Friday, October 13, 2017

Clarifying the Objectives of Gun Grabbers

Article V
The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress; provided that no amendment which may be made prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any manner affect the first and fourth clauses in the ninth section of the first article; and that no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate.
For years the idea of an Article V convention of the states has been pushed by many conservatives as a way to reign in federal spending and an out of control federal government. An Article V convention is a way to propose new amendments to the constitution, a provision added by our founders as a way to ensure the people have the ability to take control of their governing process. Any new amendments, once proposed, must then be ratified by three fourths of the states legislatures in order to become the law of the land. Conservatives argue, that because Republicans control the majority of the state legislatures, precious liberties protected by the constitution, such as the right to keep and bear arms, would be in no danger. This has proven to be false as The New American Magazine is reporting that a "clarification" of the Second Amendments meaning is on the agenda should an Article V convention take place.

What does it mean to clarify the Second Amendments meaning? Well, many gun control proponents point out, as The New American highlights, that the Second Amendment was written at a time when only muskets and other arms of less lethal ability existed. Their arguments would of course suggest that the founders had no idea what direction technology would go and what type of arms would then be available to the public. On the other hand, if a pro-Second Amendment majority is present at the convention, clarifying the right to keep and bear arms could in deed do just that. They could re-affirm that an armed public is the best way to ensure the security of a free state. This however, in our politically charged climate of fear and hysteria against guns, is not likely.

Setting these idle arguments aside there are more serious threats that an Article V convention poses to the Second Amendment. One of these threats is the fact that gun control, and the disarming of America has been written into public law since 1961. Signed by President Kennedy, PL87-297 Arms Control and Disarmament Act sets in motion the process in which America's military will be systematically reduced, disarmed and subverted to the authority of a world army headed by The United Nations. According to Bernadine Smith of, the final stages of this plan would be the elimination of national control of our armed services, which in turn would subvert our national sovereignty, and the total and complete disarming of the American people.

The American public seems blissfully unaware that the past several decades have brought us a massive, systematic reduction in the size of our military and the closure of many bases nationwide.

Also, the process for turning over command of the U.S. military to the United Nations started nearly two decades before with the passing of the United Nations Participation Act. This act put the power of committing U.S. forces to conflicts overseas in the hands of the U.N. Security Council as opposed to the U.S. congress, who incidentally constitutionally speaking, has the sole authority to declare war. Since the Korean war, all conflicts involving U.S. forces have been directed by the United Nations Security Council.

State Department Publication 7277  states as one of it's goals the total and complete disarmament of military forces except for that which is necessary to maintain internal order and for contributions to a United Nations peace keeping force. This essentially means that only a small body of armed forces operating under the jurisdiction of the United Nations would exist for the purpose of enforcing principles set forth by a world governing body.


What agreements are this publication referencing and what disarmament obligations is the United States expected to be held to? The United Nations Program of Action on Small Arms is one such agreement. Many may argue that as of now this agreement has no bearing on U.S. law. Considering the harsh political climate and the constant efforts to pass gun control laws it is important that the American public at least understand what this agreement entails. For example, section II explicitly states that where they do not yet exist, laws should be passed criminalizing the illicit manufacture, transfer and possession of small arms. What does illicit mean? Does that mean the three pound drop  trigger in your semi-automatic rifle? It can mean anything that gives them the necessary wording to criminalize gun ownership in America.

II.  Preventing, combating and eradicating the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons in all its aspects

(Take note that the current gun control bill proposed by Republican Carlos Curbelo is so vaguely worded it could outlaw the manufacture of almost anything that enhances a semi-auto's performance.)

Another agreement is the U.N Arms Trade Treaty, which was signed illegally by Former Secretary of State John Kerry. While this treaty has not been ratified it is hard to argue that our government is not working to accomplish the objectives set forth within its text.

One particular aspect of this treaty that readers should take note of is Article 16 titled simply, International Assistance. To put it bluntly, this section establishes a trust fund of sorts, and other means of assistance, which can be used to assist nations that have signed into forcing others into compliance. While this treaty begins with words that suggest the U.N. will respect the sovereignty of nation states, other material provided in this article shows that the ultimate objective is in fact completes disarmament of the public. Proof of this being the final objective is demonstrated every time the push for gun control returns in response to a national tragedy. 

Bernadine Smith, at, claims that the government will use the Article V Convention process to introduce a new constitution which will be communistic in structure and more in line with the principles of the U.N. Charter than the U.S. Constitution. This constitution exists and it explicitly denies the right of individuals to keep and bear arms of any type except for those serving in the capacity of a U.N. peacekeeping force Clarifying the used for keeping internal order. This constitution can be read here

With all of this being said it is imperative, should an Article V convention take place, that the people, along with pro-Second Amendment advocates pay close attention to its proceedings. There is a reason that America is constantly being discredited and referred to as a racist, oppressive nation. They want the general public confused and spiritually defeated to the point they will accept this new socialist constitution as an alternative to a system of governance they have been taught has failed. Be weary America. Allow me to leave with one more quote.

Wednesday, October 4, 2017

Democrats Have No Moral Base to Push Gun Control

So the Democrats are pushing gun control, again. The latest word is that Republicans may be willing to accept a ban on bump fire stocks and other after market accessories. Why does the minority party get to dictate this while the majority begs and pleads to be accepted into their elitist club? Personally, I think the Republicans should find the intestinal fortitude to tell Democrats to shove it up their proverbial donkeys. After all, the Democrat party has proven over the past few years, that they have absolutely no credibility or integrity and that they are driven purely by their hatred for this country. In other words, they have no right whatsoever to push for gun control when they lack the righteousness and ethical back ground to do so.

First of all, the Democrats acted with complete disbelief that Donald Trump won the election when in all reality it should have come to no surprise. The average person, when faced with such an obvious rejection, actually does some soul searching and self reflecting in an effort to change. Not the Democrats. In response to the loss of a legitimate election they immediately go on a wild goose chase in an attempt to convince the nation that Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election from Hillary. Ten months into Trumps presidency and they are still searching for some way to make this connection despite the lack of evidence proving any conspiracy.

Of course, before the election even happened the Democrats got caught red handed fixing their own primary election in favor of Hillary Clinton. Clearly, if they had not done so Bernie Sanders would have been the chosen nominee. What was the reaction to this? Nothing, it was covered up. In fact, in a law suit filed against the DNC by Democrat voters a court actually ruled the DNC had the right to rig the election in any way they see fit. How is this not considered corruption of the highest order?

Over the past few years we have been witness to Operation Fast and Furious, Benghazi, the Iran Deal and numerous other scandals.

We witnessed several mass shootings perpetrated by Islamic terrorists. In response to these attacks the Democrats blamed America's inherent racism insisting that Muslims are the new oppressed group.

The Democrats encouraged a literal war on police by allowing a destructive narrative based on a lie to develop and take hold, "Hands up don't shoot." Many police officers have been murdered in cold blood by people supporting the cause of groups like Black Lives Matter, yet the Democrats are completely indifferent to this claiming that blacks are oppressed victims of White Privilege. To this day many blacks still believe police are systematically hunting them down and shooting them just because they are black.

Cities have been burned to the ground by organized groups of professional leftists being paid by George Soros to riot and disrupt the lives of everyday Americans. These riots destroyed businesses and homes and the left puts these people on a pedestal as though they are some kind of cultural hero's.

Hillary Clinton has been implicated in numerous scandals including the Email issue, where no real investigation took place, along with her real collusion with Russia to sell our uranium. She has also been caught using her State Department position to elicit huge donations to her Clinton Foundation in an elaborate pay to play scheme. What was done about any of this? Absolutely nothing. Let's not forget the numerous investigators that continually pop up dead while investigating Clinton corruption.

The Democrat party is the first party to actually remove God from their political platform. They sit in their positions of wealth and power and lecture us about greed. Democrat politicians make up some of the richest in the country. For instance, Senator Diane Feinstein has a total net worth of 80 million dollars, yet she advocates for policies which restrict an individuals ability to be able to pursue that kind of wealth themselves. If she could she would enact a Marxist dictatorship demanding everyone give up what they have so everything is fair. The truth is that she advocates against capitalism to hide the fact that her husband is a finance capitalist. She is a person of very low integrity who has no ethical standing to be pushing gun control. By the way, she has a concealed carry permit in California.

Democrats have done nothing but use fear, lies and smear campaigns in an effort to get what they want. They have used words like racist, homophobia, Islamophobia, uncompassionate and extremist to describe anyone who stands in the way of their agenda. They accuse Republicans of wanting people to die when in fact they hide the brutal truth about Obamacare and what socialized medicine would do to America. They lie about gun statistics in order to push a disarmament agenda, demonstrating a willingness to leave good people helpless when they know full well gun control will not stop violent crime. Again, they are willing to leave you helpless against people who will not follow their laws. How is that moral or fair?

Democrats have no moral standing whatsoever to be pushing an agenda of any kind. Not only are they the minority party they are liars, cheaters and have demonstrated they do not deserve the trust of the American people. They have no moral base to be legislating people's rights, yet here we are on the edge of our seats watching to see what happens. Get off you asses America.

Tuesday, October 3, 2017

The Psychopolitics of the Lone Wolf Scare

The left is so predictable. In response to the worst mass shooting in our country's history they frantically start their push for gun control. In an effort to whip up an emotional fervor, they are attempting to convince us we need to restrict the second amendment by passing more laws like the ones that did absolutely nothing to stop this guy from effortlessly murdering so many people.

Think about it a moment, they are constantly exposing us to the shocking brutality of gun violence, innocent people frantically running for their lives, then demanding we give up our rights to be able to defend ourselves from  madmen who obviously don't follow laws.  Unbelievable, really.

We are about to witness a massive push to eliminate the second amendment in much the same way we saw the left move against the confederate statues. They will attempt to label anyone who doesn't see the so called reasonableness of gun control as insane, uncompassionate and un-American.

The populace must be brought into the belief that every individual within it who rebels in any way, shape or form against efforts or activities to enslave the whole must be considered to be a deranged person whose eccentricities are neurotic or insane and must have at once the treatment of a psychopolitician (psychiatrist.)

Generally speaking, the real agenda behind these events can be discovered by carefully listening to the language that is being used by the left. For instance, there is a lot of talk about the lack of anti-terror laws for so called "homegrown" American terrorists. For years now the left has been attempting to use a terrorist watch list to prevent Americans from legally purchasing firearms.

To be more specific, people on the no fly list could find themselves being denied next time they undergo the required background check to legally buy a gun.

This of course, does absolutely nothing to stop someone like Steven Paddock from illegally acquiring weapons. Something would at least be done though, right? If you happen to think this is a good idea consider the fact that if you by chance have expressed any right wing beliefs , or aligned yourself with any right leaning ideology, you may be a good candidate for such a list.

Another term loosely being thrown around is "Lone Wolf Shooter." What is being implied by this term? The term Lone Wolf is intended to strike fear into the hearts and minds of all of us by suggesting that no one can be trusted with guns because at any moment, for some deep, dark psychological reason we are all capable of going insane and committing mass murder. Consider for a moment the fact that after every shooting, we are inundated with non-sense about how no one knew the shooter was capable of such a thing. The shooter knew nothing about guns, the shooter was compassionate and he loved to jump through daisies and dance with butterflies while rubbing a puppies belly.  In other words, the shooter is every man's neighbor. This reinforces irrational fear in the hopes that when you see your neighbor loading up his rifle for a day of great second amendment activities, you become frightful and concerned.

In order to induce this kind of fear in the public the psyche of the nation must be attacked in a manner which brings to question the sanity of all men. Man himself must be broke down and his spiritual will to resist crushed.

The first thing to be degraded in any nation is the state of man himself. Nations which have high ethical tone are difficult to conquer. Their loyalties are hard to shake, their allegiance to their leaders is fanatical, and what they usually call their spiritual integrity cannot be violated by duress. It is not efficient to attack a nation in such a frame of mind. It is the basic purpose of Psychopolitics to reduce that state of mind to a point where it can be ordered and enslaved. Thus, the first target is Man, himself. He must be degraded from a spiritual being to an animalistic reaction pattern. He must think of himself as an animal, capable only of animalistic reactions. He must no longer think of himself, or of his fellows, as capable of "spiritual endurance," or "nobility."

By labeling mass shooters as "Lone Wolf Terrorist" the unity of the nation is disrupted by creating a fear and mistrust. By moving immediately to take advantage of over boiling emotions, the left is keeping the population in a reactionary pattern, unwittingly following the lead of their controllers without the ability to reasonably question their own actions. Slowly, because all men are suddenly capable of committing these horrific murders, the population begins to question their own nature as human beings. Are we truly spiritual beings, or animals that need to be controlled and trained how to behave? Are we capable of being free, or do we need an over bearing government?

The left needs the populace to be untrusting of one another. We are supposed to be suspicious of anyone who is a supporter of gun rights and at this point, the constitution itself. Through the coming months we will see increased pressure for stricter gun restrictions along with the efforts to completely dehumanize gun right supporters. The second amendment will likely become the next General Lee statue to the point where the left may start attacking people for having pro gun stickers on their car or for even carrying legally. Now's the time to start articulating what you believe in and making your voice heard. Look, the left has demonstrated a willingness to destroy this country through their social movements and protests. They are driven purely by hatred of a country that they have been lied to about their whole lives. What kind of power could we have if we could come together and take a stand in the name of a country we love and want to endure for the sake of future generations?

Saturday, September 30, 2017

The Anthem Protests-Playing by the Radicals' Rules

I have always believed that the NFL has been a deliberate distraction to keep Americans fat, happy and distracted from what their government is doing. Let's face it, the vast majority of us, on any given day, couldn't identify three major issues in the news and how it affects them, but those football scores are always on the top of their mind. It must also be noted however, that the overwhelming majority of football fans are people who love their country and work hard for a living. Since it's inception how ever many decades ago, football has been associated with patriotism. The NFL therefore, is the perfect organization for the left to hijack and use an organization for social change.

It has long been known that the left hates professional football and everything it stands for, including patriotism. This has been the topic all week long on talk radio. The left views the sport as patriarchic, too masculine, too violent and would love to see it's demise. The theory that the left has deliberately set the stage for these anti-American protests in order to drive a wedge between the fans and the sport has began to take shape. This is certainly a possibility, in fact a probability, but there is so much more to than that. This a multifaceted psychopolitical assault on the heart of America and the organization that has defined Americanism for decades. It is an assault designed to get us to change the way we think and manipulate us into begging for an end to our own rights. The only way you can win this is by doing nothing.

American's may think they are winning by boycotting the NFL but what you are really saying is that you don't support everyone's right to free speech. Commentators are addressing this issue by saying the first amendment has no bearing because the players are employees working for someone who owns the team. Yes, this is true; however, there are still first amendment implications and the left has you demanding someone take action to limit speech you don't like. They are creating the problem in order to get you to demand the solution. Let's face it America, if you demand that the government, or the NFL take action to silence speech you don't like you are saying that it's alright for the same to happen to you. Let's take this a step deeper. Once again I am going to use the following quote from Alinky's Rules for Radicals to stress my point.

Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian Church can live up to Christianity.

Their intent is to make hypocrites out of the right. The snowflakes on the left have for years, been waging a war on free speech on the basis that they find many of our beliefs to be offensive. On the other hand, we have been arguing that offensive speech is what was meant to be protected by the first amendment in the first place. Well America, I'm sorry but the left has outdone you again by proving that you don't really believe that. The more you argue for a boycott against the NFL the more you are proving the left right, that some speech is offensive and that it should be banned in public. In other words, like gullible automatons you played right into their little psychosocial experiment. Again, many will argue that the first amendment has no bearing here because we are technically talking about employment on a professional team. This is true from a certain stand point; however, it is a small technicality that has no bearing when it comes to the tide of social and cultural movements. Besides, when has something so trivial stopped the left?

Furthermore, the left has hijacked the NFL and has attempted to use it as a vehicle of social change. They are using the fake issue of racial injustice in an attempt to change the hearts and minds of football viewers. Obviously this has backfired in a big way. Or has it? American's are indeed tired of the fake social issues and the constant race baiting. Shutting off football had to be an expected reaction from the social planners who orchestrated this whole thing. Remember America, the left wing media, along with our education system, are firmly in control of the main stream narrative. That narrative describes a racist, selfish American population who cares nothing for the plight of minorities. By boycotting the NFL over a couple of idiots taking a knee you are only reinforcing that narrative, whether you realize it or not.

In the left we are dealing with an enemy that has no rules. Operating off the ends justify the means philosophy there is nothing they won't do to gain a stronger foothold over the culture wars. Their aim is to humiliate and destroy conservatism and they will do whatever it takes. The anthem protests were almost certainly designed to separate the audience from the sport; however, in reacting to it the way we have we are only empowering the left and playing catch up in a game many of us don't understand yet. A game of social change.

Saturday, September 23, 2017

Understanding Psychopolitics Part 3: Psychology, Behavioral Modification and the Stimulus Response Mechanisms of Men

In the last installment of this series we learned that the fall of the Soviet Union and the collapse of Communism was nothing but a psychological ploy designed to get the west to lower their guard against the rising tide of collectivism. Evidence was provided showing how the American people themselves had been deceived by one of their so called iconic conservative hero's. In the book New Lies for Old, we saw that the Communists were all too willing to go to any length necessary to accomplish their goals of global conquest, even creating the illusion that Communism had died. This is the deceptive nature of the left, they understand all too well that people would never willingly accept communism and in order to achieve their goals, the subversion of the mind must be accomplished.

Today, psychological manipulation through the media, our schools and medical systems is being used as a method of social change and behavioral modification. A close examination of our society will show how effective this has been. Men have become feminized weaklings, black groups are demanding to be re-segregated, killing an unborn child has become a human right, people are demanding that men pretending to be girls have access to girls bathrooms, and people are popping pills for every little thing that upsets them. Human beings are destroying the planet because we exhale carbon dioxide, (belief in global warming) people need safe spaces to feel protected from opinions they don't like and people are self-identifying as anything they want to be and given recognition for it. In other words, our nation is upside down and if we can't set the track straight the intended cure will soon be given to us.

By psychopolitics our chief goals are effectively carried forward. To produce a maximum of chaos in the culture of the enemy is our first most important step. Our fruits are grown in chaos, distrust, economic depression and scientific turmoil. At last a weary populace can seek peace only in our offered Communist State, at last only Communism can resolve the problems of the masses.

It is important to understand that communism itself is an application of psychology. Lenin, seeing the usefulness of Pavlov's stimulus response conditioning, went to work applying this on the Russian people. Furthermore, as people saw the real destructiveness of communism throughout the twentieth century it became necessary to shift the methods used from all out brute force to the type of behavioral modification techniques which condition people to willingly accept communism.

One of the biggest obstacles standing in the way of all out communism is Christianity. The communists know all too well that Christians will not willingly roll over and accept totalitarian rule by men. Their will to resist has to be broken, their faith shaken and their beliefs shattered in order to manipulate their behavior in a way that favors the aims of communism. The teaching of Darwinian evolution along with stimulus response conditioning has gone a long way in accomplishing this goal. It must be understood that communism does not view mankind in the same light that Christianity does. To the Christian, man is a divine being, created for a special purpose and each of us is as a unique an individual as snowflakes are to each other. To the Communist on the other hand, we are nothing special at all, we have no independent will of our own and we are able to be programmed to behave in whatever manner our masters would like to see.

Man is a stimulus-response animal. His entire reasoning capabilities, even his ethics and morals, depend upon stimulus-response machinery. This has long been demonstrated by such Russians as Pavlov, and the principles have long been used in handling the recalcitrant, in training children, and in bringing about a state of optimum behavior on the part of a population.

Having no independent will of his own, Man is easily handled by stimulus-response mechanisms. It is only necessary to install a stimulus into the mental anatomy of Man to have that stimulus reactivate and respond any time an exterior command source calls it into being.

Our entire education system is now based off of a system of stimulus response conditioning. In other words, our children are being rewarded with a positive stimulus for exhibiting behaviors that demonstrate a willingness to go along with communist objectives. This was the result of the education agreements signed between Reagan and Gorbachev that was discussed in the last article.

How does stimulus-response conditioning work? A negative reinforcement is given for behavior that is not considered to be optimal. For example, in a classroom setting if a student is expressing opinions that go against the general consensus, and in many cases these opinions will be conservative or Christian in nature, the individual will be isolated, mocked or punished to the point where they now feel compelled to go along with the masses. It is the same principle that was discussed concerning the re-aligning of loyalties. The opinions that the individual were once loyal too are so thoroughly discredited they feel shame in holding onto them. The shaming of the individual is the stimulus and the changing of opinions is the response. After this has occurred the body will now automatically remember the affects of the stimulus forever altering the way they approach sharing opinions of a nature that differs from the general consensus. This is why the media and our education system uses words like racist and fascist. They have successfully attached these words to conservative values to the point that many conservatives are afraid, or simply don't know how to defend what they really believe. The Manual on Psychopolitics explains it like this-

The mechanisms of stimulus-response are easily understood. The body takes pictures of every action in the environment around an individual. When the environment includes brutality. terror, shock, and other such activities, the mental image picture gained contains in itself all the ingredients of the environment. If the individual, himself, was injured during that moment, the injury itself will re-manifest when called upon to respond by an exterior command source.

The depths to which this has been successful is breathtaking. To say that the left has taken over our education system is truly an understatement. Everything that we as Americans believe in is being re-defined in our textbooks and the tenants of communism is subtly replacing our values. This is especially true when it comes to the teaching of psychology. Dialectical Materialism, Marxism, Pavlovian conditioning and Darwinian evolution have become so embedded in the curriculum that susceptible students will almost automatically view communism as more of an acceptable economic system than capitalism. The purpose of psychology is to re-condition the mind of those who oppose communistic ideals and bring them into alignment with state objectives. The goal of Psychopolitics is to destroy God in the minds of men and replace religion with psychology, or mental healing. Psychology itself, is used to expand communism in America.

Reactionary nations are of such a composition that they attack a word without understanding of it. As the conquest of a nation by Communism depends upon imbuing its population with communistic tenets, it is not necessary that the term "Communism" be applied at first to the educative measures employed.

As an example, in the United States we have been able to alter the works of William James, and others, into a more acceptable pattern, and to place the tenets of Karl Marx, Pavlov, Lamarek, and the data of Dialectic Materialism into the textbooks of psychology, to such a degree that anyone thoroughly studying psychology becomes at once a candidate to accept the reasonableness of Communism. 

As every chair of psychology in the United States is occupied by persons in our connection, or who can be influenced by persons in our connection the consistent employment of such texts is guaranteed. They are given the authoritative ring, and they are carefully taught.

Constant pressure in the legislatures of the United States can bring about legislation to the effect that every student attending a high school or university must have classes in psychology.

Educating broadly the educated strata of the populace into the tenets of Communism is thus rendered relatively easy, and when the choice is given them whether to continue in a Capitalistic or a Communistic condition, they will see, suddenly, in Communism, much more reasonably than in Capitalism, which will now be of our own definition. (Chapter X, The Manual on Psychopolitics)

Saturday, September 9, 2017

Understanding Psychopolitics and the 45 Goals of Communism Part 2-Deception and the Realigning of Loyalties

This week, in a move that surely angered many conservative voters, President Donald Trump made a debt ceiling deal with the Democrats. Not just any democrats but Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, who are likely to be the most despised of them all. While many people may have been shocked to see such a move, there are many others who warned Americans that this would likely happen because after all, Trump has been a Democrat his whole life. Certain radio show hosts took to the air offering excuse after excuse as to why Trump may have done such a thing, insisting that his actions aren't based on any ideological leanings but rather the desire to get a deal done. This may be true to some degree, though one has to wonder why Americans allowed a non-ideological candidate who insisted he was a conservative become the Republican nominee in the first place. Oh yeah, he was the only one who could beat Hillary Clinton.

There's another reason for working inside the system. Dostoevski said that taking a new step is what people fear most. Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and chance the future. This acceptance is the reformation essential to any revolution. (Alinsky, Rules For Radicals)

Is it possible that the election of Trump was a deceptive strategy employed by the Democrats to appease the American voter who was fed up with eight years of liberalism? While many Americans will scoff at such a question it is one that should be taken seriously, especially if people believe the Democrats are pushing a socialist agenda because deception in the advancement of socialism is the rule of the day.

It is widely accepted today that Communism died with the fall of the Soviet Union and that the United States won the cold war. This is not true, the collapse of Communism was a strategy of deception designed to lure the U.S. into lowering her guard and adopting a less defensive attitude towards Russia.

It was an attempt to convince the American government to begin a pattern of disarming its nuclear forces and cutting back its military growth. One of the goals of the Communist Party was to create the illusion that reducing her offensive military capability would actually be a sign of strength on the part of the American government. In the meantime, Russia's military strength would grow and Communism would continue to thrive, while working its way into the minds of young American's using the strategy of Ideological Subversion.

Everybody also believes that Ronald Reagan was responsible for the fall of the Soviet Union, this is also not true. In fact, it would be more accurate to say that he is responsible for young people in American universities begging for a socialist government. This is perhaps one of the biggest acts of deception ever pulled on the American people. In the name of world peace and cultural understanding, Ronald Reagan signed agreements with Mikhail Gorbachev allowing Russian influence in American classrooms. This was done in the name of advancing world peace.

One of the things that the Communists were extremely successful in accomplishing was perpetuating the belief that Communism stood for peace and equality. The atrocities of Communist dictatorships have been wiped out of the history books and the illusion has been set in the minds of young people that the Nazi regime was of a right wing nature. The book,The Communist Peace Offensive describes this strategy by quoting State Department advisor John Dulles' testimony before congress in July of 1950. He testified to his belief that the Soviet Union was engaged in a psychological warfare campaign designed to create the illusion that the United States was a nation engaged in imperialistic wars of conquest and that Communism stood for peace, human rights and total equality. Isn't this what we hear from so many young college students today?

Former KGB agent Anatoliy Golitsyn wrote in his book New Lies For Old that Communists, in an effort to achieve global Communism, were willing to use any deceptive means necessary, even creating the illusion that Communism itself was dead. This was called the "Weakness and Evolution Pattern" and it was employed with the intent of understating Communist strength and intent.

"The pattern of disinformation used during the implementation of a
long-range policy may be called the "weakness and evolution" pattern,
or the pattern of "calculated ideological moderation." Its aim is to
calm the fears of the adversaries of international communism by
understating real communist strength and to confound the policies of
those adversaries by masking the realities of communist policy.

When following this pattern, therefore, disinformation reflects real
or imaginary weaknesses, splits, and crises in the communist world
and projects an image of evolution away from an ideological toward a
conventional, national system. The intention is that the nations of the
noncommunist world, accepting the alleged disunity and evolution of
the communist world as genuine, will fail to respond effectively to
communist offensive strategy and, in their confusion, will be induced
to make practical miscalculations and mistakes in their dealings with
the communist world. The major role of disinformation in the
weakness and evolution pattern is to conceal and misrepresent
the real nature, objectives, tactics, and techniques of communist policy."  (Golitsyn, New Lies For Old)

What is the point of all of this? If disinformation is a key strategy of implementing Communism in non-communist countries why would be out of the question for our entire election system to be a part of this deception? Everybody knows that the so called right and left wing parties in America are of the same bird, yet they refuse to accept that perhaps Donald Trump is just another part of this deceptive strategy. The belief that he is the outsider that will fix it all and do what is right is foolish at best as it blinds Americans to the fact that we need to hold him accountable just as we are supposed to do with all politicians. The fact that Donald Trump was running against Hillary Clinton ensured that Americans would blindly support him because, well lets face it, anyone but Hillary would have been acceptable. Please re-examine the above quote from Rules For Radicals.

Another strategy employed by the Communists that may explain Trumps crossing of the aisle is called the re-alignment of loyalties. This is likely to be a far more plausible theory to die hard Trumpsters as it would place no fault on Trump for his actions.

Loyalty to the Communists simply means remaining in alignment with state, or Communist goals. To be disloyal is to be out of alignment with Communism and its objectives. To bring one back into alignment one has to be made to believe that his previous loyalties were causing him stress or a lack of recognition. In some cases the imprisonment of the person in question may be required with fake evidence proving that it was his previous loyalties that brought him there. The media and the labeling of people with certain stigmas serves this purpose well. The constant accusations of racism, being accused of taking people's health care, being anti-immigrant, all of these labels are brought to bear to demonstrate to those out of alignment that their previous loyalties, say to the constitution and rule of law, are actually causing them duress. In this authors opinion, this strategy goes along way to explain the behavior of not only Donald trump, but of most Republicans as well.

Could have the illusion that America is the imperialistic war machine and Communist Russia was the pursuer of peace pressured Ronald Reagan to sign the agreements he signed with Gorbachev? It is entirely possible, Reagan spoke adamantly about defeating Communism at any cost. It would have been quite easy for the Communists to portray him as a war monger while hiding behind a fake call for peace.

Despite what people choose to believe, Trump betrayed his voters by making a deal with two of the most despised Democrats. In fact, it is these two Democrats that Trumps voters put him in office to shut down, not make deals with. Some will continue to make excuses for him the same way the Obamites made excuses for Obama. None of that changes the fact that Trump made a hard turn left and if people refuse to consider the possibility that he is just a distraction, he will continue to move to the left with no opposition.

It is imperative that people consider the information presented here. While the conclusions are speculative, the strategies and disinformation tactics are real. We already know the Democrats operate on an ends justify the means philosophy, so why wouldn't they use Trump in this manner? After all, do these people look like ideological opponents to you?

Image result for image of trump and the clintons

Friday, September 1, 2017

Understanding Psychopolitics and a Re-Examination of the 45 Communist Goals Part 1-The Discrediting of Americanism

America is upside down. Her values and traditions have been completely destroyed and re-defined to the point that much of the population couldn't define them. The stigmatism of racism and bigotry have so successfully been attached to patriotism that many fear standing up for what they believe.

People know there is something wrong and attribute this non-sense to political correctness or a bunch of sissified liberals who demand that they live their lives without the discomfort of opinions they don't like. Many Americans fail to face the fact that this is a deliberate attack upon the psyche of our nation. An attack designed to demoralize our people and change the very nature of human being. It is in fact, a full blown Psychopolitical assault and the end goal is the complete subversion of our culture and an American population that is so thoroughly weakened psychologically, that they willingly seek further government control of their lives. In other words, a Communist takeover of the country is near completion without a shot being fired and the application of the Soviet Manual on Psychopolics was how it was accomplished.

What is Psychopolitics? It is an application of psychological warfare designed to breakdown the will of the people in a nation marked for conquest. Global Communism has been the goal of the Communist movement since it's inception and America is the one nation where the people have a governing structure that empowers them to resist. We have the right to politically oppose our elected officials policies, the right to assemble, the right to bear arms. In other words our constitution was designed to protect and empower the dignity and freewill of the individual human being. To conquer America an enemy would have to defeat us militarily, which no country can do, or convince us to willingly accept Communism. By working incessantly to create the impression that America is the problem in the world, they can then offer Communism as a solution. The following are goals of the Communist party which were originally published in a book called the Naked Communist by Cleon Skousen.

29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

The main theme of these three goals is the discrediting of the United States, its founding and its culture. Today, students in American universities are taught that America is a nation founded on unfairness, selfishness and bigotry. Issues like wealth inequality are used to turn the idea of "all men being created equal" on its head. The idea that the American founding revolved around the owning of slaves and the exploitation of another's labor is used to present the founding as illegitimate while Communism, or Communitarianism, is offered up as a solution that will make everyone equal. This is part of the demoralization process and it is designed to make people confused about the values they once believed in or at the very least, afraid to stand and defend them. Consider the following quote from the Manual on Psychopolitics, page 41.

Defamation is the best and foremost weapon of Psychopolitics on the broad field.  Continual and constant degradation of national leaders, national institutions, national practices, and national heroes must be systematically carried out, but this is the chief function of Communist Party Members, in general,* not the Psychopolitician. The realm of defamation and degradation, of the psychopolitician, is Man himself. By attacking the character and morals of Man himself, and by bringing about, through contamination of youth, a general degraded feeling, command of the populace is facilitated to a very marked degree.

This explains the constant attacks on the character of our nation by the media, academic institutions and certain government officials. In an effort to make people hate the constitution and display a desire for change they have deliberately turned America into a nation that oppresses instead of liberates, that discriminates instead of empowers and imprisons instead of enlightens.

Italian Communist, Antonio Gramsci, aided in this effort through his understanding of Psychopolitics and Marxist principles. The Communists, being frustrated that they couldn't pit the so called proletariat against those that employed them needed a new way to bring about Communism. Gramsci developed the theory of Counter Hegemony. What this entailed was the creating of social groups that stood opposed to the influence exerted by the dominant social group. To put it more simply, the dividing of Americans into different social classes was a deliberate act to cause conflict. We are no longer an America united on the principles of liberty and justice but an America divided into groups where everyone thinks they are entitled to their own brand of social justice. The one thing that these groups all have in common is that they are oppressed victims of America's unfair economic system and blatant bigotry.

Examine the very first paragraph of this article again. Understanding what is said here is imperative if you are to understand the real agenda. In America today we have scientific turmoil with lies of climate change and little boys using the girls bathroom in school. We have economic depression looming over us with a national debt in the tens of trillions and trillions more in unfunded liabilities. We have a welfare system that cannot support the needs of those dependent on it without taking more from the producing class. Groups like Antifa and Black Lives Matter, paid protestors hired to wreak havoc on our streets are intent on doing so in an effort to stir up conflict. Finally, the redefining of our values and the labeling of anyone opposed to political correctness has created a mistrust for our neighbors. All of this is done on purpose to bring this country to its knees and subdue the population into accepting its own demise.

The Communists believe in Darwinian evolution. It is their belief that man is an animal who needs to be programmed how to behave. The idea that man has a will of his own is scoffed at and ridiculed. Much of the Communist mindset has been developed through the mental science discovered by Russians like Pavlov. They believe we are nothing more than an organism which operates on the principles of stimulus/response programming. There is some truth to this assertion; however, man is more than that, much more. The vast majority of Americans, despite this constant psychopolitical assault on our character, are still Christians. We believe in the morals and values this country was founded on and when necessary, we will bind together to prove the lies wrong. The media is in literal shock at the response of the average American to Hurricane Harvey. If one were to believe the media's depiction of America then they would assume that all minorities are being left behind and that LGBT Americans are being forced to drown in flood waters. The truth is that the vast majority of us simply don't care what social group the Communists and Psychopoliticians have assigned to you. You're an American and a human being and because of that you won't be left behind. This is why we are still a country and the Communists haven't won yet. This is why in the end, they won't win.