The left is using the issue of illegal
immigration to push for open borders and the elimination of America’s national
identity. They are also using it to discredit Donald Trump as he is being
portrayed as a heartless dictator who is locking up poor children seeking asylum
in the United States. The two Alinsky rules the left are using here are numbers
eight and ten.
Keep the pressure on with different tactics
and actions and utilize all events of the period for your purpose. (Alinsky, 1971)
The major premise for tactics is the
development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the
opposition. (Alinsky, 1971)
What President Trump is currently dealing with
is an overwhelming problem of illegal immigrants crossing our border because
the left has virtually made it legal to do so. The Hegelian dialectic is in
play here as this issue has been allowed to grow out of control for several
decades to create a public demand for a solution, and that solution is being
presented as amnesty.
For years, the Obama administration, according
to the Dailymail.com[1],
had been sending leaflets to Mexico advising people that they can get free food
stamps and other benefits in America without admitting they are in the country
illegally. As a result, millions of people are rushing to cross the border to
get their fair share of the free ride. The left is taking the opportunity to
discredit President Trump because of policies which have been in place for two
decades which separates children and their families at the border while a
determination is made pertaining on what to do with them. The debate currently
rages over whether there is a federal law requiring such an action. President Trump
has made the claim that Democrats passed this law. In 2002, a Democrat senate majority
voted in favor of Public Law 107-296[2],
which was a bill following the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks.
George W. Bush was president at the time, so he would have had to sign the bill
into law. This bill does give authority to place illegal immigrants under the
age of 18 into a detention facility; however, there is nothing in this law
which specifies the separation of
families. In any case, families have been separated at the border for decades,
even under the Obama administration[3].
Even MSNBC was forced to admit that the policy took place under the Obama
administration.[4]
Whatever the case may be, the Democrats are clearly showing their hypocrisy on
the issue while pulling the heart strings of the ignorant. For years, when it
suited them, they advocated for strong border policies and tougher laws on
illegal immigration. Many people likely remember the time when the Clinton
administration sent armed Immigration and Naturalization officers to seize
Elian Gonzalez from his family’s home in Miami [5].
Gonzalez was brought to the United States from Cuba under the same conditions
which Democrats now champion and encourage illegal immigration. To escape the
harsh realities of living under oppressive rule and third world economic
conditions. The Clinton Administration made no apologies for this pre-dawn raid
where they snatched young Elian from his uncle’s arms at gun point.
The left is now using this issue to present
Trumps actions as morally reprehensible, so they can get their voting base
worked up and mobilized. While doing so they have once again shown the world
just how low they are willing to go to present something as a crisis which must
immediately be solved. Time Magazine, on the cover of their July issue, has run
a photo of a little girl screaming at the border and President Trump hovering
over her while saying the words “welcome to America.” As stressed many times
throughout this blog, the left’s job is to discredit the country, so this cover
makes America look like a mean and nasty place. You must wonder though, if they
thought the country was such a mean and nasty place then why are they
encouraging people to cross the border illegally, only to be separated from
their families and be treated like animals? Shouldn’t they be encouraging the
people oppressed by white privilege and imperialism to cross the border into
Mexico where everyone is of such higher virtue? The truth of this photo is that
the girl was never separated from her family and that her mother was not an
asylum seeker. Rather, her father claims that the mother hired a smuggler to
bring her across the border, leaving the father behind, and that she was
looking for work. According to an
article published in the Washington Times by Stephen Dinan,[6]
the mother, Sandra Sanchez was deported from the United States under the Obama
administration. Dinan further argued that because she left other children
behind she has no justifiable claim to asylum in the United States. If she had
fears of being persecuted she would not leave other loved family members
behind. This is how the left plays, they take advantage of any opportunity to
discredit their opposition even before finding out any facts.
Another shocking revelation that has become
known, one that of course the left is trying to use against Trump, is the fact
that many of these children are being force fed powerful anti-psychotic drugs
once they have been separated from their families. A report from Revealnews.org[7]
reveals that immigrant children have been sent to shelters which have a history
of abusing their guests with psychotropic medications since 2003. One such
shelter, Shiloh, received 5.6 million dollars from the federal government and
has been housing these children since 2013. Children have complained of being forced
to take up to ten different medications at a time. This author, during an
internship at a child welfare office can attest to this as he was witnessing shelters
who engage in the practice of drugging the children after they have been taken
from their parents. Ironically, many of these children were of Hispanic origin
and the year was 2013. It is unknown if there is a connection between these
shelters and those involved in housing illegal immigrants.
Another image that has sent shockwaves through
the lefts emotional outrage machine was one of a little boy being locked in a
cage, crying. It turns out that the photo was part of a staged protest where
left wing agitators put themselves in a cage to demonstrate their outrage over
families being separated at the border[8].
That brings us to another Alinsky rule, one that has been employed many times
before.
A good tactic is one your people enjoy. If
your people are not having a ball doing it there is something very wrong with
the tactic. (Alinsky, 1971)
The left has fun doing many of the things they
do. They especially like to incite riots against conservatives in their attempts
to portray conservatism as selfish, bigoted, and hateful. On Sunday, June 24,
2018, Congresswoman Maxine Waters, attempting to whoop up hatred against
Republicans encouraged her voters to harass and intimidate Trump supporters[9]
to protest the immigration issue. This is despite many of the issues she is
trying to bring attention to have been proven false.
This is all indicative of the means the
Alinsky moralists are willing to employ to discredit and destroy their
opposition. The sad thing is that they feel no shame for doing so, they have
elevated their morality with the false notion of being virtually superior to us.
As mentioned in earlier articles, they have no morality except that of being
willing to corrupt themselves to create their cherished Utopia. They will only
come out and admit they are wrong if they fear public opinion demands they do
so. In many cases, they will still find a way to justify the use of misinformation
or lying to prove a point. In the case of Waters, her voters believe, because
of the lies pushed by the media in collaboration with the education system,
that the Republicans truly are bigoted and are working feverishly to keep the
poor children from their families.
Maxine Waters isn’t the only Democrat who has
become unhinged in her calls for action. MSNBC commentator Donny Deutsch[10] took to the airwaves on Saturday, June 23,
2018, to suggest that all Trump voters are to blame for child separations. In
fact, he suggested that voting for Trump is comparable to standing on the
border and ripping children away from their parents.
What has to happen now is this can no longer be about
who Trump is. It has to be about who we are, if we are working towards
November. We can no longer say Trump’s the bad guy. If you vote for Trump,
you’re the bad guy. If you vote for Trump, you are ripping children from
parents’ arms. The mistake that we’ve made in the past, is “Look at that bad
guy over there. Look at that bad guy.”
What the Democrats have to do is make the next
election a referendum on not who Trump is, but who you are. That’s the big
difference. You can no longer now as a voter — because it’s not about taxes,
it’s not even about some abstract term of immigration or nationalism; if you
vote for Trump then you, the voter, you, not Donald Trump, are standing at the
border, like Nazis, going “You here, you here.”
And I think we now have to flip it and its a given,
the evilness of Donald Trump. But if you vote, you can no longer separate
yourself. You can’t say, well he’s okay, but — and I think that gymnastics and
I think that jiu-jitsu has to happen. (Deutsch)
The desperation to retain voters and discredit
the truth is boiling over to dangerous levels and if it is not tamed by a
respect for humanity, could very well result in someone getting hurt.
No comments:
Post a Comment