America
is on the edge and tensions are rising. Impeachment, Russian collusion,
red-flag laws, gun control, illegal immigration, constant accusations of racism,
transgenderism and finally, the rising debt are all lending to the perfect
storm where absolute chaos will enable the globalists to enact the control they
have been pursuing for over a century. Most Americans have no idea where to
stand on many of these issues as they live their lives in an innocent, albeit
ignorant bliss. The rest of us follow along believing that the nation is made up
of two rival political factions. One righteously fighting for the American way
and the other made up of communists, hell bent on America’s destruction.
Yuri
Bezmenov was a Soviet propaganda specialist who later defected to the
United States and lived out his life as Thomas Schuman. He
described the deceptive methods of the Soviet Union and their quest for
global communism with a term he called ideological subversion. This is a
process of changing the public’s perception of reality to the point that they
have no idea where to stand on anything.
Ideological
Subversion-An overt...slow
process... to change the perception of reality of every American to such an
extent that despite the abundance of information, no one is able to come to
sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families,
their community and their country. (American
Thinker)
It is safe to say that in some ways we have
reached this point in America. The constant portrayal of opposition to Trump’s
agenda is an example of this insurrectionary methodology. For example, pro-gun
conservatives refuse to question President Trump even though he has openly
supported red-flag laws and enacted an unconstitutional ban on bump stocks. His
supporters are not paying attention to the reality that the new trade agreement
with Mexico will further the goals of establishing a North American Union, or,
the fact that he just signed the new Defense Authorization Bill which still
contains the provisions to detain Americans without charges or trial if they
have been deemed to be enemy combatants. The effective use of propaganda by the
television media, which reinforces the illusion of two parties vehemently
opposing one another is a prime example of ideological subversion.
In the book Perestroika
Deception, Anatoliy Golitsyn, another Soviet propaganda specialist, warns
the west of the Soviets mastery of misinformation and the use of controlled
opposition to transform governments into communist states. He describes the
differences between communist planning and the west’s understanding of
strategy. To the United States, strategy is usually understood in the context
of short-term goals which are immediately achievable. Comparatively speaking,
the communists viewed strategy as “a grand design or general Party line which
governs the Party's actions over a long period and contains one or more special
maneuvers designed to help the Party achieve its ultimate objectives”
(Golitsyn, The Perestroika Deception). One of these party lines and special
maneuvers was creating the illusion that communism had died, and the Soviet
Union had taken on capitalist reforms. In fact, Golitsyn implicitly states that
the purpose was to use this illusion as a weapon against the west. The defeat
of communism, and their willingness to adopt capitalist reforms would cause the
west to lower their guard.
Since then, I have
submitted new memoranda to the CIA and American policymakers in which I
explained Soviet grand strategy and its strategic designs against the West, the
essence of 'perestroika' (the final phase of the strategy), the new use of the
Bloc's political and security potential for introducing new deceptive
controlled 'democratic', 'nationalist' and 'non-Communist' structures in the
Communist countries, and the deployment of the political and security potential
of the renewed 'democratic' regimes for the execution of the strategic design
against the West (Golitsyn, The Perestroika Deception).
What Golitsyn is saying is that communism is alive and well and
the idea that it has been defeated is part of the overall strategy to conquer
the United States. Another grand design involved creating the illusion that
communism stood for peace and equality. The report entitled The
Communist Peace Offensive, which was prepared and released by the House of
Un-American Activities in 1951 highlights this strategy. The goal, and we see
this playing out on our college campuses and in our public schools, was to
portray the United States as the war mongering, oppressive nation and
capitalism as a selfish system driven by greed. Communism was to be presented
as a system that stood for equality, peace, justice and human rights. In the
book The Naked
Communist, a list of forty five goals was presented. These goals were to present
the founding fathers as selfish aristocrats and discredit the U.S. constitution
on the grounds that it hampers cooperation between nations. Even mocking this
knowledge as a conspiracy could be described as part of this overall strategy.
Why does any of this matter? American’s are overwhelmed in their
own country and have no idea where to turn. Everything is being used against us
and the stage is being set to implement the final stages of transforming the
nation into a full-blown communist state. Our colleges and universities, right
under our very noses and with little to no opposition, are indoctrinating our
children into communist ideology. If communism had been defeated how could this
be happening? By implementing the strategies described in this article, and the
only way people will be able to come to terms with it is to accept it as truth
and discard the notion that it is a discredited conspiracy theory.
The grand strategy was deception and American’s were deceived by
one of their favorite conservative presidents and the notion that he
economically defeated communism. Ronald Reagan will long be remembered for
bringing down the Berlin Wall and stopping communist expansion. Golitsyn even predicted
the Soviets would take the necessary step of tearing down the wall as a means
of deceiving the west. Possibly being deceived himself, believing that the
result would be a more peaceful world free from a fear of nuclear war, Ronald Reagan
signed the Exchanges and cooperation in Scientific,
Technical, Educational, Cultural and Other Fields, agreements with the Soviet
Union which gave them influence in our education system.
The agreements call for Cooperation in the field of science and
technology and additional agreements in other specific fields, including the
humanities and social sciences; the facilitation of the exchange by appropriate
organizations of educational and teaching materials, including textbooks,
syllabi and curricula, materials on methodology, samples of teaching instruments
and audiovisual aids, and the exchange of primary and secondary school
textbooks and other teaching materials…the conducting of joint studies on
textbooks between appropriate organizations in the United States and the
Ministry of Education of the U.S.S.R. (Iserbyt,
Soviets in the Classroom)
American’s first reaction to this would be denial. After all,
Reagan was an ardent critic of communism whose patriotic speeches on freedom
and human dignity inspired generations of Americans. Ronald Reagan was also an
actor. A personality that American’s
could relate to. Just as Donald Trump was a reality television star with an enigmatic
personality who can capture the attention of a nation. Whether Reagan was deceived
or signed these agreements knowing what he was doing will likely never be
known. Charlotte Iserbyt, author of The
Deliberate Dumbing Down of America, makes a
compelling case that Reagan had a hand in creating the regional governments
the Soviets sought to create while serving as California’s governor.
Things in America are not as they seem. We have been divided along
so many lines ̶ politics, race, economics, religion and even along our beliefs
of what it means to be free. The illusion being presented to us is one of rival
political factions duking it out for the future of our nation. Does this
represent reality or is this part of a deceptive strategy? President Trump is
loved by his supporters even though many of his actions contradict the things
he has promised. The information provided in this article at least lays out the
possibility that what we are witnessing is the grand strategy of deception
designed to keep Americans locked in their respective ideological boxes. If we
do not at least consider this possibility we will have no way of stopping it if
it is true.
No comments:
Post a Comment