Sunday, December 25, 2016

Economic Determinism vs. Freewill and the Destruction of our Morality

In any Intro to Psychology class students are often faced with questions which challenge their values, or their current understanding of America's traditional Judeo-Christian morality. For example, they may be asked if it is morally wrong to steal a medication from a pharmacy if a loved one is deathly ill and the medication is unaffordable. Other questions may involve the possibility of having to allow someone to die in order to save others, or even whether or not God exists as an actual being, or as a gene hardwired in our DNA. While educators claim that these types of questions open an individuals mind to the current problems faced by society, the truth is radically different. These questions are posed in an effort to discredit the current culture in which we live, our economic system and the traditional morality which governs our behavior.

From the administrators point of view these questions do address problems faced by our society; however, the effort is focused on changing, or challenging the typical response which is generally based on Christian morality. For example, they want the student to consider the possibility that there is no right or wrong when it comes to making a decision about stealing the medication, they want students to view capitalism as an unfair economic system. They want the student to become accustomed to the idea that some lives may be more valuable than others when it comes to deciding who should live and who should die. Ultimately, the goal is social change and the destruction of a system of morals that those on the left consider to be responsible for all the world's problems.

The left has had a firm grip on America's education system for decades. They have used it as a catalyst for social change, a means of changing behavior and beliefs through operant conditioning, as opposed to classically educating those under their control. To understand the basis for the questions discussed above one must first understand the stark differences between the left and right wing world views. The left believes that America and capitalism are greedy, a system of laws designed explicitly to protect the modes of production and the private property rights of the so called "bourgeoisie."

Karl Marx and Friedrich Engles believed that society could be broken down into two classes, the oppressor and the oppressed. The private property owners and those they exploit. This is the basis of communist thinking. To Marx and Engles, there was no morality in capitalism because they believed the property owners were oppressors; therefore, there is nothing immoral about breaking the laws imposed by them. When a student is asked about the morality of stealing medication for a dying loved one for example, the goal is to get them to see the unfairness in an economic system that prevents them from obtaining that medication simply due to a lack of finances. The leftist professor is attempting to portray America as a system of greed and oppression, because everyone should have free health care of course.

Communists do not view mankind in the same way that Christians do. To Christians, man is governed by his freewill, able to make choices based on a moral system of what is right and wrong. In other words, man is able to see that stealing the medication is wrong because someone else exerted their own labor and resources in order to provide it in the first place. To the communist, man is motivated by nothing more than the economic system which dominates his time. This is called Economic Determinism. In other words, man is not in charge of his ability to freely choose; rather, he is controlled by the urges of self preservation and will act accordingly to survive.

According to Cleon Skousen, author of The Naked Communist, Marx viewed freewill as nothing more than an awareness of the impulses which force him into action. In other words, man is more driven by animalistic instinct rather than rational thoughts governed by a system of morality. To understand this further consider the fact that Karl Marx adopted Charles Darwin's theory of evolution to back his view of man's history. To Darwin, man was nothing but an animal. There was nothing special about his existence. From this belief a dehumanizing, scientific view of man has developed which solidifies the explanation of his behavior from a cold, scientific view as opposed to one that supports the idea we are spiritual beings.

"In what we may call the pre-scientific view (and the word is not necessarily pejorative) a person's behavior is at least to some extent his own achievement. He is free to deliberate, decide, and act, possibly in original ways, and he is to be given credit for his successes and blamed for his failures. In the scientific view (and the word is not necessarily honorific) a person's behavior is determined by a genetic endowment traceable to the evolutionary history of the species and by the environmental circumstances to which as an individual he has been exposed. Neither view can be proved, but it is in the nature of scientific inquiry that the evidence should shift in favor of the second. As we learn more about the effects of the environment, we have less reason to attribute any part of human behavior to an autonomous controlling agent. And the second view shows a marked advantage when we begin to do something about behavior. Autonomous man is not easily changed: in fact, to the extent that he is autonomous, he is by definition not changeable at all." (B.F. Skinner, Beyond Freedom and Dignity)

The left views America as a nation where the traditional laws and morals are nothing more than a system put in place to protect the rich and propertied classes. Our behavior, according to them, is driven by nothing more than an urge to survive in a system governed by immoral laws. Everything that we believe to be right or wrong is an artificial construct, (right down to the belief that there only two genders mind you) based on a system of economics that protects certain individuals and exploits others. In order to change this, and create the perfect classless society, they have to first breakdown the moral standards which have governed America since her founding. They have done this in our institutions of learning by discrediting the culture in which we live by blaming societies problems on capitalism and presenting ideas based on socialism/communism as the solution.

After eight years of Obama America is at a crossroads. While Trump won the election and Republicans have more seats than they have in decades, we still have a generation of people literally begging for socialism. If we don't find a way to articulate to them what the difference is between the way we view mankind and the way they are being taught, this is a fight that will go on.

Saturday, December 17, 2016

The Real Fake News and the Effects of Television on the Brain

(Forward) Joseph Goebbels, Hitler's minister of propaganda once said a lie repeated often enough becomes the truth. This is obviously true as our nation has become one of an uninformed, confused citizenry more interested in entertaining itself than defending their values and principles. How else can this change unless we are willing to repeat the truth over and over again?

Clearly, all of this hype about fake news and the Russians hacking our elections is an attempt to undermine our Constitutional Republic and convince Americans they are in need of a new form of government. The idea that the Russians hacked our election process to instill a capitalist like Donald Trump is laughable seeing as though Hillary Clinton played an instrumental role in ensuring Vladimir Putin now owns twenty percent of America's uranium mines. Furthermore, President Obama funded a campaign to undermine the re-election of Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu in 2015, so not only is he making an idiot of himself assuming the simpletons he lords over have forgotten, he is also showing the depths of liberal hypocrisy. Unfortunately, most Americans have no idea where to stand on any major issue because our nation has been inundated by fake news and propaganda for decades. While it is doubtful the Russians attempted to undermine the election in favor of Donald trump, it is highly likely the Communists are behind the efforts to convince you they did. The Russians have been engaged in a ruthless campaign to undermine America as a Democratic Republic for nearly a century, since the beginning of the progressive movement at least. They have undermined our morality and values by taking over our education system and they have fed us a steady diet of news that subtly favors a communist world view in an effort to keep us from being able to pursue the truth. They have also used race as a means of creating chaos, inciting violent riots based on what can only be described as "fake news" designed to make police look like they are systematically murdering minorities for sport. In other words, they are attempting to convince the average American that our culture needs to change and they are presenting communism as an alternative. While this may be dismissed as a wild conspiracy or fake news, there is more documented proof of this then there is of any effort to undermine our election in favor of Donald Trump.

By psychopolitics our chief goals are effectively carried forward. To produce a maximum of chaos in the culture of the enemy is our first most important step. Our fruits are grown in chaos, distrust, economic depression and scientific turmoil. At last a weary populace can seek peace only in our offered Communist State, at last only Communism can resolve the problems of the masses. (Laventia Beria, A Synthesis of the Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics.)

In 1948, the Central Intelligence Agency charged Frank Wisner with the responsibility of creating a covert, internal organization responsible for spreading misinformation in the United States. The intent was to manipulate public opinion in favor of the governments world view. This was known as Operation Mockingbird. From the 1950's through the 70's major news organizations such as ABC, NBC, CBS, Time and others were brought in as media assets. Other corporations such as Disney, AOL, Fox and Universal were also utilized. Today, almost everything you watch on television, whether it be news related or entertainment, pushes propaganda that supports the politically correct party line.



Controlling the media was one of the established goals of the Communist Party in America. In 1963, Congressman Albert Herlong Jr. entered into the congressional record a list of 45 goals the Communists deemed essential in order to transform our nation from one of freedom to one of total state control. Among these were the undermining of American values, the discrediting of the American constitution and our founders, the destruction of morality and religion and control of education and media. Clearly, many of these goals have been accomplished as we have a generation known as the millennials who hate this country, have no idea what it means to be a constitutional republic and are begging for socialism. This would not be possible without an element of communist control within our educational and media establishments.

Americans spend a vast majority of their free time watching television, or being plugged into some other form of social media device. While it may seem harmless enough, it is having a massive effect on the way they view reality. In fact, there is research out there that suggests too much television will cause an individual to confuse what is being viewed on television with the real world. Watching television produces a chemical reaction in the brain, releasing the body's natural opiates as brain activity switches from the left hemisphere to the right. These opiates are structurally the same as codeine and heroin. In other words, watching television becomes an addiction as it creates pleasure. Furthermore, the switch over of activity from the left hemisphere to the right shuts down an individuals ability to rationally process the information being taken in, as the left is responsible for more cognitive processes and the right is more aligned with producing emotional reactions to stimulus. So while the brain is releasing the body's natural opiates while watching television, the brain is also being conditioned to react emotionally first before logically thinking through the stimulus being fed to it.

Also, it has also been discovered that while watching television, the Neo-cortex, or upper region of the brain, also shuts down while the limbic system, (the lower portion) becomes more active. These lower regions of the brain cannot process information the way the Neo-cortex does, therefore, the ability to discern reality from television programming is diminished. In other words, the more T.V. you watch, the more likely you are too think that what you are watching represents reality. The following is from research conducted by Herbert Krugman in the Journal of Advertising Research.

When you’re watching television the higher brain regions (like the midbrain and the neo-cortex) are shut down, and most activity shifts to the lower brain regions (like the limbic system). The neurological processes that take place in these regions cannot accurately be called “cognitive.” The lower or reptile brain simply stands poised to react to the environment using deeply embedded “fight or flight” response programs. Moreover, these lower brain regions cannot distinguish reality from fabricated images (a job performed by the neo-cortex), so they react to television content as though it were real, releasing appropriate hormones and so on. Studies have proven that, in the long run, too much activity in the lower brain leads to atrophy in the higher brain regions.

A lingering question remains. Was the CIA aware of these types of affects on the brain when they implemented operation mockingbird? While it is unlikely they had this much detailed knowledge because television didn't exist at the time Frank Wisner put his program together, there is evidence to suggest they knew how to manipulate public opinion. After the War of the Worlds broadcast in 1938, social scientists scrambled to study the affects of mass panic on the population. If you remember, The War of the Worlds was a radio broadcast depicting an alien invasion from Mars that many across the country thought was a real event.

“Such rare occurrences provide opportunities for social scientists to study mass behavior. They must be exploited when they come. Although the social scientists unfortunately cannot usually predict such situations and have his tools of investigations ready to analyze the phenomena while it is still on the wing, he can begin his work before the effects of the crisis are over and memories are blurred. The situation created by the broadcast was one which shows us how the common man reacts in a time of stress and strain. It gives us insight into his intelligence, his anxieties and his needs, which we would never get by tests or strictly experimental studies.”

Today, as we listen to the frantic claims that we are being inundated by fake news and Russian attempts to undermine our elections, keep in mind that it is true. Everything we see in the main stream media is an attempt to undermine our cultural values and beliefs in liberty. It is highly likely that Communist agents are behind the efforts to convince us that Russians hijacked our elections if for no other reason than to simply diminish our faith in our nation and our constitutional form of government. In an age when the vast majority of people believe what they are taught, and what they see on television, it is unlikely we will overcome these attempts to ideologically discredit us as a nation unless we decide collectively to stop listening to the media and do what was intended when the nation was founded. Live our lives as informed citizens working to hold our government accountable to the principles the nation was founded on. The more we sit back and focus on entertaining ourselves the more power we surrender to forces that do not have our nation interests at heart. Shut off your televisions America, do some research. Our nation depends on it.

Thursday, December 8, 2016

Education: The Left's Long Game of Social Change by David Risselada

A month after the elections Americans are breathing a sigh of relief that Clinton didn't win while at the same time, experiencing feelings of euphoria at some of Trump's cabinet picks. As an author who offered up some pretty harsh criticisms of The Donald it must be admitted that some of his picks are outstanding. For instance, Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt is a staunch constitutionalist and climate change denier which makes him the perfect choice for the EPA, if that unconstitutional monstrosity is to be reigned in. Marine Corps General James Mattis for Secretary of Defense surely has liberal heads spinning as he is not likely to play politically correct games designed to protect peoples feelings while putting the nation at risk. Other picks have created a bit of a controversy, like Mitt Romney for Secretary of State for instance, or Elaine Chao, wife of establishment Republican who did little to stop Obama's agenda, Mitch McConnell. Truthfully, if something isn't done about education it wont matter who Trump nominates because the next generation will simply be brought up being taught that they are all racist, warmongering, sexist islamophobes that don't care about the planet. Trumps pick for Education Secretary, Betsy Devos, vows to be a force for change in our education system. She is a strong advocate for school choice who vociferously stated her opposition to common core standards. These are good signs, however; until someone acknowledges that our school systems have become a breeding ground for behavior based psychology and behavior modification techniques to indoctrinate our children into the tenants of progressivism, nothing will change.

If Betsy Devos is serious about reforming our education system the first thing she would do is eliminate the United States participation in UNESCO, which stands for The United Nations Educational, Scientific, Cultural Organization. The United States has been a member since 1946. Since this time the United Nations has dictated educational policy in the United States with the main goal being the elimination of  patriotism, individualism and any concept of what is right and wrong. This explains how the radical left has maintained such a control over education, getting away with teaching racially divisive concepts like "white privilege" while at the same time raising generations of American students who have no understanding of the constitutional republic in which they freely live.

During the early 1900's, "Americas progressive era," educators became convinced that the Soviet model of education was superior to America's. Instrumental players like John Dewey, author of the Humanist Manifesto, worked to turn America's education system into one where students were trained to become "socially acceptable" members of society as opposed to free thinkers able to exercise their own free will. Schools were designed to create the ideal citizen as opposed to the next great inventor, or entrepreneur.

In 1932, William Foster, national chairman of the Communist Party of the United States wrote the book Toward Soviet America, where he described his vision of American education, which is strikingly similar to what we see today as much of what he describes has been accomplished.

"A U.S. Department of Education; implementation of a scientific materialist philosophy; studies revolutionized, being cleansed of religious, patriotic and other features of the bourgeois ideology; students taught on the basis of Marxian dialectical materialism, internationalism and general ethics of a new socialist society; present obsolete methods of teaching will be superseded by a scientific pedagogy. The whole basis and organization of capitalist science will be revolutionized. Science will become materialistic, hence truly scientific. God will be banished from the laboratories as well as from the schools." (Foster, Toward Soviet America)

This is exactly what our school system teaches today. American students are convinced that America is the worlds greatest evil and believe an international government will solve many of the world's problems. Science and psychology have completely eradicated religion in public schools and universities and the idea that pursuing wealth and property is equated with selfishness and greed.
Unfortunately, the practice of psychology has taught educators that training students using behavior modification techniques can have lasting results. In other words, the earlier the radical left gets a hold of your child the more likely they are to grow up being a communist without even knowing it. B.F. Skinner said in his book Beyond Freedom and Dignity that manipulating the environment to create a fear of "not being accepted" can be a greater form of control than an all out police state. This seems to be a popular theme as another well known psychologist, Bertrand Russell, says virtually the same thing.

"Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy. . . . It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. . . . Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. . . .”----Bertrand Russell,1953

As long as government remains in control of education it is certain they will use it to psychologically condition students to behave in manners that suit governments needs. Today, our kids are being inundated with propaganda concerning race, gun control and a belief that America has stolen the worlds resources. Their ability to clearly think and problem solve has been destroyed and replaced with an emotional outburst spouting off liberal talking points to anything that upsets their fragile egos. Unfortunately, the earlier they are exposed to this propaganda the more likely it is to become embedded in their brains as a permanent fixture.

"Education should aim at destroying free will so that after pupils are thus schooled they will be incapable throughout the rest of their lives of thinking or acting otherwise than as their school masters would have wished ... The social psychologist of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for more than one generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen." -----Bertrand Russell quoting Johann Gottlieb Fichte, the head of philosophy & psychology who influenced Hegel and others – Prussian University in Berlin, 1810

Donald Trump could appoint the most conservative cabinet in the history of the United States. Betsy Devos could be totally devoted to reforming America's education system; however, failure to acknowledge the real issue while parading around acting like school choice will solve our problems will accomplish nothing, except determining which school gets the privilege of indoctrinating your child. James Mattis and Scott Pruitt are great picks, but unless something is done to really examine and change what is being taught in our schools, the left will continue to pound ideas into our children's head that support their beliefs, not ours; and our children will be the next generation of useful idiots demanding social change they don't understand while standing in opposition to whatever positive changes Trump has made. Control of education is the lefts long game folks. The biggest mistake we could make as a nation is become comfortable with the belief that winning this election means we have won the nation back. Therein lies the point of this whole article; all of us have been affected by our education to the point where we are comfortable with government running things. The only way things will change is if we remember that we control our government, not the other way around. We need to a thorn in Trumps side America, make him remember why he won.

Sunday, November 27, 2016

Manning R. Johnson and a Communist Agenda

President Obama recently announced that he was proud his administration had not been plagued by scandals.  Upon hearing this, most Americans probably fought to keep their food down as the past eight years have been the most tumultuous, chaotic, divided and violent that many can remember over the past several decades. Since the beginning of the Obama administration it was clear that there was an agenda to use not only class and wealth, but race as issues that would bitterly divide the nation. Groups like Black Lives Matter and Occupy Wall Street are well organized socialist front groups put on the streets under the guise of populist uprisings against the alleged oppression of capitalist America. A deadly narrative depicting a racist nation, where innocent black men are constantly hunted down by police and ruthlessly murdered is not only pushed by Obama, but supported by the leftist media, and communist controlled education system as well. As he prepares to leave office, and America (hopefully) returns to normal under a new president, it is overwhelmingly clear that race is the driving issue being used to bring fundamental change to our constitutional republic. The question remains however; is this President Obamas agenda or he is working to implement one that was started many, many decades ago?

The Democrat party has risen to prominence by portraying the Republicans as racist and uncompassionate towards the poor. Democrat politicians continually campaign on the ideology that Republicans seek to keep black people impoverished because they care more about corporate profits than people. The exact opposite is true. Many people are awakening to the fact that it was indeed Republicans who have continually voted in favor of civil rights for blacks, while Democrats traditionally voted against them. In fact, the current impoverished conditions of many black Americans can be directly tied to the Democrat party when President Lyndon Johnson created his so called "Great Society" program which did little but ensure that blacks would be dependent upon government welfare for generations to come. In fact, Lyndon B. Johnson was quoted as saying "I'll get those n***ers voting Democratic for the next 200 years." Essentially, that is what has happened, black Americans have been tricked into voting for their own subjugation under the guise of compassion. Government dependency and generational welfare has destroyed many millions of black families.

The truth is that black America has been used for decades to bring about a socialist state in America. Barack Obama is a community organizer and has connections to groups like Democratic Socialists of America who in 1983, under the leadership of Frances Fox Piven, developed a voting strategy to radicalize the Democrat party along class and racial lines. Piven, along with her husband Richard Cloward also developed what has come to be known as the Cloward and Piven strategy. In an article entitled "The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty," which appeared in "The Nation" magazine in 1966, Piven called for the deliberate creation of an unsustainable welfare state which would inevitably crash the economy and force the government to implement a socialist economic system. It is hard to argue that certain aspects of this strategy are not currently in play. There are more people drawing off of the welfare system than paying into it. As of 2013, according to an article published by townhall.com there were 108,592,000 people drawing some kind of welfare benefit while there were only 101,716,000 people working full time. That's eight million more people receiving benefits provided by tax payers. This is the very definition of unsustainable.

Still, we are left with the question of where this agenda originates. Is this all Obama, Piven and the Democrats or does it go back further? Communists have a history of deception as they have used so called oppressed groups to create revolutionary movements to force their agenda upon unsuspecting nations. In Russia, China, Cambodia, Cuba and other communists nations the oppressor has been described as capitalism or the bourgeoisie, and the oppressed have been the workers. They also use race to discredit their opposition. In fact, the very word racism is directly tied to Communist movements as Leon Trotsky, leader of the Red Army, coined the term to discredit the Eastern Slavs for doing nothing more than attempting to preserve their cultural identity in the face of communist aggression.  This brings us to the main point of this article, communist revolutionaries, decades ago, began using black Americans in an effort to destroy the United States' capitalist system and in the process, deliberately destroyed the black American.

Manning R. Johnson was a black American who was a member of the Communist Party U.S.A in the 1930's. In fact, he was running for New York's 22nd congressional district as a Communist candidate. He, like many other American's became enamored by the deceptive narrative that Communists stood for human rights and peace and that capitalism was the oppressor of the working class.

"Ten years I labored in the cause of Communism. I was a dedicated "comrade." All my talents and efforts were zealously used to
bring about the triumph of Communism in America and throughout the world. To me, the end of capitalism would mark the
beginning of an interminable period of plenty, peace, prosperity and universal comradeship. All racial and class differences and
conflicts would end forever after the liquidation of the capitalists, their government and their supporters. A world union of Soviet
States under the hegemony of Russia would free and lead mankind on to Utopia."

Johnson was highly trained communist agent who had worked his way up into the Politburo. Eventually he left the party because he learned the true nature of the communist plan; more specifically, he learned that black Americans were deliberately being used to push a communist agenda and that they were in truth, despised by the very communists that claimed to be fighting for them. After leaving he wrote the book "Color, Communism and Common Sense," which after reading, the reader is left with little doubt that what we are witnessing today stems back to this agenda. Everything from the infiltration of the black church to the creation of the so called "Uncle Tom" is discussed in this book.

"Little did I realize until I was deeply enmeshed in the Red Conspiracy, that just and seeming grievances are exploited to transform
idealism into a cold and ruthless weapon against the capitalist system — that this is the end toward which all the communist
efforts among Negroes are directed."

In short, the impoverished state of many black Americans can be traced back to early roots of America's communist movement. They have been exploited and used by those who have taught them they are systematically oppressed by the white man. They have been organized in an effective voting machine where they continually vote the same racist party into power on the promise of welfare and other benefits. The conditions of their communities never change; in fact they worsen, this is then used to further the argument for socialist solutions.

Many people fail to understand the true difference between the way the left and right wing view humanity. The left believes primarily in science, not God and spirituality. They believe in Darwinian evolution where black people are viewed as being lower on the evolutionary chain, they believe that black people literally cannot make it in a free society and in fact, wish to be enslaved. Benjamin Rush, who has come to be known as the father of modern psychiatry coined a term called "negritude." He believed that blacks were simply not as capable as higher evolved whites and argued that they should be taken care of by the white man. To understand this further read my article "Psychiatry: The True Origins of Racism."

Looking at what is occurring in our society today with the Black Lives Matter movement and the deceptive "white privilege" narrative, it is hard to argue that there is not truth in Manning Johnsons words.  This begs the question; does Barack Obama know of this agenda and did he purposefully use the black community to worsen race relations in order to force a communist solution? Only time will tell because it is unlikely that Donald Trump will be able to slow what Obama has created.
 

Sunday, November 20, 2016

A Communist Pope, Clueless Liberals and A Truth Long Forgotten

Pope Francis has raised a lot of eyebrows when it comes to positions he has taken on many social issues. He has embraced Islam, homosexuality, refugee resettlement, wealth redistribution and the topic of global warming; all of which by the way, happen to be issues the far left argues in favor of. His latest public statement is sure to raise more as it is virtually impossible to argue that the man represents the catholic religion and not outright communism. Writing for trevourlouden.com, Renee Nal cites an interview between an Italian journalist and Pope Francis where he reportedly said that it is the communists who think more like Christians. He is of course referring to the false idea that communists stand for total equality and that they have the monopoly on compassion for the poor and underprivileged.  The far left has done a magnificent job indoctrinating American students into the idea that conservatism equates to selfishness and hate, and that Republicans deliberately keep poor people down in order to exploit their labor. In fact, the exact opposite is true.

There is a vast difference between the way the left and right view mankind and the reasons for his existence.

Traditionally speaking, the religious view of man holds that men have an independent free will that operates outside the realm of human instinct. In other words, religion argues that man is very much in control of his thoughts, actions and emotions. Communists on the other hand, despise religion. Karl Marx wrote in the Communist Manifesto that religion was the opiate of the masses and one of the goals of communism was to "destroy God in the minds of men." They view man through the so called "scientific view" of man which argues that men have no independent will of their own and are not in control of their own behavior. It isn't  that they believe man has no will of his own, but that they must destroy it in order to get him to accept communism, this will be discussed in greater detail later. Their beliefs stem from evolutionary theory which suggests that man is no more special than an ape or any other wild animal. Consider what behaviorist B.F. Skinner had to say about the pre-scientific view of man and the "scientific view" in his book Beyond Freedom and Dignity.

"In what we may call the pre-scientific view (and the word is not necessarily pejorative) a person's behavior is at least to some extent his own achievement. He is free to deliberate, decide, and act, possibly in original ways, and he is to be given credit for his successes and blamed for his failures. In the scientific view (and the word is not necessarily honorific) a person's behavior is determined by a genetic endowment traceable to the evolutionary history of the species and by the environmental circumstances to which as an individual he has been exposed. Neither view can be proved, but it is in the nature of scientific inquiry that the evidence should shift in favor of the second. As we learn more about the effects of the environment, we have less reason to attribute any part of human behavior to an autonomous controlling agent. And the second view shows a marked advantage when we begin to do something about behavior. Autonomous man is not easily changed: in fact, to the extent that he is autonomous, he is by definition not changeable at all." (Skinner, Beyond Freedom and Dignity)

What he is essentially saying is that for scientific purposes, it is no longer accepted that man has any control over his behaviors. Instead, when it comes to scientific inquiry into the behavior of man all studies are now conducted through the understanding that mans behavior is traceable to our so called "evolutionary genetics," which means we are viewed by science as animalistic in nature and not spiritual because according to evolution, we evolved from monkeys. This is a direct contradiction to the idea that we are created in the image of God. So, in this sense communists think nothing like Christians.

Communists seek to completely eradicate Christianity because it is a belief in something higher than the state that stands in the way of them obtaining complete control over mans behavior and remaking society in their image. Communists understand human behavior very well; most psychologists, behaviorists and psychiatrists are indoctrinated into the tenants of communism whether they realize it or not. A great deal of effort has been made in learning how to manipulate behavior to their end in order to reshape society, and one of the things that must be accomplished is the destruction of free will and individualism. Religion argues that man was given free will by God so that he could choose between good and evil. Communists seek to destroy mans ability to choose because if given the opportunity to fully understand the truth of communism, men would flat out reject it. Our education system has done a terrific job of presenting communism as a kinder more compassionate system while systematically discrediting our culture. In an effort to weaken our nation they have taught students that the pursuit of wealth and individual interests is selfish, they hide the truth of communism behind words like communitarianism, fairness and equality. The end result is the destruction of individualism, free will and the ability to think for one's self. Consider the following quote from the "Manual on Psychopoltics" which is described as a textbook used to train communist agents in the art of deception.

“The tenants of rugged individualism, personal determination, self-will, imagination, and personal creativeness are alike in the masses antipathetic to the Good of the Greater State. These willful and unaligned forces are no more than illnesses which bring about disaffection, disunity, and at length the collapse of the group to which the individual is attached.” (Beria, pp. 9)

What he is essentially saying is that a culture which embraces true human diversity and freedom is a danger to itself and that human behavior should be controlled so that everyone's personal goals are aligned with state goals. They view individualism as a sickness that is misaligned with the needs of the state. This is dangerous and completely antithetical to true Christianity. The Pope is arguing that communists think more like Christians because they are more compassionate towards the poor when in reality, Communists will eventually eradicate everyone that they think is not like them using an argument such as this to justify their actions. The behavior of the anti-Trump protestors is a good example. They believe that Trump is a racist bigot who has no sentiments towards the poor. They have been brought up to believe that they have a superior morality because they care about the poor and underprivileged, so in their minds it is justifiable to threaten Trump and his supporters because they are afraid he represents a new era of inequality. Another good example can be found in the Black of Communism where an order given by the Soviet Political Police makes it clear that one of the goals of Communism is the elimination of the so called bourgeoisie as a social class in the name of equality. This is one of the great oxymoron's of Communism; their hatred and desires to be rid of those they despise is justified because they allegedly represent oppression and inequality but somehow, committing genocide against them is somehow fairness.

"We are exterminating the bourgeoisie as a class. In your investigations don't look for documents and pieces of evidence about what the defendant has done, whether in deed or in speaking or acting against Soviet authority. The first question you should ask him is what class he comes from, what are his roots, his education, his training and his occupation."

All throughout the twentieth century communist regimes systemically eliminated those that were viewed as privileged or upper class. Communists viewed themselves as fighting for equality when in reality they were the oppressors they thought they were fighting against. Today's liberal has once again been brainwashed into this backwards ideology and is out in full force calling for the deaths of those that voted differently than they did, and, they have the nerve to call us fascists in the process. They are nothing more than the proverbial useful idiot in a game where the real communists guiding the agenda remain hidden in the shadows. Pope Francis is working synonymously with the left to further undermine religion and destroy Christianity. Why else would he compare something like communism to the Christian religion?

From a testimony given to the house of Un-American Activities by Manning R. Johnson, member of the Communist Party U.S.A. and author of the book Color, Communism and Common Sense.

"Once the tactic of infiltration of religious organizations was set by the Kremlin ... the Communists discovered that the destruction of religion could proceed much faster through infiltration of the (Catholic) Church by Communists operating within the Church itself. The Communist leadership in the United States realized that the infiltration tactic in this country would have to adapt itself to American conditions (Europe also had its cells) and the religious make-up peculiar to this country. In the earliest stages it was determined that with only small forces available to them, it would be necessary to concentrate Communist agents in the seminaries. The practical conclusion drawn by the Red leaders was that these institutions would make it possible for a small Communist minority to influence the ideology of future clergymen in the paths conducive to Communist purposes This policy of infiltrating seminaries was successful beyond even our Communist expectations."

The church was infiltrated by communist agents long ago with the explicit purpose of discrediting religion and slowly replacing it communist tenants.

From the list of 45 communist goals-

27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch." [Note: This has been largely accomplished through the communist infiltration of the National Council of Churches, Conservative and Reform Judaism, and the Catholic seminaries.]

28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the grounds that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state"

Sunday, November 13, 2016

American Communists

Ever since the beginning of Barack Obama's first term we have been saturated with propaganda that attempts to portray the conservative movement as an extreme threat to the nation. Returning war veterans, Evangelicals, pro-lifers, constitutionalists, gun rights activists and anyone else who essentially disagrees with the liberal agenda have been labeled as potential terrorists in a document entitled Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment.  The Department of Homeland Security has even gone as far as to suggest that this extremism was motivated by the election of America's first black president. The southern Poverty Law Center and the American Civil Liberties Union have both taken upon themselves to create hate watch lists which ultimately, led to the attacks on the Family Research Council because the shooter (a Democrat) believed that Christians really hate homosexuals. These same organizations also refuse to label Black Lives Matter as a hate motivated group even though they are relentlessly murdering police. The reason for this is based on the White Privilege ideology where Black Liberation Theologists claim that it is impossible for minorities to be racist and discriminate against whites because they hold no institutional power. In 2009 we witnessed the results of a carefully contrived community organizing scheme instituted in our public universities as thousands took to the streets in a protest against capitalism. This was the Occupy Wall Street movement. This was the result of far left wing professors deliberately stirring the pot in an attempt to discredit American culture by portraying our nation as an oppressive "meritocracy" that only works for the rich. They have literally turned our children's brains into mush by teaching them they can't succeed on their own merits and need the government to level the playing field. Over the past eight years we have been witness to one violent riot after the other that in most cases, such as Ferguson Missouri and Baltimore, the reasoning for such proved to be nothing but over exaggerated lies deliberately told to stoke the flames of revolution. Now we are witnessing the true colors of the left once again as they take to the streets and burn down their cities and beat innocent people all because they believe Trump hates Mexicans and gay people. Some of them are even calling for a violent revolution and the death of those that voted for Trump.

What we are dealing with is a communist movement intent on finishing the fundamental transformation of our nation promised by Barack Obama. All throughout the campaign we have been witness to violent leftists deliberately causing trouble at Donald Trump rallies in order to give the impression that his supporters were the violent ones.  On January 20, they plan to stage what may prove to be biggest act of violence yet by deliberately disrupting Trumps inauguration in Washington D.C. This video is packed with some of the most ridiculous lies one could imagine; however, when you consider the garbage they are indoctrinated with it easy to understand why sixty million useful idiots would believe it.



The communist left has successfully taught generations of people that it is American culture that is oppressive and that communism is kind and compassionate. They have taught your children that your values are discriminatory and that Conservative Republicans do not care about poor people. They are acting on the false notion that they are morally superior because they believe they hold the monopoly on compassion for the so called under privileged, and in their demented, brainwashed world view, this violence against the right is completely justified because we are intolerant. Consider one of the Communist Goals listed in Cleon Skousens "The Naked Communist."

Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use "united force" to solve economic, political or social problems.

This is what our students are being taught in school, to be social agitators in order to affect social change. What many people may not realize is that we are being played on a massive scale. Not only are these riots being deliberately funded by George Soros, but the left has found an ingenious way to completely discredit everything about our constitution. If you remember, The Declaration of Independence explicitly states that it is the right of the people to alter or abolish any government that becomes destructive to liberty, and that they may establish a new government which may seem most likely to secure their safety and happiness. The fact that this nation was born in a revolution against tyranny aides them in this effort because as Saul Alinsky has instructed them to do, they are using our own rules against us.

Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian Church can live up to Christianity.

Most Americans claim that a continued encroachment on our liberties will ultimately result in the second American revolution. The left is mocking the conservative movement as they have been organizing and preparing for this for the past several decades. They have successfully taken over every institution in this country and wrapped their tentacles around the very culture of liberty and now, they are launching a revolution of their own in an effort to get us to respond violently. They are trying to lure us into a fight in order to drive the final nail into the coffin. Fighting back may become an inevitability as these communists attack innocent people in violent hoards just as they did in the communist revolution in Russia and in China's Great Leap Forward. These movements, along with the ones in Cambodia and other communist countries resulted in the deaths of over one hundred million people who were guilty of nothing but disagreeing with communism. For those of you who may not know where to stand, take a hard look at what is going on and re-visit history because it seems as if it is about to repeat itself. Brace yourself America, this could get real ugly, real fast. The sad thing is that these people do not even know they are being used, and as Yuri Bezmenov said on the subject of Ideological Subversion-

‘Useful idiots' the true believers of Marxism, according the KGB, would be executed to end the undermining of government. This means all activists, propagandists, Marxist revolutionaries, progressives / liberals...everyone on the "left" whose political ideology hangs on the tenets of socialism (communism) would be removed from influence.

Why would "Marxists" get rid of their own? Because ‘true believers' in the ideology would become bitter enemies of the state upon finding out they were deceived in their utopian ideals. According to Mr. Schuman, they would soon find there is no equality in communism but the:
Equality of living in dirt.

God help us all.

Saturday, October 29, 2016

The deceptive nature of Hillary Clinton is right in line with Communism



Much to the surprise of the American electorate, both on the right and left, the FBI is reopening it's investigation into Hillary Clinton's email scandal. Whether this will amount to anything meaningful, or it is simply a distraction is any body's guess. Many are speculating that this could be the issue which would cause President Obama to cancel the elections. In my recent article "Corrupting One's Self is the Ultimate Morality in the Pursuit of Utopia," I discussed the possibility that the blatant corruption is deliberately being thrust in our face to create the necessary attitude for social change. This idea of course, is based on the writings of Alinsky and other "social engineers" skilled in the arts of propaganda and psychological manipulation. Looking at it from this perspective, cancelled elections are a possibility. The truth is, with Hillary Clinton you never know what to expect because she is operating from an "ends justify the means mentality," and she is willing to do anything to see her dreams of a collectivized America move forward.

According to Elizabeth Harrington from the Washington Free Beacon, the Clinton campaign began conducting focus groups to determine which approach Hillary should take concerning her run for the presidency. Hillary is diehard ideologue whose beliefs are right in line with Communists dictators like Stalin and Mao. She believes that ordinary people have no idea how to best conduct their personal business and the state should be involved in every aspect of our lives. The goal of these focus groups was to determine the attitudes of the electorate in order to mold her message and her personality into something they would vote for. Many people would attempt to ridicule and discredit anyone associating Hillary Clinton with communists because she comes across as compassionate and caring, always blaming everything on a vast, right wing conspiracy.

This has always been the modus operandi of the communist movement and it explains why so many young people have no idea about the atrocities committed under the regimes of communist rulers. Today's millennials are well aware of the holocaust and the millions of Jews murdered by Adolph Hitler. They may not however, know that Hitler murdered more than Jews. He started by eliminating the sick and disabled, then he murdered Christians, homosexuals and anyone else essentially, that didn't go along with his national socialism. The belief is that fascism is an extreme right wing world view. This explains the hostility towards today's conservative movement. They have been branded as fascists, when in fact, the truth is the exact opposite. On the true political scale, national socialism or fascism is to the right of communism, which represents complete state control, but it is still way left of center. A true, extreme right wing world view would be complete absence of government control over anything. With this being said, and understanding that the horrors of communism have all been forgotten simply because they are no longer being taught, the communists have been very successful in deceiving people because like Hillary Clinton, they pretend to be something they are not.

Millions of young people in America, due to left wing indoctrination in our universities, are falling for the communist propaganda under the guise that communism is a more fair, compassionate system of economics. Left wing professors, refusing to acknowledge the failures of communism because they believe the right leader has not come along to implement it the right way, have failed to teach these young minds that the pursuit of total equality has led to the death of 100,000,000 people under communist controlled governments. Communists, believing not in God but in evolution and science,  believe that man can be trained into submission and a refusal to accept communist ideals is in fact, a sign of mental deficiency. Therefore, it is justifiable to eliminate them. To understand this read "Brainwashing: A Synthesis of the Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics." Communists also hide this belief by claiming their pursuit of equality is motivated by a pursuit of social and economic justice when in fact, it is motivated by a pure desire to control every aspect of human being.

The Black Book of Communism references the historical debate over the evil natures of both Communism and Nazism. Adolf Hitler, despite his cruelty was open about what his intentions were. He set out to create a perfect race that understood its role was to serve the state and nothing else. This isn't any different than the goals of communism truthfully, only insofar as communists seek to accomplish this on a global scale, (using the economic class issue as opposed to race) while national socialism focuses on achieving such a goal for the country itself. The communists on the other hand, as mentioned above, pretended to be compassionate about the poor and oppressed when in reality-they use these groups to organize for power while hiding behind the guise of compassion and the struggle to achieve social justice, while in reality-they are systematically imprisoning and murdering all that don't go along with their agenda. This, according to the Black Book of Communism, makes the communist ideology, if you could really assign degrees of evil, more evil than Nazism because of its deceptive nature.

We all know Hillary Clinton is a liar, and she wrote her college thesis on Saul Alinsky but do we know anything else about her? Given the fact that she conducted focus groups to help mold her campaign message it is obvious she is hiding something. Over the past several weeks we have seen references to leaked emails which show she has an obvious disdain for the average American and the common beliefs in liberty that most of us share. She has referred to many of us as "irredeemable deplorables" in an effort to brand us as the uncompassionate ones while pretending to care about the poor and so called oppressed. In fact, this is the whole strategy of the Democrat party because as we all know, they have taken a hard turn left and do not represent the views of most Americans. They will however, pretend to in order to get in office. What are her intentions if she were to assume office? Are the massive dehumanization campaigns where conservatives are labeled as fascists and whites as automatic racists a first step to a repeat of history where millions were slaughtered because they were deemed as undesirable by their own government? Looking at the deceptive nature of Hillary Clinton and the violent nature of the left, it sure seems like a distinct possibility.

The number of deaths under communist regimes from the Black Book of Communism

Soviet Union- Vladimr Lenin and Joseph Stalin-20 million deaths
China-Mao- 65 million deaths
Vietnam- Ho Chi Mihn- 1 million deaths
North Korea- 2 million deaths
Cambodia- Pol Pot- 2 million deaths
Eastern Europe- 1 million deaths
Latin America- 150,000 deaths
Africa- 1.7 million deaths
Afghanistan (under soviet control) 1.5 million deaths

These are not deaths represented by wartime or revolutions, but by outright murder committed by evil men intent on creating perfect societies based on social justice and equality. I guess the question remains. Is man capable of bringing  about a perfect society?

Sunday, October 23, 2016

Ridicule: Man's Most Potent Weapon Indeed

Many people are expecting major changes in the event Donald Trump should win the presidency. While it is imperative that Hillary Clinton not be given a four year stint at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, it is doubtful that the Donald will be able to change much of anything. We have had a Republican led house since 2010 and a Republican controlled Senate since 2012 and despite the fact that they have had the power to oppose Obama's agenda they have, for the most part, caved on nearly every aspect of it. This is particularly true when it comes to funding the government in the hopes of avoiding a government shutdown.  Why would things be any different under a Trump Presidency? For the most part, a majority of key Republicans have already expressed opposition to Trump and if the Democrats should regain control of either the House or Senate they will surely be a thorn in his side, if he indeed carries on with a true Republican agenda that is.

Over the past several years the Republicans have been virtually paralyzed with fear when it comes to opposing Obama's agenda because they have been demonized, ridiculed and discredited to the point that they desperately grasp for legitimacy. Accusations of racism, sexism, homophobia and not caring for the poor have forced the Republicans into a position of not being able to defend their values because the values themselves, have been destroyed in the eyes of the public. (The main stream media presents this as reality anyway when truthfully, people are longing for a return to a traditionally American way of life.) America has been painted as nation where only rich white people benefit and minorities suffer at the hands of greedy business men who exploit their labor. This tactic of discrediting America has been so successful that those we put in office to represent our values are afraid to defend them because they do not want to appear uncompassionate or bigoted.

How does this happen? How can a persons loyalties be so easily changed, or an individuals principle so easily compromised to the point they can no longer defend them? First, it must be understood that discrediting America as a whole, conditioning people to hate the culture has been a long time goal of the communists. They have been working feverishly to present our nation in a wicked light in an attempt to convince you to accept a new system of government. Secondly, in order to destroy our constitution and way of life, those that support and defend it have to appear foolish and incompetent for doing so. They have to be made to appear that defending the positions they do means they are siding with positions that are causing people problems that of course, the communists, aka, the Democrats, are trying to solve. It is all a well organized campaign designed to completely destroy the opposition in the minds of the public, and just like a Jedi mind trick, it works miraculously on weak minded Republicans.

In order to best explain this the rest of this article will focus on quotes from three particular authors discussing the effectiveness of such tactics; Saul Alinsky, Laventri Beria and B.F. Skinner.

On Page 128 of Saul Alinsky's Rules For Radicals he discusses his fifth rule of power tactics. He states that ridicule is man's most potent weapon and that it is nearly impossible to counter because it forces your opponent to react in ways that can surely be used to your advantage. This is true, ridicule always forces people to act in a defensive manner which gives credibility to the people employing the tactic. There is no logical way to argue against being ridiculed without looking like you are hiding something. You can come back with counter ridicule; however, doing this afterward is defensive and lacks the credibility needed to have any effectiveness. A good example of this tactic can be seen simply by watching the evening news. The main stream media demonizes everything that goes against Democratic politics and they have no shame when it comes to eliminating opposition to their agenda.

We all understand the media being used as a campaign to destroy reputations and make Republicans look like fools. How do they actually make people abandon the things they once stood for? Ridicule is part of the equation; however, there is more.

Leventri Beria writes in Brain Washing: A Synthesis on the Russian Textbook of Psychopolitics that a persons loyalties can be changed by destroying the things which they were loyal to. In other words, by placing a Republican politician under a great deal of duress, then presenting facts to him that reveal his previous loyalties are causing him this duress, you can forever destroy and realign his loyalties.

The changing of loyalties consists, in its primary step, with the eradication of existing loyalties. This can be done in one of two ways. First, by demonstrating that previously existing loyalties have brought perilous physical circumstances such as imprisonment, lack of recognition, duress, privation and secondly, by eradicating the personality itself. The first is accomplished by a steady and continuous indoctrination of the individual that his previous loyalties have been granted to an unworthy source.

As it is plainly stated above the goal is to make an individual believe that his previous belief system is responsible for any stress they may going through. Politicians, for example, are under a great deal of stress and in many instances, cave to Obama's agenda precisely because they are made to feel irrelevant and unpopular for going against a president who the media portrays as having popular support. A good example was the Paul Ryan video depicting him throwing Granny over a cliff over proposed Medicare cuts. Perhaps this video is why Ryan became such an ineffective speaker, seemingly turning into putty for the Democrats.

As part of this there is the creation of a state of mind in the individual, by actually placing him under duress, and then furbishing him with false evidence to demonstrate that the target of his previous loyalties is itself, the source of the duress.

Finally we reach B.F Skinner. In Beyond Freedom and Dignity Skinner discusses how change can be achieved through the manipulation of the environment. He also says that the fear of being disliked or "not approved of" is a powerful motivator when it comes to controlling individuals. Again, through the use of effective smear tactics, like portraying Republican values as racist and uncompassionate towards the poor, the social engineers have forced the Republican party into a position of compliant silence because they are afraid of appearing uncooperative or xenophobic.

People who get along together well under the mild contingencies of approval and disapproval are controlled as effectively as (and in many ways more effectively than) the citizens of a police state. Orthodoxy controls through the establishment of rules, but the mystic is no freer because the contingencies which have shaped his behavior are more personal or idiosyncratic. Those who work productively because of the reinforcing value of what they produce are under the sensitive and powerful control of the products. Those who learn in the natural environment are under a form of control as powerful as any control exerted by a teacher.

Here we have the same tactic of destroying the opposition found from three different sources. One a community organizer, the second a former KGB operative who wrote a book describing how to brainwash people and third, a psychologist who used to do experiments on his own daughter. The agenda of discrediting America as a racist nation has been successful beyond anyone's dreams, and now they assign the values they claim to be destructive and responsible for all the nations ill's to anyone who dares stand in the way of the Democrats. How likely is that Trump will win the support of congress when one, they are already afraid of being disliked if they go against Obama and two, he continues to be portrayed as a racist even if he wins the White House?

Thursday, October 20, 2016

Corrupting One's Self is the Ultimate Morality in the Pursuit of Utopia

As we draw closer to the day that many of us hope will end the outright assault on liberty, I can't help but feel our nation will never be the same again. It is unfortunate that far too many of us have fallen for the false paradigm of right vs. left politics and fail to realize that there is a process of change taking place that is influencing every one of us. The presidential debates have turned into nothing more than a reality television series designed to keep the uninformed entranced by a spectacle of insults and attacks by two power hungry individuals allegedly representing the exact opposite in ideas and ideologies. The truth is that these candidates will say anything to get elected and often times know exactly what to say to their audiences due to polling and data mining of opinions and attitudes towards certain issues. Many would argue that Donald Trump has risen to his level of prominence precisely because he is not beholden to any political party or special interest groups; however, by voting for Trump we are inevitably accepting change that we may not have accepted before because we have been brought to a point of desperation. Lets not forget that Donald Trump once identified as a Democrat. In fact, he is even quoted as saying that the economy typically does better under Democrats. So, after years of failed Democrat economic policies we are accepting this man as our presidential contender? It is easy to understand why, most people simply are not familiar with the principles of change practiced by the left. Most people do not believe that evil exists and that a deliberate strategy would be employed to not only control the narrative but to guide the way you think through it. That is exactly what is happening in Trump Vs. Clinton folks. You see, the social controllers want change, and they want you to want change. Once they can bring you to the point of wanting to change the system because of the incessant corruption, they can mold you like clay and bring you along like a desperate puppy in search of a meal. The creation of hopelessness is a deliberate change strategy employed by the left; never forget the quote from Rules For Radicals.

Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude towards change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and chance the future.

While the nation seems to believe that Trump will restore America to her former greatness they fail to realize that Trump is in fact, change that the left can live with. Their opposition to Trump is a ploy contrived to strengthen his support and give the illusion of choice.

Truthfully, a morally sound nation adhering to founding principles such as ours should be disgusted at the outright mockery of our nation which they disguise as a presidential race. That's exactly what it is too, a mockery. Is it possible that the treacherous corruption and the constant mud slinging is more than mere attacks to discredit each others opponents but a deliberate strategy designed to discredit our current system of government and create demand for change? Is it possible that Hillary Clinton is deliberately corrupting herself in order to create the necessary anger needed to bring about their much desired social revolution? In "Forcing Change Through Chaos And Conflict" I discussed Dialectical Materialism and the left's belief that change is the natural result of conflict. Here I would like to discuss the type of morality we are dealing with it comes to the left and their belief that they can create a better world,or a utopia.

Most of us are familiar with the term "the ends justify the means." Have you really sat down and thought about what that means? Alinsky describes the concept of means and ends by saying the following-

"To say that corrupt means will corrupt the ends is to believe in the immaculate conception of ends and principles." 

What Alinsky is saying is that there is no ultimate moral authority that determines the meaning of right and wrong and that morality can be determined based on the ends which you are pursuing. In other words, the creation of a better world, a utopia where everyone is completely equal is worth the corrupting of one's self in order to achieve it. So in essence, corrupting one's self in the eyes of the left, in pursuit of utopia is in a way, the highest level of morality. Consider the following from Alinsky.

In action, one does not always enjoy the luxury of a decision that is consistent both with one's individual conscience and the good of mankind. The choice must always be for the latter. Action is for mass salvation and not for the individual's personal salvation. He who sacrifices the mass good for his personal conscience has a peculiar conception of "personal salvation;" he doesn't care enough for the people to be "corrupted" for them.

 Seeing as though Hillary Clinton wrote her college thesis "There is Only The Fight," based on the Alinsky model, and considering the fact she worked for the man it is safe to say she adopted some of this mentality. One of the things implied in this line of thinking is that there is an elite group of people that know what is better for everyone else and they alone have the right to impose their will on mankind. This certainly fits Hillary Clintons frame of mind. Also, consider the fact that she desperately wants to be president because she believes her vision for our nation is superior and that she has the divine right to rule over us. She wants to implement "social change" and according to Alinsky, to view achieving social change as anything other than a strategic problem is to fail all together.

Whenever we think about social change the question of means and ends arises. The man of action views the issue of means and ends in pragmatic and strategic terms. He has no other problem; he thinks only of his actual resources and the possibilities of various choices of action. He asks of ends only whether they are achievable and worth the cost; of means, only whether they will work. 

 Considering the points that have been made concerning the Alinsky model, it is completely possible that Clinton is deliberately corrupting herself in order to create the necessary demand for change. The truth is however, that the entire system has been corrupted in this manner. We have a Republican Congress that refuses to do anything about the rampant corruption even though it has been exposed for all to see. This means they are either in on it or they are simply too scared to take a principled stand. Somehow, I have a feeling its the former. The system was allowed to become as corrupted as it is because it gives the politicians the opportunity to continually seek change. Little by little our country has adopted more draconian policies because people have been demanding solutions to problems that government has purposefully created. I think someone once wrote that we have the right to take charge of this process and institute new government if the one we have becomes destructive to the ends of individual liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal, and they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness-That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed , that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to initiate new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers is such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. 

We have a choice America, the pursuit of ends based on no sound principle but the ambitions of power hungry politicians who think they have the right to rule or, the pursuit of ends based on universally moral principles enshrined in our founding documents. Which will it be?

Monday, October 17, 2016

The Truth For All To See

We have all known for some time that liberals and Hillary Clinton supporters have been the ones responsible for inciting violence at Trump rallies across the nation. There is no longer denying it as the truth has been exposed for all to see. In the following video we see Clinton campaign team members admitting to planning the violence. They even go so far as admitting they hire mentally ill people to be disruptive and confrontational. Yet, at the same time they get away with accusing the right, who has not committed any acts of violence mind you, of being fascists. Hillary Clinton is deliberately staging this violence and then justifying it on the grounds that the right is deplorable, racist, homophobic and intolerant. I don't know about you America but I have had enough. Now only if we had a congress that will do anything about it.



Unfortunately, this video was probably deliberately leaked. It is just another problem demanding a pre-determined solution. They want you to believe that Trump is unfit for office and now with Clinton being so corrupt there is, in the frame work of the dialectic, the justification of postponing the elections. Of course, this is just conspiracy theory; however, Obama is on record proclaiming he won't let Trump assume office. Remember who we are dealing with here. The left has no morality and can use any situation to its advantage. For all anyone knows Hillary herself is following a script and deliberately engaging in this corruption simply to make us all lose hope in the current system.

Thursday, October 13, 2016

Antonio Gramsci's Counter-Hegemony is Evident in Today's America

For many Americans it is hard to understand how our country has changed so dramatically over the past several years. It is easy to blame everything on Barack Obama as he is by far the most openly "leftist" president many of us can remember; however, the problem goes much deeper than one man. Most of us have fallen for the left/right paradigm where we believe one side is evil and the other is good while the media constantly contrasts the policies of Republicans and Democrats in news programs that shape the way we view the political landscape. To blame Barack Obama, or just the Democrats for that matter is to completely ignore the real problem that plagues our nation and unless we are willing to do some real soul searching and admit it will take more than just the election of Donald Trump, (as if that will help anything) we will lose our country. The problem we face is that most people don't understand this because the country we think we are trying to save, for all practical purposes, hasn't existed for a long time. We are engaged in a culture war that has been waging for over one hundred years and conservatism is losing, plain and simple. We are dealing with a diabolically patient enemy who years ago, set out on a plan to change our culture so slowly, so incrementally that with each passing generation, change goes virtually unnoticed. We are at the point now that many people in the younger generations simply have no idea about the true history of our country, or the meaning of her constitution because the left has been in firm control of nearly every institution we have held dear, for decades.

As I wrote in my book "Not on My Watch: Exposing the Marxist Agenda in Education,"  Antonio Gramsci (1891-1937) was an Italian Marxist who shared Marx's ideas of a communist revolution. Gramsci realized however; after seeing how  Marx's forced proletarian dictatorship had failed, that change would have to take place much more gradually. His idea, known as The Long March Through the Institutions involved the undermining of American values by infiltrating every aspect of our culture and government. Today, it is widely acknowledged that many of our cherished institutions have been destroyed and that government has turned into an oppressive system of untouchable bureaucracies where they enforce rules and regulations that have not been legitimately passed into law. The nuclear family has been discredited, genders have been confused, we have a culture in our universities where everything is offensive and considered a "micro-aggression," killing your own baby is considered a civil right while being pro life is a form bigotry and every white man in the country is considered part of a privileged class in a system designed specifically to benefit them and them alone. These are but a few of the shocking changes our country has endured over the past century and they can be attributed to the idea of infiltrating our institutions and slowly changing the culture.

To be more specific, Gramsci's ideas would build off of Marx and elaborate on the idea of a struggle between the classes. Whereas Marx believed that a revolution would occur by pitting the oppressed and exploited working class against the oppressive "bourgeois," Gramsci took it further by creating several different oppressed classes based not only on wealth but on race, gender and even criminal status and then claiming they are oppressed because they are forced to live as minorities in systems designed for a dominant class. This is why we have feminists claiming that we live in a patriarchal society where men are paid more than women, and that virtually every minority in America can claim some kind of victimhood status because they are "oppressed victims." According to Steven Yates, Gramsci believed that before any revolutionary state of mind could exist there would have to be a sort of "counter-hegemony," or system of values that would represent the so called oppressed people's while at the same time de-legitimizing the values of the socially dominant group. The word "hegemony" simply means-the social influence exerted by the dominant social group, so to speak of a counter-hegemony means to develop a social influence that is contrary to the main culture. Looking at America today it is easy to see that this is exactly what has occurred. We have been divided into many different social groups with the white, conservative male being labeled as the dominant-oppressive class, and all other groups sharing the burden of being an oppressed class. Each class has been assigned its own collective definition of oppressed life in America and they are all bound by one common idea. This so called "counter-hegemony" is the idea that they are all down trodden and oppressed by the white majority.

In "The Superior Virtue of the Oppressed,"  Bertrand Russell notes that the left, namely liberals, socialists and communists have assigned a superior morality to the poor, as if because they were poor they automatically possessed more compassion towards other people than the dominant social group typically would. He also notes how different so called socially oppressed peoples were assumed to have different, superior virtues. For instance, American intellectuals once assumed that the Africans had possessed a superior "earth consciousness" and were more connected to nature in the same way that the English once thought the Irish possessed a mystical insight. These virtues tended to disappear as these oppressed people gained liberation from the dominant group. In America today, virtually every social group is considered to be a victim of white privilege and they are allegedly bound by the superior virtues of community, collectivism and sharing. The individualistic, liberty centered culture of America is demonized and theories like Black Liberation Theology or Critical Race Theory teach that minorities cannot live under the American constitution because it was written purely to exploit and support white supremacy.  Of course, this is untrue, if it wasn't for the writing of the constitution there could very well still be slavery in the U.S. today; however, that is for another time. The left is portraying minorities in America as being bound in purpose by the idea that they all stand together to bring change to the oppressive U.S. and the white majority. This is all the result of Antonio Gramsci's efforts to expand on Marx's idea of class struggle and it has been very successful, especially under Barack Obama who is a master of social change.

You see, far too many people aren't even focusing on the real issues we face. Too many of us show up on election day believing that if our candidate wins we will see change. We fail to realize that change occurs incrementally and that a plan set in motion many years ago is in fact, reaching its culmination now. Our culture has been changed because the left has changed the way people think about this country, electing Donald Trump will not change that. The only way this will change is if we as Americans put as much effort into teaching future generations the truth as the left has put into teaching lies. That means we may have to abandon our ambitions and put the country first. The left understood that in order to change the culture all of their efforts had to go into the future generations. Unless we are willing to make such sacrifices with the understanding that change will come slowly, nothing short of an all out revolution will change anything. Conservative constitutionalists must become the social workers and teachers. We need to be employed in the government agencies, slowly introducing ideas that may once again, shift the balance. At the very least every single one of us needs to be articulating what it actually means to be conservative and a patriot.