Media manipulation and the nomination of another gun grabber

             Most conservatives, before the 2016 presidential election, believed there was an effort to undermine America and transform the constitutional republic we love into a socialist nightmare. The mass media presented us with the dramatics of a Donald Trump vs. Hillary Clinton narrative where most people believed electing Trump was critical to saving our nation. To be fair, this was a legitimate assumption. After eight years of Obama the prospects of continued Democrat governance were terrifying, to say the least. Immediately after Trump’s victory we were treated to continued theatrical drama of Russian collusion investigations and a constant resistance to anything Trump said or did. In what was probably very predictable behavior, the more the media presented resistance to Trump, the more the so-called right loved and supported him. This was by design.

There were problems that presented themselves with the idea that Trump was the constitutional conservative we were all hoping for. First of all, the man was close friends with Bill Clinton for years. They were such good friends in fact that while Trump was promising to arrest Hillary, he had a phone conversation with Bill where he was being encouraged to run for president. Explain that one.

The media, along with the Washington D.C. establishment, had gone to great lengths to convince the nation that Trump’s positions are so conservative that they must be resisted on every level. The confirmation hearings of Brett Kavanaugh, for example, were presented to the public in a spectacular side show complete with false sexual abuse allegations and accusations of gang rape. They also attempted to portray Kavanaugh as a pro-life conservative who was a threat to the 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision which legalized abortion on the federal level. This simply wasn’t true. This writer, along with others, tried to expose the fact that Kavanaugh was assuring key senators during this fiasco that he would not vote against Roe v. Wade because it was established law. Furthermore, Kavanaugh proved this to be the case when he recently joined the liberals on the court in declining to hear a case concerning Planned Parenthood funding. Kavanaugh has consistently sided with the liberals since being seated incidentally.

We are currently being treated to another show concerning William Barr and his so-called investigation into the “deep-state coup” alleging Trump of colluding with the Russians. The truth about Barr is that he is an anti-gun swamp creature who said as plain as day in his confirmation hearings that he supports red-flag gun confiscation laws. As this writer has mentioned before, there are bills in the works that authorize this man to grant states tax-payer dollars to pass their own gun confiscation laws. People, however, are currently cheering him on because they believe he is working against the Democrats due to the media narrative being fed to us.

Just this past Friday Donald Trump nominated another anti-second amendment swamp dweller to be the ATF director. Be ready to be treated to another superficial bazaar designed to appease the right by showing us how much Trump and everything he does is hated by the left. By the time these confirmation hearings are over they will have you begging your senator to confirm him.

By staging fake opposition and staged protests to Donald Trump, the media is masterfully manipulating the public into believing things that are not true and accepting things they normally wouldn’t. As this writer mentioned in his book Psychopolitics in America: A Nation Under Conquest, the effects of television and mass media on the brain have been understood for decades. Manipulating the public through mass media has become an artform mastered by the globalists to the point where many of us refuse to even consider it a possibility.

In an article entitled “Television addiction is no mere metaphor,” Robert Kubey and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi highlight the fact that the brain goes into a severe state of relaxation when exposed to television for too long. This is because the brains more primitive functioning is activated. According to the authors, the television kicks in our brain’s natural response to predatory threats, meaning our bodies become very relaxed while our brains absorb the information around us for survival purposes. Thus, the more relaxed we become the more what we see on television seems real. This is called our orientating response.

“What is it about TV that has such a hold on us? In part, the attraction seems to spring from our biological “orienting response.” First described by Ivan Pavlov in 1927, the orienting response is our instinctive visual or auditory reaction to any sudden or novel stimulus. It is part of our evolutionary heritage, a built-in sensitivity to movement and potential predatory threats. Typical orienting reactions include dilation of the blood vessels to the brain, slowing of the heart, and constriction of blood vessels to major muscle groups. Alpha waves are blocked for a few seconds before returning to their baseline level, which is determined by the general level of mental arousal. The brain focuses its attention on gathering more information while the rest of the body quiets.” (Kubev & Csikszentmihalyi, 2002)

Scientists have been studying people’s reactions to media since the 1938 radio broadcast of War of the Worlds. Millions of Americans believed we were being invaded by aliens as a result. The social scientists of the time jumped on the opportunity to study this reaction which likely contributed to further research on human behavior and our reactions to media.

“Such rare occurrences provide opportunities for social scientists to study mass behavior. They must be exploited when they come. Although the social scientists unfortunately cannot usually predict such situations and have his tools of investigations ready to analyze the phenomena while it is still on the wing, he can begin his work before the effects of the crisis are over and memories are blurred. The situation created by the broadcast was one which shows us how the common man reacts in a time of stress and strain. It gives us insight into his intelligence, his anxieties and his needs, which we would never get by tests or strictly experimental studies.” Cantril, The invasion from Mars: A study on the psychology of panic

In this author’s last article many policy positions were highlighted showing how the lefts agenda is being advanced with little resistance by the right. America is an entertainment addicted nation and the powers that be understand this. On the left you have constant opposition to Trump because he is supposedly so conservative, and on the right side of the spectrum you have nothing but a mundane analysis of how much the left allegedly hates him. Neither Limbaugh nor Levin has mentioned anything about Barr’s support for red flag laws, for example. Instead, he is presented by the right as the knight in shining armor sweeping down to save Trump and restore justice. In the meantime, Trump nominates another gun grabber, and no one notices. Little by little, step by step, the gun confiscation agenda advances.

Fake opposition and an advancing agenda

Ever since Donald Trump was running for president there has been a mass movement dubbed “the resistance.” The perception is that the left vehemently hates him and is doing everything they can to unseat him from the presidency. This includes staging a fake Russian collusion story. The talking heads on the radio, Levin and Limbaugh, cannot stop talking about how much the left hates him. In fact, it is all they talk about. There is only one problem. None of it makes any sense because so much of what Trump does advances the leftist agenda or supports their narrative.

My friend Tim Brown recently published this story where Trump says he has no problem with a gay man, who is married to another gay man, running for President. The Trump administration is also seeking to de-criminalize homosexuality across the world, which is something the left would seemingly support. Yet, they continue to hate him with a passion, portraying him as a hateful homophobe. You would think they would at least give him some credit for trying.

The Trump administration, while promising to do something about illegal immigration is currently flying illegals all over the country. The state of Florida is expected to take in one thousand a month. Yet, the left still portrays him as a bigoted anti-immigrant individual.

The left is all out in the open with their calls for gun bans and the elimination of the second amendment. Most Trump supporters still believe the man is on their side despite his support for red flag laws and the bump stock ban. His administrative banning of a piece of worthless plastic gave the left all they need to ban semi-auto rifles by fiat. Yet, the unabated hatred towards him and his supposed conservative agenda carries on.

Brett Kavanaugh has sided with the liberals several times since his confirmation hearings. One against Apple and the monopolization of their own apps and the other in refusing to hear a case concerning planned parenthood funding. This is a big deal because he was portrayed as being someone that was so conservative Roe v Wade was going to be threatened on the federal level. Many of us knew the truth of Kavanaugh and in this article I tried to explain that he wasn’t who he was being portrayed to be.

President Trump has also made numerous spending deals with Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer which continued to fund planned parenthood and keep Obamacare intact. Whether these deals were good or not is irrelevant. It shows his willingness to work with Democrats. Yet, the hatred towards him coming from these individuals continues. This makes no sense as Trump contributed money to both Pelosi and Schumer before running for president.

There are more things that Trump has done which advances the leftist/statist goal. The new NAFTA, for example increases global governance of trade in our region, pushing us closer to the globalist vision of a North American Union. Betsy Devos, as another example, has signed onto the U.N. sustainable agenda education program. This will standardize education across the U.S., so all students are indoctrinated with globalist, climate change propaganda.

Why does the left insist on this portrayal of vile hatred towards the man when so much of what he does supports their agenda? The more they hate him, the more his supporters love him. The answer is simple, if you’re willing to accept it. It is all a distraction to keep us locked in our own ideological boxes while an agenda against our interests continues unfazed.

War with Iran has been planned for years

“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies... is a foolish idea. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can throw the rascals out at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies.” (Carroll Quigley)

As a writer and researcher of Marxist propaganda and psychological manipulation of human behavior, I have been critical of President Trump. I have written many articles suggesting that Trump is not the conservative many people believe him to be. I have highlighted his support for red flag gun laws, his unconstitutional bump stock ban and the fact that many of his polices advance leftist objectives. The new NAFTA for example, strengthens global governance of trade in the region pushing us closer to globalist vison of a North American Union. Another example is the fact that education secretary, Betsy Devos, has signed us onto the U.N. education initiative which pushes the objectives of sustainable development onto our children.

The mainstream media does an excellent job of portraying a constant conflict between Trump and the liberals so that most people believe Trump is working for them. The more the Democrats object to Trump the more his base supports him, even though he is advancing the leftist agenda. A good example is the NAFTA deal and the U.N. education plan Devos signed. Trump pulled out of the Paris Climate Accord, for example, which really had no force of law behind it, solidifying in his supporter’s mind that he is working against leftist objectives. He then went on to support the new NAFTA and Devos signed on with the U.N. Both policies push the same objectives as the Paris Accord. Another example is Trump pulling out of the U.N. Arms treaty after banning bump stocks and supporting red flag gun laws.

I have written many times about the dangers of that treaty however; it was never ratified and had no real force of law. Trump pulling out of it, however, assures his second amendment base that he is on their side while he is still pushing anti-gun policies himself.

Psychologists have figured out long ago that people can be easily conditioned. In most cases, the convictions that people hold are not easily broken. My book, Psychopolitics in America: A Nation Under Conquest discusses this in detail. What people are taught tends to stick with them. In the case of Trump, Americans were taught early on that he was the last hope America had. After eight years of Obama and the prospect of a Clinton presidency Americans believed it.

"Education should aim at destroying free will so that after pupils are thus schooled, they will be incapable throughout the rest of their lives of thinking or acting otherwise than as their school masters would have wished ... The social psychologist of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for more than one generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen." -----Bertrand Russell quoting Johann Gottlieb Fichte, the head of philosophy & psychology who influenced Hegel and others – Prussian University in Berlin, 1810

Alinsky said in Rules for Radicals that people can be brought to accept almost anything if they are brought to a point of absolute desperation and face no prospects for the future. Hillary Clinton wrote her college thesis on Saul Alinsky. I would also like to remind everyone that she was also an attendee at Trumps wedding. Front row seats.

In March of 2017, shortly after President Trump took office, I wrote this article highlighting the fact that he was deploying troops to Syria in accordance with the Project New American Century war doctrine. The links used in that article have been taken down and little remains to be found, except for this article describing what the Project New American Century is. Essentially, it was a plan designed to take out seven middle eastern countries; Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and IRAN. These wars were planned more than twenty years before their execution, using the September 11 terror attacks as the pre-text for initiating them. President Obama dropped bombs in five of these countries during his term in office proving the quote by Quigley to be factual. There are certain policy objectives that will be met whether a leftist Democrat is in office or a so-called conservative Republican.

Earlier this month President Trump deployed a carrier strike group and a fleet of B-52 bombers to the Persian Gulf in response to a series of threats made by Iran. Most of his base support this move even though war with Iran would devastating consequences. Russia, China and Iran have been forming a military alliance to counter what they view as, western aggression.

Is Trump’s deployment to Iran in response to a genuine threat or is it in fact a continuation of war plans that were written up years ago to change the land scape of the middle east and project U.S. power in the region?