Gay marriage decision: Communist goal realized By David Risselada

While I have written many articles on the topic of the 45 communist goals, it can’t be stressed enough that achieving “marriage equality” for homosexuals was definitely one of them. The Supreme Court’s decision on Friday, June 26 was no surprise to many of us, and in many ways it was used to continue the moral degradation of our society. The Obama Administration, as surely we have all seen by now, took the pleasure of flaunting their victory by posting pictures of the White House lit up with the colors of the homosexual’s rainbow flag. This was a “stick in your face gesture” as they know that the vast majority of Americans disapprove of the homosexual agenda, and there is an agenda. This was also a symbolic gesture in the eyes of the left because they view this as the replacement of the old culture with a new one. It was no coincidence, in my opinion, that this gay marriage decision happened at the same time there was all out war declared on the confederate flag. We are after all, dealing with communists whose entire agenda revolves around breaking down the moral standards by which many of us live our lives. Make no mistake America, this ruling pushes the United States one step further away from liberty, and one step closer to all out communism. Many people have a difficult time understanding this concept; after all, granting protection to homosexuals to marry allegedly embodies the ideals of liberty and justice for all. This is a misguided worldview, what it actually does is open the floodgates to the depravation of humanity, as I will explain in this article. From the 45 communist goals entered in to the congressional record in 1963-

25) Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography,
and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio and TV.

26) Present homosexuality, degeneracy, and promiscuity as "normal,
natural, and healthy."

One of the main goals of communism has always been the destruction of the Judeo Christian worldview. Man will not allow himself to become subservient to an all powerful state as long as he believes in, and follows the laws of God. The Bible commands us to follow Gods law and not the ways of men, so in order to enslave the mind, belief in God must be discredited. The communists themselves don’t care about marriage equality; the issue is used as a means of demoralizing society. In fact; it is not at all uncommon for communist regimes to brutally oppress homosexuals, if not outright murder them. Many people find themselves wondering why the left is silent as Islamonazi’s continue to throw gays from rooftops, and burn them alive. It would seem that any organization truly dedicated to gay rights would acknowledge these atrocities while pointing out the safety most homosexuals enjoy in the United States. The goal, as mentioned previously, is not to give gay people equal rights, but to demoralize society in order to make us susceptible to an all out communist takeover. In order to do this, religion must be destroyed.

This was admitted by one of the leaders of the gay rights movement. Homosexual activist and journalist Masha Gessen admitted in a radio interview that the goal is to destroy the institution of marriage, nor become a part of it. She admits that the whole argument being made to push their agenda for equality is a lie, and what they truly seek to do is destroy traditional societal values.

Here is what she recently said on a radio interview: 

“It’s a no-brainer that (homosexual activists) should have the right to marry, but I also think equally that it’s a no-brainer that the institution of marriage should not exist. …(F)ighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there — because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie. 

The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change. And again, I don’t think it should exist. And I don’t like taking part in creating fictions about my life. That’s sort of not what I had in mind when I came out thirty years ago.”  Illinois Family Institute

Again, this is a concept many people have a difficult time understanding. The goal is to completely remake society in the image of communism. Sadly, these homosexual activists fail to realize that they are no more than “psychopolitical dupes,” or useful idiots being used to push an agenda that in the end will strip them of all humanity as well.

To understand this further we need to once again, refer to the Soviet Manual on Pyschopolitics. The whole communist agenda can be best summed up saying that they are attempting to label America as a sick society in need of mental healing. For centuries, men looked to the clergy in order to solve problems of the mind and spirit. Communists despise this because they want to rule over man, and as mentioned previously, men who follow Gods laws cannot be ruled by men. Consider this quote from page 60 of the Soviet manual.

“You must work until religion is synonymous with insanity. You must work until the officials of the city, county and state governments will not think twice before they pounce upon religious groups as public enemies.”

The attack on Christianity is in full swing in almost all aspects of our culture. The homosexuals are being used in an effort to label Christians as being bigoted and homophobic while simultaneously tearing at the moral fabric of our society. Unfortunately, as many of us are well aware, the gay marriage issue is just the beginning and it is the symbolic “slippery slope” leading to the unimaginable. In my book, “Not On My Watch: Exposing the Marxist Agenda in Education,” I included some text from a research paper I did while in the Masters of social work program at the University of Oklahoma. The social work agenda is big on gay rights, and in social work education the issue of heterosexual privilege is synonymous with white privilege. Heterosexual privilege is defined as-

Benefits derived automatically by being (or being perceived as) heterosexual that are denied to gays, lesbians, bisexuals, queers and all other non-heterosexual sexual orientations.

To be against homosexuality is now viewed as a bigoted position. Those who enjoy the benefits of marriage are now considered the oppressors of those who are allegedly being denied these privileges. This spans well beyond the scope of just gay marriage as the issue of pedophilia is making its way into the main stream. If you remember, not too long ago Rutgers-Camden professor Margo Kaplan declared that pedophilia is not a crime, rather a condition one might be born with. This is how the argument was made that homosexuality might in fact be normal. She also declare that pedophilia should be considered a human right because people who identify as having sexual orientations towards young children are often marginalized because they have to keep these orientations to themselves.  Many people have warned that the issue of gay marriage would open a floodgate; well that floodgate is indeed open.  The efforts are well underway to repeal the age of consent laws, as was the topic of my research paper, and to redefine the term pedophile with the term “minor attracted person.” The overall goal here is to normalize sex with children. In fact, in 1998 the American Psychological Association issued a report claiming that child sexual abuse was not as harmful to children as previously believed. Also, they went on to suggest that sexual relationships between men and young boys could actually develop into strong caring relationships. Furthermore, they suggested that harmful effects from sexual abuse would only result if the child was forced into having sex with an adult, not if the child chose freely to do so. This is sick beyond comprehension; however it serves as further proof of a communist agenda. Once again we need to refer to this quote from the Soviet Manual, page 62.

“Technical papers should exist as to the tremendous number of cures effected by psychiatry and psychology, and whenever possible, percentages of cures, no matter how fictitious, should be worked into legislative papers, thus forming a back ground of evidence which would immediately rebut any effort to actually discover anyone who had ever been helped by psychiatry or psychology.”

What this quote is essentially admitting is that communists lie. They have subverted every aspect of our culture and submit false evidence that attempts to discredit the Judea Christian worldview and turn the minds of men towards communistic solutions, through the social sciences. Issues that can be disguised as human right struggles are being used to actually denigrate society in an effort to demoralize the nation, making us ripe for conquering. Homosexual rights, the black lives matter campaign, racism, feminism and wealth inequality are all being used in this manner, and the activists pushing these issues are nothing but the proverbial “useful idiots” of our time. If we do not reverse course now we will certainly follow the same path as other communist countries before us. Once men have become completely demoralized they no longer have a leg on which to stand to defend their nation.

Liberals fear the gun because liberals fear themselves By David Risselada

Joseph Goebbels believed that if a lie could be told often enough, the public could be brought to believe it. In his mind, the bigger and more outrageous the lie the better, because it would be easier to discredit those who would call it out for being untrue. Today, we are certainly being forced to live under the pretense of outrageous fabrications, and the consequences of such vagrant falsehoods will surely show their ugly heads. One of these deliberate distortions of truth is the notion that gun free zones keep us safe, and if everyone would just do the compassionate thing and turn in their guns, there would be no more violence. That in and of itself is such an obvious misrepresentation of what we know about gun violence; however, it’s one of many misperceptions of reality that are all intertwined with one another, further complicating the situation. To get to the real heart of the problem you have to understand the liberal world view.

Too often, we as conservatives allow ourselves to get dragged into the gun debate by responding to contemptible accusations. Liberals tend to be very emotional, and as a result they allow the argument to be directed by their alleged empathy as they do little more than blame the gun, and the conservative supposedly holding it. We respond, (and this humbled author is guilty of it too) by citing factual statistics concerning firearm use in self defense situations. We believe that we can reason with a human being pushing an agenda, while also in a heightened, fanatical state. We understand that the typical liberal believes that more gun control will solve the problem. On the other hand, what we fail to comprehend is the root of their belief system which drives them to act in the irrational manner in which they do. This belief system incidentally, is also one of the big lies permeating our society, and affecting the way we live our lives. This belief system is humanism, or atheism.

While it would be unfair to characterize all liberals as being humanist, let’s not forget that it was the Democrat Party that booed God at the Democratic national convention.  The humanist belief defies the notion of God, and operates on the premise of moral relativism. They essentially believe that they can define their own morality and be the determiners of all that is right and wrong, if they believe in right and wrong at all. The humanist belief also traces back to the theory of evolution, which is the basis for communist ideology. Without God as a creator, man becomes no more than an accident, and no more significant than any other animal which operates purely on instinct. They don’t believe in the same values as we do, meaning that the ideas of individual liberty, personal responsibility, and self governance are abstract concepts. Truthfully, it would be safe to say that liberals believe man is incapable of reaching such heights and is in need of constant controls against his every action.

What all of this boils down is simple. Liberals, in all of their fanatical reactions to the mere mention of the word gun, don’t really fear the gun itself; they fear their own lack of self control. Their Darwinist worldview explains their rationale on every social issue currently up for debate. Liberals simply do not believe that the average man is capable of making the correct decisions, or acting in the interest of anything but their own selfish ends. What this truly is however; is self projection.  They have allowed themselves to be beaten down by the humanist worldview, they have allowed themselves to be inundated with manipulative rhetoric and feelings of inadequacy, that the hate they feel burning through their veins towards conservatives, is actually hatred they feel for themselves. There is no better way to explain this concept than through a series of articles I wrote called “Critical Projection Theory.” I explained this concept by relating to the way that the typical liberal Democrat treats black Americans. In the minds of the depraved left, black Americans are incapable of anything without their help. This mentality resulted from the historical fact that it was the Democrat party that was responsible for the oppression black Americans faced from the slavery era, the KKK, Jim Crow segregation laws, and now degradation of the family and complete government dependency. They project these failures onto us in an effort to draw attention away from reality. This is probably the biggest lie preventing America from uniting as one nation against the encroaching tyranny we all face.

Many people understand this to be the truth. What we don’t have however; is an army of people out there repeating it often enough to sink into the rest of society. Liberals are repeating one lie after another with the belief that if they tell it enough people will believe it. The only reason this tactic works is because too many conservatives, and it doesn’t help when we have cowards for Republican politicians, sit on the sidelines and await the one person who can articulate what needs to be said, in just the perfect way. This isn’t what we need. We need people that will come together and work to discredit the lies that are destroying our society. We need people that will work to make the truth drown out the lie. All too often people resort to the belief that in the end good will win, and truth will prevail. This is true, it can. It won’t however if the majority of us are sitting out the fight and letting others fight it for us.  Come on America; let’s repeat the truth so much that it becomes the truth again.

To learn more about the psychopolitical agenda and communist indoctrination check out my book “Not on my watch: Exposing the Marxist agenda in education.”

Blood in gun free zones falls on the hands of anti gun politicians By David Risselada

When an event like the one in Charleston South Carolina occurs, it’s hard to know exactly what to say. Before anybody gets a chance to do any serious inquiry the left has already gone into full blown reactionary mode, making it difficult to get others to see the facts. While the usual talking heads go on and on blaming guns and conservatives, with the help of television media no less, actual statistics and facts that may be useful are relegated to the sidelines where millions may be able to see them, but they matter little nonetheless. We have very little control over this narrative, and we all see exactly where this is going; the furthering of the gun control agenda.  We all knew this was coming, we could feel it in our bones. The consequences of moral relativism and a President intent on pushing a false social justice agenda have reached its culmination, and it’s only going to get worse.

It’s tragic when a life is lost to senseless violence. It is even more tragic when that life could have been saved by exercising common sense. Once again, innocent lives weren’t lost because a criminal got his hands on a gun; lives were lost because innocent law abiding citizens were prohibited from exercising their natural rights to self defense. In other words, the church was a “gun free zone.” South Carolina law, Title 23, Chapter 31 prohibits the carrying of lawfully concealed firearms in churches, and as a consequence, a mad gunman took advantage of helpless victims.

The following is the list of prohibited places a person may carry a concealed firearm.

(M) A permit issued pursuant to this section does not authorize a permit holder to carry a concealable weapon into a:
(1) law enforcement, correctional, or detention facility;

(2) courthouse or courtroom;

(3) polling place on election days;

(4) office of or the business meeting of the governing body of a county, public school district, municipality, or special purpose district;

(5) school or college athletic event not related to firearms;

(6) daycare facility or preschool facility;

(7) place where the carrying of firearms is prohibited by federal law;

(8) church or other established religious sanctuary unless express permission is given by the appropriate church official or governing body;

(9) hospital, medical clinic, doctor’s office, or any other facility where medical services or procedures are performed unless expressly authorized by the employer; or

Did you notice that line 8 explicitly states that permission may be granted by the appropriate church official?

It’s too bad that our culture has been inundated with such a vile, anti gun attitude; nine lives could have been saved if someone in that church had a gun. It’s not as if South Carolina hasn’t seen this before. In Spartanburg, a man with a concealed carry permit stopped a shooter at his church when a man busted down the door with a shot gun. No one was injured in this situation as the concealed carry permit holder was able to subdue the suspect at gun point until police arrived. Another incident in Colorado Springs proves that guns can save lives when a volunteer security guard put herself between an active shooter and his victims, and shot him with her duty weapon. She was a former law enforcement officer but the fact remains that it was a good guy (or woman) with a gun that stopped a bad guy with a gun.

Sadly, this loss of innocent life in Charleston is the fault of anti gun politicians who foolishly believe limiting people’s ability to defend themselves is the way to prevent crime. According to the current law, it was illegal for a man to bring a gun into the church. That law didn’t stop the shooter. It is unlawful to carry a firearm with the intent of using it against another human being, according to South Carolina law. That law didn’t stop him. It has been revealed that the shooter was taking psychotropic drugs. People who have been deemed “mentally ill” are already prohibited from owning firearms.  That law didn’t stop him. The only thing that would have stopped that man is another gun, plain and simple.

The South Carolina legislature had the opportunity to right this wrong as H. 3025 would have repealed the prohibition against concealed carrying in churches. Unfortunately, this bill did not pass, leaving the church goers, and others who dare to venture into gun free zones completely helpless. This, in the opinion of this humble writer, leaves the blood of these victims squarely on the hands of those who refuse to exercise sound logic and instead, argue with pure emotion. In many ways this proves beyond a reasonable doubt that there is an agenda to strip us of our responsibility to protect our loved ones because reasonable men would see the fallacy in the “gun free zone” argument. Reasonable men would see that no matter how many laws are passed with the intention of stopping violence, the only people inclined to follow these laws are “law abiding citizens.” Too many times facts and honest statistics are tossed aside in an effort to pass “feel good legislation” that does little more than give the appearance that law makers are trying to do something. This type or reckless lawmaking needs to stop. The only thing these politicians are doing is convincing their constituents that they are more concerned with accomplishing an agenda than they are with stopping violent crime.

To learn more about the gun control agenda and communist indoctrination check out my book“Not on my watch: Exposing the Marxist agenda in education.”

Republican Support for Trans Pacific Partnership Treaty Shows Their True Colors By David Risselada

Congressional Republicans really showed their true colors this past Friday. Even though the bill did not pass, 191 house GOP members sided with President Obama and voted to grant him fast track authority over the Trans Pacific Partnership Treaty. As you may well know, this fast track authority would have given the president the power to negotiate any trade deal with any nation, without congressional approval of any kind.  This is a scary proposal as for weeks we have heard report after report of congressmen having to be escorted into the basement of the capital building just to view the bill. Even though many have not read it, they still supported it because of its alleged “free trade” proponents. The most disappointing aspect of Friday’s vote is knowing it was Nancy Pelosi, who will always be remembered as saying “we have to pass it to see what’s in it” when it came to Obama care, is the one who ultimately killed the bill. It is highly likely that Pelosi’s actions are motivated by the fact that the unions were strongly opposed to this trade agreement. Whatever the case may be, the Republicans support for this trade authority proves beyond a reasonable doubt that there are very few in Washington who are truly working for the American people and that most support the money powers, even the President.

President Obama easily won the 2008 presidential election because many Americans saw the actions of the Republican Party being motivated by “corporate greed.” Liberals have accused the conservatives of caring about nothing but profits and corporate power.  This tactic endured throughout the duration of Obama’s presidency and was successful in bringing the Republican Party into alignment with many of the Presidents goals.  The support for fast track authority and the Trans Pacific Partnership Treaty not only proved the liberals making these accusations were right; it also brings into question the true motivations and loyalties of President Obama. While many liberals have fallen for the false notion that Obama is about protecting the poor and middle class, his actions have consistently proven otherwise.  President Obama has proven over and over again that he is a stooge for big corporate power and that his policies actually do more to redistribute wealth from the poor and middle class to the wealthy elite he conditions you to hate. The best example is how he enabled Jeffrey Immelt, president of G.E, to pay no taxes and ship jobs overseas while serving as his “jobs czar.” This action alone should have shown the liberals who Obama really is. While the Republican establishment may support this kind of corporate greed, real conservatives certainly don’t. Unfortunately, the Republican Party is stacked with those that pose as conservatives and support this type of corporate power under the guise that it grows the economy.

Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz are two Republican Presidential contenders who were in favor of granting fast track authority to Obama. As I mentioned in my article “The Application of Social Science through a Ted Cruz Presidential Run,” Ted Cruz’s wife is an executive at Goldman Sachs, who would obviously have a big interest in seeing this trade agreement finalized. Rubio and others support the bill because it expands on the nation’s H1-B visa program. This program allows companies to bring in foreign workers who have degrees in high tech fields and hire them on a temporary basis. This actually displaces American workers as those motivated by higher profits are firing current employees and hiring foreigners, mostly from India, to do the work at less than half the cost. Even Disney is in on the action. Does this sound like something that a politician who has America’s best interest at heart would support?

The Guardian.com released a damning report citing the amount of money U.S. senators received to support the Fast Track Authority and Trans Pacific Partnership Treaty. According to the report, a total of $1,148,971 was given to the senate. Of that amount, the average senator that voted yea to support the bill received $17,676.48. Breaking it down further, the average Republican, that includes Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, were paid a total of $19,673.00 while Democrats only received $9,689.00. Well, at least Republicans held out as long as they could.

As it stands right now there are a whopping 92, 898,000 Americans who are not participating in the labor force. This is the highest number in over 37 years according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In the seven years since Obama took office over 12 million American workers have left the work force and that number continues to grow despite the claims that the economy is improving.  According to the Center of Immigration Studies the number of jobs held by immigrants whether legal or illegal has increased since 2007, while the number of jobs held by American citizens since that time has actually decreased. This essentially means that much of the job growth in the United States has gone to immigrants while American workers continue to drop from the labor force. From The Center of Immigration Studies-

The BLS reports that 23.1 million adult (16-plus) immigrants (legal and illegal) were working in November 2007 and 25.1 million were working in November of this year — a two million increase. For natives, 124.01 million were working in November 2007 compared to 122.56 million in November 2014 — a 1.46 million decrease. 

Although all of the employment growth has gone to immigrants, natives accounted for 69 percent of the growth in the 16 and older population from 2007 to 2014. 

The number of immigrants working returned to pre-recession levels by the middle of 2012, and has continued to climb. But the number of natives working remains almost 1.5 million below the November 2007 level. 

More recently, natives have done somewhat better. However, even with job growth in the last two years (November 2012 to November 2014), 45 percent of employment growth has gone to immigrants, though they comprise only 17 percent of the labor force. 

America does not this treaty. It is due time to put American workers first and stop these insane policies that enable corporations to seek the cheapest labor possible. There is a point where it is no longer excusable to claim the cost of paying labor is “too expensive” and that point is when you sell out your own country in order to fatten your own wallet.

For those Americans who find themselves enamored with false conservatives like Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, it is time to do some real soul searching. They are the establishment that is selling out your children’s future with their support for big corporate policies. In fact, it is safe to say the vast majority of people sitting in the halls of the people’s government are voting for their own interest, not yours. This vote for fast track authority and the Trans Pacific Partnership Treaty proves that. Forty four house Republicans voted against the trade vote on Friday, of which I am proud to say my representative, Congressman Jim Bridenstein is one of them, and for that he deserves a thank you from his constituents, as do all of those that voted no. It is a safe bet that this fight is not over. There is little chance, seeing the amount of money that was paid to the senate, that the big corporate players will just let this fall to the wayside. Watch closely America and don’t let them get away with selling out your children’s future so big corporations can profit a few extra dollars.

Be sure to check out my new book “Not on my watch: Exposing the Marxist agenda in education.”

Republicans used as psychopolitical dupes........The Radical Conservative

Mitch McConnell recently announced that there would be no senate hearings concerning Barack Obama's upcoming supreme court nomination. Americans are on their knees praying that he sticks to his guns and follows through with this promise. For months leading to the 2014 elections, we listened to aspiring politicians spout their love of America while espousing their loyalty to the constitution, only to see them reverse their position immediately after being elected. This has left many Conservatives feeling completely hopeless and ready to leave the Republican Party in search of much needed leadership.  What many people fail to realize is that the nation has been “marked for conquest” by the Communists, and that the Republican Party is under the full influence of those skilled in the Russian art of Pyschopolitics. The practice of ridicule, blackmail and bribery are in full swing in Washington D.C., and it’s a safe bet that many key players in the Republican Party are being manipulated in some way, shape or form. Consider the following quote-

“There is the creation of a state of mind in the individual, by actually placing him under duress, and then furnishing him with false evidence to demonstrate that the target of his previous loyalties is itself, the course of the duress. Another portion of this same method consists of defaming or degrading the individual whose loyalties are to be changed to the target of his loyalties, i.e. superiors or government, to such a degree that this target, at length, actually does hold the individual in disrepute, and so does rebuff him and serve to convince him that his loyalties have been misplaced.”  Anton Berea “Brainwashing- A Synthesis on the Russian Textbook of Pyschopolitics.”

This paragraph sums it up nicely. Essentially, it can be described like this. We all know that the Republicans have become deathly afraid of going against the welfare state, or appearing to be “uncompassionate.” This is the same idea as rule number five from  Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals.

Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also, it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage.

 The left has been so successful in discrediting anything that has to do with conservatism that the Republicans are afraid of standing on their principles out of a fear they will be labeled or racist. Their loyalties have been changed using the tactics listed above to the point that they may actually believe their previous loyalties to liberty and the Constitution were causing them more stress. Just as our young college students are being indoctrinated in the tenants of communism, so too are our politicians expected to demonstrate complete loyalty to the communist state. For decades now, people have been thoroughly brainwashed into the idea that communist ideals are best suited to serve the needs of the masses. So all that is necessary to bring a dissenter’s loyalty into alignment with communist goals is to discredit his compassion for the weakest members of his society to the point where he is publicly humiliated and thoroughly discredited.

Another point to consider is the possibility that many politicians are being blackmailed. Last year, we witnessed former speaker of the House Dennis Hastert (R) attempt to pay off a blackmailer because he stood accused of engaging in sexual activity with young boys as a wrestling coach. The question many commentators are asking is how a person with this kind of track record could get elected to congress in the first place. We may have to consider the possibility that people with skeletons in the closet are deliberately put into positions of power in order to maintain control over them in pursuit of communist goals. Consider the following quote-

Recruitment into the ranks of mental healing can best be done by carefully bringing to it only those healing students, who are, to some slight degree, already depraved, or who have been treated by psychopolitical operatives. Anton Berea “Brainwashing- A Synthesis on the Russian Textbook of Pyschopolitics.”

 This means exactly what it says. Psychopolitical operatives working within the U.S. government are actively seeking those who have been corrupted in some manner so they can control them. This seems to be the only logical explanation as to why so many Republicans are willing to just go along without a fight; because they have something to hide.

The promise of unlimited sexual opportunities, the promise of complete dominion over the bodies and minds of helpless patients, the promise of complete lawlessness without detection, can thus attract to mental healing, many desirable recruits who will willingly fall in line with psychopolitical activities. Anton Berea “Brainwashing- A Synthesis on the Russian Textbook of Pyschopolitics.”

 The term “mental healing,” when used within the frame work of these quotes actually refers to the arts of psychology and psychiatry. The pyschopolitical agenda is one where the arts of mental healing are used to guide a person’s values to the left. Psychologists and psychiatrists are considered skilled facilitators and work to keep people from turning to spiritual means to heal their so called mental sickness. When it comes to government you could look at it in almost the same way. The mainstream narrative attempts to portray America as a nation plagued with problems, a sick nation if you will. People are being conditioned, through the communist agenda in schools, to see government as a savior to these problems. Psychopolitical dupes, or Lenin’s useful idiots in other words, are being used to give the impression that moving towards the left, or compromising your values is the enlightened thing to do, thus healing a sick nation. Many of these politicians, McConnell, Ryan and others that show more loyalty to the left than their own constituents, were likely put in power because they have something in their past that the pyschopolitical operatives are holding over their heads. Maybe it’s sexual in nature, as was the case with Dennis Hastert, or perhaps they are afraid people will see just how involved they are in creating the current mess in the middle east.  Whatever the case may be, it’s obvious that there are darker hands pushing the actions of key players in government, and the art of pyschopolitics is driving the agenda.

To learn more about the psychopolitical agenda and communist indoctrination, check out my book “Not on my watch: Exposing the Marxist agenda in education.”

Patriot Update's David Goetsch reviews "Not on my Watch: Exposing the Marxist Agenda in Education "

I have reviewed many books over the course of my career. Nevertheless, it is a special treat to review the new book by Patriot Update author David Risselada. NOT ON MY WATCH! Exposing the Marxist Agenda in Education is an outstanding book written by an outstanding author. David is a patriot who served our country as a Marine and a soldier. He is also a scholar and an accomplished author. But what makes his new book especially credible is that David is a warrior in the cultural battle that has been raging in education since the 1960s and still rages to this day. Consequently, David’s description of the Marxist agenda in education is the first-hand account of a warrior who has fought against the pernicious forces of radical liberalism that have infected education for decades and—like all real warriors—he has the scars to prove it. If doing battle with mushy-headed Marxist professors resulted in combat decorations, David would wear the Medal of Honor.

David begins his narrative with these words: “Our country has changed; we are no longer the bastion of freedom we once were. Somewhere along the line our beloved nation has taken a hard turn left and we have been steadily driving down a road toward totalitarianism. The general public seems to be completely oblivious to it, and those who have noticed are struggling to get others to wake up.” In just one paragraph, David summarized two of the biggest problems facing America: 1) the unrelenting onslaught of Marxism, and 2) the apathy of those whose freedom is being undermined by the Marxist agenda.

Fighting back against the first of these problems and trying to overcome the second are high on the list of David’s priorities (as well as mine and the owners of Patriot Update). With his new book David has taken a major step forward in the war against creeping Marxism while at the same time equipping those who should be engaged in it with the information they need to join the battle. For example, the book begins with the Constitution, a document David and I both swore to defend when we joined the United States Marine Corps. To Marxists, the Constitution is anathema. It represents the biggest impediment to their pernicious agenda and the most effective weapon freedom loving Americans have for thwarting that agenda. But in order to defend the Constitution—and in turn the liberty encoded in it—freedom loving Americans must know what is in it; what it says and what it doesn’t say.

NOT ON MY WATCH! Provides readers with a full and accurate account of such issues as how the left has used education to demoralize America; how the myth of white privilege has been perpetuated by mushy-headed liberals; the nefarious teachings of Saul Alinsky, Richard Cloward, and Frances Piven; the truth about the Occupy Wall Street movement; and the left’s psycho-political agenda to name just a few. David also summarizes the goals of the communist party; many of which have already been achieved right here in America. Thankfully David goes beyond just exposing the problem, he also explains in clear terms how freedom loving Americans can fight back.

Consider the final paragraph of the book: “Everything that we are experiencing in America is an all-out assault on the free will of mankind. Free will is a gift given to us by God; without it we will lose connection to him. Remember, one of Karl Marx’s stated goals in the Communist Manifesto was the destruction of God in the minds of men. What we are engaged in is a spiritual war for the heart and soul of man, my friends. If this generation doesn’t stand to take our nation back, it is highly unlikely the proceding generations will be able to.” This paragraph is a powerful call to action. David’s book is the battle plan. I recommend that you read it, suggest it to other freedom loving Americans, share it with your children, and then take your place among those of us who are determined to fight for what is right and good in America. The book is available at: www.createspace.com. Also, watch for David Risselada’s columns that appear regularly at Patriot Update.

Read more at http://patriotupdate.com/articles/not-on-my-watch-a-must-read-for-conservatives/

Senator Inhofe's (R-OK) response to TPP fast track authority

Dear Mr. Risselada:

Thank you for your correspondence regarding Trade Promotion Authority (TPA).  As your Senator, I appreciate knowing your views. 

The purpose of granting TPA to a President is to make it more efficient for him to negotiate agreements with U.S. trading partners.  TPA does this by establishing expedited procedures under which negotiated trade agreements are considered in Congress.  In essence, the legislation offers trading partners the assurance that the agreements, once submitted to Congress, will receive an up or down vote without amendment.  President Bush received TPA in 2002 in response to the growing number of trade agreements that were being negotiated.  This authority expired on July 1, 2007.  

It is important to note that TPA does not remove Congress’ ability to influence the outcome of trade agreements.  In fact, it enhances Congress’ role in the negotiating process. TPA procedures require that the President notify Congress at least 90 calendar days of his intent to sign an agreement.  This gives Congress the opportunity to review and provide input before it is signed. Once the agreement is signed and sent to Congress, Congress has 90 days to pass or reject the bill. 

On July 31, 2013, President Obama asked Congress to reauthorize TPA because current trade negotiations are in progress on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). He restated his request for TPA in his January 20, 2015, State of the Union address. Legislation to renew TPA (H.R. 3830/S. 1900) was introduced in the 113th Congress, but it was not acted upon. However, on April 16, 2015, Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, and Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR), the Ranking Member, introduced new TPA legislation – the “Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015.” On April 22, the Senate Finance Committee voted 20–6 to advance the bill to the full Senate. After five days of debate on TPA, the Senate passed the measure, with my support, by a vote of 62 to 37on May 22, 2015. 

Through Trade Promotion Authority, Congress sets out specific trade negotiating objectives that must be met before a trade bill can be brought to Congress for approval.  This holds the Administration to greater accountability and transparency standards when negotiating the agreements than would otherwise be required. Should an Administration fail to meet Congressional trade objectives or fail to inform Congress on the progress of negotiations, there are legislative mechanisms in place for Congress to withdraw the use of fast track authority.  Furthermore, TPA stipulates that any changes made to a trade agreement after it is enacted will require Congressional approval. TPA also mandates that trade agreements cannot change or override U.S. laws or regulations, including those related to immigration.  By including this provision, the Senate is effectively preventing back door amnesty from being a part of any trade agreement. 

The potential benefits of the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership currently being negotiated are difficult to understate.  If modeled after the free trade agreements with Korea, Panama, and Colombia, they could expand market opportunities for our farmers, manufacturers, and energy exporters across the Pacific Rim and Europe. Oklahoma already exports $1.9 billion in wheat, beef, pork, and other agriculture products per year and is among the top five natural gas producing States.  This six-year TPA reauthorization will give the U.S. a strong voice in these trade deals, providing more opportunities for the development of our natural gas resources while maintaining our strong agricultural heritage. Every trade agreement must be evaluated on its merits, but I am hopeful TPA’s passage ushers in new economic opportunities for the United States.

Again, thank you for your comments on this issue. If you are interested in keeping up with my work in the Senate, I invite you to sign up for my newsletter by visiting http://www.inhofe.senate.gov/newsletter/sign-up. Please do not hesitate to contact me again should you have additional concerns. 

Sincerely,

James M. Inhofe
United States Senator

Trapped in a false narrative about free speech by David Risselada

Over the course of the past few months we have seen the concepts of free speech pushed to its ultimate limits, if there are indeed any limits at all. The left has been using the issue of free speech as a means of trying to silence speech all together, as they portray certain speech as hate speech, or offensive speech. This traps us in the lefts narrative as the whole subject then revolves around whether or not we have the right to offend others who may hold a different point of view. Conservatives argue that people don’t have a right to be protected from offensive language, and the first amendment is meant explicitly to protect offensive speech. They argue that non-offensive speech doesn’t need to be protected.  The problem with this position is twofold. First, it keeps us trapped in the left wing narrative, focusing only on the issue of offending people; and second, the real purpose of the first amendment and its free speech provision becomes lost amongst the sea of senseless left wing drivel.

The most recent examples to which I am referring are of course the draw Muhammad cartoon contests. The left would have us believe that the contest was so offensive that it drove two Muslim terrorists to drive from Phoenix to Texas to commit mass murder. Somehow, the act of drawing a cartoon is deemed more offensive than the act of committing murder in response. Never mind the fact that such a callous disregard for our culture and the freedom we have is extremely offensive; we are supposed to feel shame for exercising our right to free speech. Somehow, no one is offended when Muslims cut off people’s heads, or claim that the lives of Christians and Jews have no value, and their property can be taken because they are unbelievers. The very fact that the left could hide behind such fallacious arguments is a testament to the fact that we are failing to gain control of the narrative and define the first amendment in its proper perspective. When we begin arguing about people taking offense, or the consequences of free speech, or whether or not such events should be allowed we are aiding the left in the dismantling of the very right we think we are defending.

We live in a free society, that’s true. Unfortunately freedom has been radically redefined over the past century. There has been a deliberate attempt by the left to corrupt our culture, discredit our constitution and make freedom seem like a bad thing. (See the 45 goals of the Communist Party.) Thanks to moral relativism, (which I defined in my book “Not on My Watch”) people have increasingly been brought up to believe that they can do whatever they want without consequence because we live in a free society. Patriots know that our constitution was written for a virtuous people; after all, with freedom comes responsibility. Therein lies the point, by focusing our attention on nonsense revolving around first amendment arguments, we are being conditioned to believe the first amendment means something other than what it was intended to do. The first amendment wasn’t written so you could say whatever you wanted whenever you wanted. We all know if we scream fire in a movie theatre we will face consequences. It was written for the explicit purpose of protecting speech that seeks truth. From the Heritage Guide to the Constitution pp 314-

The free speech /press guarantee extends not just to political speech, but also to speech about religion, science, morality, social conditions, and daily life as well as arts and entertainment.

Notice that arts and entertainment were mentioned as almost an afterthought. You could hardly deny the right to free expression in such areas when the basic right of seeking truth is held in such high regard. What has happened in our culture over the past sixty years is the perversion of this basic right, which has most definitely led us down the road to losing touch with its intended purpose. Consider goal number 24 of the 45 goals of the Communist Party.

Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them censorship, and a violation of free speech and free press.

This is a perfect example of how the left has used one of our basic rights against us, to the point where now they act as if something needs to be done to reign in the alleged problems caused by free speech. The draw Muhammad cartoon contest demonstrated this perfectly as the left argues that free speech should have limits because it can be offensive.

The argument that people don’t have a right to offend other people is as fallacious as they come. The very purpose of the first amendment is to let ideas compete against one another in pursuit of truth. In order for this to occur some of the most offensive speech must be just as protected as non offensive speech, otherwise there is nothing to compare it to, and ideas are not competing. From the Heritage Guide to the Constitution pp 314-

Under the first amendment there is no such thing as a false idea. However pernicious an opinion may seem, we depend for its correction not on the conscience of judges and juries, but on the competition of other ideas.

What this means is that truth, while sometimes lost in the fog of ideas and propaganda, will eventually find its way if that’s what people truly seek. In order for this happen you not only have to recognize the lie, you have to have a virtuous society which will uphold the truth once it is found. You can’t do this if you have forgotten that it is your responsibility to uphold society’s values.  We are witnessing our civil liberties erode at a rapid pace; this includes our ability to stand for truth. We blame Democrats and we blame Republicans, but we forgot that this is a government of, for and by the people. This means that we are to hold these representatives accountable, and the means we have available to do that is the first amendment. Just as sure as the second amendment was written to defend against foreign invasions and government tyranny, the first was written to hold government accountable, period. We are allowing the left to redefine the terms of the first amendment and by doing so we are surrendering its true meaning. How can a government of, for and by the people have any effect without the first amendment?

If you enjoyed this article check out my book detailing my true, personal experience being educated by the radical left and how it correlated with America’s fundamental transformation.