Saturday, August 19, 2017

The Truth of White Privilege

I remember being introduced to the concept of white privilege while attending Northeastern State University in Broken Arrow Oklahoma. I was in a social work program where the professors were all left wing zealots working feverishly to influence the political opinions of gullible students. One day during class, one of the professors made the subtle suggestion that people had racist family members if they didn't vote for Barack Obama in 2008. This was in 2010, during the Obamacare debates. From this point on the entire curriculum was dominated by the concept of a racist America whose white majority had special protections and privileges from institutions designed to benefit only them, while minorities were left to suffer. White men were referred to as oppressors, minorities were victims and every possible thing that could be wrong in their lives was attributed to white privilege. I understood at this point that this was part of a larger agenda to silence pro-American opinions and push forward a socialist agenda by dividing and conquering.

During the intro to social work semester students were required to write a position paper on white privilege. We were to read Peggy McIntosh's' White Male, White Privilege and offer our thoughts on the subject. My paper reflected my opposition to this nonsense by citing how programs like affirmative action can actually be harmful to minorities by selecting them purely on a required numbering system as opposed to a merit based system. This has led to highly qualified minority students being denied access to higher learning institutions simply because the school was in a hurry to meet the required quota. If this isn't an institution based on racism I don't know what is. As a result of my paper I was told I wasn't fit to be in the social work profession because I didn't believe in social justice and white privilege.

Today it is overwhelmingly obvious that there is an agenda to use race as a dividing tactic to bring America down and force a new system of government upon us. The left is determined to erase what they see as America's racist history by tearing down monuments that they insist represent white supremacism. They won't stop there, if they are successful in this endeavor they will keep pushing until our constitution is nothing but a burning heap of ashes.

The issue of race has long been used as a tool to divide nations and push unpopular agendas. The term racism itself was in fact, invented by Russian revolutionary Leon Trotsky to discredit all who stood in the way of the communist agenda. It is being used in much the same way now. Anyone who stands in opposition to the left's attempts to discredit America and implement socialism is labeled as a racist who benefits from white privilege. The concept is so far out of hand that blond hair is now considered privileged.

Racism in America used to be considered hatred for someone simply because they are a different color or nationality. Today, the concept has taken on new meanings as it is considered racist to believe that minorities can be successful on their own without government programs. Minorities are taught they are victims and encouraged to hang on to this victimhood status. Black people who step away from this enslaving mentality are discredited as "Uncle Toms." In one of my social work classes we discussed a lesson involving a depressed black woman. She was financially successful yet, depressed nonetheless. The lesson ultimately suggested that she could alleviate her depression by casting aside her desires to adapt to the white man's world and embrace her historical roots of oppression. I vehemently opposed this idea and was shocked when people in class took offense to my doing so. I was arguing that a black woman didn't need to be a victim and people in class were offended by that. That is the result of decades of leftist indoctrination.

The left works incessantly to convince gullible Americans that right wing conservatives are racist and full of hate. Most of us know that the history of racism in America can be traced solely to the Democrat party. The KKK was founded by the Democratic party. Woodrow Wilson re-segregated the federal government. Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, an organization that kills over three hundred black babies a day, was a Democrat who advocated for the elimination of so called weaker races, and finally, President Lyndon Johnson instituted the great society program which ultimately did nothing less than enslave blacks and their future generations to government welfare. In reference to this program Johnson said he would get those ni**ers voting Democrat for the next two hundred years. Over fifty years later we have generations of black people living in run down ghettos whose districts are controlled by Democrats. They are dependent on government welfare and taught that there is no way that they can over come their oppression because of white privilege. Was this part of a larger agenda to perpetuate a permanent underclass that could later be used as a revolutionary army?

To believe in white privilege is to believe that one race is ultimately superior to another.  In other words, you would have to be a white supremacist in the first place to believe in white privilege. Do you believe minorities need special government treatment to get a hand up or do you believe they are just as capable as you are? Through the pushing of white privilege the left is trying to convince society that minorities need special treatment, that more money needs to be spent on programs to help them succeed. If the Democrats believed in total equality why would these programs be needed? The left has systematically destroyed the free will of black people by constantly teaching them they are victims. That is the truth. Now, their victimhood status is being used to launch and justify revolutionary violence based on the false notions of oppression. This is the truth of white privilege.

Sunday, August 13, 2017

It has been a while since I have written anything. I have sat and stared at a blank screen several times simply not knowing what to say anymore. Our country is so far gone, our principles so blurred and values redefined that many of us stand dazed and confused not knowing how to defend what we believe. Many on the right stand convinced that Donald Trump is going to fix everything just as many on the left assumed Obama would. Trump, Clinton, Obama and the rest of the false paradigm of left and right politics are nothing but a representation of how psychological manipulation influences our behavior. It is a false choice. Whether you support Trump or not it is a safe bet that ten-twenty years ago there is no way he would have been accepted as the conservative republican he now claims to be. Put him up against Clinton however, especially after eight years of Obama and he is a sure win. That's how they control our choices. Remember what Alinsky said about bringing people to the point of helplessness? Once they reach that point they will accept anything.

Just as it has been predicted, the right is slowly being set up to take a massive fall. Through the association of ideas those in the patriot movement are being portrayed as terrorists. The recent events in Virginia where the so called "unite the right movement" held protests against the removal of confederate statues is only fueling this fire.

For decades now the communist controlled education system has filled the heads of our children, our children, with lies of a racist white supremacist nation working hand and foot to keep minorities down. Everyone in America, except the white man is a victim of an evil, selfish society whose institutions were designed to benefit only the white rich. Slowly and methodically, the comparing of those on the right with the Nazi's of World War II Germany has led people to believe that Republicanism, conservatism or being a nationalist is equal to being a Nazi. Nothing could be further from the truth. The comparison has been so successful however that the term "white nationalist" is now being used to discredit the patriot movement, and in response the left wing groups like Antifa and Black Lives Matter are being portrayed as oppressed victims fighting for their rights. It will not be long, if this keeps up, until they are portrayed as freedom fighters.

It has to be assumed that certain so called right wing groups are actually being controlled by the left. Globalists insistent on a world government have been funding both sides of every war for centuries. Why would this be any different? Ask yourself what it is you believe in. Does a group of so called right wingers waving swastikas really represent that belief? Not likely. We are being set up and if we allow our selves to be led by these false choices and redefined values we will be on the losing end. We stand on the precipice of the perfect crisis the master planners have been waiting for. One that in the end, will see the complete destruction of our constitution and everything we believe our nation has stood for. It is imperative you understand that your choices and actions are being manipulated by those who have mastered the science of human behavior. It is all here, in this blog.

God Bless and God Speed

Saturday, July 29, 2017

I don't post other people's work very often. In fact I hardly do it all because I want this blog to represent my original views based on my own research and knowledge. With that being said I think the following article is appropriate because It offers another perspective on a topic I have been trying to get across. Trump is the Trojan horse here, we have been duped and the GOP has been completely discredited.

http://theresurgent.com/lifelong-democrats-now-control-the-white-house/

Monday, July 17, 2017

Manufactured Discontent For the Illusion of Conflict

America, despite the election of Donald Trump, is still in a lot of trouble. The average American believes that there exists an epic struggle between two ideologically opposed sides, battling it out for the heart and soul of the nation. A false paradigm of Republicans and Democrats applying the principles of manufactured chaos in order to force change in their favor. They fail to understand that they are thinking in a box that is very much controlled by this false paradigm and most of what they believe is a carefully contrived circus show designed to control their opinions. Since the airing of
H.G. Wells radio broadcast, The War of the Worlds, social scientists have been using the media as a psychopolitical weapon in order to influence public opinion. This is an art that has long been mastered and is being used effectively to not only control what people think, but to keep them solidly rooted in their ideological camp for the purpose of creating conflict. The inability to see the wrong doings of a persons chosen candidate is a good example.

If America is ever to return to the true principles of liberty and justice they must realize that their minds are being subverted and their choices are being guided by those skilled in behavioral manipulation techniques. The following is a quote highlighting the effectiveness of such manipulation-

"Education should aim at destroying free will so that after pupils are thus schooled they will be incapable throughout the rest of their lives of thinking or acting otherwise than as their school masters would have wished ... The social psychologist of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at: first, that influences of the home are 'obstructive' and verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective ... It is for the future scientist to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for more than one generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen."Bertrand Russell quoting Johann Gottlieb Fichte, the head of philosophy & psychology who influenced Hegel and others – Prussian University in Berlin, 1810

Yuri Bezmenov, former KGB agent, once described a process the Communists used to undermine a nation that has been marked for ideological conquest. This process is known as ideological subversion and it is being applied here in the United States on a massive scale. The purpose of ideological subversion is to change everyone's perception of reality by inundating a culture with disinformation. The end goal is to create a society that is unable to articulate its values, defend its principles and stand for truth.

In essence, this is the role of the mainstream media.

They are currently keeping everybody dumbed down and tuned in to the fake Russian collusion story in an effort to.....brace yourself now, keep everyone from realizing that the new boss is no different than the old boss. It is fake opposition designed to keep people diametrically opposed to one another because the system is designed to progress through chaos and conflict. At the very least it is the Democrat party and establishment Rinos attempting to give the impression they are working for their voters.

Consider the fact that just like Obama supporters, Trump supporters are blind to the fact that he is reversing on many campaign policies, many of which were key to his becoming president. For example, despite the promises Trump made to return jobs to American workers he actually just increased the number of H-2B visa workers to fill seasonal jobs. This brings the number up from 66, 000 to 81,000. That is 81,000 jobs going to foreign workers because they will work for less than an American worker will. President Trump is also signaling that he may reverse his position on the Paris Climate Accord as well. Furthermore, the travel ban that Trump has put into place is nothing more than a list of countries that the Obama administration had already listed as terrorist hotspots. The outrage that ensued was nothing more than manufactured discontent designed to give the illusion of conflict. This keeps the giant from truly awakening because they think Trump is working for them when in reality, its all a sideshow and nothing in the end will have changed. Finally, just as the quote above suggests, you could throw the evidence in the people's faces over and over again but because they have been so thoroughly conditioned to believe this ideological divide exists between Trump and the establishment they won't believe it, even when it's too late. Donald Trump is and always has been a Democrat who advocates for single payer health care.

Many readers will scoff at this article and call me a liberal. That's fine, the evidence speaks for itself. In truth I am neither for or against Donald Trump, I just refuse to believe that every election cycle I have to put all of my faith in one man and support him blindly despite the fact he fails to deliver on his promises. We as Americans have a responsibility to question our elected officials, not believe everything they tell us. It is up to us to research the truth and demand that the people we put in office live up to the values we put them there to uphold. Instead, too many of us get wrapped up in this political psychodrama attempting to control our thoughts and actions so we ultimately don't know what to think and what values to defend. American values have been so thoroughly discredited and demonized that many people are afraid to express them, let alone attempt to defend them.

Time is short America, please read the links provided as well as the links within the links. There is enough evidence to suggest that what I am saying here is the truth.

Friday, July 7, 2017

Personal Responsibilty Vs. Government Control: The Choice is Yours America

When it comes to banning guns the left claims that any measure is necessary if it would save the life of just one child. Their hypocrisy is on full display as they are now attacking the right for caring about the life of Charlie Gard, the infant who has been sentenced to death by Europe's single payer health care system. Slate magazine is claiming that the right is using this issue to demonize single payer health care. They are also suggesting that the death of one infant is meaningless when compared to the alleged thousands that would die without government care. The left is so deluded in their thinking that they claim capitalist nations like America place value systems on human life based on what they have to offer society. This is despite the fact that it is a socialist country that has determined Charlie Gard should die because the Quality-Adjusted Life Care ratio isn't worth the cost because he is suffering too much. In other words, government bureaucrats have decided the fate of this child based on the cost of continued treatment and their definition of quality of life. Shouldn't the parents be involved in this decision? After all, they have raised 1.6 million dollars to put towards treatment.

We are reaching a point in America where the definition of quality living will no longer be defined by us but by government bureaucrats. The value of human life is no longer sacred, rather it is viewed by many as a burden if it is draining resources from society. This is because several generations of American students have been indoctrinated into socialist thinking within the halls of our so called higher institutions of learning. In many courses such as Social Work, Psychology and Sociology students are asked to consider the cost of keeping sick individuals alive while also discussing where the primary responsibility for these decisions should be made. They have already, through their primary education years, been taught to accept the idea that government plays a central role in societal evolution. The idea of freedom of choice and personal responsibility is all but stricken from the curriculum, they have become foreign ideas to today's indoctrinated liberal. If the notion that government is responsible as opposed to the individual for paying for health care, then the natural conclusion would be that government would also be responsible for life and death decisions. The dissimilarity between this and the ideals that America was founded must be contrasted against one another.

Freedom, from the American founders perspective meant taking personal responsibility for our own lives. The belief was that human beings had inherent value and inalienable rights to determine the outcome of our own destinies, among which were life, liberty and the pursuits of happiness. The exercise of freewill and the belief in God made freedom possible because people believed in making responsible choices and living moral lives. It stands to reason, from this perspective, that individuals rather than government should be responsible for issues pertaining to health and end of life choices. How does an individual retain the right to life if for example, the power to end it because of a lack of  government funding is made by a faceless bureaucrat? The answer to that question is obvious. If someone else is making that choice for you there is no right to life. You exist merely because the government hasn't decided to kill you yet.

Slate magazine argues that capitalist systems place a value on human life based on what they have to offer to society and this is simply not true. There is no one in America, for example, that is trying to raise money to take their sick family member to Europe for health care. It is the socialist system that ties the human life to a dollar amount and the cost of keeping an individual alive. It is the socialist system that seeks to define the value of human life because in socialism there is no God, only the state as the highest authority. In America it is believed that human life is so valuable that we are able to make our own choices without the over burdening hand of government. In other words, not interfering in the free exercise of individual choice is the highest value that governments can place on human life.

In the case of Charlie Gard the European Court of Human Rights has ruled against any natural rights of the parents to exercise free choice in the care of their child. They decided, without the parents input, what the value of Charlie's life was and what the quality of his life would be if kept alive. From their perspective the compassionate thing to do is end the suffering and they determined that there was only one way to do that. It didn't matter that the parents had their own money and that there was potential treatment elsewhere. How does this demonstrate compassion for human life? It does the exact opposite in truth, it signals that we have taken a dark turn in how we define what it means to be alive. The responsibility for providing health care to the nation was given to the European government therefore; the rights to choose now belong to them. In other words, if you give up personal responsibility you are giving up your rights to be responsible for your life. This is what is really at stake when it comes to single payer health care. Currently in America we are facing trillions in debt and the left is attempting to convince us that we should give them the power to make our health care choices.Think about it America.




Monday, June 26, 2017

Chugging Along to Single Payer

Democrats sure have a big lesson in humility coming to them. Don't they understand that the more they lie and discredit our country the more likely they are to lose everything in 2018? That's fine incidentally, I hope they lose every remaining seat they have. The only problem is Republicans are becoming more like Democrats everyday, especially in their efforts to pass a universal health care bill. Unless we learn how to control the narrative and articulate our principles, this selling out of our rights will continue to chug along on the fundamental transformation choo choo train. Which incidentally, Trump was supposed to stop.

After realizing their attempts to convince the public of a mythical Trump/Russia collusion have failed the Democrats are now focusing their efforts on the GOP health care bill in an effort to destroy the opposition. It is a real spectacle to watch too. Democrats are claiming that the bill will leave millions dead and millions more without care while conservatives are upset because it is nothing more than Obamacare lite. This is the perfect example of our false right/left paradigm that controls our dialogue. Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell is reportedly looking for a way to put penalties for being uninsured back into the bill which is one of the biggest reasons Americans demanded an end to Obamacare in the first place. No,there is nothing different about this bill and Mark Levin is correct in his assessment that it will lead us yet one more inch closer to single payer health care. Sadly, many Americans refuse to acknowledge the truth that President Trump wrote a book where he said America must have single payer care. In fact, he specifically stated that he is conservative on most issues but liberal when it comes to health care. He has fallen for the lie that socialized medicine is a better solution than the free market system.

"We must have universal healthcare. I'm a conservative on most issues but a liberal on this one. We should not hear so many stories of families ruined by healthcare expenses." (Donald Trump, The America We Deserve)

Sadly, after years of indoctrination in our public schools young Americans know very little about the free market. Instead they have been brought up in a world where they are "oppressed" by the U.S. capitalist system. They have been trained to be liberal activists fighting for socialist issues like universal health care. According to the left, health care is a human right. Health care can not legitimately be a human right because it requires someone else give up their labor to provide a service. In fact, when government controls health care that service is seldom reimbursed at the rate it is really worth because government can't afford to pay it. In all cases where universal health care plans are instituted the quality of care goes down while the cost goes up. The main reason for this is money. Liberals fail to understand that government's are not in the business of creating wealth, only redistributing what the private sector creates. As the old saying goes, socialism works great until you run out of other people's money. Eventually that is exactly what happens.

Many Americans look at Europe's National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence, also known as NICE, as a model for how they think socialized medicine would work. What they have heard their whole lives is that everybody in Europe has free health care. To some extent that is true; however, what they are lacking is actual access to life saving treatments and the ability to choose it on their own. The government bureaucrats control everything from what types of drugs NICE will prescribe to which type of treatments will be offered. If it is something they do not consider to be cost effective it simply is not an option unless one can afford it themselves. In fact, when governments run health care they have the power, because they control the money, to choose what the value of human life is. In Europe they have a formula called the Quality-Adjusted Life Care. This is the formula used to determine how much it will cost per year, to keep a patient alive and whether it is worth the cost. According to pri.org the maximum the European health care system will pay out is 47,000 per quality adjusted year gained. This is because health care in Europe, like in other socialist countries, is rationed. It has to be rationed for one simple reason, it is being paid for by money being taken from the public in the form of taxes and redistributed throughout the health system. In a socialized health care system there is no wealth being created; therefore, money is tight.

"We have a limited budget for health care, voted by Parliament every year, and we have to live within our means," said Michael Rawlins, chairman of a government agency called the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).

This is basically what the whole idea of "death panels" was all about when Obamacare was originally being passed. Bureaucrats controlling your health decisions and having the power to decide what your life is worth. What conservatives are arguing for is a system where the patients not only control these decisions but can afford on their own to determine what their lives are worth and pay the bill without the burdening hand of government. Until government gets out of the way this will never be the case. We gave the Republicans everything they said they needed to repeal Obamacare yet they are poised to continue this push towards single payer. At this point it is likely that this trend is irreversible.







Friday, June 23, 2017

Conflict-Chaos- Control The Dialectic of Trump's Presidency

Once again the Republicans have proven that they in no way intend to live up to their promise to fully repeal Obamacare. The bill introduced to the senate is nothing more than a watered down version of the atrocious law Republicans were elected to repeal, and in fact, it promises to create more problems. President Trump hailed the house version as a victory even though it was nothing that was expected by the people who elected him. Americans voted for repeal not replace.

Americans voted for Donald Trump on the belief that he was an outsider and not an establishment politician. Just as it was with Obama, Trump has an army of supporters who absolutely refuse to see any wrong doing on his part despite the fact that he is failing to deliver on many of his promises. This author has opined in several articles that what we are witnessing in this country is a sham and that the election of Trump was a fraud of epic proportions. The fact that Trump beat Clinton has relieved many Americans who now believe that Trump is a conservative. The thought of Hillary Clinton as president forced Americans to support a candidate they really didn't know a lot about. They refuse to look at the facts that he donated money to the Clintons, supported Bill Clintons gun ban and wrote a book describing his belief that America must have single payer health care. Little do most Americans know that Trump also just encouraged big Tech corporations to rally congress to enact "comprehensive immigration reform." Yes, America we have been duped and in the end we will be forced to accept many things that we elected Trump to put an end to.

Many people believe that Trump is the "conservatives conservative" because the left, as well as establishment Republicans appear to detest him. The media has us convinced us that there is a witch hunt against him and that the hate being expressed is because he is a threat to everything Democrats set in motion under Obama. Consider this a moment, after the senate health care bill was revealed protestors swarmed the capital in opposition to it before even understanding what was in it. The only significant change that conservatives can support in this bill is the elimination of the individual mandate. Aside from that, it is more subsidies and government funded programs. Yet, the left would have its supporters believe that this bill is stripping everyone's healthcare away. There are only two possibilities which explain this. Either the liberals are so stupid they believe everything they are told or there is someone working behind the scenes deliberately creating conflict in order to push the illusion that the President is in fact a conservative, when in the end he is rubber stamping the liberal agenda. As outrageous as this may sound there are plausible explanations for this.

First, consider the fact that the majority of Americans were so fed up with liberalism after eight years of Obama that there was virtually no way Hillary Clinton would win. There is also no way that the push for globalism was going to whimper out over something as miniscule as an American election. The globalists, who mind you have accomplished everything they have using deception as their modus operandi, needed a strategy that would quiet the right wing in America and make them support their agenda. Trump, like any establishment politician, told the people what they wanted to hear but has failed to deliver on any of it. The major policy initiatives that we voted him in to change are either tied up in court or revealing themselves as more of the same big government garbage. Even the travel ban he tried to initiate was from a list of countries that the Obama administration has deemed as terrorist hot spots. Which only adds to the suspicion as to why the left is feigning such outrage over it.

Also consider the fact that the witch hunt over the so called Russian collusion has done little but solidify Trumps base, making it more unlikely that they will oppose anything he does while at the same time enraging the liberal left. This further gives the impression that there is a deep divide and that Trump is hated because of his staunch conservatism. This keeps the right pacified in their belief that they won the election when in fact we are ending up with nothing we were promised. The funny thing is that most conservatives would agree that the left uses deception to achieve its goals and that they use trivial issues to create distractions which keeps our attention focused where they want it. Yet, when presented with the idea that these techniques were used to get us to vote for a candidate which obviously is not a conservative, they will flat out reject and ridicule it altogether.

This theory may be just that, a theory. In the end maybe it very well deserve ridicule; however, we all know the left thrives on conflict. Their whole belief system is based on the premise of dialectical materialism which posits the idea that all progress is the inevitable result of conflict. From that theory came the Hegelian Dialectic or the problem-reaction-solution strategy. In other words, problems are deliberately created to cause conflict which pushes the public consciousness towards a predetermined solution. In the case of a Donald Trump presidency perhaps the deliberate problem is the conflict itself, forcing the government to enact more control. Which is what they wanted all along. There is a lot of talk of an impending civil war due to this deep ideological divide. That is a no win situation, it would just solidify the type of control the left wants to establish in this country.

Wednesday, June 14, 2017

Corrupted Means Always Corrupt the Ends

Democrats have really trapped themselves in a corner haven't they? It was all too obvious that the constant anti-American rhetoric they have been pushing would result in the kind of political violence we witnessed today. For years, ever since being a student in a radical left wing social work program, this author has been warning anyone who would listen that this was the direction we were going. The only problem is that no one was listening. Think about it a moment; for decades now the radical left has controlled our institutions of lower learning while teaching students that they were oppressed victims of an evil, selfish, racist, sexist, homophobic capitalistic society. One that no less, caters to the privileged white man more than any other. They have ridiculed Christianity while removing it altogether from the public school system. They have replaced a traditional understanding of what is right and wrong with moral relativism which allows them to justify any action based on the view points of particular cultures or worldviews. Isn't it ironic? A political party who all but removed God from their political platform while pushing hateful lies to destroy their opposition wants us to believe they prayed for the Republicans? It seems that the idea of ends justifying the means is coming back to bite them right in the square of their proverbial donkey.

Alinsky always taught that believing corrupted means would corrupt the ends was a misguided principle, and that corrupting one's self was the greatest act of morality if one was truly interested in pursuing the greater good. Well here we are, the Democrats have certainly corrupted themselves to levels unseen before and all we have to show for it are disgruntled Americans who believe Republicans want everyone to die because we are all selfish, racist, women hating Islamophobes who don't want anyone having health care. The sad thing is liberals really believed they would have the opportunity to create a perfect world as a result of these hateful lies. Such is the way I suppose.

As usual Democrats have come out with cries for gun control. What they fail to understand is that it was their constant politicization of tragedies such as this that cost them the election in the first place. Please, by all means keep calling for gun control and we will see whatever remaining Democrat seats there are left lost to pro-gun Republicans in 2018.

The issue of gun control, in this humble authors opinion, shows the true nature of the Democrat party. They claim to be for human rights and dignity but fail to understand that a human being has nothing if not the absolute right to self preservation in the face of danger. How can an individual maintain dignity when forced into a helpless situation where the right to defend his or her own life has been taken away by others seeking political gain? Call your congressman and senators and ask them this question. Furthermore, to suffer helplessly at the hands of criminals who never have any intention of complying with society's laws is just a slap in the face by those who look down on us from their positions of power. Positions of power mind you which were created to preserve the people's liberty. The truth is that Democrats don't care about individual liberty or human dignity. They are collectivists and as such they see us as nothing but useful tools that can be played at will to accomplish a political objective. Sadly, their political objectives would see the masses psychologically subdued and chained to an ideology that has done nothing but wreak havoc and human misery since its inception. The fact that younger Americans are viewing socialism/communism as legitimate alternatives to our capitalist society is indicative of the fact that we are on the verge of witnessing more political violence. Blacks on college campuses are demanding segregation, college professors are calling for Republicans to be lined up and shot and there is even one student group who demanded Republicans be beheaded because they believe we want to take everyone's health care.

Things will likely get far worse before they get any better. Democrats will continue to blame Republican gun ownership for violence committed by Democrats while still pursuing an agenda we all know is based on lies. They will continue to tell their followers that they are oppressed victims while encouraging them to revolt in the name of pursuing a better world. The question remains however, whether or not an agenda based on lies can lead to a better world at all. So far the evidence says otherwise.





Saturday, June 3, 2017

Conservatives Aid in the Left's Agenda by Reacting To It

Kathy Griffin is now blaming Donald Trump and his family for the potential loss of her career. Like a typical liberal she is taking no responsibility for her actions and redirecting the consequences of her rude and crude behavior onto others. She is doing what the left does best, playing the victim of an oppressive intolerant society who doesn't allow for dissenting view points. Of course, we all know this is a bunch of baloney; however, by reacting to it at all we are allowing the left to win the battle in the ever going war against free speech and in some ways, we are accelerating their victory.

We are not dealing with rational people here. The left does not share the same moral base as those on the right. To them there simply is no right or wrong and because of this, there is no shame in anything they do. If you remember, Saul Alinsky taught his followers that believing in principles was for the weak hearted and an unwillingness to corrupt themselves for the greater good meant they didn't care about their cause. To be specific he said the following-

"In action one does not always enjoy the luxury of a decision that is consistent with both one's individual conscience and the good of mankind. The choice must always be for the latter. Action is for mass salvation and not for the individual's personal salvation. He who sacrifices the mass good for his personal conscience has a peculiar conception of personal salvation; he doesn't care enough for the people to be corrupted for them." (Saul Alinsky, Rules For Radicals.)

In other words, Kathy Griffin and others on the left do not care that they are hypocrites. They have a specific goal in mind that furthers their agenda and that goal is the destruction of free speech and in general, conservatism. Of course, people will be asking how Griffin's photo of Trump's decapitated head would aid in the destruction of free speech. After all, her ability to pose with such a photo is the epitome of what the First Amendment stands for. The protection of speech that others find offensive. Isn't it? While the left is on a rampage across the nation against speech they find offensive, our rallying call has been defending the First Amendment because it protects speech others find offensive. The First Amendment was meant to protect free, political speech that could be used to hold government accountable in order to preserve the people's liberty. Conservatives typically defend free speech fervently, even when they know the speech is being used to discredit America. In this case however, they have conservatives demanding that Griffin be boycotted, arrested, and fired because her photo was so offensive. In other words, they have turned many on the right into complete hypocrites who can't live up to the values they allegedly espouse to. The First Amendment doesn't just protect speech that liberals find offensive, it protects everyone's speech.

This is a deliberate tactic of the Alinsky left and it kills us every time. The following is the fourth rule of tactics in Rules For Radicals.

"Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity." (Saul Alinsky, Rules For Radicals.)

Many people fail to realize that the left gets away with what they do because many of their actions are designed to do exactly this, use our values and rules against us. It is very easy to label the right as hypocrites and extremists when we are always crying for free speech then demand the boycotting of someone because they do something we find offensive. All that does is aid the left's agenda of proving a concept like free speech isn't constructive. You can't label the left as hypocrites because they have no shame in what they do and they don't claim to have values in the same manner that those on the right do. As suggested in the first quote in this article, they are willing to fall to any level if they believe their actions will advance the agenda of destroying conservatism.

Many people probably believe what Kathy Griffin did was so over the top and offensive that it should be viewed as a threat to the president. While it was vile and telling of her character she didn't do anything illegal. All throughout the previous administration pictures of Obama hanging for treason were regularly shared by conservative groups on Facebook pages. How is this any different? Like so many other instances our reaction tells people that this isn't ok because it is being done to our guy this time, allowing the left to not only label us as hypocrites but play the phony victim game as well.

The worst thing we as conservatives can do is give this any credibility by reacting to it. Let them show their vile disgusting selves and the self evident truth of who they are and what their agenda is will be revealed. These people can take any reaction and use it to their advantage. By reacting to their antics we are giving them the opportunity to keep the pressure on and force us in a reactionary mode when what we should be doing is letting them show us who they really are.




Saturday, May 20, 2017

Police Shootings, White Privilege and the Intentional Destruction of the Black Community

Tulsa police officer Betty Shelby was recently found not guilty in the shooting death of Terrence Crutcher. The shooting represented another in a long line of national incidents where an unarmed black man was shot and killed by a white police officer. In many instances these shootings lead to cries of racism and wide spread violence by protest groups like Black Lives Matter. Luckily for the residents of Tulsa these type of protests never gain any real momentum. It seems that the shooting of Crutcher was justified in the sense that he was acting in an erratic and non-compliant manner. He had a known history of drug abuse as well as a criminal record. While this does not justify the immediate shooting of the man there are some hard questions that are not being asked and in order to ever find true justice they must be explored. One of these questions is of course, who is to blame for his death? The left will continue to blame the so called institutional racism of the United States and it's institutions as the cause of all these unfortunate events. Sadly, the truth is far different and the blood of Terrence Crutcher as well as other innocent people actually falls on the hands of the liberal left.

For decades now the left has pushed the destructive narrative that blacks in America are oppressed and white people live privileged lives. Academic theories such as Black Liberation Theology, Critical Race Theory and White Privilege education have diluted the minds of American students by teaching them that the system they live in is inherently racist and designed only to benefit the selfish, greedy interests of white men. Blacks are taught that they are incapable of racism because they have no institutional power. In other words, because the institutions of power are allegedly controlled by whites, blacks have no power to discriminate against others. The purpose of these educational theories is to create a counter-hegemony against the dominant social group and it is communist in origin. Italian communist Antonio Gramsci devised the theory of counter-hegemony because he realized that Marx's idea of an armed struggle between the economic classes didn't materialize. Gramsci instead posited the idea that different groups of oppressed people could be created on the basis of gender, criminal status and race. These groups could then be used and pitted against the dominant culture to create a revolutionary mind set.

It has worked perfectly, our nation is now divided with so many different social groups claiming to be oppressed by "white privilege." In truth however, these people are only being used and it is leading to their own destruction. The idea that blacks are oppressed and the teaching of such nonsense like white privilege has led to a movement based purely on hatred and resentment. The constant rhetoric and demonization of police by former President Barack Hussein Obama led to an all out war on cops where blacks were ambushing and killing police officers for no reason other than being told they are oppressed victims. This war on cops surely contributed to the fear and knee jerk reactions of officer Betty Shelby when she was facing down a non-compliant man who was in fact, acting in an erratic manner and reaching back into his car.

Ever since the creation of Lyndon Johnsons Great Society programs black people in America have been oppressed. They have been tricked into believing that the government will provide for them through welfare. The results were the destruction of the black family, generational poverty and government dependence. This was done on purpose in order to be able to carry out Gramsci's plan of counter-hegemony. Anyone who truly understands history knows that Republicans have traditionally voted for civil rights for blacks and Democrats have opposed them. The KKK was the terrorist arm of the Democrat party and it was Democrats who opposed the eradication of slavery. Blacks in America were at one time just as successful and integrated into American society as whites and in many cases had stronger, more successful family lives. This all changed with Johnson's Great Society welfare programs. This was the creation of the perfect revolutionary army to bring about socialism in America.

Manning R. Johnson, author of the book Color, Communism and Common Sense was a black member of the Communist Party USA. He was highly trained in subversive techniques and worked his way as high as being a member of the Politburo. He defected from the Communist Party when realizing the black community in America was being used to carry out a communist agenda. He writes in the book that the grievances of the black community such as slavery and discrimination, were to be exploited and used as a weapon against the capitalist system to bring about socialism.

"Little did I realize until I was deeply enmeshed in the Red Conspiracy, that just and seeming grievances are exploited to transform idealism into a cold and ruthless weapon against the capitalist system — that this is the end toward which all the communist
efforts among Negroes are directed."

In short, the impoverished state of many black Americans can be traced back to early roots of America's communist movement. They have been exploited and used by those who have taught them they are systematically oppressed by the white man, namely the Democratic party. They have been organized into an effective voting machine where they continually vote the same racist party into power on the promise of welfare and other benefits. The conditions of their communities never change; in fact they worsen, this is then used to further the argument for socialist solutions. Black youths are being indoctrinated into an ideology of hatred and society destroys their futures by justifying acts of violence based on the false precepts of White Privilege and Black Liberation Theology.

The shooting of Terrence Crutcher was surely a tragedy, one that happens all too often in this country. Again, the question arises. Who's really to blame? Surely police have a responsibility to their communities to exercise their training in a responsible manner and in some cases, they should show a little more restraint in the name of preserving life. On the other hand, the evidence strongly suggests that the black community has been used to create a revolutionary fervor which has done nothing but create mistrust and fear among police. With all of the attacks against police perpetrated by groups like Black Lives Matter what do you think was going through Betty Shelby's head? Police nor citizens should be fearful of each other; however, because of the efforts of the liberal left our nation is now made up of groups who are motivated by a burning hatred based on lies told intended to create chaos.




Saturday, May 13, 2017

Communism and Fascism: A Brief Explantion of the Deception that Brought us to the Verge

The group Antifa continues their rallying call for a communist revolution in America.  They view our beloved nation as an oppressive, imperialistic power whose founding was illegitimate because of slavery and institutional racism. They claim that they are fighting fascism by taking a stand against the very liberty which allows them to assemble and voice their political opposition to a system they view as needing change. Questions as to why people don't know the atrocious history of communism as opposed to the genocide committed against the Jews by Adolf Hitler are today, of great importance. Many on the left believe that fascism is an extreme right wing ideology whose philosophies are based on white supremacism and nationalism. The truth is exactly the opposite. In fact, fascism was nothing but the interpretation of Marxism by Italian dictator Benito Mussolini. The term "Fasci" simply meant a bundle of sticks, so the term fascism is nothing but a term describing collectivism. The political scale is also very misunderstood. The further to the right the scale goes the less government control and more freedom there is. In fact, pure right wing extremism would mean no government controls, pure anarchy in other words. The far left represents total government control. Political systems such as socialism and fascism, as they were historically practiced, left some  control to organizations outside of government. Theoretically speaking, fascism could be viewed as right wing in the context that it was to the right of communism; however on the true political scale, it is far left of center and represents a system of totalitarian rule.

How did we arrive at this point? How did people in America, arguably the most free and prosperous nation to ever exist, be brought to the point where they are arguing against their own best interests and demanding a communist system of government? The answers to this question would take volumes to answer. The intent of this article is simply to point readers in the right direction to answer it for themselves. The truth will certainly challenge any basic understanding of American history and what we have traditionally believed about American politics.

Without a doubt the most obvious place to start is the infiltration of our education system. Our children are being overwhelmed with frivolous topics masquerading as education. White privilege, gender studies and the general idea that American capitalism is the greatest threat to world peace are all topics that are turning the next generation of Americans into good little socialists demanding change. This "infiltration" can be traced back to Fabian Socialist John Dewey, who is known as the father of modern education. Dewey was an admirer of the Soviet model of schooling where people were trained to be useful members of a socialist society as opposed to independent thinkers. What many people don't realize is the role conservative president's played in allowing the communist takeover of our education system. In her book, The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America, Charlotte Thomas Iserbyt discusses the agreements reached between the U.S. and the Soviet Union in the name of achieving a cultural understanding between the two nations.  In 1985, an agreement signed between Conservative Icon Ronald Reagan and the Soviet Union merged the two nations' education systems together in the name of achieving world peace. This was later referred to as Edu-Gate. This agreement also set in motion the idea of a planned economy in the United States. Furthermore, other agreements were signed earlier in the twentieth century between the Russians and conservative president Dwight D. Eisenhower. The first of these was signed in 1958. A full chronological record of the communist takeover of education  is shown at the end of Iserbyt's article Soviets in the Classroom.

The takeover of education certainly explains how so many young people have become infatuated with communism; however, there is so much more to the story. During WWII The United States was providing military weaponry and millions in aid to the Soviet union in its efforts to defeat Nazi Germany. As a result of this, the truth of Communist oppression towards its own people was suppressed. Joseph Stalin, arguably one of the most brutal dictators in the history of humanity was viewed as an ally of the United States and an enemy of Nazi aggression. This is only because Germany advanced it's war machine into the Soviet Union. The ideological makeup of communism and national socialism however, is identical. Also, because of this alliance many of Russia's subversive activities into the United States were ignored. In her book American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation's Character Diana West cites the book The Red Plot Against America by Robert Stripling. Stripling explains that subversive plots against America by nations such as Japan and Germany inspired government action however, the same types of activities found to be committed by Soviet agents were widely ignored. In fact, any mention of them often resulted in ridicule and public shaming in much the same way that speaking out against the Democrats does today. Names such as witch-hunter and red-baiter were used to discredit anyone speaking of a communist plot against the United States. In fact, according to the research done by West, the more people like Joseph McCarthy investigated communist activity the more it created an anti- anti-communist sentiment. It was almost as if communism as an ideology was being protected and the crimes they committed against humanity being hidden in order to further an agenda. Was this due to the fact that Franklin Delano Roosevelt provided money and military aid to the Soviet Union at a time it was believed they were our ally in the fight against totalitarianism when in fact, it was being used to commit the same atrocities against their own people? This goes a long way in explaining why people know so little about the true history of communist oppression but there is still more.

Nazism is remembered in all of its brutality simply because they were honest about what their intentions were. National Socialism is Marxist in origin but differs in the fact that they seek to put themselves at the head of all others. In other words, A Nazi's sole purpose for existence was the furthering of nationalism and the strengthening of German power on the world stage. Communism on the other hand, was more about globalism, a world without nationalism or independent sovereign nations. That however, is where the differences end and the deception begins. According to the Black Book Of Communism Nazi's did not hide their intentions to create one master race that would serve the greater interests of Germany. They were honest in their idea's that only certain people were deserving of life and only people who shared in Hitler's visions deserved a place in the new Germany. Communists on the other hand made their pursuit of Utopia based on the idea of class and equality. They were able to appeal to the senses of humanity by making their argument on the basis of fairness and the idea that people should not have to work in order to enjoy the finest things in life. Communism represents a system where people are free from the so called burdens of personal responsibility. It offers a structural system where humanity is changed on the ideal that responsibility for our successes and failures is that of the collective and not the individual. Communism itself argues, on the basis of human psychology, that man is devoid of a "freewill" and is only capable of reacting to the environment around him as opposed to taking positive responsibility for his actions.

Arguing from the perspective that communism represents a system where fairness is dictated by a dictatorship and people are "free from personal responsibility" is probably one of the most significant factors in it's increasing popularity. The truth that averts the thoughts of most people is that true liberation lies in the fact that freedom itself means being free to learn from one's own actions and accepting personal responsibility. This is what makes communism such a dangerous ideology, without a will of his own man becomes useless and devoid of any spirituality. Communists set out to change the very nature of man by seeking to destroy his connection to the divine. They believed they could eliminate all those that stand in the way of the promised Utopia by restructuring what it means to be human through psychological conditioning which was aimed at the destruction of free, independent thinking. As a result, nearly one hundred million people were brutally murdered or starved to death in pursuit of this ideal in the twentieth century. Still, the rallying call of fairness and the belief that communism itself simply hasn't been tried the correct way drives many people to the belief that communism should be instituted in America to address issues such as wealth inequality and racial discrimination.

It is the false idea that people can be made equal under a system of control devised by man that appeals to the senses of the younger generations. Communists atrocities, according to The Black Book of Communism, were not viewed as genocides or crimes against humanity but victories in the fight for socialism and the ideal world where there was no competition and exploitation of people. The results, no matter where communism was tried was always the same. Mass murder in the name of eliminating those who stood in the way, or those who were viewed as defective because their opposition to fairness and equality represented a threat to those who had fallen for the false promises of Utopia. This is why communism has such a strong hold on people today, they see a system where someone else will make it fair for them instead of having to work for it themselves. The crimes of Nazism are kept alive because it is used to demonize the political opposition to communism while providing the means of presenting communism as an alternative to the way they are portraying the United States as a system of oppression. As long as the left remains in control of education and the people are more concerned with entertaining themselves as opposed to researching what is happening in their country, this will only go in one direction.


Saturday, May 6, 2017

Antifa: Useful Idiots too Brainwashed to Know They are Being Used

Across the nation the group Antifa is continuing its call for revolution by staging massive riots and acts of violence against innocent people. They are pushing the narrative that they are engaged in a revolutionary struggle against Fascism and that the time to act is now in order to stand against oppression. They have been brainwashed to believe that America represents racism and our constitution was written only to protect the interests of a few privileged white men. They are demanding an end to constitutional government and the enactment of a communist system which they believe will be more fair. In this facebook video posted by Columbus Ohio Antifa, they are asking military veterans to remember their oaths and join their national militia. Obviously, these people have no idea what they are talking about nor do they have any clue what it means to take an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.

Unfortunately, Antifa fails to realize that they are nothing but useful idiots being used to accomplish an agenda they do not understand. They are the shock troops being used to finish the final phase of demoralizing America through a process known as Ideological Subversion. In other words, Communists have been waging a psychological warfare operation against the United States aimed at destroying our religion and morality so that they may peacefully, as opposed to militarily, conquer our nation. Our institutions of government, our education system, our legal system and all other aspects of American culture have been infiltrated by leftists. Today this is recognized by the term Deep State.

The goal of Ideological Subversion is to educate a generation of Americans into the ideology of communism by discrediting the United States in all of its aspects. Today we have at least one generation that believes America is an oppressive war mongering country that discriminates against minorities, homosexuals and women. The job of discrediting America in the minds of these people is complete. The government is in control of education from kindergarten through college and through these formative years of learning young people are indoctrinated into the tenants of progressivism. They are taught that capitalism is for the greedy rich and that white people are racist and privileged. Every aspect of our history has been rewritten to give the impression that America was founded by heartless, mean spirited white men who only cared about money. 

What many people fail to realize is the effectiveness of the classical conditioning being used in our public schools. Our children's opinions and beliefs are being shaped through rewards and praises being given for answering questions that reinforce the communist world view. Psychologists have long ago learned the effectiveness of this type of conditioning. In fact, Gottlieb Fichte, who was a philosopher and psychologist who influenced the philosophy of communism is quoted as saying the following concerning education.

"Education should aim at destroying free will so that after pupils are thus schooled they will be incapable throughout the rest of their lives of thinking or acting otherwise than as their school masters would have wished ... The social psychologist of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at: first, that influences of the home are 'obstructive' and verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective ... It is for the future scientist to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for more than one generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen." Bertrand Russell quoting Johann Gottlieb Fichte, the head of philosophy & psychology who influenced Hegel and others – Prussian University in Berlin, 1810

Take this quote into careful consideration. This is exactly what we are witnessing with groups like Antifa and Black Lives Matter. They are incapable of developing an individual thought that differs from that which they were indoctrinated with. They are behaving in the exact manner in which their educators would have them behave. They were trained from the beginning to be a force for social change.

Communism itself is a philosophy that is derived from Marxism, Darwinism and the discoveries of classical conditioning through the works of Ivan Pavlov. Darwinism posits the idea that men are not spiritual beings able to act through a will of their own but creatures whose behavior must be modified. According to Darwin we are no different than the apes from which we allegedly evolved from. This is why it has been so easy for leftists regimes to murder millions. The justification arises from the fact that they view a failure to conform to their ideals as being a form of mental defection.

Psychologists, as mentioned earlier, have discovered that people can in fact be conditioned and trained to act in accordance to their programming. People engaged in these so called revolutionary movements have literally been trained to believe they are living in an oppressive system so they can be used to bring it down. That has been the rallying call of communists for the past 100 years. They have routinely organized the masses to engage in revolutionary conflicts in the name of liberation in order to destabilize a nation and manufacture the need to implement stricter order. This is called the destabilization phase of Ideological Subversion.

Unfortunately for groups like Antifa, the need for stricter order and the accomplishment of the goals they are seeking will bring them to a crashing end. As mentioned earlier, communists have a history of taking out their own first. This is done for two reasons. One, these useful idiots are being taught that communism represents an utopian paradise where everyone lives in total equality. Unfortunately they fail to realize that total equality means the equality of living in squalor. Once they realize they have been taken for fools they will surely focus their aggression on their leash handlers who will then see the need to make an example out of them. They will be taken out to stop the undermining of government which of course, groups like Antifa have already demonstrated a willingness to do.

Many people look at groups like Antifa and ridicule them. Do not be fooled folks. These people are well funded and are being agitated to high levels. They were taught to hate this country and everything it stands for. It may not be long until they are encouraged to rip us from our homes and take everything we have worked for in the name of fairness. They are being led by true communists who are looking to complete the objectives of the global communist movement started by Lenin many years ago. They are organizing to take down the nation we love folks.


Tuesday, April 25, 2017

The Artificial Womb and the Devaluation of Man

What are we supposed to make of  the world in which we currently live? It's as if the very nature of what it means to be human is being changed right before our very eyes. Karl Marx, in his book The Communist Manifesto, wrote that one of his objectives was to dethrone God in the minds of men. Communism, besides being a failed economic system, was actually designed to attack the freewill of man while breaking his connection to the divine. Establishing the state as the one and only god was his ultimate aim. Looking at the world today it is hard to argue that we are not close to realizing his goal. The normalization of transgenderism and homosexuality along with the constant attack against the nuclear family serves to redefine what we understand to be a civilized society. The feminist movement has contributed greatly to this end as it was deliberately created by a communist propagandist, Betty Friedan, in order to discredit the role of a mother in American culture. Sadly, we have reached a point in our society where the right to kill an unwanted baby is more valued by some than the miracle that being able to give birth represents. As we continue to chug along in this backwards world we move closer and closer to the day where human life will in a sense, become obsolete and retain no value.

While we were being taught that it is acceptable in civilized society to murder unborn children, science has been hard at work learning how to create life in a laboratory. The science journal "Nature Communications," recently published its findings on the ability to grow a baby lamb in an artificial womb. At the rate technology is currently advancing it is only a matter of time before they can do this with humans as well. Scientists claim however, that the artificial womb would only serve to complete the development of premature embryos and that getting through the early stages of development would still require a human mother; for now anyway. It is important to note that one of the benefits of this technology would be eliminating "some of the health risks of pregnancy." This is important in understanding the connection to Marxist philosophy because a book written in 1930 entitled "The World in 2030 A.D." by Fredrick Edwin Smith makes the assertion that growing babies in a laboratory would eliminate the health risks of pregnancy while also furthering gender equality, which is in and of itself, a Marxist concept.

In 2030, the prospect of woman’s liberation from the dangers of childbirth will almost certainly become a matter of general realization. This evolution, the most serious biological departure since the natural separation of living organisms into two sexes, will vitally transform the whole status of women in society. Unless their present importance and limitations be clearly apprehended, their future development cannot be apprehended. (The World In 2030 A.D. Birkenhead, Fredrick Edwin Smith. 1930)

The early 1900's is remembered as a time when communism/progressivism was taking hold in American politics. It isn't hard to imagine these concepts existing at this time as this was also the time eugenics and the idea of eliminating the unfit was coming into being.

If this technology continues to advance and we reach a point where human beings can be grown in a laboratory, Marx may indeed see his dream of destroying God in the minds of men become a reality. There will no longer be a need for God as these new humans would surely be taught by their  masters that government is all they need. If that sounds too far fetched ask your self why they are pushing concepts like transgenderism. They are working to change what it means to be human, to change God's creation into their own.

To complicate the problem further consider the fact that Artificial Intelligence is set to explode onto the scene and displace nearly sixty percent of the current workforce. Imagine a world where robots do all the work and government decides how many living humans they need to support the automated workforce.

Sadly, with the way that humans are being "dehumanized" and blamed for fictitious problems like global warming, it is easy to see that this is the direction we are headed. Perhaps this is part of the elite's depopulation agenda. Teach the masses to abort their own off spring and in the meantime take control of the very method in which life is created. Before you know it, the state has become the one and only God where humans are harvested in labs purely to serve the objectives of the state.

Monday, April 24, 2017

Bill Nye Contributes to Transgender Insanity

We are all familiar with Bill Nye the so called Science guy. His overtly political stance on what he calls science is often shared in middle and high school classes across the country. He has taken hard left positions on the topic of global warming and now seems to be embracing the transgender movement as well. The left is trying to solidify in the minds of young people that transgenderism is hard, proven science. In reality it is a mental disorder whose biggest proponents are severely suffering. This video which aired on the "Bill Nye Saves the World" show is a perfect example.


Friday, April 21, 2017

Living Up To Our Own Book Of Rules

The left has one goal and that is to completely destroy and discredit the conservative movement. They have been working effortlessly, through the universities and other institutions, to create the impression that their morals and values are mainstream. People on the right, espousing conservative viewpoints, are to be ridiculed and cast aside as extremist,  hateful bigots who marginalize minorities and women. In too many instances unfortunately, the so called right falls for the trap and literally manufactures the rope from which they will later hang. There is no better example of this than the recent Bill O'Reilly situation where it was revealed he paid out millions to settle with those who were accusing him of sexual harassment. Some people would argue against the notion that O'Reilly was in fact a conservative, however; in the minds of millions he was the voice of the conservative movement who as of now, has been successfully silenced by the left. After years of dominating the news with his so called "no spin" approach, O'Reilly has accomplished little more for conservatives than feeding the left wing narrative that conservatives are sexist, chauvinist pigs.

If the right truly wants to win back this country then we must start living up to the values and morals we espouse. There is more than a simple war against conservatism going on, there is an all out assault on the very nature of truth itself. The left is seeking to change the nature of man and his understanding of natural law. The normalization of homosexuality and transgenderism, the teaching of moral relativism as opposed to moral absolutes and the feminization of the American male are all deliberate attacks against the free will of man designed to destroy God's creation and remake man in the lefts image. We will never be able to stop the onslaught against our values as long as the left is able to prove that we cannot live up to them. Remember, this is an Alinsky tactic and every time a prominent conservative figure falls, they prove it to be a successful one.

"Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity." (Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals.)

Essentially, what Alinsky is saying is that it is easy to make conservatives look like hypocrites because in too many cases their behavior does not live up to the moral codes they allegedly live by. Rush Limbaugh often discusses this topic. He frequently points out the fact that hypocrisy, while more prevalent on the left than the right, is something that fails to stick to them. What he falls short of explaining clearly is the fact that the left is working from a place where there are no moral absolutes. Christians, as well as right wing conservatives wear their values on their sleeve and we believe that is in fact, our values and belief system that made this country great. Leftists believe in moral relativism, meaning that there is no universal morality; therefore, they have no morals to live up to making it difficult to label them as hypocrites. Morality to them, like gender and the Constitution, is fluid and can be changed to meet the situation they are currently in in order to achieve the results they seek in the moment, and they have no shame in employing this tactic. A recent example is Harry Reid admitting he lied about Mitt Romney's tax returns and bragging that it cost him the election. In pursuit of the perfect "socialist utopia" the left believes that sacrificing their own morality is in fact, the highest level of morality that can be achieved. To further understand this we again, turn to Alinsky.

"In action one does not always enjoy the luxury of a decision that is consistent with both one's individual conscience and the good of mankind. The choice must always be for the latter. Action is for mass salvation and not for the individual's personal salvation. He who sacrifices the mass good for his personal conscience has a peculiar conception of personal salvation; he doesn't care enough for the people to be corrupted for them." (Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals.)

Essentially, the left believes that their socialist utopia is what is best for mankind and that corrupting themselves in order to achieve it is the highest level of morality. This is why you can never slap them with the label of hypocrisy, they simply don't care. They believe that their compassion, their intentions to do good far outweigh the actual consequences of their actions. The damage they actually cause is either ignored or viewed as a necessary step in America's transformation.

There really is no way to fight an enemy who conducts this type of psychological warfare, short of actually living up to the values we espouse. People in the conservative movement have to conduct themselves in a manner that is beyond reproach because around every corner is a social justice warrior seeking to discredit everything we believe in. When people like Bill O'Reilly or others who by their own actions allow themselves to be silenced by the left, bring this type of discredit to conservatism we have to work twice as hard to prove that the left wing narrative is incorrect to those sitting on the sidelines. The election of Donald Trump, despite what others claim, was not a victory for conservatism but the perfect example of people being forced to cast a vote because there was no other choice. The war for hearts and minds is still very much alive and there are millions of future voters who are conditioned by the left to go along to get along. We will not win this cultural battle if the main stream is successfully presenting liberalism as morally superior and conservatives as chauvinistic. We can not allow them to turn us into hypocrites because we can not live up to our own "book of rules." We have to start by being the change we want to see.



Tuesday, April 11, 2017

I'm finding myself at a loss for words. Our country is so twisted, so misguided and led astray. We live in a land that was founded upon the indubitable idea that the individual human being is worthy of dignity and far more important than any collective. Yet, we allow ourselves to be collectivized by politicians who play on our fears and beliefs while keeping us divided into groups for their own benefit. Worse yet, people have become so complacent, so comfortable with the status quo while focusing on their own lives they forget that preserving liberty is an obligation we all must share, or else the next generation will not know it.

People have come to accept the unacceptable, allowing their own power to self govern to be usurped by political parasites making promises they never intended to keep. They do this for two reasons. One, because it is their team, the man they voted for doing it, or two, they simply do not  know any better. Most people, because they have come to prioritize entertainment and self gratification are not even aware of the degree which our country has changed. Over the past decade we have been conditioned, trained if you will, in public schools, to look to government to solve our problems instead of being self reliant. It is a continuous, vicious circle. The government breaks our country, our constitution, steals our labor and morals, then they promise a quick and easy fix by voting for them in the next election cycle.

Sadly, each passing generation becomes further enslaved in this breakdown of the freewill because government has wrapped it's long, sticky tentacles around every facet of our lives. Whether it comes to educating our children, expressing our values or trying to get ahead the government is there with oppressive regulations which serve to limit man's capacity for growth. People blame the government, and others in an official capacity, then they turn right around and keep supporting the system that puts the same corruption back in office. Sure we vote for the man that better represents our ideals and makes better promises but in reality, we are voting for people that are preselected by others. In other words, the aspirant office seekers presented to us are running because it has been determined they will push the larger policy issues that really matter to those in the shadows, the ones we want to see defeated every time we vote. The most recent example is Donald Trump and his attack against Syria.

Is it so hard to believe that the global elite, which we thought Trump would stand against, could be so diabolical to train an individual to be the ideal candidate that would beat one they knew had no chance of winning? In other words, is it so hard to believe that Trump has been pulling the wool over your eyes since the beginning? Just as it was with Obama, Trump has his unquestioning supporters who will support his every move because he is not Hillary Clinton and called himself a Republican.

A lot of this would make more sense if everyone understood that society is constantly under a microscope, being studied and evaluated so they can use the things we believe against us and play us for the fools we are. Donald Trump played on our emotions on issues such as immigration and the repeal of Obamacare and as we can now see, those are dead-end issues going nowhere fast. While we are being distracted with these small petty issues, the larger one of carrying on wars of regime change to prevent sovereign nations from dropping the dollar as the reserve currency carries on. Yet, because of a lack of motivation and a fear to question their own choices, people will blindly support these wars without realizing they are the same ones planned before the attacks of September 11, 2001 even occurred. Such is the way I suppose.

Anyhow, we have a responsibility to uphold liberty and yet, as mentioned earlier, we have been conditioned to accept that government not only protects, but grants liberty. If we are to call ourselves constitutionalists then we better wise up and start exercising the liberty to question our president's while we still have it. We have to stop looking to government to solve all of our problems and start exercising the responsibility to solve them ourselves before the government comes up with a final solution. We have to stop letting them define the narrative and directing our morality. We need to stand up and say with conviction that we will no longer be accepting the things we cannot change but changing the things we cannot accept. We can no longer accept being lied to by people who enrich themselves over the loss of our liberty.

Sunday, April 9, 2017

The War in Syria and the Mess We Created

Many are cheering President Donald Trump's decision to retaliate against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad for the chemical weapons attack he allegedly launched against his own people. It isn't hard to understand how Trump's decision can garner the support of so many Americans who feel a sense of outrage that a government would attack its own people. Americans, rightfully so, hold a moral high ground concerning the relationship between governments and the people they govern.  Unfortunately there is no solid evidence that Assad is the one responsible for the attack. The fact that so many are behind Trumps action is also problematic in the sense that he didn't seek congressional approval before launching the attack. People voted for Trump because he led them to believe that he would stand against the global interests subverting our sovereignty as a free nation and that he would return our country to the principles that made us free in the first place. As his administration continues on it seems that he either is a proxy who has been working for the globalists all along, or he simply isn't as tough and principled as he presented himself. Syria is another in a long line of nations who refuse to participate in The Bank of International Settlements.  They also moved away from the U.S. Dollar as it reserve currency in 2006. Saddam Hussein was ready to sell oil in Euros as opposed to dollars and we took him out. The same is true with Libyan President Miramar Gadhafi, he was ready to drop the U.S. Dollar and trade in his own gold backed currency and we took him out as well. Besides Syria, the only other nation not participating in the Petrodollar oil market is Iran, which is why they are one of the original seven countries targeted for regime change in the war plan known as the Project for a New American Century.



Throughout the Obama administration many people expressed frustration over the fact that Obama seemed to pander to radical Islamists while referring to militant groups such as ISIS as the "JV team." It eventually became apparent that Obama was actually arming these radical militants and recently released documents show that he was doing so in order to pressure Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. The group was being used to destabilize Syria in order to topple the Assad government. This is to ensure that Syria does not create its own currency. President Obama was a master manipulator and he effortlessly was able to blind the masses through his social justice rhetoric. None of his supporters would have thought that he was carrying on the same war objectives as his predecessor George W. Bush. The truth is that Obama conducted nearly ten times as many air strikes, mostly by unmanned aerial drones, than Bush had.  Ironically, these strikes were also conducted in countries targeted for regime change under the Project New American Century doctrine. Gadhafi was killed by Obama's administration and it was during Obama's watch that tensions first escalated with Syria. The point is that there is an objective, and Trump's recent action proves that he is not the independent, principled statesman we were hoping for. He is working to achieve the same globalist agenda through phony proxy wars as Bush, Clinton and Obama.

Many people may not realize the extent in which the United States has contributed to the chaos in the Middle East. The U.S. supported Iraq in its eight year war against Iran and in fact, there is evidence suggesting that the U.S. aided Iraq in launching mustard nerve agents against Iranian forces. The Reagan administration had determined that there was no benefit from an Iranian victory so we threw our full support behind Iraq. Ironically, decades later we would accuse Iraq of having the same mustard gas we supported them using because they threatened to sell oil in Euros as opposed to dollars. The United States also funded and trained the Mujahideen, which would later become the radical militants known as Al-Qaeda, in their efforts to beat back a Soviet invasion of Afghanistan during the cold war. The U.S. later invaded Afghanistan using the September 11, 2001 attacks as justification. The truth has more to do with a natural gas pipeline project sponsored by the corporation Unocal. In 1998 congressional hearings were held concerning this project and due to rising political tensions in the region it was put on hold. The September 11 attacks provided the perfect opportunity to go into Afghanistan and ensure that the project would continue. It is important to know the history of how the U.S. has influenced and participated in Middle east wars because we are doing the same thing now in Syria. Not only did the Obama administration arm and train ISIS militants to use as a tool against Assad,  the U.S. is also arming and training opposing factions to create a proxy war designed to entirely destabilize the region. Rebels armed by the CIA and Pentagon are now fighting against each other in Syria.

The question before us is a tough one. Is Donald trump just another shill for the globalists whom so many thought he would stand against, or was it necessary for him to attack Syria to prevent further attacks? We will likely never know for sure because the media will work incessantly, as they always do, to fill our heads with disinformation designed to keep us from knowing anything for certain. As far as most Americans are concerned our country is strictly divided along ideological lines between the so called left and right wings. Two carefully constructed narratives between so called liberal and conservative worldviews which create the necessary conflict and distractions needed to carry out the objective of world wide social change.  The election of Donald Trump was heralded by many as an intervention from God that prevented a known globalist from assuming power; however, he just carried out Hillary Clinton's bidding by attacking Syria. America will never return to its founding principles as long as people continue blindly supporting the team they voted for. We have a responsibility to preserve liberty and pass it along to the next generation. This can't be done if after every election we step back and simply assume our guy can do no wrong. Conservatives mocked Obama voters for years for this sheepish mentality and now, well now those same people are making the same mistake exhibiting the same sheepish, follow along behavior. Just because we voted for Donald trump it doesn't eliminate the facts presented in this article, nor does it mean you have to stand behind his every action. In fact, liberty depends upon your not doing so.