Thursday, November 5, 2020

Forcing change through a well “framed” fear message.

 From my upcoming book

According to Perloff,[1] social scientists and philosophers have theorized for years about the best methods to craft a message to influence attitude and or, opinion change.  Returning to the previous section’s discussion on fear messages, a well framed argument will contain the element of fear but also a recommended course of action to alleviate that fear, or avert the potential danger causing it. Perloff states that “a fear-arousing message contains two basic elements: threat and efficacy information, or a problem and a solution. A message must first threaten the individual, convincing him or her that dangers lurk in the environment.”[2] The American media is infamous for presenting the news in a manner that suggests there is always a danger, and that freedom itself is a dangerous concept. There is always a problem, and a potential solution. This solution generally leads to less freedom for the individual and more control for the government.

This method of framing arguments bears striking similarity to something called the Hegelian Dialectic. This is based on dialectical materialism[3], which according to Ray Nunes, who was once chairman of the Worker’s Party in the 1990’s, is central to the Marxist push for social change. Dialectical materialism posits the idea that all progress is made through conflict, and, because matter existed before conscious thought, progress through conflicting matter has brought us to where we are. The Hegelian Dialectic[4] is based off the ideas of Georg Hegel and applied to Fredrick Engels and Karl Marx’s theories on communism. It is also known as the problem-reaction-solution strategy. The idea is to strike fear into the hearts of the masses, which would motivate them to demand change and, implement the solution which was already been predetermined.





[1] Perloff, R, M. The dynamics of persuasion: Communications and attitudes in the 21st century (2017) New York. Routledge

 

[2] Perloff, R, M. The dynamics of persuasion: Communications and attitudes in the 21st century (2017) New York. Routledge

 

[3] Nunes, R. Dialectical Materialism (https://www.marxists.org/history/erol/new-zealand/nunes-marx-mao/nunes-dialectical.pdf)

[4] Nightingale, Y.C. (2016, May 25) What is the Hegelian dialectic? https://christianobserver.net/what-is-the-hegelian-dialectic/


No comments:

Post a Comment

Analyzing the Attempts to Normalize Pedophilia.

  December 18, 2023   by  David Risselada Sometimes I find myself at a loss. The past few years have been quite an experience for me as I ha...