Wednesday, September 28, 2016

Reeducating a Nation of Deplorables

A high school in Manville New Jersey has suspended a student for preparing an anti-gun control report for a home work project. In fact, the school has ordered the student to undergo a psychological evaluation because it is believed by the liberal left that any position contrary to theirs is a sign of mental illness. This is reminiscent of when Park elementary school suspended Josh Walsh for biting a pop-tart into the shape of a gun. In the article "The Culture Changing Pop-Tart," this author argued that the attack on gun rights in our schools was specifically designed to change Americas culture from one of rugged individualism to complete dependence upon authority. It is almost as if they are deliberately creating an atmosphere of panic while at the same time, attempting to teach kids that gun ownership is a privilege granted by government, not a protected right in our constitution. Common Core textbooks are literally taking the liberty to rewrite the second amendment and very little is being done about it. This is all part of the agenda to create a new "Soviet America" using our education system to rewire our children's brains using stimulus-response mechanisms to fundamentally change their value systems. The nation recently witnessed Hillary Clinton refer to half of all Americans as deplorable. She, along with the rest of left wing, truly believe that people that cannot be brought inline with their way of thinking are less than human. The goal, through education, is to create a society of good little socialists where everyone is exactly the same.

The tenets of rugged individualism, personal determination, self-will, imagination, and personal creativeness are alike in the masses antipathetic to the good of the greater state. These willful and unaligned forces are no more than illnesses which will bring about disaffection, disunity, and at length the collapse of the group to which the individual is attached. Beria-Brain Washing-A Synthesis of the Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics.

In chapter four of her book "The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America" national whistleblower Charlotte Iserbyt cites the work of famous behaviorists B.F. Skinner and his utopian novel, Walden Two. In Beyond Freedom and Dignity Skinner talked about the manipulation of the environment in order to change behavior. Skinner believed that man in no way has control of his behavior and all that was needed to force behavioral change was environmental manipulation. This is the stimulus response mechanism at work. In the case of schools attacking gun rights, they are attempting to change behavior by reinforcing positive attitudes about gun ownership with punishment and social isolation. Skinner also said in the same book that the fear of acceptance/non-acceptance was just a powerful motivator for behavioral change as an all out police state. In Walden Two, Skinner writes that children should be raised by the state, trained from birth to demonstrate only desirable characteristics and behavior. This is what is taking place in our public schools today.

Iserbyt also discusses the United States' membership in UNESCO, (The United Nations Educational, Scientific, Cultural Organization.) The United States officially became a member in 1946 and she cites this as the cause of a major shift in educational policy where a classical liberal education was no longer the focus, but the changing of traditional values and the absolving of what has come to be known as a universal right and wrong. The United States' membership in UNESCO also meant that from that point on, the United Nations would dictate our education policy. It was understood at this time that the use of psychology and behavioral modifications techniques such as operant conditioning could potentially be used to completely rework the morality of mankind. The goal was to eradicate the traditional morals of the Judeo-Christian worldview and create a new world of peace and total equality. Presenting a paper entitled "The Psychiatry of Enduring Peace and Social Progress" to the World Health Organization, Canadian psychiatrist Brock Chisolm posits the idea that a world can be created, through the use of psychotherapeutic techniques, where people no longer suffer from greed, a fear of others, or prejudice. These are issues that he claims, lead to nations fighting wars. He also believed that children should be free from parents imposing their rigid, oppressive and outdated views of an ultimate, universal morality and that their values should be remolded through operant conditioning. The type of values that they seek to instill in your children are completely antithetical to common sense and decency.

The reinterpretation and eventually, the eradication of the concept of right and wrong, which has been the basis of child training....these are the belated objectives of practically all effective psychotherapy. Brock Chisolm

This is what is taking place in our schools today. An education not based on the classical ideas of freeing the minds of men or based on proven logic, but an attempt to rework the morality of man through psychology and environmental manipulation. Look at the world around you. Violence and crime are out of control, people have no basic sense of humanity and the younger generation literally believes that because we exhale carbon dioxide we are endangering our planet. They are trying to create a world where individualism no longer exists and everybody is the same, exactly the same. A world where it is understood that the state is the highest power and everything they do is for the state and the state alone. They are turning your children into communists while you work to fund the education system being used to do it.

Although the psychopolitical operative working in universities, where he can best direct the curricula of psychology classes is often tempted to teach some of the principles of psychopolitics to the susceptible students in the psychology classes, he must be thoroughly enjoined to limit his information in psychology classes to the transmittal of the tenets of communism under the guise of psychology, and must limit his activities in bringing about a state of mind on the part of the students where they will accept communist tenets as those of their own action and as modern scientific principles. The psychological operatives must not, at any time, educate students fully in stimulus-response mechanisms, and must not impart to them, save those who will become his fellow workers, the exact principles of psychopolitics. It is not necessary to do, and it is dangerous. "Beria-Brainwashing: A Synthesis of the Russian Textbook of Psychopolitics."

Sunday, September 25, 2016

No Fly No Buy, Association of Ideas and the Silencing of Opposition


On Friday September 23rd, at the Cascade Mall in Burlington Washington, there was yet another mass shooting incident where at least four people were killed. The main stream media, in an attempt to hide the truth, reported that the shooter was an Hispanic male when in fact, he was a Muslim. This is just another in a long line of Islamic attacks against our nation where our government sits idly by and does absolutely nothing to prevent it. Radical Islamists have made their intents to attack soft targets within the U.S. perfectly clear. Clarionproject.org ran an article in February of 2015 exposing the fact that radical Islamists have made specific threats to target U.S. malls and murder innocent Americans in the name of Jihad. Many Americans express outrage and frustration as they question why our government does nothing about this. At the same time, they also refuse to acknowledge that there may be a more sinister agenda at play. While some people can entertain the idea that these attacks are allowed to occur in order to pass stricter gun control, they fail to see that it may in fact, be more sinister than that. Why on one hand does our government work so feverishly to protect Islam while at the same time plastering pictures of Islamists who commit terror attacks all over the mainstream media? The answer is simple; they want the fear of terrorism at the forefront of our subconscious in order to carry out their agenda.


Congress has once again, in response to the bombings in New York and New Jersey, as well as the mall stabbing spree in Minnesota, introduced their "no fly, no buy gun control bill." The shooting spree in Washington will certainly add fuel to this fire as they aim to add anyone who may be on a terror watch list to the so called no gun buy list. It’s worse than that even, the proposed bill, which has bipartisan support, would prevent anyone who has been under investigation for suspected ties to terrorists or terrorist activity from buying a gun. Most Americans, assuming that the government is honest and really trying to prevent another attack think this is a great common sense idea; however, they fail to realize that they themselves may be considered a potential extremist.


In 2009, almost immediately upon President Obama assuming office, the Department of Homeland Security released the following report- Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment. This report focuses exclusively on people whose political leanings are to the right and alleges that they have the potential to commit acts of violence. The report claims that right wing extremists have capitalized on the election of the first “African-American” president and immediately increased their recruitment efforts in response. After all, right wingers are racist, xenophobic bigots. The report also cites fears of gun rights restrictions, loss of jobs to overseas manufacturers and increased immigration as reasons why right wingers may suddenly become unhinged and launch lone wolf style terrorist attacks.


(U//FOUO)  The possible passage of new restrictions on firearms and the return of military veterans facing significant challenges reintegrating into their communities could lead to the potential emergence of terrorist groups or lone wolf extremists capable of carrying out violent attacks.


(U//FOUO)  Rightwing extremists were concerned during the 1990s with the perception that illegal immigrants were taking away American jobs through their willingness to work at significantly lower wages.  They also opposed free trade agreements, arguing that these arrangements resulted in Americans losing jobs to countries such as Mexico. 


The problem is that none of this ever happened, there has been no major right wing terrorist movement. This report was designed to silence all opposition to Barack Obama’s agenda, and when the time came where people were so fed up, they would have this to fall back on and label people as potential extremists for being against government. It’s almost as if this report was deliberately released to tell us what they intended to do, and any opposition to it should be suspect. In fact, looking at America today it is obvious that the only terrorist threat we face comes from left wing radicals that are paid to disrupt and cause chaos in order to justify the growth of government power. We certainly do not see any “right wingers” organizing and burning down cities, or attacking innocent people and looting stores in the name of social justice or Jihad. Again, these actions are allowed to take place, or purposefully acted out in order to further an agenda, and that agenda involves creating a mental association, otherwise known as association of ideas, in the minds of gullible Americans between terrorism and everyday people. This is why the media always goes into overdrive portraying every mass shooter as just an ordinary guy who everybody loved until one day, he just snapped for no explainable reason. Think about it a moment, for years we have seen violent acts carried by radical Islamists and now, slowly but surely we are seeing violence being acted out by Americans. How do you describe an association of ideas exactly?


In the book Brainwashing: A Synthesis of the Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics, Laventri Beria describes man as nothing more than an animal whose behaviors are easily controlled by stimulus response mechanisms. In other words, the idea is to constantly expose the population to terror and slowly create the association between these acts of terror and other people who may be disgruntled enough to commit acts of violence of their own. Consider the following-


Man is a stimulus-response animal. His entire reasoning capabilities,even his ethics and morals, depend upon stimulus-response machinery. This has long been demonstrated by such Russians as Pavlov, and the principles have long been used in handling the recalcitrant, in training children, and in bringing about a state of optimum behavior on the part of a population.

Having no independent will of his own, Man is easily handled by stimulus-response mechanisms. It is only necessary to install a stimulus into the mental anatomy of Man to have that stimulus reactivate and respond any time an exterior command source calls it into being.

The mechanisms of stimulus-response are easily understood. The body takes pictures of every action in the environment around an individual. When the environment includes brutality. terror, shock, and other such activities, the mental image picture gained contains in itself all the ingredients of the environment. If the individual, himself, was injured during that moment, the injury. itself. will re-manifest when called upon to respond by an exterior command source.

The more Americans witness violent attacks by terrorists the more they will accept the idea that certain people who may be on a terror watch list shouldn’t buy guns. While none of the violent acts we are witnessing are being carried out by Conservative Republicans, the violence justifies in the minds of the masses, the restrictions of rights of all people who they consider have the potential to commit violent acts. The report on so called right wing extremism justifies adding people of right wing ideologies to terrorists watch lists based on the idea that right wingers are angry and disgruntled over the possible loss of freedom. That’s the point. The whole agenda revolves around getting the guns out of the hands of those that oppose the left wing agenda. When was the last time you heard anyone on the left refer to people actually committing acts of terror as terrorists? Passage of the no fly, no buy gun control bill could result in millions of innocent people being added to a watch list simply because they have expressed concerns over illegal immigration, gun control and a loss of American manufacturing. Things which incidentally are all coming to fruition now. It isn’t about stopping terrorism folks, it’s about eliminating any opposition to the left wing agenda.




Friday, September 23, 2016

Democrat Policies are the Oppressor of Minorities


So here we are again, riots in North Carolina and another shooting of an unarmed black man in Tulsa. Already, Black Lives Matter protestors are gathering in Oklahoma awaiting their opportunity to riot and disrupt the lives of ordinary people based on the precepts of white privilege and America’s systematic oppression of minorities. I was a social work student for five years and nearly completed a master’s degree program except for the fact that I stood in direct opposition to the white privilege narrative. As I described in my book Not on My watch, I was literally told that I was not a good fit for the social work program because I wouldn’t submit to the white privilege ideology and-because I didn’t believe in social justice.  I was told that the whole program revolved around these concepts and that most social workers were in fact, politically to the left.  They have been teaching this narrative for years and truthfully, the only thing it has accomplished was reducing a portion of the American population to nothing but dependents on big government, which of course if you are familiar with the Cloward Piven strategy, this is the goal.
The Democrats have for years posed as champions of America’s alleged “oppressed minorities.” Their policies however, do little more than contribute to the oppression that they claim to be fighting against. In 2012, Northwestern University professor Aldon Morris noted that black people were disappointed in Obama because they felt he really wasn’t addressing the issue of racial inequality and poverty. He pointed out the facts that black unemployment was higher than it had been in years and that crime in inner city minority communities was rising drastically. These were things that President Obama was expected to rectify as Americas first black president. President Obama did address these issues; however, instead of handling them like an American president by creating policies that would enable people to find work and become independent productive citizens, he went about the work of being a community organizer and stirred up hate and discontent. It is almost as if he had a plan to plant the seeds of revolution by pushing the narrative that minorities in America are oppressed victims.
The last thing I want to do is give the impression that I believe in any stereotype when it comes to minorities. There is however, a stark contrast between the way the Democratic Left and Conservatives view the issue. Personally, I happen to believe that black people are just as capable as white people and that there isn’t a need for programs like affirmative action. There may have legitimately been a need for it at one time, but that time has passed. The left on the other hand, insists that there is a need for such a program because they believe that black people would not be able to survive without their help. If that wasn’t the case, then why do they insist on programs like affirmative action? Think about it a moment, under a program like affirmative action a major university or place of employment is forced to hire so many minorities based on test scores or other performance aptitudes. The end result of this could actually see a lesser qualified black person being hired or enrolled over a more qualified individual simply because the institution is being forced to meet a quota. How is that not a form of systematic oppression to those individuals who put forth a great deal of effort to accomplish a goal?  
As I wrote in my article “Psychiatry: The True Origins of Racism,” the prevailing attitude that blacks needed continual government support stems from the left wing field of Psychiatry. According to Benjamin Rush, father of modern day Psychiatry, black people suffered from a disease similar to leprosy called Negritude. This so called disease was actually based on the premise of the color of their skin and he believed the only cure was to turn their skin white. He also believed that because of Negritude, black people were entitled to live off of white people because Negritude was a debilitating disease. If you look at the prevailing attitude of the left today, they believe that America systematically oppresses black people and that they should be entitled to the fruits of societies labor. This has done nothing but destroy the free will of generations of people while simultaneously reinforcing a negative stereotype that the left claims to be fighting against. After decades of welfare dependence, forced upon inner city communities under programs like Lyndon Johnsons “Great Society,” many black people truly view the United States as a place of oppression where they never can seem to get a hand up. This makes them willing and ready recruits for Obama’s revolution.
Race relations had come a long way in America; however, the newly formed communist front group, Black Lives Matter, brought to us by Obama, Sharpton and George Soros, is doing little but creating a fear in the minds of Americans when it comes to young black men.  For five years I listened to radical left wing professors teach young gullible students that blacks in America were discriminated against because white people were scared when they realized a young black male was approaching them. So, their answer to this is starting riots and killing cops? Think about what it must be like to be a police officer now. Black men are engaging in a literal war against the police based on the precepts of a false narrative and at the same time expecting society to not view them through the lens of a negative stereotype.
This is the sheer genius of the communist left. They have initiated a firestorm that will worsen exponentially because a primal fear is being driven into the public consciousness, and the divisive rhetoric is leading to a society that trusts no one and suspects everyone. The young female police officer in Tulsa certainly reacted the wrong way; however, in her mind is the idea that this guy in front of her could be part of the group murdering police officers. Perhaps Black Lives Matter should consider how their actions are contributing to the reactionary behavior that is seeing innocent people killed needlessly by police. Perhaps police officers should also consider the same. Either way, we have some serious reflecting to do because as it stands now, the narrative and direction of the country are being controlled by people who create the problem and then offer the solution. The Democrats have purposefully kept black people impoverished so as to use them for votes and when necessary, a rent a mob.  The hateful rhetoric is purposefully being implanted in the minds of an already angry population and in the background sits a master community organizer taking advantage of it all for his own political aspirations. That my friends, represents the real oppression of black Americans.


Tuesday, September 20, 2016

Thank You President Obama

I would like to give President Obama a big thank you from all of us "conspiracy theorists." For years now we have been warning people that the United Nations was plotting to institute a global government on the pretext that human beings were not capable of self governance and that they needed a global elite to rule their lives. Well, President Obama just proved that we were telling the truth as he stood in front of the whole world and declared that the only way to defeat terrorism was for powerful nations like the United States to surrender some of their freedom to some type of global government. This is the Hegelian Dialectic at play, using a crisis to institute a pre-planned solution. Since September 11, 2001 the U.S. Government has been chipping away at our liberties in the name of keeping us safe, and now it has come to its fruition. Barrack Obama is just another globalist selected for his smooth talking, and his abilities to pull the whool over the sheeples eyes. RIP America.


Monday, September 19, 2016

A Social Injustice Indeed....A Grave Social Injustice

Colin Kaepernick's refusal to stand for the National Anthem has kick started a string of similar incidents across the country. Not only are other professional athletes joining Kaepernick's ridiculous protest, but high school teams are now refusing to show respect to the Star Spangled Banner as well. It has gotten so far out of hand that even a state senator from the state of Missouri is standing in solidarity with this so called protest against social injustice. The only problem is that the real social injustices aren't even being addressed. These people are exercising a constitutionally protected right by taking  a stand against the very constitution that protects it. That, in the words of Michael Savage, proves that liberalsim is a mental disorder. Unfortunately, the idea that the United States is an oppressive, unfair nation has gained some major ground under the tenure of the community organizer in chief. After nearly a decade of contious lies designed to discredit the culture of liberty, and portray America as a racist, xenophobic nation; a weary beaten down population has no idea how to defend the truth. That is, in and of itself, a social injustice of epic proportions.

The real injustice lies in the fact that the United States has become an oppressive nation. We are now a country where our very government, in cahoots with the mainstream media, deliberately misleads us in a misinformation campaign designed to keep us distracted from the fact that we have been completely sold out. We have been divided on every social level while the media works feversihly to incite racial and class warfare. Our schools are complicit in this as they have completely rewritten the truth about about our history in order to support the narrative that America systematically discriminates against minorities. Our teachers are even so dumbed down that they have no idea that they are teaching lies. Our kids are being taught that being white is inherently evil and that they are privileged recipients of a system that automatically favors them and punishes others based on skin color alone.

The real injustice lies in the fact that we have a government facilitating the systematic overthrow of this nation by allowing a radical leftist to get away with everything he wishes to "fundamentally transform." The Republican Party has rendered themselves absolutely useless as they have, for all practical purposes, stepped aside and made it perfectly clear they would not oppose Obama.

The real injustice lies in the fact that we have thousands of troops returning home from wars that both the Democrats and Republicans voted for, only to be spit upon by the likes of idiots that have no understanding of the definiton of liberty, nor any respect for people who sacrafice for their freedom to speak as they choose. Troops returning home with PTSD, lost limbs and broken families; only to be cast aside for immigrants who care nothing about this country except for what they can get from it. We were told we had to go fight them over there so they wouldn't come over here, and now, our government is voluntarily bringing in the same people we were sent to fight. People who come here with the intent to murder. This is not only a grave social injustice, it is treason of the highest order.

Yes, there is indeed a social injustice occurring in this country and it isn't due to racism or discrimination. It isn't sexism, homophobia or even wealth inequality. It is because a group of elitists, in an effort to wrestle away our liberties have systematically lied about our nation and left those behind that have done so much for us. They sent our fathers our brothers, mothers and sisters off to foreign lands to fight wars in the name of freedom and when they came back they were demonized, called extrremists and left to die on V.A. waiting lists while their commander in chief sends billions to our enemies. A nation that forgets its defenders is a nation that will be forgotten.

Monday, September 5, 2016

The Depths of Ideolgical Subversion: Communism and Islam

To this day many people are convinced that the September 11th attack of 2001 was a conspiracy orchestrated by our own government to usher in the New World Order. This type of attack is known as a “false flag” and the United States is no stranger to their use. Pearl Harbor and The Gulf of Tonkin were both said to be false flag attacks used to get the American people to accept war. Operation Northwoods was another false attack planned by the Joint Chiefs of Staff to get the American people to accept an invasion of Cuba. These plans called for attacks against American citizens, and then blaming it on the Island nation. Luckily this plan never came to fruition.  After September 11 The United States government immediately launched a campaign in the Middle East that began with Afghanistan and then included Iraq and now Libya and Syria. This plan was referred to as the Project New American Century and ultimately, it also included plans to attack Iran. Liberals were sure that Barack Obama was going to end the wars in the Middle East and bring a new era of peace; however, his wars in Libya and Syria are merely extensions of the Project New American Century which seeks to expand American military dominance around the globe. This means that Obama is carrying out the same war plans started by Bush.  Actually, the Project New American Century was written well before the attacks of September 11, and one of the planners allegedly admitted a new Pearl Harbor event would likely be necessary to get the American people to accept an invasion of not only Afghanistan, but Iraq as well.

Fifteen years later the debate still rages as to whether September 11 was an actual attack launched by radical Islamists in the name of Jihad, or an attack launched against our freedoms by our own government. The evidence is becoming increasingly clear, according to an article published by Europhysics Magazine, that the twin towers were not brought down by excessive heat from burning jet fuel, but by controlled demolition. As if we need a panel of experts to bring us to this conclusion. According to the article, the Twin towers, along with building 7, would have been the first known case of total collapse due to excessive heat and fire melting steel frames.

“Indeed, neither before nor since 9/11 have fires caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise—nor has any other natural event, with the exception of the 1985 Mexico City earthquake, which toppled a 21-story office building. Otherwise, the only phenomenon capable of collapsing such buildings completely has been by way of a procedure known as controlled demolition, whereby explosives or other devices are used to bring down a structure intentionally. Although NIST finally concluded after several years of investigation that all three collapses on 9/11 were due primarily to fires, fifteen years after the event a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists are unconvinced by that explanation.”

How would the American people react if they were to find out this was a conspiracy orchestrated by their own government? What if the conspiracy was planned to not only do away with the freedoms we have enjoyed and taken for granted, but to completely destroy the morale of the American people, while simultaneously discrediting the American government on the world stage in order to offer a different form of government as a solution? Is it possible that the release of this article is a prelude to a revelation that the U.S. government intentionally staged the September 11 attacks in order to launch wars of aggression? Granted, this is all merely speculation conjured up by an author who is fascinated by the techniques of psychological warfare; however, there are little bits of evidence that suggest this is a strong possibility.

First of all, look at the inroads Islam has made in American society since the 9/11 attacks. The attacks themselves have been turned into the means in which Muslims have become oppressed victims in America. Stereotyping a Muslim as a terrorist is the new Jim Crow and they have made tremendous progress using this as a civil rights tactic. Could you imagine how empowered the Muslims would be if it were revealed that the U.S. government deliberately staged the 9/11 attacks in order to prop up Islam as the enemy? Revelation of this kind would likely put America in its place while shaming the vast majority of us into silence.  Secondly, the global elite have been trying to destroy conservatism and the patriot movement for a long time. If it was determined that the government of George Bush and the Neocons deliberately staged this event it would be the ultimate end of the Republican Party. It would also destroy the morale of the Republican rank and file as well. They would have absolutely no idea how to deal with this kind of information and they wouldn’t know which leg to stand on.  This would force them into compliance with whatever solution would be offered, which of course would be along the lines of a global type government.

Is it possible that this attack was not launched by radical jihadists but by Communists within our own government using Islam as a force for revolution? Is it possible that the 9/11 conspiracy theory is a deliberate misinformation campaign designed to keep us from seeing the real objective, which would be  the complete discrediting of our form of government all together in order to offer communism as a solution? This is exactly what would happen if it were revealed to the world that the U.S. deliberately staged the 9/11 attacks in order to launch wars of aggression in the Middle East.  It is also a strategy that would fall right in line with the Communist concept of Ideological Subversion.

Former KGB agent Yuri Bezmenov describes Ideolgical Subversion as a process that seeks to demoralize an entire nation to the point that despite the abundance of information available to the public, they have absolutely no way of discerning what is real. It is certainly safe to say that we are at that point in the United States. Never before in the history of man has so much information been right at our finger tips yet, somehow we have never been more misinformed.  He also describes it as a process of educating the population into the culture of the enemy, more and more we are seeing Islam becoming the protected culture in America while at the same time, acceptance of the loss of American Sovereignty is gaining tremendous ground.  Discovering that our own government was responsible for the 9/11 attacks, as stated earlier, would empower the Muslim world and destroy any remaining faith the American masses had in their system of government. This alone would accomplish the Communist goal of discrediting the America Constitution. The following is from the book The Naked Communist.

Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

In 1951, State Department advisor John Dulles gave a testimony before the U.S. Congress describing a plan he referred to as the Communist Peace Offensive. He offered his opinion that the Soviet Union was involved in all out propaganda campaign designed to give the world the impression that the United States was the country that stood for wars of conquest and that Communism was the solution to worlds problems and stood for peace.  Looking at the mentality of many people in our younger generations you would have to argue, despite the fact that much of this material refers to events prior to WWII, that there is something of this affect happening in our country. Young college students, as well as activist groups, are literally begging for enslavement that masquerades as freedom. If an organization such as the U.N., for example, were to reveal to the world that the U.S was responsible for 9/11 then this Communist plan to portray the American government as Imperialistic warmongers would have been successful beyond their wildest dreams.

Many people may be wondering why we are discussing Communism and not Islam; after all, it was radical Islamists who allegedly attacked us on September 11, 2001, not Communist revolutionaries. Despite the fact that Russia currently acts as an adversary to radical Islam, the truth is quite different. According to Cliff Kincaid in his book “The Sword of Revolution And The Communist Apocalypse” Russia has a long history of support for Islam because Muslims were one of the peoples considered to be oppressed by the bourgeoisie. This makes Muslims perfect candidates for acting as the useful idiots of Communist revolutionaries who seek to do nothing but create chaos in order to offer communism as a solution. Kincaid cites an excerpt from a report written by a former KGB agent for America’s Survival Inc. where he describes the history of Russian support for Islamic terrorism.

The communists have considered Islam their ally from the very beginning, because in the early twentieth century, Islam was the religion of the oppressed people. Support of Islam was considered a part of the Russian based anti-colonialism. It is very significant that Vladimir Lenin in December 1917 addressed his second message, delivered just after coming to power, to the “Toiling Muslims of Russia and East.” So they considered Muslims a reservoir of people for the world communist revolution.

This makes a lot of sense if you stop and think about it. Sharia Law has little to do with the actual religion of Islam and more to do with a radical political ideology. It is virtually an Islamic version of communism if you want to be more specific. Looking at where America is today, 15 years after the September 11 attacks, it is safe to say that America is forever changed and will likely never be the same. People are begging for communism and restrictions on our freedoms, Islam is becoming more of an accepted culture than Christianity and the idea of American Sovereignty in the minds of millions is a laughable concept. The idea of a free and prosperous America has been destroyed and if it were revealed that the U.S. was in fact responsible for 9/11, then the country would be completely discredited on the world stage and ripe for a complete ideological takeover, which is in fact one of the goals of the communists. Are the communists using Islam as a force for world revolution? Was it communism behind the September 11 attacks? We will likely never for sure; however, if they soon come out with proof that it was the U.S. we may have a better understanding.