Friday, March 23, 2018

The Next Generation of Tyrants

On Saturday March 24th, students across America will once again be taking to the streets to demand law makers pass stricter gun laws. Poor, brainwashed kids don't even realize there are already thousands of gun laws on the books. None of which by the way stopped either the Parkland shooter or the most recent attempt at mass murder in Maryland. The latter showed quite clearly that the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. In this writers humble opinion, any school shooting that happens after the nation witnessed this truth will be squarely on the shoulders of the school district who failed to provide adequate armed security at their school. This doesn't mean providing your students with a bucket of rocks as Pennsylvania school superintendent Dr. David Helsel believes.

While the media and their government cohorts attempt to portray this movement as grassroots in nature, led by students demonstrating great leadership, the truth is vastly different. Powerful leftwing groups such as Planned Parenthood, Every Town for Gun Safety and the Woman's March are behind the funding. Public schools, using taxpayer dollars are also encouraging kids as young as kindergarten age to participate. In one instance a student was suspended from school for refusing to join in the protests as he was a second amendment supporter.

When schools force students to participate in political activities they are essentially causing, whether intentionally or not, conflict and confusion in school students because the values the school system intends to push may contradict the values the student is learning at home. This is unacceptable. Also, if a student chooses to express himself in a different manner or express values that are not in line with the masses, the student could become isolated or even targeted for retaliation. 

The sad reality of all of this is that our students are being denied the truth of history. All through the twentieth century mass movements against what was considered to be the normal culture always ended in mass violence and bloodshed. Tyrannical dictators like Hitler, Pol Pot and Mao Tse Tung worked incessantly on the children of the nation, turning them into agents of the state while programming them with the idea that the culture they grew up in was somehow backwards while teaching them they had the power to fix it all. The result was mass slaughter and the destruction of nations. Some may consider this to be an inappropriate analogy however, this writer disagrees. Last week during the school walk out against gun violence we witnessed student mobs engaging in behavior like ripping down an American flag, storming and trashing a Wal-Mart and attacking police. Our students are turning into out of control mobs with the help of the public school system.

Another example of this out of control behavior occurred near this writers hometown of Tulsa Oklahoma. A young student of Glenpool High School was viciously beaten to the point where surgery was necessary simply for expressing opinions that went against the tide. In a post on social media this student made a comment referring to the protests by saying he would catch all the clowns heading to the sports arena for the circus. He claims he was referring to the students participating in the walk out simply to get out of class. In other words, he was beat for not participating in the anti-gun walk out because he had given the impression that the clowns he referred to were the protestors themselves. Did he really deserve this? Is this the new reality we live in now? Where expressing different opinions can get us beat down? 

The left likes to refer to those of us who support the constitution and the bill of rights as Nazi's and bigots. The truth is that the school system and other leftist controlled organizations are creating the next generation of  tyrants. They have taught our kids nothing of truth, but instead filled their heads with lies about being oppressed victims. They have taught our kids that they live in a nation of white supremacy and that we are all racist unless we abandon our values and march in lockstep with leftism. They have taught them that the state is their controller and master and conditioned them to live in fear always looking to government for answers. This is not likely to end well. In conclusion I would like to leave you with one of my favorite quotes.

Here is a link to the go fund me page for the student in Glenpool.

Wednesday, March 7, 2018

A Growing Hatred In America

In America, the higher education system continues to push an anti-American, racist agenda against white people. The narrative that whites are privileged and unconsciously racist has led to a growing resentment of mainly, the white male. According to the white privilege narrative American institutions are perpetuating systemic racism which prevents minorities from getting a fair shot in society. Any hatred expressed against the white man is not considered racism as minorities in America have been taught they are oppressed victims and lack the institutional power to discriminate against whites. This is creating a very unstable and divided country with the potential to spin rapidly out of control as the hatred towards white people and their alleged privilege continues to grow.

It isn’t difficult to see where this is leading. The dehumanization of the white male is following the same systematic process that led to diabolical regimes committing genocide across the globe. It works the same every time, blame a certain demographic for societies problems and teach the rest of the population that they are victims of that demographics privileges and abuses. This method of dividing society came through the realizations that Marx’s ideas of class war had not come to fruition. Antonio Gramsci, in an effort to create a new Marxism based on culture as opposed to class coined the term Counter Hegemony as a way of turning society against the dominant culture. The term Hegemony refers to the cultural influence of the dominant social group. In other words, whites make up the dominant social class in America, therefore they are the oppressors. Gramsci believed that the ruling class through culture and civil society exerted dominance and that other social groups in society lacked any significant organization or leadership. In his Essay Gramsci and the Theory of Hegemony Thomas Bates cites a paragraph from the work The Risorgimento: A Multinational Movement that describes the concept of counter hegemony.

An independent class of intellectuals does not exist, but rather every social group has its own intellectuals. However, the intellectuals of the historically progressive class ... exercise such a power of attraction that they end ... by subordinating the intellectuals of other social groups and thus create a system of solidarity among all intellectuals, with links of a psychological (vanity) or caste nature. This fact is realized spontaneously in historical periods in which the given social group is truly progressive. (

In other words, American society has been broken down into different groups with their own value systems and beliefs that are counter-intuitive to the dominant culture. Feminists, homosexuals, Muslims, Hispanics, African-Americans, and even transgendered people are all bound together by the common thread of being victims of white privilege.  In Gramsci’s view these groups didn’t even realize they were oppressed because they have created a values system that justified their repression. He believed he could change society by encouraging these different groups to go against the dominant culture. This has been an extremely successful undertaking as most of American society now identifies as being a victim of white privilege.

The anger against the white man is not limited to just America. Across the globe the third world has been systematically taught that the white Europeans were Imperialist men of conquest and that they have unjustifiably stolen the resources of the nations they conquered. The white man stands accused of alone, being responsible for the atrocities committed in the Atlantic slave trade even though Africans themselves participated by selling and enslaving their own people. Arabs have also been involved in trading African slaves as early as the year 900 A.D.

“Africans were not strangers to the slave trade, or to the keeping of slaves. There had been considerable trading of Africans as slaves by Islamic Arab merchants in North Africa since the year 900. When Leo Africanus travelled to West Africa in the 1500s, he recorded in his The Description of Africa and of the Notable Things Therein Contained that, "slaves are the next highest commodity in the marketplace. There is a place where they sell countless slaves on market days." Criminals and prisoners of war, as well as political prisoners were often sold in the marketplaces in Gao, Jenne and Timbuktu.(South African History Online, 2011)

In South Africa this hatred is quickly coming to fruition as the African National Congress has voted to strip the white farmers, whom have been in South Africa since the 1600’s, of their farms without just compensation. Julius Malema is the leader of South Africa’s Marxist party and believes that the whites stole their land and have been unjustly occupying it for centuries.

“The time for reconciliation is over. Now is the time for justice,” Malema told the parliament. “We must ensure that we restore the dignity of our people without compensating the criminals who stole our land.” (RT, 2018)

This is similar rhetoric we hear from some black groups in America demanding that white people pay reparations for the exploitation of black labor during slavery and the alleged injustices that whites continue to perpetrate against blacks today.  These include the accusations that blacks are denied equal access to education and afforded equal employment opportunities.

Where is this hatred going to lead us? The rhetoric in South Africa against white farmers and the confiscation of their land is only a small part of the whole story. Since the Marxists have taken over, more than 70,000 white people in South Africa have been brutally murdered. The Marxist ideology is based purely on resentment and hatred towards those who have been portrayed as oppressors and always leads to mass killings of entire populations of people.

In America, the white privilege narrative, as stated earlier, has led to a growing hatred of white people and radical groups sharing in the Marxist mindset have been calling for action. Groups like Black Lives Matter, in response to the Michael Brown shooting, began calling for the death of police officers and white people in America. They have been fallaciously taught that white police officers are deliberately hunting them down and executing them in cold blood. They have been taught for decades that they are victims of a racist America that deliberately keeps them poor. Unfortunately, this is true. Democratic politicians preside over the nation’s poorest cities, while continually advocating for policies that create more government dependence in minority neighborhoods. The impoverished conditions are blamed on white Republicans to keep blacks voting for democrats. The welfare state continues to expand, which does more to stifle opportunity as more money is syphoned from the private sector only to be wasted in an endless bureaucratic nightmare. Since the war on poverty began over twenty two trillion dollars has been wasted on programs allegedly designed to alleviate poverty and nothing has changed. Democrats are keeping them down, so they can be used as the next revolutionary army.

If something doesn’t change soon, and conservatives don’t gat a hold of our educational institutions, the situation in America could potentially go the way of South Africa and other third world countries. We are reaching a point where nearly all conservative based groups are being associated with a white supremacist attitude. White Supremacy is being named the biggest national security threat in the nation by the FBI while the whites in South Africa are being targeted for genocide. This is despite the fact that 93% of black murder victims are murdered by other black people. Labeling all whites as white supremacists is sure to keep the fear-based anger alive and well.

We must keep a close eye on what develops in South Africa. Surely, whatever occurs there is sure to inspire Marxist groups in America, who already have been indoctrinated into the politics of hatred and envy, to radicalize and recruit new members into their organizations. While many people will argue that this will never happen here because we have a participatory Democracy, or a Democratic Republic, it is important to remember that South Africa once had something similar. They lost their country to political correctness, skillful propaganda, and pressure from outside groups. America is being overrun with third world immigrants who do not share our values and our opposition is being classified as racism and white supremacism.

"White South Africans, you should remember, have been in that part of Africa for the same amount of time whites have inhabited North America; yet ultimately South Africans voted for their own suicide. We are not so very different from you.

We lost our country through skillful propaganda, pressure from abroad (not least from the U.S.A.), unrelenting charges of "oppression" and "racism," and the shrewd assessment by African tyrants that the white man has many Achilles' heels, the most significant of which are his compassion, his belief in the "equality of man," and his "love your neighbor" philosophy -- none of which are part of the Third World's history.

The mainline churches played a big role in the demise of Western influence throughout Africa, too; especially in South Africa. Today's tyrants were yesterday's mission-school protÈgÈs. Many dictators in Africa were men of the cloth. They knew their clerical collars would deflect criticism and obfuscate their real aims, which had nothing whatever to do with the brotherhood of man."

Tuesday, March 6, 2018

Education and Stimulus Response Mechanisms

The following is a chapter from the new book I have been working on. Let me know what you think please.

As briefly mentioned in the last chapter, B.F. Skinner wrote on the post-scientific view of man that if the environment could be changed human behavior would change with it. This came to be known as operant conditioning. This was based on Ivan Pavlov’s discovery on learning which was classical conditioning. This is the idea that behavior could be trained through stimulus response mechanisms. What Pavlov discovered was that a dog would begin to associate food with the sound of the bell and repeat the same behavior when simply presented with the sound of the bell.  Unfortunately, it has been discovered, that if thoroughly broken-down, man responds to stimulus response mechanisms in much the same way. Much of our education system has been based on techniques of negative and positive reinforcement.

In her book “The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America” Charlotte Iserbyt explains that our education system, in the 1960’s, began the work of modifying the behavior of our children as opposed to educating them[1]. The purpose was to create compliant citizens that generally agreed with government policy and global governance. Competition of free thought and ideas, and the expression of freewill were not on the agenda. Instead, the standardization of human behavior and the elimination of belief systems which opposed government goals were. With classical conditioning techniques, or stimulus response mechanisms, social science and educators alike saw the potential for developing the type of human they saw useful as opposed to free thinkers schooled in the ways of rugged individualism. Professor John Goodlad, author of the book “The Public Purpose of Education and Schooling,” is quoted in Iserbyt’s book as saying the following.

“The most controversial issues of the twenty-first century will pertain to the ends and means of modifying human behavior and who shall determine them. The first educational question will not be what knowledge is of the most worth? but what kinds of human beings do we wish to produce? The possibilities virtually defy our imagination.”

Clearly there has been enormous success in accomplishing this agenda. The American male has been virtually wiped out and replaced with the hipster generation. Kids in public school are graduating believing that there are more than two genders. In fact, seventy-seven percent of Democrats with a higher education degree believe that gender is not determined at birth.[2] Furthermore, forty-four percent of America’s largest generation, the millennials, claim that they would prefer socialism over capitalism.[3] Imagine that, just what the social engineers had hoped for!

This transformation of public education began in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. John Dewey[4], known today as the father of modern education, was one of the most influential figures in transforming America’s education system. Dewey was a Fabian Socialist [5]who believed there was a need to move away from a traditional education where reading, arithmetic and writing were the focus[6] as society progressed into the industrial age. He saw the old systems and institutions that revolved around the family and the church as crumbling and outdated, not able to fulfill the needs of the new developing society. Science, the arts, and nature learning would take precedence. Education should focus on socializing the student as opposed to educating them to be free thinkers. Dewey foresaw that a public education system, where education was free, and children were guided by trained teachers, had the potential to create a system where the children themselves would be aiding in the creation of an equalitarian society.

Again, here we are in the early twenty first century and American students from elementary education in free public schools to top tier universities are advocating for socialism. They are being educated to believe it is their job to create a world based on the principles of equality, not liberty. Professor Goodlad’s question of what kind of student should be produced is being answered. They are creating a generation of social activists ready to take to the streets to make the final push towards a collective society.  Referring back to the list of forty-five communist goals it is readily apparent that using our children and the school systems to push their agenda has been the plan.

17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack[7].

In 1932, William Foster, national chairman of the Communist Party of the United States wrote the book “Toward Soviet America”[8], where he described his vision of American education, which is frightening as it is apparent that eliminating all forms of American patriotism is on the agenda.

            "A U.S. Department of Education; implementation of a scientific materialist philosophy; studies revolutionized, being cleansed of religious, patriotic and other features of the bourgeois ideology; students taught on the basis of Marxian dialectical materialism, internationalism and general ethics of a new socialist society; present obsolete methods of teaching will be superseded by a scientific pedagogy. The whole basis and organization of capitalist science will be revolutionized. Science will become materialistic, hence truly scientific. God will be banished from the laboratories as well as from the schools[9]."

We have seen this come to fruition on many levels as students have been professionally organized across the country to protest what they perceive as inequality when it comes to the issue of race, gender, and wealth. Protest movements such as Occupy Wall Street and Black Lives Matter are made up primarily of college aged leftists who have had a constant barrage of Marxist propaganda pumped into their soft heads since first entering the public education system. At the time of this writing, February 2018, high school students were being organized to protest for gun control in much the same way.

This is the result of stimulus response, or operant conditioning. The education system has been transformed into one where compliance with social norms has been rewarded with positive reinforcement and undesirable traits have been rooted out. Positive reinforcement simply means rewarding desirable behavior immediately after the behavior is performed. This can be done socially with verbal praise or with candy and stickers for elementary school children. In 1969 the U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare released a booklet entitled Reducing Behavior Problems: An Operant Conditioning Guide for Children[10] where operant conditioning is defined as the following-

“In its simplest form, operant conditioning involves the systematic use of consequences to strengthen and weaken behaviors under specified stimulus conditions. Operant behavior is strengthened by some consequences called reinforcers and weakened by other consequences called punishers. Withdrawal of reinforcing consequences will also weaken behavior. This procedure is called extinction[11].”

Going along with Dewey’s vision, children in America are being trained, not educated, to be good, obedient socialists. The effectiveness of this type of behavior modification, if started at an early age, can be very effective as demonstrated by the mindset and lack of any patriotism in college students today. The same report cited above also stated that the most effective stimulus is the social praising of students for exhibiting appropriate behavior. Imagine students being socially praised for demonstrating attitudes that favor the socialist controlled education systems teachings. That is exactly what has occurred. In fact, a student’s attitudes can be just as easily changed through negative reinforcers as they can through positive reinforcers.

Looking again to B.F Skinner’s Beyond Freedom and Dignity[12] we can see that people can be easily controlled through stimulus response mechanisms. In other words, people’s attitudes can be changed and brought into alignment with the collective using ridicule, peer pressure and the demonization of their belief systems.

“People who get along together well under the mild contingencies of approval and disapproval are controlled as effectively as (and in many ways more effectively than) the citizens of a police state. Orthodoxy controls through the establishment of rules, but the mystic is no freer because the contingencies which have shaped his behavior are more personal or idiosyncratic. Those who work productively because of the reinforcing value of what they produce are under the sensitive and powerful control of the products. Those who learn in the natural environment are under a form of control as powerful as any control exerted by a teacher[13].

What Skinner is saying here is that there is a social desire to fit in with peers and a fear of not being able to is a great motivator for behavioral change. Our public schools have become bastions for anti-American attitudes and in many cases pro-American attitudes are viciously frowned upon and attacked as America is often presented as a selfish, white supremacist nation. Students from patriotic families may feel forced to keep their opinions quiet as they are sure to be ridiculed and put on the spot by students who are rewarded for expressing socialistic views.

The Manual on Psychopolitics addresses this issue by describing how ridicule and pressure can change a person’s loyalties to that of his enemy.

“The changing of loyalties consists, in its primary step, with the eradication of existing loyalties. This can be done in one of two ways. First, by demonstrating that previously existing loyalties have brought perilous physical circumstances such as imprisonment, lack of recognition, duress, privation and secondly, by eradicating the personality itself. The first is accomplished by a steady and continuous indoctrination of the individual that his previous loyalties have been granted to an unworthy source[14].”

As part of this there is the creation of a state of mind in the individual, by actually placing him under duress, and then furbishing him with false evidence to demonstrate that the target of his previous loyalties is itself, the source of the duress[15].

What Beria is saying is that demonization and public shaming of a person’s beliefs is a powerful tool of behavioral change. Constant exposure to this type of negative reinforcer, especially at a young age can have lasting effects on the psyche of an individual. This conclusion, given the state of American youth today, must be taken seriously as this type of behavioral modification is still occurring in our public schools.

Saturday, February 17, 2018

To Discredit and Destroy American Government

Another school shooting has occurred and in an all too predictable fashion, the main stream media, along with the same old politicians, are beating the drums for gun control. They believe that the terror of such an event will result in an outright demand from the public for a ban on scary AR-15 rifles. The cry for civilian disarmament never materializes because what the public sees is the exact opposite of what the gun grabbers are hoping. The public sees a madman who has no regard for the law committing murder in yet, another gun-free zone. In other words, government enacted gun control has failed. In 1990 President George HW Bush signed into law the Gun Free Zones Act of 1990 which prohibited any person who was unlicensed to carry a firearm from doing so within 1000 feet of a school. The law was worded in this manner because many states had laws protecting certain types of unlicensed carry, like simply transporting a weapon in your vehicle. In 1994 President Clinton signed into law the Gun Free Schools Act of 1994. This law was intended to stress a no tolerance policy towards students, or any person who carried or discharged firearms on school property. Interestingly enough, the law still provides for state and federal assistance for a student who may be expelled for violating the law in order to continue their education. These laws have been on the books for over two decades and have done nothing to prevent any school shooting. People intent on murder are encouraged, not deterred by the GUN FREE ZONE sign. 

This shooting comes on the heels of a year long, malicious campaign aimed at removing a legitimately elected president. Since the election of 2016 we have learned that the Democrat party rigged their own primaries in favor of Hillary Clinton. It was revealed that a former British intelligence agent was paid, by the Democrats, to collaborate with the Kremlin to fabricate a fake "dossier" in order to apply for a FISA warrant against the Trump campaign. Despite the fact that there has been absolute no evidence of any Russian collusion to affect the results of the election, a fake witch hunt headed by Robert Mueller continues. This is the same Robert Mueller who was head of the FBI when Hillary Clinton collaborated with the Russians in the Uranium One scandal.  Robert Mueller was also responsible for the removal of any reference of Islamic Terrorism from law enforcement training manuals and yet he still is acting as if he has moral authority to lead this fake investigation. The American people are in no mood to listen to these corrupted, incompetent, morally bankrupt people push gun control, they would rather see them arrested for treason.

Unfortunately, the frantic cries for gun control are merely a distraction to keep us focused on fighting a long range goal while the short range goal is being accomplished right before our very eyes. It is another application of the Hegelian Dialectic. The whole school shooting situation is a result of this problem, reaction, solution strategy as well. As noted above, government caused the problem by turning schools into gun free zones. They are allowing the problem to grow and create trauma in people's minds by not doing the one thing they know will stop it. Teaching the truth about America's gun culture and encouraging citizen vigilance. They are patiently awaiting the day where the demand for civilian disarmament is so overwhelming, there will be little to no resistance. The late radio talk show host William Cooper, in his book "Behold A Pale Horse" predicted this on page 225.

"The government encouraged the manufacture and importation of military firearms for the criminals to use. This is intended to foster a feeling of insecurity, which would lead the American people to voluntarily disarm themselves by passing laws against firearms. Using drugs and hypnosis on mental patients in a process called Orion, the CIA inculcated the desire in these people to open fire on schoolyards and thus inflame the antigun lobby. This plan is well under way, and so far is working perfectly. The middle class is begging the government to do away with the 2nd amendment." (William Cooper, Behold A Pale Horse)

Is it any coincidence that most active shooters are on heavy doses of psychotropic medications?

The long term goal is the eventual eradication of the Second Amendment and civilian disarmament for sure; however, the short term objective, one which is being carried out very subtly, is the destruction of faith in the American form of government through the use of absolute chaos.

This is a multifaceted psychopolitical attack against our political system and the American psyche designed to keep us dazed and confused so we have no idea which leg to stand on. Once we have accepted that our system no longer works we will be more open to alternatives if they promise to keep us fat, happy and entertained. 

Over the past year we have seen just how corrupt and vile our system has become and the politicians responsible merely wave their hands at us and say "so what." When it comes to the mass shootings, the developing trend is one where the shooting is a result of government failure on some level. In the Texas church shooting the United States Air Force failed to add the name of Devin Patrick Kelley to back ground check system due to a conviction of domestic violence. A dishonorable discharge in and of itself carries the weight of a felony conviction, prohibiting the purchase of firearms. In the latest shooting in Florida we are being inundated with stories of failure on the part of the FBI to sufficiently investigate the shooter as he apparently has made several threats on the issue of school shootings. Another point to made is that in almost every recent shooting we are being told that the firearms are all legally purchased even though there is something that should have prevented the shooter from purchasing them. 

While American gun owners see these issues as potential victory against the gun control narrative, the truth is that they are designed to give the impression of government failure so that a solution is demanded by the public. This solution is the complete eradication of our republican, representative form of government and the implementation of Socialism. A draft Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America put out by America's Revolutionary Communist Party already exists and is waiting in the shadows. The following is an excerpt concerning defense. 

 The basic components and structures of the armed forces and militia and other organs of public defense and security of the New Socialist Republic in North America will have been brought into being through the course of the revolutionary struggle for power, once the conditions for that struggle had emerged: the development of an acute revolutionary crisis and the emergence of a revolutionary people, in the millions and millions, who have the leadership of a revolutionary communist vanguard and are conscious of the need for revolutionary change and determined to fight for it. With the establishment of this Republic, these institutions of public defense and security will be further developed in accordance with their essential purpose and role: to defend and safeguard the New Socialist Republic in North America and the security and rights of its people, in furtherance of the aims of this Republic and in support of the masses of people in carrying forward the revolutionary transformation of society, and contributing as much as possible to this transformation throughout the world.

(It doesn't sound like gun rights for those that disagree are on the agenda.)

American Communists have been undermining our system for decades and have a established a list of 45 goals necessary to facilitate their takeover. Some of which include the discrediting and dismantling of the FBI as a law enforcement agency, which clearly is in full swing incidentally, and the discrediting of American culture in all of its aspects which would include our form of government.  Other goals listed include the discrediting of our founding fathers, the use of student protests and riots, domination of the psychiatric profession and the discrediting of the American family as an institution. Oh, let's not forget the infiltration of media. We have seen the accomplishment of many of these goals on nearly every level of our society. 

As long as the powers that be have the ability to lead around us around with fake narratives and news stories designed to shock our conscience, their agenda will advance. When the public as a whole turns to government for solutions they will get them in the form of more ineffective laws, more control and in the end, socialism. American's need to realize that the defense of their schools and communities is their responsibility, not the government's. That is what the militia in the Second Amendment is for, the people having the power to provide security for themselves, to protect life and liberty. The more power we give government to fix our problems, the more the control we have over them diminishes. Think about it America.

Friday, January 26, 2018

DACA, H.R. 4760 and the Hegelian Dialectic

Watching the current events play out in Washington D.C. is like watching a circus on steroids. The false left/right paradigm in politics has both sides saturated with misinformation, accusations of corruption, anger and confusion. New revelations of deep state criminality are being released to the public at such a rapid pace it is impossible to keep up. The so called FISA memo promises to reveal malfeasance at the highest levels of government which would shock Americans to their very core, changing the way they view their nation.

Could this be the ultimate goal of the elite? Destroy America's faith in her system of government in order to pave the way for something new, something we may not fully understand? The evidence of this is overwhelming if you understand the
Hegelian Dialectic.

The Hegelian Dialectic is a way of controlling and guiding our thoughts and actions into already existing, predetermined solutions. Another way of describing this would be to say that the extremes of both sides, the left and the right for example, are presented as conflict while the actual goal of the elite is presented as the compromise. The best, most recent example is the DACA debate. 

DACA itself is an unconstitutional executive order signed by former President Barack Obama. It gave temporary legal status to children of illegal immigrants who by no fault of their own, were brought across the border. The current battle between the left and right is just a circus sideshow designed to condition the public to accept the inevitable outcome. That outcome is the eventual legalization of the DACA people. In fact,
President Donald Trump has stated that he is for giving them eventual legal status. 

This is how the Hegelian Dialectic works, while the corporate media and their government sidekicks portray the issue as a conflict with the President standing firm and the Democrats caving, a bill to give these people permanent legal citizenship is being advanced in congress. H.R. 4760, Securing America's Future Act of 2018 will give legal status to some one million or so immigrants while also enabling them to bring some family members across the border. According to supporters of the bill, legal status would be granted to the so called DACA recipients over a 10-12 year period, however this is roughly the time it takes to become a citizen already.

Proof of the effectiveness of the dialectical process is seen by observing the Trump supporters defend his complete reversal on the issue. 

By presenting the extremes of both sides, full and complete amnesty on the left and deportation on the right, the public is likely to be subdued into accepting H.R. 4760 as an acceptable solution to a problem that shouldn't exist in the first place. 

According to
Chuck Baldwin, this bill will require all Americans to possess a national I.D. card. Without it, Americans would not be able to travel, open a bank account or even get a job. A national I.D. which possesses the biometric information of the individual has been a long term goal of the both the left and right for years. In a post on Facebook, Baldwin cites the concerns of Dr. Ron Paul about the bill.

"For years now, statists in BOTH parties have been fighting to RAM their radical National ID-database scheme into law.
"In fact, this scheme was a key portion of the infamous failed “Comprehensive Immigration Reform” bills BOTH parties tried to ram through during the Obama administration.
"Now, using the momentum behind Trump’s tough talk on immigration and border security, I’m afraid the statists believe the best way to finally enact their National ID scheme is by promoting their bill on Capitol Hill as a “DACA fix” while they sell it to the GOP base as a border “security” measure.
"Of course, that’s nothing more than a buzzword meant to trick Americans from all over the country into thinking that Congress is going to seal our southern border.
"But in reality, it means something far different.
"The “security” members of BOTH parties in the U.S. House want doesn’t target any U.S. border. Instead, it’s meant to create an all-out police state within them."

In typical fashion, the left and right are working together under the guise of a crisis in order to pass legislation that would otherwise be unacceptable to the American people. It wouldn't be the first time an Orwellian bill was passed under the guise of preserving American ideals while using an American sounding name. The Patriot Act, for example, was rammed through after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack under the false notions that it would secure our freedoms when in fact, it set the stage for much of the surveillance state that is in existence today.  

American's want to believe that they elected a President who is standing for their values and willing to take it to the left in big ways. The truth is that Trump has always been a Democrat and has always supported amnesty. In fact, he donated most of his political money to Democrats during the election which put Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi in power. This enabled the passage of Obamacare. For those that think that Trump may have changed his position consider the fact that even after 2010 he continued to donate heavily to democrats, even after the passage of Obamacare. Need I remind you that the repeal of Obamacare, a major campaign promise, has not yet occurred?  Also, consider that in his own book Trump stated the following concerning single payer health care.

"We must have universal healthcare. I'm a conservative on most issues but a liberal on this one. We should not hear so many stories of families ruined by healthcare expenses." (Donald Trump, The America We Deserve)

Could this be the real reason that Obamacare has not been repealed as promised?

While Trump, in the opinions of his biggest supporters, has accomplished many big things the truth is that when it comes to major policy initiatives of the big statists nothing is changing. The Hegelian Dialectic is being used to present Americans with contrived conflicts in order to guide our thoughts and actions into pre-determined solutions that in the long run, further the objectives of big government. Many will scoff at this however, the fact remains that Obamacare has not been repealed, there is no wall, there will be no wall and for all practical purposes, the media side show concerning the government shutdown seems to be a show as the president now supports a pathway to citizenship. Is that what you voted for?

The media will continue to be used as a means to keep Americans arguing over the issues they want you to argue about while legislators work together contriving bills that serve their interests, not yours. 

"There's another reason for working inside the system. Dostoevski said that taking a new step is what people fear most. Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and chance the future. This acceptance is the reformation essential to any revolution." (Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals)