The deceptive nature of Hillary Clinton is right in line with Communism

Much to the surprise of the American electorate, both on the right and left, the FBI is reopening it's investigation into Hillary Clinton's email scandal. Whether this will amount to anything meaningful, or it is simply a distraction is any body's guess. Many are speculating that this could be the issue which would cause President Obama to cancel the elections. In my recent article "Corrupting One's Self is the Ultimate Morality in the Pursuit of Utopia," I discussed the possibility that the blatant corruption is deliberately being thrust in our face to create the necessary attitude for social change. This idea of course, is based on the writings of Alinsky and other "social engineers" skilled in the arts of propaganda and psychological manipulation. Looking at it from this perspective, cancelled elections are a possibility. The truth is, with Hillary Clinton you never know what to expect because she is operating from an "ends justify the means mentality," and she is willing to do anything to see her dreams of a collectivized America move forward.

According to Elizabeth Harrington from the Washington Free Beacon, the Clinton campaign began conducting focus groups to determine which approach Hillary should take concerning her run for the presidency. Hillary is diehard ideologue whose beliefs are right in line with Communists dictators like Stalin and Mao. She believes that ordinary people have no idea how to best conduct their personal business and the state should be involved in every aspect of our lives. The goal of these focus groups was to determine the attitudes of the electorate in order to mold her message and her personality into something they would vote for. Many people would attempt to ridicule and discredit anyone associating Hillary Clinton with communists because she comes across as compassionate and caring, always blaming everything on a vast, right wing conspiracy.

This has always been the modus operandi of the communist movement and it explains why so many young people have no idea about the atrocities committed under the regimes of communist rulers. Today's millennials are well aware of the holocaust and the millions of Jews murdered by Adolph Hitler. They may not however, know that Hitler murdered more than Jews. He started by eliminating the sick and disabled, then he murdered Christians, homosexuals and anyone else essentially, that didn't go along with his national socialism. The belief is that fascism is an extreme right wing world view. This explains the hostility towards today's conservative movement. They have been branded as fascists, when in fact, the truth is the exact opposite. On the true political scale, national socialism or fascism is to the right of communism, which represents complete state control, but it is still way left of center. A true, extreme right wing world view would be complete absence of government control over anything. With this being said, and understanding that the horrors of communism have all been forgotten simply because they are no longer being taught, the communists have been very successful in deceiving people because like Hillary Clinton, they pretend to be something they are not.

Millions of young people in America, due to left wing indoctrination in our universities, are falling for the communist propaganda under the guise that communism is a more fair, compassionate system of economics. Left wing professors, refusing to acknowledge the failures of communism because they believe the right leader has not come along to implement it the right way, have failed to teach these young minds that the pursuit of total equality has led to the death of 100,000,000 people under communist controlled governments. Communists, believing not in God but in evolution and science,  believe that man can be trained into submission and a refusal to accept communist ideals is in fact, a sign of mental deficiency. Therefore, it is justifiable to eliminate them. To understand this read "Brainwashing: A Synthesis of the Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics." Communists also hide this belief by claiming their pursuit of equality is motivated by a pursuit of social and economic justice when in fact, it is motivated by a pure desire to control every aspect of human being.

The Black Book of Communism references the historical debate over the evil natures of both Communism and Nazism. Adolf Hitler, despite his cruelty was open about what his intentions were. He set out to create a perfect race that understood its role was to serve the state and nothing else. This isn't any different than the goals of communism truthfully, only insofar as communists seek to accomplish this on a global scale, (using the economic class issue as opposed to race) while national socialism focuses on achieving such a goal for the country itself. The communists on the other hand, as mentioned above, pretended to be compassionate about the poor and oppressed when in reality-they use these groups to organize for power while hiding behind the guise of compassion and the struggle to achieve social justice, while in reality-they are systematically imprisoning and murdering all that don't go along with their agenda. This, according to the Black Book of Communism, makes the communist ideology, if you could really assign degrees of evil, more evil than Nazism because of its deceptive nature.

We all know Hillary Clinton is a liar, and she wrote her college thesis on Saul Alinsky but do we know anything else about her? Given the fact that she conducted focus groups to help mold her campaign message it is obvious she is hiding something. Over the past several weeks we have seen references to leaked emails which show she has an obvious disdain for the average American and the common beliefs in liberty that most of us share. She has referred to many of us as "irredeemable deplorables" in an effort to brand us as the uncompassionate ones while pretending to care about the poor and so called oppressed. In fact, this is the whole strategy of the Democrat party because as we all know, they have taken a hard turn left and do not represent the views of most Americans. They will however, pretend to in order to get in office. What are her intentions if she were to assume office? Are the massive dehumanization campaigns where conservatives are labeled as fascists and whites as automatic racists a first step to a repeat of history where millions were slaughtered because they were deemed as undesirable by their own government? Looking at the deceptive nature of Hillary Clinton and the violent nature of the left, it sure seems like a distinct possibility.

The number of deaths under communist regimes from the Black Book of Communism

Soviet Union- Vladimr Lenin and Joseph Stalin-20 million deaths
China-Mao- 65 million deaths
Vietnam- Ho Chi Mihn- 1 million deaths
North Korea- 2 million deaths
Cambodia- Pol Pot- 2 million deaths
Eastern Europe- 1 million deaths
Latin America- 150,000 deaths
Africa- 1.7 million deaths
Afghanistan (under soviet control) 1.5 million deaths

These are not deaths represented by wartime or revolutions, but by outright murder committed by evil men intent on creating perfect societies based on social justice and equality. I guess the question remains. Is man capable of bringing  about a perfect society?

Ridicule: Man's Most Potent Weapon Indeed

Many people are expecting major changes in the event Donald Trump should win the presidency. While it is imperative that Hillary Clinton not be given a four year stint at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, it is doubtful that the Donald will be able to change much of anything. We have had a Republican led house since 2010 and a Republican controlled Senate since 2012 and despite the fact that they have had the power to oppose Obama's agenda they have, for the most part, caved on nearly every aspect of it. This is particularly true when it comes to funding the government in the hopes of avoiding a government shutdown.  Why would things be any different under a Trump Presidency? For the most part, a majority of key Republicans have already expressed opposition to Trump and if the Democrats should regain control of either the House or Senate they will surely be a thorn in his side, if he indeed carries on with a true Republican agenda that is.

Over the past several years the Republicans have been virtually paralyzed with fear when it comes to opposing Obama's agenda because they have been demonized, ridiculed and discredited to the point that they desperately grasp for legitimacy. Accusations of racism, sexism, homophobia and not caring for the poor have forced the Republicans into a position of not being able to defend their values because the values themselves, have been destroyed in the eyes of the public. (The main stream media presents this as reality anyway when truthfully, people are longing for a return to a traditionally American way of life.) America has been painted as nation where only rich white people benefit and minorities suffer at the hands of greedy business men who exploit their labor. This tactic of discrediting America has been so successful that those we put in office to represent our values are afraid to defend them because they do not want to appear uncompassionate or bigoted.

How does this happen? How can a persons loyalties be so easily changed, or an individuals principle so easily compromised to the point they can no longer defend them? First, it must be understood that discrediting America as a whole, conditioning people to hate the culture has been a long time goal of the communists. They have been working feverishly to present our nation in a wicked light in an attempt to convince you to accept a new system of government. Secondly, in order to destroy our constitution and way of life, those that support and defend it have to appear foolish and incompetent for doing so. They have to be made to appear that defending the positions they do means they are siding with positions that are causing people problems that of course, the communists, aka, the Democrats, are trying to solve. It is all a well organized campaign designed to completely destroy the opposition in the minds of the public, and just like a Jedi mind trick, it works miraculously on weak minded Republicans.

In order to best explain this the rest of this article will focus on quotes from three particular authors discussing the effectiveness of such tactics; Saul Alinsky, Laventri Beria and B.F. Skinner.

On Page 128 of Saul Alinsky's Rules For Radicals he discusses his fifth rule of power tactics. He states that ridicule is man's most potent weapon and that it is nearly impossible to counter because it forces your opponent to react in ways that can surely be used to your advantage. This is true, ridicule always forces people to act in a defensive manner which gives credibility to the people employing the tactic. There is no logical way to argue against being ridiculed without looking like you are hiding something. You can come back with counter ridicule; however, doing this afterward is defensive and lacks the credibility needed to have any effectiveness. A good example of this tactic can be seen simply by watching the evening news. The main stream media demonizes everything that goes against Democratic politics and they have no shame when it comes to eliminating opposition to their agenda.

We all understand the media being used as a campaign to destroy reputations and make Republicans look like fools. How do they actually make people abandon the things they once stood for? Ridicule is part of the equation; however, there is more.

Leventri Beria writes in Brain Washing: A Synthesis on the Russian Textbook of Psychopolitics that a persons loyalties can be changed by destroying the things which they were loyal to. In other words, by placing a Republican politician under a great deal of duress, then presenting facts to him that reveal his previous loyalties are causing him this duress, you can forever destroy and realign his loyalties.

The changing of loyalties consists, in its primary step, with the eradication of existing loyalties. This can be done in one of two ways. First, by demonstrating that previously existing loyalties have brought perilous physical circumstances such as imprisonment, lack of recognition, duress, privation and secondly, by eradicating the personality itself. The first is accomplished by a steady and continuous indoctrination of the individual that his previous loyalties have been granted to an unworthy source.

As it is plainly stated above the goal is to make an individual believe that his previous belief system is responsible for any stress they may going through. Politicians, for example, are under a great deal of stress and in many instances, cave to Obama's agenda precisely because they are made to feel irrelevant and unpopular for going against a president who the media portrays as having popular support. A good example was the Paul Ryan video depicting him throwing Granny over a cliff over proposed Medicare cuts. Perhaps this video is why Ryan became such an ineffective speaker, seemingly turning into putty for the Democrats.

As part of this there is the creation of a state of mind in the individual, by actually placing him under duress, and then furbishing him with false evidence to demonstrate that the target of his previous loyalties is itself, the source of the duress.

Finally we reach B.F Skinner. In Beyond Freedom and Dignity Skinner discusses how change can be achieved through the manipulation of the environment. He also says that the fear of being disliked or "not approved of" is a powerful motivator when it comes to controlling individuals. Again, through the use of effective smear tactics, like portraying Republican values as racist and uncompassionate towards the poor, the social engineers have forced the Republican party into a position of compliant silence because they are afraid of appearing uncooperative or xenophobic.

People who get along together well under the mild contingencies of approval and disapproval are controlled as effectively as (and in many ways more effectively than) the citizens of a police state. Orthodoxy controls through the establishment of rules, but the mystic is no freer because the contingencies which have shaped his behavior are more personal or idiosyncratic. Those who work productively because of the reinforcing value of what they produce are under the sensitive and powerful control of the products. Those who learn in the natural environment are under a form of control as powerful as any control exerted by a teacher.

Here we have the same tactic of destroying the opposition found from three different sources. One a community organizer, the second a former KGB operative who wrote a book describing how to brainwash people and third, a psychologist who used to do experiments on his own daughter. The agenda of discrediting America as a racist nation has been successful beyond anyone's dreams, and now they assign the values they claim to be destructive and responsible for all the nations ill's to anyone who dares stand in the way of the Democrats. How likely is that Trump will win the support of congress when one, they are already afraid of being disliked if they go against Obama and two, he continues to be portrayed as a racist even if he wins the White House?

Corrupting One's Self is the Ultimate Morality in the Pursuit of Utopia

As we draw closer to the day that many of us hope will end the outright assault on liberty, I can't help but feel our nation will never be the same again. It is unfortunate that far too many of us have fallen for the false paradigm of right vs. left politics and fail to realize that there is a process of change taking place that is influencing every one of us. The presidential debates have turned into nothing more than a reality television series designed to keep the uninformed entranced by a spectacle of insults and attacks by two power hungry individuals allegedly representing the exact opposite in ideas and ideologies. The truth is that these candidates will say anything to get elected and often times know exactly what to say to their audiences due to polling and data mining of opinions and attitudes towards certain issues. Many would argue that Donald Trump has risen to his level of prominence precisely because he is not beholden to any political party or special interest groups; however, by voting for Trump we are inevitably accepting change that we may not have accepted before because we have been brought to a point of desperation. Lets not forget that Donald Trump once identified as a Democrat. In fact, he is even quoted as saying that the economy typically does better under Democrats. So, after years of failed Democrat economic policies we are accepting this man as our presidential contender? It is easy to understand why, most people simply are not familiar with the principles of change practiced by the left. Most people do not believe that evil exists and that a deliberate strategy would be employed to not only control the narrative but to guide the way you think through it. That is exactly what is happening in Trump Vs. Clinton folks. You see, the social controllers want change, and they want you to want change. Once they can bring you to the point of wanting to change the system because of the incessant corruption, they can mold you like clay and bring you along like a desperate puppy in search of a meal. The creation of hopelessness is a deliberate change strategy employed by the left; never forget the quote from Rules For Radicals.

Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude towards change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and chance the future.

While the nation seems to believe that Trump will restore America to her former greatness they fail to realize that Trump is in fact, change that the left can live with. Their opposition to Trump is a ploy contrived to strengthen his support and give the illusion of choice.

Truthfully, a morally sound nation adhering to founding principles such as ours should be disgusted at the outright mockery of our nation which they disguise as a presidential race. That's exactly what it is too, a mockery. Is it possible that the treacherous corruption and the constant mud slinging is more than mere attacks to discredit each others opponents but a deliberate strategy designed to discredit our current system of government and create demand for change? Is it possible that Hillary Clinton is deliberately corrupting herself in order to create the necessary anger needed to bring about their much desired social revolution? In "Forcing Change Through Chaos And Conflict" I discussed Dialectical Materialism and the left's belief that change is the natural result of conflict. Here I would like to discuss the type of morality we are dealing with it comes to the left and their belief that they can create a better world,or a utopia.

Most of us are familiar with the term "the ends justify the means." Have you really sat down and thought about what that means? Alinsky describes the concept of means and ends by saying the following-

"To say that corrupt means will corrupt the ends is to believe in the immaculate conception of ends and principles." 

What Alinsky is saying is that there is no ultimate moral authority that determines the meaning of right and wrong and that morality can be determined based on the ends which you are pursuing. In other words, the creation of a better world, a utopia where everyone is completely equal is worth the corrupting of one's self in order to achieve it. So in essence, corrupting one's self in the eyes of the left, in pursuit of utopia is in a way, the highest level of morality. Consider the following from Alinsky.

In action, one does not always enjoy the luxury of a decision that is consistent both with one's individual conscience and the good of mankind. The choice must always be for the latter. Action is for mass salvation and not for the individual's personal salvation. He who sacrifices the mass good for his personal conscience has a peculiar conception of "personal salvation;" he doesn't care enough for the people to be "corrupted" for them.

 Seeing as though Hillary Clinton wrote her college thesis "There is Only The Fight," based on the Alinsky model, and considering the fact she worked for the man it is safe to say she adopted some of this mentality. One of the things implied in this line of thinking is that there is an elite group of people that know what is better for everyone else and they alone have the right to impose their will on mankind. This certainly fits Hillary Clintons frame of mind. Also, consider the fact that she desperately wants to be president because she believes her vision for our nation is superior and that she has the divine right to rule over us. She wants to implement "social change" and according to Alinsky, to view achieving social change as anything other than a strategic problem is to fail all together.

Whenever we think about social change the question of means and ends arises. The man of action views the issue of means and ends in pragmatic and strategic terms. He has no other problem; he thinks only of his actual resources and the possibilities of various choices of action. He asks of ends only whether they are achievable and worth the cost; of means, only whether they will work. 

 Considering the points that have been made concerning the Alinsky model, it is completely possible that Clinton is deliberately corrupting herself in order to create the necessary demand for change. The truth is however, that the entire system has been corrupted in this manner. We have a Republican Congress that refuses to do anything about the rampant corruption even though it has been exposed for all to see. This means they are either in on it or they are simply too scared to take a principled stand. Somehow, I have a feeling its the former. The system was allowed to become as corrupted as it is because it gives the politicians the opportunity to continually seek change. Little by little our country has adopted more draconian policies because people have been demanding solutions to problems that government has purposefully created. I think someone once wrote that we have the right to take charge of this process and institute new government if the one we have becomes destructive to the ends of individual liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal, and they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness-That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed , that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to initiate new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers is such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. 

We have a choice America, the pursuit of ends based on no sound principle but the ambitions of power hungry politicians who think they have the right to rule or, the pursuit of ends based on universally moral principles enshrined in our founding documents. Which will it be?

The Truth For All To See

We have all known for some time that liberals and Hillary Clinton supporters have been the ones responsible for inciting violence at Trump rallies across the nation. There is no longer denying it as the truth has been exposed for all to see. In the following video we see Clinton campaign team members admitting to planning the violence. They even go so far as admitting they hire mentally ill people to be disruptive and confrontational. Yet, at the same time they get away with accusing the right, who has not committed any acts of violence mind you, of being fascists. Hillary Clinton is deliberately staging this violence and then justifying it on the grounds that the right is deplorable, racist, homophobic and intolerant. I don't know about you America but I have had enough. Now only if we had a congress that will do anything about it.

Unfortunately, this video was probably deliberately leaked. It is just another problem demanding a pre-determined solution. They want you to believe that Trump is unfit for office and now with Clinton being so corrupt there is, in the frame work of the dialectic, the justification of postponing the elections. Of course, this is just conspiracy theory; however, Obama is on record proclaiming he won't let Trump assume office. Remember who we are dealing with here. The left has no morality and can use any situation to its advantage. For all anyone knows Hillary herself is following a script and deliberately engaging in this corruption simply to make us all lose hope in the current system.

Antonio Gramsci's Counter-Hegemony is Evident in Today's America

For many Americans it is hard to understand how our country has changed so dramatically over the past several years. It is easy to blame everything on Barack Obama as he is by far the most openly "leftist" president many of us can remember; however, the problem goes much deeper than one man. Most of us have fallen for the left/right paradigm where we believe one side is evil and the other is good while the media constantly contrasts the policies of Republicans and Democrats in news programs that shape the way we view the political landscape. To blame Barack Obama, or just the Democrats for that matter is to completely ignore the real problem that plagues our nation and unless we are willing to do some real soul searching and admit it will take more than just the election of Donald Trump, (as if that will help anything) we will lose our country. The problem we face is that most people don't understand this because the country we think we are trying to save, for all practical purposes, hasn't existed for a long time. We are engaged in a culture war that has been waging for over one hundred years and conservatism is losing, plain and simple. We are dealing with a diabolically patient enemy who years ago, set out on a plan to change our culture so slowly, so incrementally that with each passing generation, change goes virtually unnoticed. We are at the point now that many people in the younger generations simply have no idea about the true history of our country, or the meaning of her constitution because the left has been in firm control of nearly every institution we have held dear, for decades.

As I wrote in my book "Not on My Watch: Exposing the Marxist Agenda in Education,"  Antonio Gramsci (1891-1937) was an Italian Marxist who shared Marx's ideas of a communist revolution. Gramsci realized however; after seeing how  Marx's forced proletarian dictatorship had failed, that change would have to take place much more gradually. His idea, known as The Long March Through the Institutions involved the undermining of American values by infiltrating every aspect of our culture and government. Today, it is widely acknowledged that many of our cherished institutions have been destroyed and that government has turned into an oppressive system of untouchable bureaucracies where they enforce rules and regulations that have not been legitimately passed into law. The nuclear family has been discredited, genders have been confused, we have a culture in our universities where everything is offensive and considered a "micro-aggression," killing your own baby is considered a civil right while being pro life is a form bigotry and every white man in the country is considered part of a privileged class in a system designed specifically to benefit them and them alone. These are but a few of the shocking changes our country has endured over the past century and they can be attributed to the idea of infiltrating our institutions and slowly changing the culture.

To be more specific, Gramsci's ideas would build off of Marx and elaborate on the idea of a struggle between the classes. Whereas Marx believed that a revolution would occur by pitting the oppressed and exploited working class against the oppressive "bourgeois," Gramsci took it further by creating several different oppressed classes based not only on wealth but on race, gender and even criminal status and then claiming they are oppressed because they are forced to live as minorities in systems designed for a dominant class. This is why we have feminists claiming that we live in a patriarchal society where men are paid more than women, and that virtually every minority in America can claim some kind of victimhood status because they are "oppressed victims." According to Steven Yates, Gramsci believed that before any revolutionary state of mind could exist there would have to be a sort of "counter-hegemony," or system of values that would represent the so called oppressed people's while at the same time de-legitimizing the values of the socially dominant group. The word "hegemony" simply means-the social influence exerted by the dominant social group, so to speak of a counter-hegemony means to develop a social influence that is contrary to the main culture. Looking at America today it is easy to see that this is exactly what has occurred. We have been divided into many different social groups with the white, conservative male being labeled as the dominant-oppressive class, and all other groups sharing the burden of being an oppressed class. Each class has been assigned its own collective definition of oppressed life in America and they are all bound by one common idea. This so called "counter-hegemony" is the idea that they are all down trodden and oppressed by the white majority.

In "The Superior Virtue of the Oppressed,"  Bertrand Russell notes that the left, namely liberals, socialists and communists have assigned a superior morality to the poor, as if because they were poor they automatically possessed more compassion towards other people than the dominant social group typically would. He also notes how different so called socially oppressed peoples were assumed to have different, superior virtues. For instance, American intellectuals once assumed that the Africans had possessed a superior "earth consciousness" and were more connected to nature in the same way that the English once thought the Irish possessed a mystical insight. These virtues tended to disappear as these oppressed people gained liberation from the dominant group. In America today, virtually every social group is considered to be a victim of white privilege and they are allegedly bound by the superior virtues of community, collectivism and sharing. The individualistic, liberty centered culture of America is demonized and theories like Black Liberation Theology or Critical Race Theory teach that minorities cannot live under the American constitution because it was written purely to exploit and support white supremacy.  Of course, this is untrue, if it wasn't for the writing of the constitution there could very well still be slavery in the U.S. today; however, that is for another time. The left is portraying minorities in America as being bound in purpose by the idea that they all stand together to bring change to the oppressive U.S. and the white majority. This is all the result of Antonio Gramsci's efforts to expand on Marx's idea of class struggle and it has been very successful, especially under Barack Obama who is a master of social change.

You see, far too many people aren't even focusing on the real issues we face. Too many of us show up on election day believing that if our candidate wins we will see change. We fail to realize that change occurs incrementally and that a plan set in motion many years ago is in fact, reaching its culmination now. Our culture has been changed because the left has changed the way people think about this country, electing Donald Trump will not change that. The only way this will change is if we as Americans put as much effort into teaching future generations the truth as the left has put into teaching lies. That means we may have to abandon our ambitions and put the country first. The left understood that in order to change the culture all of their efforts had to go into the future generations. Unless we are willing to make such sacrifices with the understanding that change will come slowly, nothing short of an all out revolution will change anything. Conservative constitutionalists must become the social workers and teachers. We need to be employed in the government agencies, slowly introducing ideas that may once again, shift the balance. At the very least every single one of us needs to be articulating what it actually means to be conservative and a patriot.
 

Forcing Change Through Chaos And Conflict...Understanding the Dialectic

For years now I have been writing about the left and the dialectic in which they operate. As it seems our country is drifting further and further astray, the motivation to write just isn't there because I  feel like I am repeating myself over and over again. For instance, a story recently broke about the Department of Justice not pressing charges against the Libyan arms dealer because he threatened to expose Hillary Clinton's involvement. Normally, after seeing a story like that I would be excited to hypothesize about how it fits in the dialectic and I would theorize how the left could use this type of story to their advantage; in the way of discrediting America on the world stage perhaps, in order to push global gun control. I would then write about how it creates a kind of chaos and hopelessness in our current system; the kind of hopelessness for example, that would prompt the American people to accept Donald Trump as their next president. I would highlight the fact that this is the Alinsky tactic of fomenting revolutionary change and that it has been used repeatedly for the past several decades to push the thoughts and attitudes of Americans towards the ideals of statism.

"Any revolutionary change must be proceeded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and chance the future." Alinsky, Rules For Radicals pp. xix

It almost seems as if the job of any administration is to create as much havoc as possible in order for a new savior to be introduced; it's just the savior always turns out to be the same guy we thought we were getting rid of. George Bush, in the minds of the left, had destroyed this nation in much the same way Obama has done in the minds of conservatives. Drawing on Alinsky's principle quoted above, Americans were so hopeless and lost after the September 11 attacks and nearly a decade of war that they were ready and willing to accept any change. What they didn't realize was that society is studied by highly intelligent social engineers who manipulate the environment to force behavioral change and that Obama is a character created to sell the same product with a different sales pitch. Obama's wars in Libya and Syria were executed under the same war plans as Bush's wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, this was called the Project New American Century. Through the employment of psychological warfare techniques, they were able to convince millions that Barrack Obama  would bring meaningful change, and to this day these techniques have been proven so effective, that millions still believe he did. Through Obama's push of multiculturalism and fairness, and the creation of false racial strife, Obama has been engaging in the same wars that had infuriated the left to begin with, and he has gotten away with it almost flawlessly.

They want you to believe that the ideological divide between the liberal and conservative worldviews is so wide that there will never be meaningful dialogue between the two sides, when in reality the truth is far different. The political left and right are artificial constructs designed to keep us in a constant state of conflict in order to achieve social change. They may appear to be ideologically opposed to one another; however, in reality there is very little difference when it comes to major policy initiatives. The Project New American Century is one example but the fact that the Republican controlled congress has offered virtually no resistance to Obama, is yet another. Perhaps the reason they are caving on every issue is that they are deliberately trying to cause tension amongst the people. Perhaps they are trying to make us feel defeated; or perhaps they are intentionally making us angry in order to cause conflict. The thing that most Americans don't understand is that the left believes change is the natural outcome of all conflict. They operate under the principles of Dialectical Materialism, which is the basic philosophy from which communism was devised. This philosophy posits the idea that change comes from struggle. This is approached from a purely scientific mindset as the left generally believes that men have no spiritual element and are actually devoid of any individuality.

Dialectical Materialism: The Marxist theory that maintains the material basis of a reality constantly changing in a dialectical process and the priority of matter over mind.

In other words, the left looks at society in scientific terms. We are not individuals, society as a whole represents nothing but matter which can be manipulated; change will be the natural result of chaos and conflict. The Hegelian Dialectic is the process in which conflict is intentionally caused in order to get the masses to demand a predetermined solution. This goes right along with Alinsky's quote as well. Society is being led into hopelessness so we will see no other solution but to accept global government. The recent news of an imminent nuclear war, constant exposure to violence in our streets and the never ending propaganda that suggests American culture is responsible for the ills we face are a deliberate strategy to make you lose hope and a belief in your nations principles. The constant lies about rampant racism, the climate change hoax, and the corruption in our government in particular are all tools being used to get us to see our current system as being flawed and in need of change.  Through the communist controlled education system our children are being force fed lies about our culture and history that they will inevitably, in generations to come, demand the change the left wishes to impose upon them. The truth has been diluted and misconstrued to the point that most people simply do not know how to research it, let alone defend it.

Sadly, America finds itself once again enthralled by a circus posing as a presidential race. The race itself is being mocked as it is being treated like a reality television program targeted to a nation of useful fools looking for someone else to lead the way. On one side is a person who is of the lowest type of character imaginable, a woman advocating for live birth abortions has no value for human life, period. On the other is a man that if we were not in such a desperate situation the thought of him running for president would be laughable. A man running as a republican, who throughout his life has supported Democrat policies such a single payer health care and Bill Clinton's assault weapons ban. Rest assured, I am done bashing Trump; my hand is kind of being forced unless I want Hillary to win. Hmmm.......what was it that Alinsky said?