Sunday, July 31, 2016

Cast aside this political madness and become the change you want to see

For most Americans the choice for the 2016 presidential election is becoming crystal clear. We either vote for Donald Trump or allow a woman who is perhaps the most corrupt and wicked individual to ever run for office become the next president.  The recent email leaks have painted an increasingly dark picture of the Democrat Party as the facts that they mock their minority voters and deliberately pay actors to play roles in their schemes have been exposed. It has also been revealed that the Clinton campaign colluded with Democrat National Committee and the media in an effort to sabotage Bernie Sanders’ efforts to become the nominee. Bernie Sanders voters have been blocked from entering the convention and Sanders signs have been confiscated.  In essence, the Democrat Party has been exposed for being the corrupt, authoritarian machine that it is. Even the main stream media can no longer hide that, so it seems.

This leaves us with Donald Trump, the man who said the Constitution isn’t always relevant. He also happened to donate more money to the Clinton foundation than he has to veterans, which sadly to say, donating to veterans is something he often brags about.  This author has ventured out in the far reaches of conspiracy theory and argued that Donald Trump is a shill who was deliberately selected by the Washington establishment to be a distraction, at the very least, while attempting to destroy conservatism.  This is exactly what has happened; the Republican Party is divided like never before with people claiming that a refusal to vote for Trump is a vote for Hillary. This may be true to some degree; in fact, it would be just as true if the situation was reversed. Democrats who refuse to vote for Clinton would inadvertently be voting Trump, wouldn’t they? Either way, what difference does it make? Donald trump isn’t any different than Hillary Clinton as far as major policy issues are concerned, especially when it comes to foreign policy and the war against Isis. For example; The National Review ran an article citing Trump’s 60 Minutes interview concerning his plans to fight Isis and it turns out his plan is Identical to Clinton’s and Obama’s. Sadly, Donald trump sounds like a bumbling idiot when describing his plan, which again, is no different than what Obama is doing now. The following is Trump’s 60 Minutes interview.

Donald Trump: I am going to have very few troops on the ground. We’re going to have unbelievable intelligence, which we need; which, right now, we don’t have. We don’t have the people over there. We are going to use–

Lesley Stahl: You want to send Americans–

Donald Trump: Excuse me– and we’re going to have surrounding states and, very importantly, get NATO involved because we support NATO far more than we should, frankly, because you have a lot of countries that aren’t doing what they’re supposed to be doing. And we have to wipe out ISIS. And speaking of Turkey, Turkey is an ally. Turkey can do it by themselves. But they have to be incentivized. For whatever reason, they’re not. So we have no choice.

Lesley Stahl: But I still don’t know if you’re going to send troops over–

Donald Trump: Very little. I’m gonna–

Lesley Stahl: But declare war–

Donald Trump: –get neighboring states and I’m going to get– we are going to get NATO; we’re going to wipe ‘em out. We’re gonna...

The point of this article isn’t to compare Trump and Clinton, they are virtually the same. The methods in which the main stream media manipulate you to believe what you are seeing is the real point. Do you really think that the masters behind the Democrat Party are so stupid as to let such damaging information make front page news when they control all of the media? If the Democrat Party and the main stream media are so tight and working in conjunction with one another then why was all of this information  thrust into public view? It is all part of the Communist takeover of America, or better put, the creation of the one world government.

This exposure of corruption brings shame to the American political system and forces Americans to re-think their system of government, it makes them demand change. This is the goal- discredit the culture; discredit America to the point that the average American no longer believes in the system.  The following is from the 45 Goals of the Communist takeover of America, which were entered into the congressional record in 1963.

Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms." –

Our political system may not be a form of artistic expression but it certainly is the means in which we express our First Amendment. The criminality exposed in the political system suggests that people are not capable of living in a free society without being corrupted. This could be taken a step further by examining some of the programming seen on television. Everything is about violence and sex; everything we view on the media either revolves around a shameful political system which divides the people, sex and violence, and it is all done with the explicit intent of making freedom look damaging. It is being done to discredit our culture by deliberately corrupting our psyche.  In fact, as this author has suggested in previous articles, which can be viewed here and here, the television itself was created for this very purpose.

The overall goal of the entire system at this point, is to create so much chaos, and to corrupt the idea of truth to the point that the average American has no idea which leg to stand on when it comes to defending their values, families and nation. The manipulators behind the scenes, despite what they are showing you in the media, are in complete control as they guide your thoughts and actions to their own end. The majority of Trump supporters, no matter what evidence is presented to them, will refuse to believe it because they have been brought to a point of complete desperation where they believe he is the only one that can save the country. This too was done on purpose in order to force you to continue playing their game. This is the continuing cycle that repeats itself every four to eight years and things never get better, they only get worse. One of these times you would think a national savior would actually fix the country. As of right now, both the Republican and Democrat Parties are a source of pure and complete disdain among the American people and sadly, the morale of Americans has been decimated to the point where all they can do is rally around the next so called leader who promises the type of change they want to see. What they should really be doing is looking in the mirror and asking themselves why they allow this to continue. Voting for one man who has political aspirations will not fix this; only throwing aside a corrupted system and becoming the change you want to see will.

Sunday, July 17, 2016

Communists Seek to Discredit America Through Lies and Chaos

Our country is in real trouble. We are being governed by a deceptive body of global government oligarchs who wish to impose their will upon the American people by breaking down our morality and presenting our way of life as the sole cause of problems in the world. Ever since President Obama was inaugurated we have been subject to one attempt after another to a campaign designed explicitly to make us believe we are a racist, selfish nation and that freedom and capitalism are responsible for poverty, inequality and the oppression of minorities. The United States is also presented as a greedy, war mongering nation whose exploitation of third world resources is responsible for global warming. In essence, those pushing for global government are using the age old technique of the Hegelian Dialectic to present capitalism as evil and communism as the world’s savior.  This plan is known as The Communist Peace Offensive and was presented to the U.S. congress by John Dulles, Republican advisor to the State Department in 1950. This was at the height of the global nuclear threat where much of this plan was then used in order to get the U.S. to surrender its nuclear arms. In other words, it was thought that the U.S. could be conned into believing that disarming herself would be a sign of moral strength. Everything that the global government advocates push is a deception of one form or another and their attempts to present our nation as the “problem” must be resisted at all levels because once the morale of the American people has been completely crushed, a total communist takeover becomes inevitable.

In the book “Toward Soviet America,” the case is made against capitalism by suggesting that mass starvation and the exploitation of the masses exists in all capitalist countries and that the United States had deliberately lied about the social progress made after Russia’s communist revolution. The communists wanted the world to believe that the Soviet Union was a workers’ paradise and that there was flourishing economic growth. The truth however, was the exact opposite. Millions died as the result of Vladimir Lenin’s efforts to collectivize the nation’s agriculture and his ruthless execution of political enemies. (Cawthorne, N. Tyrants: History’s 100 Most Evil Despots and Dictators. Metro Books, New York.) Communists believe that men must be controlled and that all human activity must exist purely for the benefit of the state. It was believed that collectivization would bring the efforts of the masses together for the greater good of Russia. Farms were seized and placed under state control, unrealistic quotas were demanded from the peasants, and those that resisted were executed.  This has been the repeating theme of communism throughout the twentieth century.  Nearly one hundred million people have been murdered in opposition to the idea that their labors should benefit the state and not themselves.

Many people in America have fallen for the lie that capitalism is an oppressive system. It’s astonishing really; everything they benefit from in this society derives from the concepts of the private ownership of property and industry. The negative attitudes towards capitalism and the emerging acceptance of socialism/communism is the result of a psychological warfare campaign designed to explicitly discredit the United States.  In the report The Communist Peace Offensive, John Dulles addresses the threat of psychological warfare and the inability of the American people to understand its effectiveness. The following is from this report.

Just as France developed illusions about the impregnability of the
Maginot line prior to World War II, only to succumb later to Hitler's
iron legions, so some Americans conceive of our security as based only
upon a spectacular weapon like the atom bomb or the H-bomb. They
fail to realize the destructive and disintegrating effects of psychological
warfare, which may be less spectacular but equally effective.

The Communist leaders are fully aware that propagandists, within
or without the United States, have easy access to the American public.
There is one radio for every two persons in the United States, and the
United States maintains radio freedom both as to broadcasting and
the listener's choice of program. The American press is also free.
Thus, an American may read or listen to whatever he pleases.

This paragraph speaks directly to the efforts made to use every available means to target the minds of the American people and wage a campaign designed to influence their beliefs about themselves and their country. Today, the mainstream media is nothing more than a constant stream of propaganda which spins every terrible tragedy in a way which suggests our culture needs to change and that our way of life is responsible for the carnage presented to us on a daily basis. The hope is that we willingly surrender our liberty and see their offered state of communism as the solution.

Many people view the talk of communist infiltration as mere conspiracy, which speaks to the effectiveness of psychological manipulation. People tend to believe what they are continually told, and lies that are told often enough are eventually accepted as truth.  Not only is our national media aiding in these efforts, the education system is as well. Over the past few years lessons on institutional racism and “white privilege” have infected the minds of American college students to the point we have a new wave of race riots erupting across the country in an effort to deliberately create chaos. We have a generation of people willing to surrender their liberties for security because they have been made to believe there is a constant threat to their safety, and most unbelievable is the fact that millions of people accept the premise that we are contributing to the destruction of the planet because we exhale carbon dioxide. This is all the result of ideological subversion within our own education system.

The communists know through their experiments in Pavlovian conditioning that most people, once brought up in a certain ideology, cannot be broken from it. We all have those experiences where we present cold hard factual data to someone and because they are ideologically set on their belief system they will choose to ignore these facts and continue their lives in ignorance. Most of what is presented concerning a communist attempt to undermine America can be taken from their own words. For instance, Joseph Stalin said that the best way to destroy America is to undermine her spirituality, morality and patriotism. Well, this has been the overall theme of this article; this is exactly what is taking place in America. America is being presented as a racist, warmongering, imperial, oppressive power in order to appeal to the senses of the masses and make them beg for another system of government. While the communists claim that capitalism is a system that seeks control and exploits the poor, the truth is really quite evident when you examine the words of Laventry Beria in “Brainwashing: A Synthesis of the Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics.”

In chapter one, simply entitled An Address by Beria, Laventry lays the groundwork for how to brainwash the American people into accepting communism. He explicitly states that capitalists seek control and then explains how to subvert our culture through the use of psychological warfare. For instance, in the following passage he explicitly mentions the use of drugs in an attempt to create a state of insanity in the nation.

Psychopolitics is a solemn charge. With it you can erase our enemies as insects. You can cripple the efficiency of leaders by striking insanity into their families through the use of drugs. You can wipe them away with testimony as to their insanity. By our technologies you can even bring about insanity itself when they seem too resistive.

He then goes onto say that you can change the loyalties of those that oppose you through brainwashing or “destroy their minds.”

You can change their loyalties by Psychopolitics. Given a short time with a Psychopolitician you can alter forever the loyalty of a soldier in our hands or a statesman or a leader in his own country, or you can destroy his mind.

Finally, he goes on to describe how our own system of governance can be used against us through the constant campaign of terror in society.

Use the courts, use the judges, use the Constitution of the country, use its medical societies and its laws to further our ends. Do not stint in your labor in this direction. And when you have succeeded you will discover that you can now effect your own legislation at will and you can, by careful organization of healing societies, by constant campaign about the terrors of society, by pretense as to your effectiveness make your Capitalist himself, by his own appropriations, finance a large portion of the quiet Communist conquest of the nation.

In essence the communists seek to convince you that your country is one founded on the precepts of conquest and exploitation by lying and creating chaos, and then they claim that this will bring peace.  Of course, the definition of peace according to a communist is the absence of opposition to socialism. I think it’s time to ask who it is that’s really seeking control.

Monday, July 4, 2016

United Nations Participation and the Loss of American Sovereignty

There have been rumors going around concerning the arrival of U.N. troops at U.S. military bases.  Conspiracy theories abound which suggests peacekeeping troops will be used to confiscate weapons from American citizens in the final stage to merge the U.S. into a globalist world order headed by the United Nations. People who espouse these views are immediately discredited as “tinfoil hat” wearers and conspiracy kooks by people that believe something like that could never happen here. The evidence however is overwhelming when considering how deeply entangled the U.S. has become in United Nations affairs. For instance, Loretta Lynch and Barack Obama have initiated a program called the Strong Cities Network, which is the product of a U.N. think tank called the Institute for Strategic Dialogue. The purpose of the Strong Cities Network is to combat home grown extremism while giving the U.N. law enforcement capabilities over our cities. While many would think this makes sense in the age of terror, this author has described many times who this administration, and the U.N. indecently, considers being the extremists.  Another example is the numerous treaties proposed by the U.N. which would surrender U.S. sovereignty to a world governing body; an example is the Arms Trade Treaty.

Is the United States losing its sovereignty to a world governing body? Sadly, the answer to that question is yes and it is a process that started many years ago with something called The United Nations Participation Act which was signed into law on December 20, 1945.

This law committed the United States to full participation in the U.N. while authorizing the president to appoint representatives and commit the United States military to conflicts based on U.N. objectives. To be more specific, congress would retain the power to determine the size and terms of military deployments but the power to determine what would constitute the type of crisis warranting their use would be solely up to the United Nations Security Council. That is a huge loss of American sovereignty in and of itself because the power to wage war, according to the U.S. Constitution, rests with the United States Congress alone. It was because of the provisions of this law that President Truman was able to commit troops to the Korean War without the consent of congress and instead, the vote of the U.N. Security Council on the pretext of an international emergency.  The same could be said for many of the wars and police actions that would soon follow.

Another area of concern is the United Nations insistence that the United States fully comply with what has become known as Agenda 21, or the sustainable development agenda.  This is the agenda based on the idea that United States, and capitalism in general, is responsible for global warming and in order to save the planet our sovereignty must be surrendered and our wealth redistributed to third world countries. According to climate justice activists the United States owes the world a climate debt because of our excessive use of fossil fuels. The U.S. commitment to the so called “climate change” problem is the result of another law passed by congress committing us to United Nations objectives. This law was called the United Nations Environmental Program Participation Act of 1973. This act, Public Law 93-188 made it U.S. policy to contribute funds to the United Nations in a “coordinated international” effort to protect and improve the environment.  The Obama administration is working feverishly to implement the climate change agenda by reducing our reliance on fossil fuels on the pretense that they are destroying the environment. The U.N. climate chief, Christine Figueres, has publicly stated that all efforts should be made to reduce the human population in order to save the planet from climate change and that a global communist regime would be the best form of government to do so.  According to Public Law 93-188, our government is providing the funds necessary to this effort.

Finally, an act passed by our congress concerning the United Nations that should have all Americans concerned because it deals with the very heart of the liberties we hold dear is the Arms Control and Disarmament Act of 1961, or Public Law 87-297.  This law calls for the complete disarming of the U.S. military as a sovereign force and the merging of our troops into a global, U.N. peacekeeping force.  The basic premise of this law is to give all policing and military powers to an international force governed by the United Nations.

The over-all goal of the United States is a free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world which has achieved general and complete disarmament under effective international control; and a world in which adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.

In order to make possible the achievement of that goal, the program sets forth the following specific objectives toward which nations should direct their efforts:

The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force;

The elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining internal order;

The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United Nations;

The establishment and effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization within the framework of the United Nations to insure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations.

Our armed forces have been reduced considerably over the past several decades and under President Obama, this process has accelerated. The U.N. Arms Trade Treaty seeks to strengthen this law by giving the U.N. jurisdiction over all arms, including those in the hands of U.S. civilians. Many believe that this treaty wouldn’t affect the rights of U.S. gun owners; however, with a U.S. military diminished in size and scope and an international army being funded by our own government through established law, not to mention the haphazard manner in which our lawmakers ignore our constitution, there is little to prevent the disarming of U.S. citizens at the hands of the United Nations. There are provisions of the Arms Trade Treaty that suggest lawful legitimate use of firearms would be protected; however, self defense and the right to over throw tyrannical governments are not considered human rights by U.N. bureaucrats.

In 2015 Congressman Mike Rogers introduced legislation to get the U.S. out of the United Nations. The bill, titled the American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2015 has once again been introduced to congress after the recent Brexit vote. The question of whether or not a move like this is even possible, considering the laws that have been passed committing us to U.N. objectives is indeed a tough one to answer. Our congress is currently made of people sold out to global government issues and they have recently demonstrated a willingness to surrender the liberties of their constituents by allowing votes on gun control and staging a sit-in demanding security in exchange for liberty.  Are they just playing a role to further the goals set by U.N. bureaucrats and global government advocates decades ago? The answer to that question is probably yes. If the U.S. is to retain its sovereignty it is imperative that we exit the U.N. and repeal all laws that give them any power over U.S. law immediately.  Or else we may just find U.N. troops policing our streets one day.