Monday, December 22, 2014

The Anti Gun PSA driven by Alinsky Logic……..David Risselada

alinsky picture

By now, most of us have likely seen the new “anti gun” public safety announcement that has been making its way around the internet. While many have a hard time  understanding the idiocy required to make such an ad, the truth is, once you understand the moral base of the left it makes perfect sense. The left has no moral base; in fact, if you understand the Alinsky mindset you would know that that the left believes sacrificing their personal morality in pursuit of “Utopia,” is the ultimate expression of morality. They believe sacrificing their own souls proves just how much they care. This explains alot when you consider the attitude of the ads producer, Regina Sincic. ( She claims that people were too afraid to repost her ad while believing what she did required a great deal of courage. Sorry Reginia, the only thing you did was create the opportunity for hysteria, and aid the communists in turning kids against their parents. Not to mention enabling them to become criminals.
In action one does not always enjoy the luxury of a decision that is consistent both with one’s individual conscience and the good of mankind, the choice must always be for the latter.Action is for mass salvation and not the individuals personal salvation. He who sacrifices the mass good for his personal conscience has a peculiar conception of “personal salvation;” he doesn’t care enough for the people to be corrupted for them.  Saul Alinsky “Rules For Radicals”
The left is so convinced that the answer to solving America’s so called “gun problem” is to disarm the law abiding  citizen who has no inclinations to harm anyone. At least this is what the left’s useful idiots believe anyway. There is a dangerous precedent when it comes to gun control, one that has left 160,000,000 disarmed civilians defenseless against brutal totalitarian regimes. It makes you wonder why this ad depicts a child turning the gun into the teacher. Wasn’t this the same tactic employed by the Nazi’s, tuning kids’ values against their parents?
This seems to be falling right in line with the “anti gun” agenda being carried out in our public schools. In my article “The culture changing PopTart,” I addressed the hysteria and helplessness that is created when schools “over react” to children doing anything that might hint they are playing with toy guns. In the case demonstrated in the article, Josh Welch was suspended for biting a pop tart into the shape of a gun.
The idea is to create a culture of fear when it comes to firearms. Just like Eric Holder said, people need to be brainwashed into thinking differently about guns. By suspending, or in some cases expelling, kids for having toy guns at school, they are attempting to create a fear of firearms. This fear is often times reinforced by panic stricken “intruder on campus drills,” where children are encouraged to hide and await authorities. This ad seems to be the logical follow up to this type of indoctrination.
Nevertheless, this is hardly the first stupid thing the virulent “anti gun” left has come up with in an effort to rid the world of conservatives and their guns. 
This past summer, a man named John Crawford was gunned down by a swat team while shopping at Walmart. Someone had called the police and reported he was openly carrying a firearm in a threatening manner. Unfortunately, John Crawford was only carrying a BB gun he intended to purchase from the store. This was actually a tactic aimed at eliminating open carriers, and it is called swatting. The idea is to call the police anytime an open carry advocate is seen carrying his weapon. This was a tragic situation that was the result of a plan hatched by liberals who are driven by hatred, and have absolutely no moral base. They have no concern about the people they target, the agenda is first and their actions are justified for this one reason; the ends justify the means. This is also the case with the so called public safety message. The only thing they care about is identifying who has guns, they could care less about the children they are turning into criminals. They are not the least bit concerned about the safety of these children; only the agenda. Never forget that America.
Folks, if they don’t care about corrupting themselves, as the quote from “Rules for Radicals” suggests, why would you expect them to care about anyone else? It truly is some twisted logic.

No comments:

Post a Comment