It’s
not paranoia if they are really out to get you......
It
never ceases to amaze me how so many people can be led to the lion’s den based
on pure emotion alone. It’s as if we are watching our society give up their God
given right to life and their ability to defend it, all because someone lied
and told them a gun free zone would make them safe. Believing in a God given
right, or rather responsibility, to defend your life requires a belief in God,
first and foremost. This is something that is definitely lacking in our society
today. Perhaps this is why our nation appears to be going mad, perhaps
this is why the left is so hell bent on destroying Christianity; without it the
idea of natural rights disappears.
The anti gun left would have you believe that
rendering yourself helpless and relying on police, who prove over and over
again to be unable to prevent murder, is the solution to so called gun
violence. In a world where every day, we see another madman, probably
doped on psychotropic drugs mind you, kill indiscriminately; the left
would have you believe surrendering your weapons is the way to guarantee your
safety. In fact, Shannon Watts, the master mind spokeswoman for Mom's
Demand Action, is on record claiming that a good guy with a gun has never
stopped a bad guy with a gun. She has the ability to look you in the face and
tell this blatant lie in the face of the overwhelming evidence that suggests
otherwise. Just today, a father in a St. Louis
neighborhood saved
his daughters life as she was being held at gun point in her own front yard.
When seeing what was occurring outside, the father of this young girl grabbed
his hand gun and killed his daughter’s abductors. If Shannon Watts had her way,
this father would be grieving the loss of his daughter and possibly the rest of
his family. Thank God that mom was packing too. This is a scenario that plays
out frequently as firearms in the hands of good guys are used defensively nearly three million times per year.
This begs the question; if the left is so
concerned about saving lives, then why do they seek to pass laws that only
empower criminals and not people who are not inclined to break the law? It
seems reasonable to assume that even law abiding gun owners would like to see
less guns in the hands of criminals; however, if criminals surrendered their
weapons, they wouldn't be criminals, would they? The impression the anti gun
left is really giving is that they don't care about the lives of innocent
people, and they are only capable of acting on emotion and not rational
thought. We all know that gun control isnt about saving lives, if it was the
left would be forced to consider our position seeing as though all these
shootings occur in "gun free zones."
The truth is that Moms Demand Action are just
the proverbial "useful idiots" in an agenda that is much darker. With
all the mass shootings set aside for a moment, our government is desperately
trying to portray anyone who is willing to stand up for our constitutional
rights as a domestic terrorist. Consider this 2009 report released
by the Department of Homeland Security. This report claims that people opposing
the election of America’s first black president, threats of economic downturn,
and the possibility of new gun laws would create new domestic terrorists,
especially among returning veterans finding no opportunity after serving their
country. It’s almost as if they set out to deliberately create the conditions
to provoke a reaction, and then use this bogus data to solidify their position
and influence public opinion. Never mind the fact that nearly all of the mass
shootings have been perpetrated by radical leftists. Never mind the fact that
Eric Holder participated in an armed raid and occupation of Columbia University's Naval ROTC building while a
member of the radical Black Panthers.
How does the Department of Homeland Security
account for the fact that Eric Holder and the rest of the Obama administration
was caught red handed running
weapons into Mexico with the intent of turning public opinion
against the second amendment, and passing new gun laws? CBS news obtained
the documents in 2011 which clearly show the conversations discussing this
objective of the Fast and Furious operation; yet, as of now it’s just another
in a long line of scandals designed to overwhelm you and make you lose
interest. Why is no one in our government asking Eric Holder what he meant when
he said people needed to be brainwashed into looking at
firearms in a
different way? Was Operation Fast and Furious one of the methods implemented to
do this? What about the incident at the Bundy Ranch, the Las Vegas Shooting? It’s
pretty funny how all of these events already have written legislation waiting
to go almost immediately. It’s pretty funny how the Incident at the ranch
seemed to give the government the perfect opportunity to call those who
know their rights, domestic terrorists.
They don't care about saving lives, they don't
care about reducing crime, they care only about increasing their power. The
power they seek is unattainable while we still have a second amendment, but
only if we are willing to defend it. They are using propaganda and lies in a
effort to convince you that they are the solution to all the ills currently
plaguing our nation. They would have you believe that surrendering your rights
is the way to guarantee your safety and that they can provide you with all you
need; yet everything they do is a dismal failure as they can’t even deliver
mail without going broke. There is a reason they seek to disarm law abiding
citizens and it isn't so we can all live in peace. Those jumping on board the calls for more gun control are begging for helplessness in a world gone mad.
No comments:
Post a Comment