to win back this country then we must start living up to the values and morals we espouse. There is more than a simple war against conservatism going on, there is an all out assault on the very nature of truth itself. The left is seeking to change the nature of man and his understanding of natural law. The normalization of homosexuality and transgenderism, the teaching of moral relativism as opposed to moral absolutes and the feminization of the American male are all deliberate attacks against the free will of man designed to destroy God's creation and remake man in the lefts image. We will never be able to stop the onslaught against our values as long as the left is able to prove that we cannot live up to them. Remember, this is an Alinsky tactic and every time a prominent conservative figure falls, they prove it to be a successful one.

"Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity." (Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals.)

Essentially, what Alinsky is saying is that it is easy to make conservatives look like hypocrites because in too many cases their behavior does not live up to the moral codes they allegedly live by. Rush Limbaugh often discusses this topic. He frequently points out the fact that hypocrisy, while more prevalent on the left than the right, is something that fails to stick to them. What he falls short of explaining clearly is the fact that the left is working from a place where there are no moral absolutes. Christians, as well as right wing conservatives wear their values on their sleeve and we believe that is in fact, our values and belief system that made this country great. Leftists believe in moral relativism, meaning that there is no universal morality; therefore, they have no morals to live up to making it difficult to label them as hypocrites. Morality to them, like gender and the Constitution, is fluid and can be changed to meet the situation they are currently in in order to achieve the results they seek in the moment, and they have no shame in employing this tactic. A recent example is Harry Reid admitting he lied about Mitt Romney's tax returns and bragging that it cost him the election. In pursuit of the perfect "socialist utopia" the left believes that sacrificing their own morality is in fact, the highest level of morality that can be achieved. To further understand this we again, turn to Alinsky.

"In action one does not always enjoy the luxury of a decision that is consistent with both one's individual conscience and the good of mankind. The choice must always be for the latter. Action is for mass salvation and not for the individual's personal salvation. He who sacrifices the mass good for his personal conscience has a peculiar conception of personal salvation; he doesn't care enough for the people to be corrupted for them." (Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals.)

Essentially, the left believes that their socialist utopia is what is best for mankind and that corrupting themselves in order to achieve it is the highest level of morality. This is why you can never slap them with the label of hypocrisy, they simply don't care. They believe that their compassion, their intentions to do good far outweigh the actual consequences of their actions. The damage they actually cause is either ignored or viewed as a necessary step in America's transformation.

There really is no way to fight an enemy who conducts this type of psychological warfare, short of actually living up to the values we espouse. People in the conservative movement have to conduct themselves in a manner that is beyond reproach because around every corner is a social justice warrior seeking to discredit everything we believe in. When people like Bill O'Reilly or others who by their own actions allow themselves to be silenced by the left, bring this type of discredit to conservatism we have to work twice as hard to prove that the left wing narrative is incorrect to those sitting on the sidelines. The election of Donald Trump, despite what others claim, was not a victory for conservatism but the perfect example of people being forced to cast a vote because there was no other choice. The war for hearts and minds is still very much alive and there are millions of future voters who are conditioned by the left to go along to get along. We will not win this cultural battle if the main stream is successfully presenting liberalism as morally superior and conservatives as chauvinistic. We can not allow them to turn us into hypocrites because we can not live up to our own "book of rules." We have to start by being the change we want to see.



Tuesday, April 11, 2017

I'm finding myself at a loss for words. Our country is so twisted, so misguided and led astray. We live in a land that was founded upon the indubitable idea that the individual human being is worthy of dignity and far more important than any collective. Yet, we allow ourselves to be collectivized by politicians who play on our fears and beliefs while keeping us divided into groups for their own benefit. Worse yet, people have become so complacent, so comfortable with the status quo while focusing on their own lives they forget that preserving liberty is an obligation we all must share, or else the next generation will not know it.

People have come to accept the unacceptable, allowing their own power to self govern to be usurped by political parasites making promises they never intended to keep. They do this for two reasons. One, because it is their team, the man they voted for doing it, or two, they simply do not  know any better. Most people, because they have come to prioritize entertainment and self gratification are not even aware of the degree which our country has changed. Over the past decade we have been conditioned, trained if you will, in public schools, to look to government to solve our problems instead of being self reliant. It is a continuous, vicious circle. The government breaks our country, our constitution, steals our labor and morals, then they promise a quick and easy fix by voting for them in the next election cycle.

Sadly, each passing generation becomes further enslaved in this breakdown of the freewill because government has wrapped it's long, sticky tentacles around every facet of our lives. Whether it comes to educating our children, expressing our values or trying to get ahead the government is there with oppressive regulations which serve to limit man's capacity for growth. People blame the government, and others in an official capacity, then they turn right around and keep supporting the system that puts the same corruption back in office. Sure we vote for the man that better represents our ideals and makes better promises but in reality, we are voting for people that are preselected by others. In other words, the aspirant office seekers presented to us are running because it has been determined they will push the larger policy issues that really matter to those in the shadows, the ones we want to see defeated every time we vote. The most recent example is Donald Trump and his attack against Syria.

Is it so hard to believe that the global elite, which we thought Trump would stand against, could be so diabolical to train an individual to be the ideal candidate that would beat one they knew had no chance of winning? In other words, is it so hard to believe that Trump has been pulling the wool over your eyes since the beginning? Just as it was with Obama, Trump has his unquestioning supporters who will support his every move because he is not Hillary Clinton and called himself a Republican.

A lot of this would make more sense if everyone understood that society is constantly under a microscope, being studied and evaluated so they can use the things we believe against us and play us for the fools we are. Donald Trump played on our emotions on issues such as immigration and the repeal of Obamacare and as we can now see, those are dead-end issues going nowhere fast. While we are being distracted with these small petty issues, the larger one of carrying on wars of regime change to prevent sovereign nations from dropping the dollar as the reserve currency carries on. Yet, because of a lack of motivation and a fear to question their own choices, people will blindly support these wars without realizing they are the same ones planned before the attacks of September 11, 2001 even occurred. Such is the way I suppose.

Anyhow, we have a responsibility to uphold liberty and yet, as mentioned earlier, we have been conditioned to accept that government not only protects, but grants liberty. If we are to call ourselves constitutionalists then we better wise up and start exercising the liberty to question our president's while we still have it. We have to stop looking to government to solve all of our problems and start exercising the responsibility to solve them ourselves before the government comes up with a final solution. We have to stop letting them define the narrative and directing our morality. We need to stand up and say with conviction that we will no longer be accepting the things we cannot change but changing the things we cannot accept. We can no longer accept being lied to by people who enrich themselves over the loss of our liberty.

Sunday, April 9, 2017

The War in Syria and the Mess We Created

Many are cheering President Donald Trump's decision to retaliate against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad for the chemical weapons attack he allegedly launched against his own people. It isn't hard to understand how Trump's decision can garner the support of so many Americans who feel a sense of outrage that a government would attack its own people. Americans, rightfully so, hold a moral high ground concerning the relationship between governments and the people they govern.  Unfortunately there is no solid evidence that Assad is the one responsible for the attack. The fact that so many are behind Trumps action is also problematic in the sense that he didn't seek congressional approval before launching the attack. People voted for Trump because he led them to believe that he would stand against the global interests subverting our sovereignty as a free nation and that he would return our country to the principles that made us free in the first place. As his administration continues on it seems that he either is a proxy who has been working for the globalists all along, or he simply isn't as tough and principled as he presented himself. Syria is another in a long line of nations who refuse to participate in The Bank of International Settlements.  They also moved away from the U.S. Dollar as it reserve currency in 2006. Saddam Hussein was ready to sell oil in Euros as opposed to dollars and we took him out. The same is true with Libyan President Miramar Gadhafi, he was ready to drop the U.S. Dollar and trade in his own gold backed currency and we took him out as well. Besides Syria, the only other nation not participating in the Petrodollar oil market is Iran, which is why they are one of the original seven countries targeted for regime change in the war plan known as the Project for a New American Century.



Throughout the Obama administration many people expressed frustration over the fact that Obama seemed to pander to radical Islamists while referring to militant groups such as ISIS as the "JV team." It eventually became apparent that Obama was actually arming these radical militants and recently released documents show that he was doing so in order to pressure Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. The group was being used to destabilize Syria in order to topple the Assad government. This is to ensure that Syria does not create its own currency. President Obama was a master manipulator and he effortlessly was able to blind the masses through his social justice rhetoric. None of his supporters would have thought that he was carrying on the same war objectives as his predecessor George W. Bush. The truth is that Obama conducted nearly ten times as many air strikes, mostly by unmanned aerial drones, than Bush had.  Ironically, these strikes were also conducted in countries targeted for regime change under the Project New American Century doctrine. Gadhafi was killed by Obama's administration and it was during Obama's watch that tensions first escalated with Syria. The point is that there is an objective, and Trump's recent action proves that he is not the independent, principled statesman we were hoping for. He is working to achieve the same globalist agenda through phony proxy wars as Bush, Clinton and Obama.

Many people may not realize the extent in which the United States has contributed to the chaos in the Middle East. The U.S. supported Iraq in its eight year war against Iran and in fact, there is evidence suggesting that the U.S. aided Iraq in launching mustard nerve agents against Iranian forces. The Reagan administration had determined that there was no benefit from an Iranian victory so we threw our full support behind Iraq. Ironically, decades later we would accuse Iraq of having the same mustard gas we supported them using because they threatened to sell oil in Euros as opposed to dollars. The United States also funded and trained the Mujahideen, which would later become the radical militants known as Al-Qaeda, in their efforts to beat back a Soviet invasion of Afghanistan during the cold war. The U.S. later invaded Afghanistan using the September 11, 2001 attacks as justification. The truth has more to do with a natural gas pipeline project sponsored by the corporation Unocal. In 1998 congressional hearings were held concerning this project and due to rising political tensions in the region it was put on hold. The September 11 attacks provided the perfect opportunity to go into Afghanistan and ensure that the project would continue. It is important to know the history of how the U.S. has influenced and participated in Middle east wars because we are doing the same thing now in Syria. Not only did the Obama administration arm and train ISIS militants to use as a tool against Assad,  the U.S. is also arming and training opposing factions to create a proxy war designed to entirely destabilize the region. Rebels armed by the CIA and Pentagon are now fighting against each other in Syria.

The question before us is a tough one. Is Donald trump just another shill for the globalists whom so many thought he would stand against, or was it necessary for him to attack Syria to prevent further attacks? We will likely never know for sure because the media will work incessantly, as they always do, to fill our heads with disinformation designed to keep us from knowing anything for certain. As far as most Americans are concerned our country is strictly divided along ideological lines between the so called left and right wings. Two carefully constructed narratives between so called liberal and conservative worldviews which create the necessary conflict and distractions needed to carry out the objective of world wide social change.  The election of Donald Trump was heralded by many as an intervention from God that prevented a known globalist from assuming power; however, he just carried out Hillary Clinton's bidding by attacking Syria. America will never return to its founding principles as long as people continue blindly supporting the team they voted for. We have a responsibility to preserve liberty and pass it along to the next generation. This can't be done if after every election we step back and simply assume our guy can do no wrong. Conservatives mocked Obama voters for years for this sheepish mentality and now, well now those same people are making the same mistake exhibiting the same sheepish, follow along behavior. Just because we voted for Donald trump it doesn't eliminate the facts presented in this article, nor does it mean you have to stand behind his every action. In fact, liberty depends upon your not doing so.

Friday, March 31, 2017

Ideological Subversion and the Deceptive Push for Single Payer Healthcare

President Trump ran a winning campaign by convincing many millions of Americans that he was the answer to the failed, social engineering of Obama. In the minds of freedom loving patriots across the country Donald Trump was a true conservative. Interestingly enough, Trump once admitted to identifying more with Democrats while also claiming the economy does better under Democratic leadership. President Trump, the man who Conservatives assume will fix our country, also supported President Clinton's assault weapons ban. While he has claimed to have changed his position on this issue it remains to be seen how well he will hold under pressure when the next mass shooting occurs. Finally, and probably most importantly considering the recent circus sideshow we have witnessed concerning health care, he wrote a book stating America needed a single payer healthcare system.

"We must have universal healthcare. I'm a conservative on most issues but a liberal on this one. We should not hear so many stories of families ruined by healthcare expenses." (Donald Trump, The America We Deserve)

The full repeal of Obamacare was probably the single most important issue Trump campaigned on that enabled him to win the election. The media would have you believe that the so called failure to pass the proposed repeal bill is a significant loss for Donald Trump and his presidency. The most likely truth is that it was probably a set up designed to give the impression that Conservatives in  Congress are responsible for holding back any real progress. Destroying the Conservative movement has been a long time goal of the left and now they have the opportunity to show Republicans that they are standing in the way of their president's agenda. Trump has recently announced that he intends to push back against the Freedom Caucus in retaliation for their vote against the proposed Obamacare replacement. The Freedom Caucus, and other Republicans, were right to vote against it as it made no real reforms in health care and kept many of the Obamacare provisions in place. Americans don't want a replacement, they want repeal, period. That is what Trump promised and that is why Trump won.

It is no surprise that Trump is  vowing to work with Democrats in coming up with a solution to the failed Obamacare law. The Affordable Care Act was likely designed to fail in the first place in order to create the demand for a solution, which would be single payer. this strategy is known as the Hegelian Dialectic or the problem-reaction-solution strategy. Democrats have been searching for a way to get single payer health care passed for nearly a century and it seems, with the election of Trump, they may actually get it. Too many Americans fail to realize the extents to which Democrats and other progressives, including progressive Republicans, will go to get what they want. The name of the game is deception, plain and simple.

The healthcare fiasco, in this authors educated opinion, is proof positive that there is an effort to deceive the American people into accepting a single payer healthcare system. Consider the following quote from Rules for Radicals a moment.

There's another reason for working inside the system. Dostoevski said that taking a new step is what people fear most. Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and chance the future. This acceptance is the reformation essential to any revolution.  (Saul Alinsky Rules for Radicals)

What this alludes to is the idea that people will eventually accept things that they normally wouldn't if they have been brought far enough into a state of despair. Americans would likely have laughed at the prospect of a Donald Trump presidency two decades ago; however, after eight years of far left radicalism and the prospect of a Hillary Clinton win, Donald trump was the best choice presented to us. Also, consider for a moment that those in the establishment knew full well that Hillary Clinton was not going to win. The vast majority of the American people were angry and Washington was facing severe backlash for their inability to listen to the American voter. If they wanted to achieve their single payer healthcare goals they would have to put an individual in office who can deceive the American people. Donald Trump, an admitted Democrat, was able to convince millions that he was conservative mainly because people were so afraid of Hillary winning. This is the same strategy they employed with Bush and Obama. As noted in this authors article on The Project New American Century, Obama's wars were the same that were planned before September 11 even happened. They presented George Bush as an abysmal failure and Obama as the one who would save us from it all. By doing so the wars originally planned decades before September 11 were able to continue virtually unnoticed by the anti-war movement. In the case of Hillary Clinton and Trump they were presented as exact opposites when in fact, the main policy issues that are desired, such as single payer healthcare, are a common goal. This is how they control your choices America. Also, consider the fact that Donald Trump is likely going sign into law a bill that allows internet providers to sell your browsing history. This is being opposed by Democrats on the grounds that it is a violation of an individuals privacy rights to do so. Since when do Democrats care about our privacy? This is also a deliberate strategy, in this author's opinion, to keep us confused and unsure of which leg to stand on. Consider the following quote from a former KGB agent, Yuri Bezmenov, also known as Thomas Schuman,  concerning a Soviet tactic called Ideological Subversion.

An overt slow process to change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that despite the abundance of information, no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community and their country.

America, we have reached a point in our society where nothing is as it seems. Donald Trump is not a conservative. He will work with the Democrats to one, instill a single payer healthcare system and two, destroy the remaining Conservatives in congress by giving the impression they are standing in the way of his grand plans to save us all. This of course, is this authors humble opinion.

Image License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
Image Source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/sandiandsteve/31312464956






Tuesday, March 14, 2017

Marines in Syria: Continuing The Project for a New American Century Objectives



Donald Trump has deployed Marine Corps ground forces into Syria to combat ISIS militants. In the eyes of most Americans this is a welcomed move on the part of the new administration because Americans are fed up with the constant threat of Islamic terrorism hanging over their heads. The former president did little to take any real action and in most cases seemed to be making excuses for radical Islam. Being the ultimate social justice warrior, Barack Obama portrayed the terrorists as victims of American imperialism while suggesting we should show empathy towards them. The fact that President Trump is escalating the war is Syria with the deployment of ground forces is not surprising. Most Americans do not realize that the war in Syria was part of an overall strategy to reshape the middle east while also redefining America's role as the worlds sole super power. President Trump is continuing this war as did President Obama with the end goal of not defeating ISIS but removing Syrian president Bashar al-Assad from power in much the same way Libyan president Muammar Gadhafi was disposed of. Gadhafi was killed not because he was a brutal dictator but because he was working to introduce gold backed money that would free Libya from the enslavement of relying on U.S. dollars to purchase oil as the greenback is the worlds reserve currency. It is said this is the same reason Saddam Hussein was executed as well. Is Trumps deployment of Marines the continuation of objectives set in The Project New American Century war plans?

Before the fall of Tripoli and his untimely demise, Gadhafi was trying to introduce a single African currency linked to gold. Following in the foot steps of the late great pioneer Marcus Garvey who first coined the term ”United States of Africa”. Gaddafi wanted to introduce and only trade in the African gold Dinar – a move which would have thrown the world economy into chaos. The Dinar was widely opposed by the ‘elite’ of today’s society and who could blame them. African nations would have finally had the power to bring itself out of debt and poverty and only trade in this precious commodity. They would have been able to finally say ‘no’ to external exploitation and charge whatever they felt suitable for precious resources. It has been said that the gold Dinar was the real reason for the NATO led rebellion, in a bid to oust the outspoken leader.

The war in Syria, as well as Iraq and Afghanistan was planned twenty years prior to the events of September 11, 2001. In fact, the war plans included military action in seven countries total, some of which President Obama continued through bombing campaigns. These countries included not only Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria but Lebanon, Somalia, Libya, and ultimately, Iran as well. In the year 2000, a little known document was written that paved the way for America to assert its military dominance and reshape the Middle East through regime change. This document was known as the Project New American Century. The aim of this project is to allegedly rebuild America's defenses and spread American principles abroad. One of the main objectives was to dramatically increase military spending while also stressing the need for a stronger military presence in the Middle East. Written within the plan itself is an admission that the goals, without the catastrophic effects of a new pearl harbor event, would take a great deal of time to accomplish. In other words, by the time the events of September 11, 2001 took place, these wars of conquest were already planned, and the previous statement has led many to believe that the September 11, attacks were a false flag event staged to provide the justification.

Both Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gadhafi were targeted because they threatened to replace the U.S. dollar as the reserve currency with one of their own backed by gold. The U.S. dollar has been the worlds reserve currency in oil purchases ever since Richard Nixon took it off of the gold standard. It is for this reason that the dollar is known as the Petrodollar. According to an article written by Callum Newman for the Daily Reckoning, the reserve currency status of the U.S. Dollar is propped up by Saudi Arabia in exchange for U.S. military muscle. In other words, Saudi Arabia deliberately prices its oil in U.S. denominations, forcing other countries to keep a huge stock of U.S. currency on hand. This keeps our paper money relevant as oil is the only thing giving our money any value.  In exchange, we provide the Saudis the military muscle needed to maintain dominance in the region. If Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gadhafi would have succeeded in selling oil in their own gold backed currencies the effects on the U.S. economy would have been devastating. Furthermore, it is also believed that these seven countries are targeted for regime change because they are not part of the international central banking system. According to an article at Zerohedge.com, none of the listed countries targeted for regime change are members of the Bank for International settlements, which allegedly makes them out of reach for those seeking to globalize the worlds financial markets.

What do these seven countries have in common? In the context of banking, one that sticks out is that none of them is listed among the 56 member banks of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). That evidently puts them outside the long regulatory arm of the central bankers’ central bank in Switzerland.

The most renegade of the lot could be Libya and Iraq, the two that have actually been attacked. Kenneth Schortgen Jr, writing on Examiner.com, noted that “[s]ix months before the US moved into Iraq to take down Saddam Hussein, the oil nation had made the move to accept euros instead of dollars for oil, and this became a threat to the global dominance of the dollar as the reserve currency, and its dominion as the petrodollar.”

According to a Russian article titled “Bombing of Libya – Punishment for Ghaddafi for His Attempt to Refuse US Dollar”, Gaddafi made a similarly bold move: he initiated a movement to refuse the dollar and the euro, and called on Arab and African nations to use a new currency instead, the gold dinar. Gaddafi suggested establishing a united African continent, with its 200 million people using this single currency.

As noted earlier, Barack Obama continued these wars, despite the fact he promised to end them. He was able to do so because he had pulled the wool over the eyes of the American people through his social justice campaigns and continued insistence that he stood with the Muslims against the imperialism of capitalistic America. The truth is that Barack Obama was put in place in order to do just this, deceive the American people so the same agenda could be continued unimpeded by discontented Americans and the anti-war left. These wars to maintain the dominance of a fake, valueless U.S. Dollar were able to advance while Barack Obama kept us divided over issues of race and income inequality. Is Donald Trump doing the same thing? It is safe to assume that Trump, like other president's,  is following the advice of his senior advisors on many issues; however, there a few points that need to be considered now that the war in Syria is escalating with the deployment of ground troops.

First, a little known provision in  the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act allows for the creation of propaganda to be used against the American public. To be more specific, the bill repeals the 1948 Smith-Mundt act which according to The Business Insider, prohibits the use of psychological warfare and propaganda intended to sway the opinions of the American public. America has been subject to brutal psychological warfare campaign, waged by the mainstream media, that is intended to do just that, manipulate the opinions of Americans. The repeal of the Smith-Mundt Act makes this perfectly legal, especially if it is being done for the so called greater good.  Also, a Hollywood film production studio was recently exposed producing ISIS propaganda videos, suggesting that many videos seen on the internet are actually fake. Evidence has also surfaced which claims the Jordanian pilot allegedly burned alive by ISIS militants is also a fake. If these videos truly are staged and the U.S. government has legalized the use of propaganda against it's own citizens then the question remains. Is Donald Trump continuing the war in Syria to remove Bashar al-Assad from power for the same reasons Gadhafi and Saddam Hussein were taken out? Was ISIS a deliberately created enemy needed for the justification of continuing U.S. military presence in the Middle East in order to achieve the objectives of the Project New American Century, and reign in the nations who don't belong to the global banking network? We will likely never know the truth because most Americans are too busy paying attention to what their television and smart phones tell them to care about.