Thursday, March 19, 2015

The High Cost of Treason Part Two.....David Risselada

In my article, The High Cost of Treason, I discussed the fallacious claims made by Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT.) In what could best be described as an all out assault on law abiding gun owners, he viciously attacked those in possession of the so called “high capacity” magazine, by suggesting they are “arming against the government.” This goes right along with efforts made by our federal government to label patriots as “threats” while trying to appease our real enemies. There is something disturbing about a government that doesn't trust its own people to keep and bear arms, especially while ignoring the threats being made against us by those who commit violent acts in the name of their religion.  You see, the Democrats go to great lengths to make excuses for Islamic terrorism by claiming they are oppressed victims. They suggest that we should try to “empathize” with their worldview and understand what drives them to commit the atrocities they do. They ignore the fact that there is a literal genocide being committed against Christians, and they have the audacity to label hard working Americans as terrorists, and a threat to national security because we believe in the constitution.  It’s no wonder Senator Murphy (D-CT) is concerned, the acts of this government are downright treasonous. Unfortunately, the treason doesn't stop there.
Sen. Chris Murphy represents the third type of "stupid" person in America today.
Claims people with high capacity magazines are "arming against the government."
Recently the unconstitutional ATF was considering a ban on 5.56, green tip ball ammo. Using the typical “Alinsky style” tactics, they claimed there was a need to ban the popular cartridge to make the police safer.  It is truly ironic, because the only danger the police are currently in, is from the thugs that the Obama administration had “organized into action” in response to the Ferguson incident.  Let’s not forget that the biggest job of a community organizer is to stir up hate and discontent.  After receiving nearly 100,000 letters and comments, including claims by police that not one green tip had been used against them, the ATF backed off the ban. It was only a week before another Democrat congressman, Steve Israel of New York, introduced legislation to ban all rifle ammunition in the name of police safety.  To sum this up, the government is seeking to disarm the population based on the false premise of racism, and a danger posed to the police by those in possession of rifle ammunition. It’s no wonder they are scared of us, they are using lies to steal our liberties.
ATF-ammo-ban
While the Obama administration worked feverishly to incite it’s much desired race war, they were also going to great lengths to militarize the police. Police stations across the country, including the Ferguson Police Department, have received high grade military equipment from the pentagon under a Department Of Defense program called 1033. In what can best be described as an application of the Hegelian Dialectic (problem, reaction, solution) strategy, the federal government has been arming local police forces to the teeth, in anticipation of the potential problems it may cause. They then sweep in and offer their communistic, utopian solutions in the form of a federally controlled police force.  This is outright treason as the constitution gives absolutely no authority to the executive branch to create such a force. History shows that when a dictator assumes this kind of power the results are disastrous; all out totalitarianism is sure to follow. Given the fact that the National Defense Act of 2011 gives the military the right to detain anyone indefinitely, and that the Posse Comitatus act has virtually been repealed, there is absolutely nothing protecting us from all out usurpation. It is becoming abundantly clear why the government does not trust its citizens with firearms, they are committing all out treason against the United States.
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
There is one more subject that needs to be discussed, and that is the rate at which Obama is firing top military generals that seem to be standing in the way of his agenda. There have been many reports suggesting that President Obama has asked military commanders if they were willing to fire upon American citizens who refused to surrender their firearms. While this claim remains controversial, the fact is that he has been firing many generals and replacing them with people more willing to remake the military in his image. Hardened war commanders have been replaced with radical feminists and homosexual activists more concerned about making a political statement than fighting the nation’s battles. As far as the litmus test goes, there is reason to believe it may be real. In 1994 at the Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center in 29 palms California, a similar survey was given to marines.  This author was stationed in 29 Palms in 1995 and knew marines who had taken this survey. Many of the questions revolve around the attitudes of marines and their willingness to deploy on U.S. soil and work under the authority of the U.N. The most alarming question is the very last one in the survey that bears a chilling similarity to the question Obama has been allegedly asking.
The  U.S.  government declares a ban on   the possession,  sale, transportation, and transfer of all non-sporting firearms.  A thirty (30) day amnesty period is permitted for these firearms  to  be turned over to  the local authorities.  At the end of this period, a number of citizen groups refuse to  turn over their firearms. Consider the following statement:
I would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the U.S. government
(_____)(____)(_____)(______)(____)
Strongly disagreeDisagreeAgreeStrongly agreeNo opinion


Regrettably, service members who had less than 10 years of service time, and those who had just entered the service saw no problem with this order; 63% of them stated they would follow it. It was the older troops, those who had over 15 years of service that had resoundingly answered no. This was in 1994 my friends. Imagine what the numbers are now with the level of socialist indoctrination our younger generations have endured.
There are many that would call me a crazy conspiracy theorist for writing this article. I am not claiming that I know what is going to happen or when, if anything at all. I do know however, that our government has labeled the patriots of this nation as threats to national security and is ignoring the real threats we face. I know that radical Islam is on the move and the people we elected to preserve our constitution are working day and night to undermine it while inciting racial tensions, appeasing our enemies and attempting to limit our abilities to defend ourselves. I would like to think that these are issues that could unite all Americans into standing for liberty; unfortunately, they are not. It is evident however, that lawmakers on the left are hell bent on eliminating the second amendment. Their fear of an armed populace, in my humble opinion, is evidence of their treachery and treason against their country. If they were honest, and working to uphold and defend the constitution as they swore to do, what would they have to fear?

No comments:

Post a Comment