Friday, March 31, 2017

Ideological Subversion and the Deceptive Push for Single Payer Healthcare

President Trump ran a winning campaign by convincing many millions of Americans that he was the answer to the failed, social engineering of Obama. In the minds of freedom loving patriots across the country Donald Trump was a true conservative. Interestingly enough, Trump once admitted to identifying more with Democrats while also claiming the economy does better under Democratic leadership. President Trump, the man who Conservatives assume will fix our country, also supported President Clinton's assault weapons ban. While he has claimed to have changed his position on this issue it remains to be seen how well he will hold under pressure when the next mass shooting occurs. Finally, and probably most importantly considering the recent circus sideshow we have witnessed concerning health care, he wrote a book stating America needed a single payer healthcare system.

"We must have universal healthcare. I'm a conservative on most issues but a liberal on this one. We should not hear so many stories of families ruined by healthcare expenses." (Donald Trump, The America We Deserve)

The full repeal of Obamacare was probably the single most important issue Trump campaigned on that enabled him to win the election. The media would have you believe that the so called failure to pass the proposed repeal bill is a significant loss for Donald Trump and his presidency. The most likely truth is that it was probably a set up designed to give the impression that Conservatives in  Congress are responsible for holding back any real progress. Destroying the Conservative movement has been a long time goal of the left and now they have the opportunity to show Republicans that they are standing in the way of their president's agenda. Trump has recently announced that he intends to push back against the Freedom Caucus in retaliation for their vote against the proposed Obamacare replacement. The Freedom Caucus, and other Republicans, were right to vote against it as it made no real reforms in health care and kept many of the Obamacare provisions in place. Americans don't want a replacement, they want repeal, period. That is what Trump promised and that is why Trump won.

It is no surprise that Trump is  vowing to work with Democrats in coming up with a solution to the failed Obamacare law. The Affordable Care Act was likely designed to fail in the first place in order to create the demand for a solution, which would be single payer. this strategy is known as the Hegelian Dialectic or the problem-reaction-solution strategy. Democrats have been searching for a way to get single payer health care passed for nearly a century and it seems, with the election of Trump, they may actually get it. Too many Americans fail to realize the extents to which Democrats and other progressives, including progressive Republicans, will go to get what they want. The name of the game is deception, plain and simple.

The healthcare fiasco, in this authors educated opinion, is proof positive that there is an effort to deceive the American people into accepting a single payer healthcare system. Consider the following quote from Rules for Radicals a moment.

There's another reason for working inside the system. Dostoevski said that taking a new step is what people fear most. Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and chance the future. This acceptance is the reformation essential to any revolution.  (Saul Alinsky Rules for Radicals)

What this alludes to is the idea that people will eventually accept things that they normally wouldn't if they have been brought far enough into a state of despair. Americans would likely have laughed at the prospect of a Donald Trump presidency two decades ago; however, after eight years of far left radicalism and the prospect of a Hillary Clinton win, Donald trump was the best choice presented to us. Also, consider for a moment that those in the establishment knew full well that Hillary Clinton was not going to win. The vast majority of the American people were angry and Washington was facing severe backlash for their inability to listen to the American voter. If they wanted to achieve their single payer healthcare goals they would have to put an individual in office who can deceive the American people. Donald Trump, an admitted Democrat, was able to convince millions that he was conservative mainly because people were so afraid of Hillary winning. This is the same strategy they employed with Bush and Obama. As noted in this authors article on The Project New American Century, Obama's wars were the same that were planned before September 11 even happened. They presented George Bush as an abysmal failure and Obama as the one who would save us from it all. By doing so the wars originally planned decades before September 11 were able to continue virtually unnoticed by the anti-war movement. In the case of Hillary Clinton and Trump they were presented as exact opposites when in fact, the main policy issues that are desired, such as single payer healthcare, are a common goal. This is how they control your choices America. Also, consider the fact that Donald Trump is likely going sign into law a bill that allows internet providers to sell your browsing history. This is being opposed by Democrats on the grounds that it is a violation of an individuals privacy rights to do so. Since when do Democrats care about our privacy? This is also a deliberate strategy, in this author's opinion, to keep us confused and unsure of which leg to stand on. Consider the following quote from a former KGB agent, Yuri Bezmenov, also known as Thomas Schuman,  concerning a Soviet tactic called Ideological Subversion.

An overt slow process to change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that despite the abundance of information, no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community and their country.

America, we have reached a point in our society where nothing is as it seems. Donald Trump is not a conservative. He will work with the Democrats to one, instill a single payer healthcare system and two, destroy the remaining Conservatives in congress by giving the impression they are standing in the way of his grand plans to save us all. This of course, is this authors humble opinion.

Image License:
Image Source:

Tuesday, March 14, 2017

Marines in Syria: Continuing The Project for a New American Century Objectives

Donald Trump has deployed Marine Corps ground forces into Syria to combat ISIS militants. In the eyes of most Americans this is a welcomed move on the part of the new administration because Americans are fed up with the constant threat of Islamic terrorism hanging over their heads. The former president did little to take any real action and in most cases seemed to be making excuses for radical Islam. Being the ultimate social justice warrior, Barack Obama portrayed the terrorists as victims of American imperialism while suggesting we should show empathy towards them. The fact that President Trump is escalating the war is Syria with the deployment of ground forces is not surprising. Most Americans do not realize that the war in Syria was part of an overall strategy to reshape the middle east while also redefining America's role as the worlds sole super power. President Trump is continuing this war as did President Obama with the end goal of not defeating ISIS but removing Syrian president Bashar al-Assad from power in much the same way Libyan president Muammar Gadhafi was disposed of. Gadhafi was killed not because he was a brutal dictator but because he was working to introduce gold backed money that would free Libya from the enslavement of relying on U.S. dollars to purchase oil as the greenback is the worlds reserve currency. It is said this is the same reason Saddam Hussein was executed as well. Is Trumps deployment of Marines the continuation of objectives set in The Project New American Century war plans?

Before the fall of Tripoli and his untimely demise, Gadhafi was trying to introduce a single African currency linked to gold. Following in the foot steps of the late great pioneer Marcus Garvey who first coined the term ”United States of Africa”. Gaddafi wanted to introduce and only trade in the African gold Dinar – a move which would have thrown the world economy into chaos. The Dinar was widely opposed by the ‘elite’ of today’s society and who could blame them. African nations would have finally had the power to bring itself out of debt and poverty and only trade in this precious commodity. They would have been able to finally say ‘no’ to external exploitation and charge whatever they felt suitable for precious resources. It has been said that the gold Dinar was the real reason for the NATO led rebellion, in a bid to oust the outspoken leader.

The war in Syria, as well as Iraq and Afghanistan was planned twenty years prior to the events of September 11, 2001. In fact, the war plans included military action in seven countries total, some of which President Obama continued through bombing campaigns. These countries included not only Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria but Lebanon, Somalia, Libya, and ultimately, Iran as well. In the year 2000, a little known document was written that paved the way for America to assert its military dominance and reshape the Middle East through regime change. This document was known as the Project New American Century. The aim of this project is to allegedly rebuild America's defenses and spread American principles abroad. One of the main objectives was to dramatically increase military spending while also stressing the need for a stronger military presence in the Middle East. Written within the plan itself is an admission that the goals, without the catastrophic effects of a new pearl harbor event, would take a great deal of time to accomplish. In other words, by the time the events of September 11, 2001 took place, these wars of conquest were already planned, and the previous statement has led many to believe that the September 11, attacks were a false flag event staged to provide the justification.

Both Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gadhafi were targeted because they threatened to replace the U.S. dollar as the reserve currency with one of their own backed by gold. The U.S. dollar has been the worlds reserve currency in oil purchases ever since Richard Nixon took it off of the gold standard. It is for this reason that the dollar is known as the Petrodollar. According to an article written by Callum Newman for the Daily Reckoning, the reserve currency status of the U.S. Dollar is propped up by Saudi Arabia in exchange for U.S. military muscle. In other words, Saudi Arabia deliberately prices its oil in U.S. denominations, forcing other countries to keep a huge stock of U.S. currency on hand. This keeps our paper money relevant as oil is the only thing giving our money any value.  In exchange, we provide the Saudis the military muscle needed to maintain dominance in the region. If Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gadhafi would have succeeded in selling oil in their own gold backed currencies the effects on the U.S. economy would have been devastating. Furthermore, it is also believed that these seven countries are targeted for regime change because they are not part of the international central banking system. According to an article at, none of the listed countries targeted for regime change are members of the Bank for International settlements, which allegedly makes them out of reach for those seeking to globalize the worlds financial markets.

What do these seven countries have in common? In the context of banking, one that sticks out is that none of them is listed among the 56 member banks of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). That evidently puts them outside the long regulatory arm of the central bankers’ central bank in Switzerland.

The most renegade of the lot could be Libya and Iraq, the two that have actually been attacked. Kenneth Schortgen Jr, writing on, noted that “[s]ix months before the US moved into Iraq to take down Saddam Hussein, the oil nation had made the move to accept euros instead of dollars for oil, and this became a threat to the global dominance of the dollar as the reserve currency, and its dominion as the petrodollar.”

According to a Russian article titled “Bombing of Libya – Punishment for Ghaddafi for His Attempt to Refuse US Dollar”, Gaddafi made a similarly bold move: he initiated a movement to refuse the dollar and the euro, and called on Arab and African nations to use a new currency instead, the gold dinar. Gaddafi suggested establishing a united African continent, with its 200 million people using this single currency.

As noted earlier, Barack Obama continued these wars, despite the fact he promised to end them. He was able to do so because he had pulled the wool over the eyes of the American people through his social justice campaigns and continued insistence that he stood with the Muslims against the imperialism of capitalistic America. The truth is that Barack Obama was put in place in order to do just this, deceive the American people so the same agenda could be continued unimpeded by discontented Americans and the anti-war left. These wars to maintain the dominance of a fake, valueless U.S. Dollar were able to advance while Barack Obama kept us divided over issues of race and income inequality. Is Donald Trump doing the same thing? It is safe to assume that Trump, like other president's,  is following the advice of his senior advisors on many issues; however, there a few points that need to be considered now that the war in Syria is escalating with the deployment of ground troops.

First, a little known provision in  the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act allows for the creation of propaganda to be used against the American public. To be more specific, the bill repeals the 1948 Smith-Mundt act which according to The Business Insider, prohibits the use of psychological warfare and propaganda intended to sway the opinions of the American public. America has been subject to brutal psychological warfare campaign, waged by the mainstream media, that is intended to do just that, manipulate the opinions of Americans. The repeal of the Smith-Mundt Act makes this perfectly legal, especially if it is being done for the so called greater good.  Also, a Hollywood film production studio was recently exposed producing ISIS propaganda videos, suggesting that many videos seen on the internet are actually fake. Evidence has also surfaced which claims the Jordanian pilot allegedly burned alive by ISIS militants is also a fake. If these videos truly are staged and the U.S. government has legalized the use of propaganda against it's own citizens then the question remains. Is Donald Trump continuing the war in Syria to remove Bashar al-Assad from power for the same reasons Gadhafi and Saddam Hussein were taken out? Was ISIS a deliberately created enemy needed for the justification of continuing U.S. military presence in the Middle East in order to achieve the objectives of the Project New American Century, and reign in the nations who don't belong to the global banking network? We will likely never know the truth because most Americans are too busy paying attention to what their television and smart phones tell them to care about.